Seattle Republican

The Seattle Republican CURRENT COMMENT CURRENT COMMENT CUR Newspapers make a fatal mistake when they report things for the benefit of the general public and Newspaper Reports so carelessly handle Should Be Correct. the truth as to make the real fates sneak around the corner lest they meet the garbled and contorted facts parading up and down the streets. The newspaper or periodical should be so absolutely correct in whatever it publishes that, the reader can rely on it the same as if it were the sworn statement of the publisher. Each reporter on a daily newspaper should be held strictly responsible for such items of interest or news stories as he or she turns in and if any of them are found to be false at any subsequent time such reporter should not only be fired, but lose a forfeit, which said reporter should be compelled to put up when set to work. There is no excuse for yellow journalism and it should be weeded out of the profession. "No nation or government can exist very long that has lost its religion and its patriotism," was the re- Prayer, Patriotism The Cornerstones. pages of history you will find there is more truth than poetry in the allegation. There are lots of religions in the United States, but very little Christianity, and it has been thus for the past half a century. The well of patriotism seems to be rapidly running dry and unless a new vein is tapped Old Glory will be looked upon as a dirty rag, as was shouted at her on the streets of Seattle not many moons ago. The giving away of those two fundamental principles, on which this government was founded is being felt throughout the whole structure, and unless the entire country is re-baptized in the spirit of the Holy Ghost and the patriotic fires of Bunker Hill and Valley Forge are rekindlel America will cease to be for Americans, but will be for anarchistic insurrectionists. Anna Held, a well-known theatre actress, who is seeking a divorce from her paramour-husand, admitted on the witness Common Law Marriage Wrong. stand that, she had never legally married Common Law Marriage Wrong. the man she was seeking a divorce from, but that in the presence of a few witnesses she had accepted him as a husband, and they began living together as man and wife without further formalities. Such a way of doing things may be according to her ideas of man and woman becoming husband and wife, but it is contrary to the laws of the land and likewise the teachings of all Lambeth for Telephone Dialling 13. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 1912. forms of Christianity. The court, however, held the marriage legal and granted the woman a divorce, it would seem in order that she might exact exhoribtant alimony from the unfortunate. Look at it from whatever viewpoint you will or may that union was nothing short of cohabitation, in the Edmund's law understanding of cohabitation, and both of them should be sent to state prison for living adulterous lives. With the step of a man not yet in his sixties Ezra Meeker, the Puget Sound pioneer, who has made himself famous throughout the civilized world by winning and losing fortunes. and subse Ezra Meeker Still Active. quently by driving an ox team over the trail, by which he crossed the plains almost a century ago, and his advocacy of a trans-continental highway from ocean to ocean, was seen wending his way down the streets of Seattle one day this week, with his flowing locks playing hide and go seek with the soothing breezes, so common to this section of the country, and when accosted by the writer, and after passing the time he remarked, "I am going to the city hall to register in order to cast my vote for Teddy." Remembering his years and likewise the good he has done for the Puget Sound country from time to time his hand was given a hearty shake with, "God bless you regardless of for whom you vote. It is a pleasure to know you are able to vote for any one." Ezra Meek is perhaps the most remarkable man that has lived in this secton, and history a thousand years after he is dead will tell of the great things he did for the Puget Sound country. Dodging the Law Is a Profession. American people seem to be constitutionally opposed to obeying the laws of the land. Men are paid to do nothing but study out ways and means whereby the laws of the land may be dodged. Laws are attacked by alleged constitutional lawyers on insignificant points, and too often judges decide them on equally trivial points and, in many instances, when the law says plainly, "Thou shalt not steal," it is either declared unconstitutional or is permitted to become inoperative. As a result of such legal quibbles the courts of the land are over run with cases every month in the year, the greater part of which ought to be settled by the attorneys representing both sides in one or the other's law office. LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 ublican 1912. VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 26. The childless woman always thinks she knows more about the care and rearing of children than the mother with a half a dozen or more. The person does not seem Such Advice Is Worthless. Such Advice Is Worthless. to be born, who is not ready and willing to give the other fellow pointers about doing his duty, in which he has no training or experience. On the same principle the man, who has never had more than a week's wages ahead gets up before an audience and gives a complete solution of the financial ills and complaints of a gigantic government. In order for any one to discuss the whys and wherefores of any subject diligent study and research must be given it, and this should be highly seasoned with practical experience. Smoking in public offices should be tabooed and especially city, county and state of Office Smoking a Great Loss. ly interested. In ninety-nine out of every hundred of the offices in which you may go you will find the clerks puffing away at a pipe, a cigar or a cigarette, and no man can work honestly and squarely and smoke any of those instruments of torture. If the smoking habit was cut out in public offices at least twenty-five per cent less clerks would be needed. When one of the clerks lights his pipe, cigar or cigarette all of the others, who indulge in the habit follow suit and while enjoying the puff they have a social chat among themselves, and it really makes them mad to have any one come in and disturb their smoking repose. There should be a general rule made that any person employed in a public office caught smoking while on duty lose the position. It's a sad commentary on the boasted uprightness of the so-called leading men of this country to learn Pray for Reform; that in the cities they Pay for Vice. for the most part own the houses in Pray for Reform; Pay for Vice. which the vice of the land is either planned or actually committed, and that they are not only aware of the fact, but rented or leased the property at treble and quadruple its regular renting price to persons for such purpose. It has been found in many instances that leading church members rented their properties for immoral and vicious purposes because they could get heavy rentals for the same. Right here in Seattle leading church men, who prayed loud and long on Sunday, collected the heaviest rentals from depraved men and women on ... Humphrey's Congressional Record Monday. Not much progress will be made in bringing about moral reforms, if those who pray for it on Sunday, prepare more comfortable quarters for the depraved on Monday. It is a fact that the preachers in the various churches handle the moral question with gloves because many of their best paying members are interested either directly or indirectly in the perpetuation of the vice of the city, and all because they are profiting from it in the way of high rentals. Recently a Negro mass meeting was held in Seattle for the purpose of passing resolutions denunciatory to Kicked by Ted; the actions of Theodore Roosevelt who Love Him Still. had most flagrantly Kicked by Ted; Love Him Still. insulted the Negroes of the South and ofr no other reason than to try to catch Southern white votes, yet there were those among the assemblage that really approved of Roosevelt's actions. In other words, they seem to go on the principle that, it matters not how hard Roosevelt kicks my brother just so he lets me get by. The sins of omission of the Republican party, so far as the black man is concerned, may be many, but "believe me" the sins of commission of the Bull Moose and Democratic parties so far as the black man is concerned are so appallingly numerous that, the black man has no other alternative, if he is consistent with himself, except to support William Howard Taft for President, and there is hardly any doubt but that the 700,000 in those states he is permitted to exercise his right of suffrage, and the same honestly counted, will be practically unanimous for Taft and the G. O. P. as of yore. A most remarkable coincident is found in the Progressive or Bull Moose party, which never before in the All Generals history of the birth Not Soldiers of any new party occurred. From presi- All Generals Not Soldiers dent to constable, the men who are promoting the new party in every particular are themselves ardent office seekers. Not a prominent Bull Mooser in the state of Washington, who is active in the promotion of the party, but is greatest of all himself hoping to be nominated by his party primaries. In other words, they are all captains and generals with but few, if any, real soldiers. Down in Portland, Oregon, the Bull Moose party has almost run amuck trying to decide which of the bunch will be the high cokalorum when Roosevelt comes. It has been often said that all men are more or less selfish and those trying to foster the Bull Moose party clearly demonstrates the allegation. Non-partisan campaign speeches on the part of Woodrow Wilson is both novel and unique and especially Woodrow Wilson And Absurdity. since he was nominated by the Democratic party that would ac Woodrow Wilson And Absurdity party, that would accept no side issues and would not swerve to the right or to the left for the sake of getting votes for their candidates. Standing on his party platform making nonpartisan campaign speeches for his election to the presidency would be the most con- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN After long and strenuous labors in Washington City, Hon. Will E. Humphrey is home again to report to his constituents his stewardship of their affairs while at the national capital among the lawmakers of the land. The Seattle Republican is well pleased with the record he has made in congress and believes he is as good as re-elected. He has no opposition for the Republican nomination and the Bull Moose party is so hopelessly divided that he practically has a walkover. Speaking about his record in congress the following facts have been compiled: There can be no question but that experience counts in congress and the man who "has been there," insofar as national legislation is concerned, is the man who "delivers the goods" and should be returned to congress and kept there year P. A. WILL E. HUMPHREY after year. The states that have secured the greatest favors and concessions from our national governing body are the states that have elected good men to office and KEPT THEM THERE as long as they would serve. In that way and in that way only do men become a power at Washington. It is an unwritten law at the seat of our national government that men are promoted to important positions on the committees in proportion to the years they have served. A little sober thought will convince any fair minded man or woman that on account of our geographical position the most important committee so far as we are con- glomerated bundle of contradictions that one seeking public favor has ever tried to present to an intelligent people. In this Woodrow Wilson will even go Theodore Roosevelt one better, who lauded Charles Banks, a Negro delegate to the Republican convention at Chicago from the state of Mississippi, to the very skies for deserting the Taft forces and joining the Roosevelt forces, but Roosevelt having been beaten in the Republican convention, he at once issued a call for a Bull Moose convention, and when Banks presented himself at the door of the Bull Moose convention Mr. Roosevelt denied him the privilege and gave as his reason, Banks was too ignorant to sit in a Bull Moose convention. Strange things are happening in the political game this year. In short, this a year of freaks, FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 1912.gressional Record cerned is the Rivers and Harbors Committee; a committee, by the way, that is the goal and ambition of every congressman. Because Will E. Humphrey has been a member of congress for ten years he has been placed upon this all-important committee and is in line now for the chairmanship which, insofar as power is concerned, means more to us than any other office in our national House of Representatives. You must have the best interest of the First District at heart because it means bread and butter to you and to all the people with whom you come in contact. There is now pending at Washington legislation proposed by Mr. Humphrey that means everything to the future prosperity of our section of the state. It is work that he has started, fostered and fathered and can only be pushed through to a successful conclusion by Mr. Humphrey himself. Will E. Humphrey has secured— $2,275,000 for the Lake Washington Canal. $4,300,000 for the fortification of Puget Sound. $280,000 for the improvement of Snohomish River. $100,000 for the improvement of Skagit River. $93,000 for the improvement of Bellingham Harbor. $100,000 for general work on Puget Sound. $75,000 for the construction of new snag boat and dredge to be used in local waters. He has made possible the retention of the Seattle Assay Office. He has secured the sum of $200,000 for a Seattle postoffice sub-station. He has secured $500,000 for the establishment of an immigrant station in Seattle and he now has a bill pending which will give Seattle $1,000,000 for a new postoffice. In addition, during the 60th and 61st congresses, he had personal charge of legislation that called for the expenditure in the state of Washington in the neighborhood of $22,000,000, which is a larger sum of money than was expended by the government in any other state in the Union during that time. He has also secured an appropriation of $2,300,000 for a dry dock in the thriving little city of Bremerton, and has at the present time a bill pending, with excellent chance for its passage, for the installation of a third dry dock in the before-mentioned city. All of this money being expended in this territory cannot help but be an incentive toward better times. PUGET SOUND TRACTION COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the Seventh Avenue and Olive Street. Or phone Main 2680 - - - - Independent 208 BONNEY-WATSON CO. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Elliott 13. POLITICS AND POLITICIANS The attempt on the part of some of the leaders of the Bull Moose party to nose Otto A. Case out of the running for governor, has aroused his ire and not only his but likewise the ire of his friends, and he is making a more vigorous campaign than ever and promises to expose the fellows mixed up in the attempt to nose him out. Case is a joke. John C. Lawrence and W. H. Paulhamus are up at each other in the Bull-Moose gubernatorial fight and they are saying things about each other that will not be very helpful in the final fight if one or the other should happened to be nominated. Lawrence and Paulhamus represent antagonistic factions in the party that will not mix after the convention has been held. It is claimed that Bob Hodge has changed his platform and his paramount issues so often in the present campaign that he does not now remember the one he started out with. Case is rapping him pretty hard and promises to tell how Bob is trying to easy greasy into the gubernatorial chair. The fight in the Bull Moose party for the gubernatorial nomination has reached the amusing stage and the Republicans ought to enjoy the situation. Perry H. Niles is one of five that is seeking the Republican nomination for state land commissioner. "After having gone over the state north and south and likewise east and west, I am thoroughly satisfied that I will be nominated on first choice votes. Of the five candidates for the office, but three of them will get many first choice votes and of that three I am not afraid to wager that I will get two to one over the highest," said he one day this week. Mr. Niles is spending much time in Seattle and is not leaving a stone unturned to go out of the county with an overwhelming majority. He is equally sanguine about the vote he will get in Eastern Washington. The Northwest, he thinks, is simply married to him and he will run ahead of his opponents in that section so far that they will not know they also ran. E. W. Ross, the present state land commissioner, says he plans to retire from politics at the expiration of his term and locate in North Yakima and practice law. Dollars to doughnuts he will do nothing of the kind, unless he can not help himself. Ross and his entire office force are working like Dick Nailors to nominate and elect Maud Tamberlin as his successor, and if that unfortunate mistake should be made by the voters of the state Ross would run the office just as he has been doing. Mrs. Tamberlin is no more fitted to conduct the affairs of that office than an Indian statute and Ross knows it and so does she, but she is being used as a blind to keep Ross in the office. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Name not provided] DAVID H. COX Robert L. Kline is expected in Seattle the first of September, where he proposes to camp until the campaign closes. If Senator Kline does not leave King county with two to one over Ike Howell then we miss our guess and we seldom ever do such. Mr. Howell has little or no following in King county and if Mr. Kline will fall in and campaign right he will get the popular vote in King County. Ike Howell simply represents the Perkins Press at Olympia and was never known to speak to any person in the ordinary walks of life only when he wanted an office. He was beaten for the same office four years ago simply because he was never known to be civil to the people and he ought to be doubly beaten at this time. Much has been said about his former life in Tacoma, which though not being repeated in this campaign, is not doing him any good and will cost him many votes. A. R. Upright, who has been making a red hot campaign for the Republican nomination of state land commissioner in Eastern Washington, will be in Seattle next week and will spend the most of the remaining days of the campaign meeting the voters of the county. How many votes he will get The Seattle Republican verily doth not know, but it is predicting that he will be one of the three of which Mr. Niles spoke. Mr. Upright will seek to meet the leading workers of the county and as many of the voters as the limited space of time will allow him and if he does he will get the votes, and make Mr. Niles look to his laurels. The fight for state insurance commissioner is a straight one between John Henry Schively and H. O. Fishback and it looks Friday, August 21, 1912. TICIANS at this writing that Schively has his opponent skinned a mile. The voters of the state know Mr. Schively and they will do for him what they have done in the past and he will be nominated by the Republicans by an overwhelming majority. Orville Billings may still be in the gubernatorial running on the Republican ticket, but if he is no one seems to know it. Had not the Bull Moose party organized and robbed Mr. Billings of the second choice vote he might have had a peep in, but now he will not know he also ran. D. H. Cox ought to easily win the Republican nomination for state treasurer. In the state senate he made a most admirable record and always voted right on all public and moral questions. While a man of vast agricultural resources, yet he always worked in the interest of the man of moderate means. KING COUNTY POLITICS E. N. Tahyer seems to be spending money like a prince in order to get the Republican nomination for sheriff. The Seattle Republican does not believe he will have spent a dollar under twenty thousand dollars when the campaign is over and just to get a $4,800 job. How can he afford it? is being heard every day. He has a bunch of workers out in every precinct in the city and county and men and women among all classes peddling his cards. He ought to be defeated if he is nominated. The fight for county clerk has resolved itself to a campaign of personalities. Each of the candidates is promising to save the county large sums of money, which he will forget as soon as he will have been inducted into the office. A general courthouse cleanup would not be a bad thing. Pretty nearly every deputy in the sheriff's office is a candidate for a Republican nomination of some kind. It's wonderful how quickly some men get it into their heads that the public is compelled to keep them in office. In looking over your ballot for a suitable candidate for sheriff do not overlook the fact that among those who have had experience in that work John W. Roberts leads them all. The fight for county commissioner in the third district looks like Ruffner with a vengeance. Mr. Ruffner has made a clean cut campaign and has made lots of friends by so doing. There is no doubt but that if he should be elected to the office he would give the county a most excellent administration and The Seattle Republican hopes the voters of the district will show their good political judgment by giving him a majority vote. ```markdown ``` FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 1912. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPAN”, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate ct la gate stati acon THE JUDICIARY. A long list of attorneys are candidates for the nine superior court judgeships of King county and the most of them would in all human probabilities make good hon- est judges, if elected, and for that reason it is hard to make selections of the many. The Seaitle Republican is going to support the most of the present judges for re-elec- tion, but it is going to support one or two outside of the present judiciary. While ix has not quite completed its ticket it is not afraid to give its readers the benefit of the names of those it has decided to sup- port. A. W. Frater, first of all, and because he has made a most excellent judicial wher- ever he has been, but especially in the juvenile department. Let everybody do it by voting for Frater. Kenneth Mackintosh is our second choice because he is a well known lawyer and has always stood high in the profession. Fur- ther comment on Mr. Mackintosh is un- necessary for he will get the largest vote cast for any one judge at the primary election. J. T. Ronald fills the third place on our ticket because he is a scholar and a gen- tleman and best of all a man with a most excellent legal mind. Judge Ronald needs no further publicity as he will be among the high ones at the election. John F. Main comes next because he is a man of most wonderful legal ability and one of the most unassuming men that ever went on a judicial bench. If the bench of this country was filled with men of his kind there would be less talk of recalling judges. Mitchell Gilliam has made a record on the bench that neither he nor any of his friends need feel ashamed of, and, it is here predicted, he will be returned for another four years, as has been repeatedly done in the past. Boyd J. Tallman, with a heart as big as the courthouse, has tried to do the right thing between man and man since he has been on the bench. Attorneys have said that he is not much of a lawyer, but the people know he is just and fair in his deal- ings and if some of the other judges would know less law and more humanity the peo- ple would get more justice. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ae ee eo a 4 ms oe ae / ~ 7 _ . a | oy : 5 PERRY H. NILES King Dykeman, that splendid young at- torney that has always been eminently fair in practice as well as on the bench, is an- other we have decided to support for one of the judgeships and in doing so we be- lieve a most meritorious young man will be rewarded. The short time he has been on the bench he has proven a huge success and four more years will make of him one of the most eminent judges the county has had. Ernest B. Herald also looks good to us and we are going to give him a place on our slate. He is a young man that is not only a student of the law, but an expound- er of the law, and it is safe to say he would develop into one of the ablest judges the county has ever produced. There is but one other place to fill on our slate and we propose to take time and make that selection for our next publication. . L. Frank Browne, who is seeking a su- perior court judgeship of King county, is an able lawyer and well qualified in every respect to discharge the duties of the of- fice. Persons who have had _ professional dealings with him speak in the highest re- spect of his legal attainments and persons who have met him socially say he is a most affable gentleman. The Seattle Republican can vouch for both of these qualifications in him and is of the opinion no mistake would be made should he be elected. PERSONS IN PUBLIC EYE. Emeroy R. Buckner, a young attorney of New York City, is very much in the public eye just "now owing to the fact he is prosecuting the graft cases of that city, in which the policemen are badly mixed up. A similar clearing out of police crookedness in the city of New York made of Charles E. Hughes governor of the state, which lead to his appointment to the supreme bench and which may sooner or later make him President of the United States. Eugene W. Chafin is again Prohibition candidate for president of the United States and is making a most vigorous cam- paign, but that is nothing unusual for him as he always makes that kind of a fight. Unless he is very careful he will run for president as often as did one William Jen- nings Bryan and succeed no better. Hiram W. Johnson, governor of Uali- fornia, and vice-presidential candidate on the Bull Moose ticket, has been styled the real Sancho Panza of the present campaign and he is being cartooned leading the Bull Moose on which is riding Don Quixote Roosevelt against the wind mills, who stand with outstretched arms ready to meet all comers, Sancho may win the fight against the wind mills, but it is seriously doubt- ed. John Lockwood Wilson, erstwhile United States senator from the state of. Washing- ton and leading politician, at present IT of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, is about to lay down all political ambitions and punish his enemies in politics by writing a book. Senator Wilson has long cherished the idea of writing a political history of the state of Washington and he having recently ar- ranged his financial and journalistic affairs as he would have them, he is about ready to launch his literary boat on the Booklet sea. Having seen the ins and outs of the politics of the Northwest for the past thir- ty years it is predicted that his book will be a stem-winder and he will realize more out of its sale than he has out of the Post- Intelligencer, and, God knows, that is say- ing a good deal. Hamilton Holt, a well known newspaper publisher and writer, has advocated the es- tablishing of an uncommercial and non- partisan national newspaper, and wants the broad-gauged men and women of the coun- try to raise the sum of $5,000,000, which will be put on deposit and the interest from the same used to run the newspaper. The idea is laughed at by large newspaper pub- lishers because the interest on that sum of money would not run a paper with a na- tional circulation and with no revenue from advertising and subscriptions two weeks. Dr. Charles W. Elliott, a former presi- dent of Harvard, who made a trip ‘round the world with the view of promoting world peace among the nations, is not en- thusiastic over the prospects of such being accomplished any ways in the near future. He is quoted as saying, ‘‘I fear for one reason or another neither the classes or the masses have much admiration for the idea of disarmament or would be willing to do their share to bring it about.’’ In spite, however, of this view he does not beieve that the peace idea between the nations of the world is a lost cause. If You Have a Legal Notice, Telephone MAIN 305 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. AMES R. STIRRAT, JOHN KYLE, Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. R. Sheldon. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug. 16—Sept. 27, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant.-No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo, Mauvais, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.—No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King—ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26. A. D. 1912. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant.—No. _____ The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case, of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory. A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens' Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land, Application. State of Washington, County of King —ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Clarence M. Austin, a bachelor, plaintiff, vs. H. F. Custance, Theodore Jensen, Rasmus Jensen, and the unknown heirs, if any, of Leonard Oulet, deceased, and the unknown heirs, if any, of William Brown deceased; Johannah Maria Paulson of Krogrieve, Kingdom of Norway, and the unknown heirs, if any, of said Johannah Maria Paulson, if she be deceased; and the unknown heirs, if any, of A. Amunds, deceased; and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: "Austin's Garden Addition to the City of Seattle," as per plat thereof recorded in the auditor's office of King County, in Vol. 20 of Plats at page 48 of the records in said office, and file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; such service being deemed complete at the end of the twenty-first day from and including the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, August 23, 1912; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. WITNESS, D. K. Sickels, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 3rd day of August, A. D. 1912. Date of first publication August 23, 1912. Date of last publication September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.—No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Madeline Glazier, plaintiff, vs. John W. Glazier, defendant—No. 88021 The State of Washington to the said John W. Glazier, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 30th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heietofore existing between Thomas G. Perkins, Sam Gibson, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell under the firm name and style of Purity Cone Company, and doing business at 141 22nd Ave. North, Seattle, Wash., has been dissolved by mutual consent, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell withdrawing therefrom, and notice is hereby given that the undersigned will not be responsible for any debt incurred by said Purity Cone Company from this date. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between W. H. Simpson and C. L. Gillette, under the firm name and style of Simpson & Gillette Sign Co., at Seattle, Washington, has been dissolved, C. L. Gillette withdrawn therefrom. W. H. Simpson will continue the business under the firm name and assume all the obligations and receive all moneys due the firm. W. H. SIMPSON, C. L. GILLETTE. Dated this 25th day of May, 1911. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Julia E. Siebe. Plaintiff, vs. Harry R. Siebe. Defendant. No.——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington: To the above named defendant, Harry R. Siebe: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be re- rendered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is: That the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant on the grounds of (1) desertion and abandonment for one year and more, and (2) nonsupport, and (3) that the minor child be awarded plaintiff, almony and costs. Date of first publication July 12, 1912. FRANK H. KNAPP. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 219 Epler Block, 813 2nd Ave., Seattle, King County. State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Harry N. Bentley, plaintiff, vs. Beatrice Young Bentley, defendant.—No. 88910. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Beatrice Young Bentley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the compaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of desertion and aboundment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause, for more than one (1) year. GEO. H. BAILEY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Seth H. Morford, Plaintiff, vs. Albert J. D'Aoust, and the West Coast Securities Company, a corporation; H. L. Green, Defendants. No. --- Publication Summons. State of Washington, to the said Albert J. D'Aoust and West Coast Securities Company, and H. L. Green. NOTICE: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 5th day of July, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer ahe complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the clerk in the above entitled court, a copy of which is hereby served upon you by publication. The object of this suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by Albert J. D'Aoust to H. L. Green on the 26th day of May, 1911, on Lot three (3), in Block forty-three (43) of H. E. Orr Park Division number four (4). REEVES AYLMORE, Jr., Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant—No. 88043. FRIDAY. AUGUST 30. 1912 The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Amidown, Jone Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Stella In the Matter of the Estate of Stella Ellinwood, deceased.—No. 14330. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Clarence Ellinwood, of said estate, at 4340 11th Ave. N. E., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication August 23rd, 1912. Urging the extension of lightning service along country highways and in small villages, the Electrical Review says: "The tendency of the times is toward better street illumination; real estate values rise and outside residents are attracted by ti; and apart from the reduction of accidents and the improved conditions of public safety afforded, the rural community finds itself acquiring a reputation as a lively center if it devotes a reasonable sum yearly to meeting the lighting problem with courage and farsightedness." It sometimes happens that a pessimist is a married man who can't forget it. FRIDAY. AUGUST 30. 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Winslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. DuBoise, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each, of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 8th day of April, 1912, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 3, block 38, certificate No. B76931, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 4, block 38, certificate No. B76932, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 5, block 38, certificate No. B76933, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 6, block 38, certificate No. B76934, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 7, block 38, certificate No. B76935, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 10, block 38, certificate No. B76938, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 11, block 38, certificate No. B76939, year 1908, amount $0.66. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. 1910. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 11 block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot. 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. K. WINSLOW, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. A. J. ALLEN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ida L. B. Hewlett, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph F. Hewlett, Defendant. No. 88539 Summons for Publication Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the Defendant, Ralph F. Hewlett: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action, answer the complaint of the complainant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the above entitled action is a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony, and the restoration of the plaintiff's maiden name of Ida L. Burnard. Dated at Seattle, Washington, June 29. Postoffice and Office Address: 307 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Sum-mar for Publication. mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Edwin A. Huntley, plaintiff, vs. Marie Baxter Huntley, defendant—No. — The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer on plaintiff's attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff, Edwin A. Huntley, and the defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley, upon the grounds of cruelty and desertion. P. O. address, suite 720 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. McLEAN & BALLIET. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No. The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Second.—Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for publication. Mabel Nex, plaintiff, vs. Albert Nex, defendant.—No. 88972. The State of Washington to the said Albert Nex, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support for a period of more than three years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN TH E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jane Doe Ammidon, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1,650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Orva Anderson, plaintiff, vs. James B. Anderson, defendant.-No. 88911. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, James B. Anderson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, with- A. J. SPECKBIRT Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. 7 in sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of non-support and desertion and abandonment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause for more than one year. GEO. H. BAILEY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, suite 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Seattle, 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, palintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. —. The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thousand dollars ($1,000), and interest thereon at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the following real estate, to-wit, lots five (5), six (6), seventeen (17), and eighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dollars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to secure said note, on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants—No. 89294. The State of Washington to the said B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, dated August 10, 1911, to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an attorney's fee of $250.00, and for a deficiency judgment. LEOPOLD M. STERN & J. W. RUSSELL, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 23—October 4, 1912. A good, strong, live, weekly paper that is not afraid to say things for the benefit of the public weal, is what every householder should have come to his or her address. If you think like this and are inclined to act on this initiative, then you are on, if you will send THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN your subscription. It first saw the light of day in 1894, and it has been firming away ever since, without having missed an issue and but a few hours late. The management would feel greatly encouraged if the paper’s subscription list would double up this year.. It is always Read- able, Reliable, Republican, and is quoted by the state press more than any other state weekly. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 423 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. “IT Makes The Mountain Smile * Ce Ni whee y ee) Se wa a ae Taper ve ne os) rT Gy Ag Is he a ra} Wi A iy) / Spee Deer ‘| > "a ff CO tm Mf Q aX EAC Hl | | / \ 1 fe oA ae 4/1 AW ai aS ! | | # hin fing i sey a =A aH aL l i | ae WON th tH Ber genre iy ay f ( VV Hil (fe IL me ees H iy Re } ci) f y i ; aie i a S A) iy erie Hl TAN TINS il" Ae | Na eZ) if ! oa 4 iy WW hie Mesa te AY \ \ pe 4 an inl a ‘i ed aay | We cag 7 = eel WN Po Z Vy waa ne : ic Mls Mh nn \ ly mM | if | a ee aie il Te Ses ‘ ‘ Lt rm | te — | 5 ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING Co. ALBERT HANSEN Jeweler and Sliveremiih LOWMAN BUILDING | First and Cherry Paid Advertisement. ERNEST B. HERALD Candidate for JUDGE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Non-Partisan Judiciary Ballot Primary Election, September 10, 1912 Paid by G. W. Ide | WILL E. HUMPHREY CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS Subject to Primaries on September 10, 1912 Paid Advertisement. J. Henry Denning FOR Prosecuting Attorney — KING COUNTY | Republican Primary Sept. 10, 1912 Kenneth Mackintosh CANDIDATE FOR Judge of Superior Court © Paid Advertisement. JOHN B. WRIGHT CANDIDATE FOR JUSTICE OF THE PEACE FOR SEATTLE Republican Primaries, September 10, 1912 Office: 623 New York Block THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 9999999099 O00090000000 $0004 FRIDAY, AUGUST 30, 1912.