Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912. Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate EDITORIAL Perhaps Morgan never contributed to campaigns with a promise of refund, but he must have had a trump up his sleeve when he gave a quarter of a million dollars to aid the candidacy of a presidential aspirant. In the past, New York state may not have used much care in selecting gubernatorial candidates, but this year all parties are getting their Eli in naming excellent men as thier standard bearers. Sulzer is no exception to the rule. May the best man win. War in the Balkins will be just as bad as if it were anywhere else. War is simply hell, wherever it is. Campaign contributions by corporation kings are common to our system of government, and instead of washing dirty linens, efforts should be made to discontinue the practice. Arizona's governor that was so keen for a re-call constitution is to be given a dose of his own vomit. With Gov. Hadley stumping Missouri for Taft and La Follett working in Wisconsin for him, Teethevelt will not have as smooth sailing as he had contemplated. The purity squad, after all, did not seem to have a mistaken idea in arresting Tonkin and his girl companions at a vile dance hall, Col. Alden J. Times to the contrary notwithstanding. Vermont's chief output is tombstones. But the address on the consignment shipped last election day seems to be confusing. Cleveland Leader. Secretary Wilson, of the Agricultural Department, says that he will retire on March 5. But he does not say of what year. Rochester Post-Express. Should the Canal question be referred to The Hague? The charges of some lawyers make it doubtful whether peace is cheaper than war.—Southern Lumberman. ```markdown ``` Referendum and the Recall The referendum and recall ideas would have answered very well in the days of such tyrants as Nero, as a matter of thwarting the designs of despots. Representative government is the outgrowth of the conditions of those days and similar conditions until the ideal in government became a realization the individual governing himself. These days in all things may not be the best. From what is taking place daily by improvements in many directions it may mean that we are just entering the good things reserved up in the centuries for the well-being and earthly glory of mankind. Government, however, is not susceptible to great changes, as Mr. Roosevelt would instill in his followers. We can only be governed by some one wholly or by a few, or by ourselves wholly, if by ourselves and others jointly. The choice of government is indeed limited. And the political economist or the most learned statesman may write volumes in elaboration of government, but they will still be speaking to the very few kinds of government possible. This goes to say that the evolution leading up to the automobile or to those great printing presses, with their wilderness of machinery, will not apply to government. The thoughtless think of government as they think of machinery. They think that it can go on and on forever, making additions by way of improvement. They speak of old-fashioned ideas and new-fashioned ideas as flippantly as if they were speaking of women's wearing apparel. Representative government is perfect government, and is not susceptible to any improvement—just as truth will not be bettered. We cannot accept substitutes for the parents in the family as the head of the family at its best. Philosophers, the wise men of all time, have dreamed of democracies and republics, and now and then they were realized. They lapsed now and then, not because the truth that man would govern himself was in "error," but because the people were traded on; they became heedless and thoughtless, and as Patrick Henry put it, little by little the liberties of the people were stolen from them. We have a reflex of that condition today, when under one pretext or another designing men are making effort to play the people into political ambush. And if they are not careful they will lose their present estate of self-government and thus revert to one of the other, where dspotism is a phase if not the whole thing—depending on the caprice of an individual or individuals, rather than on the deliberate choice of themselves. The referendum and the recall, if not the initiative, are not less than expressions of representative government in reversion. It LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON VOLUME XIV. NUMBER 30. is as if we had made the rounds of the different modes, and in our craze for change are willing to hazard our independence at finding something new. "There is nothing new under the sun," strikes off the situation aptly enough. In the effort to find the new we are confronted with the old. Knock the masks away, and there it is. The referendum is a repudiation of ourselves, and which will beget distrust and chaos in the end if permitted as thought out. It is a pretty theory to talk of the people uncreating what they create. It is all right in the potentiality. The power is theirs. But at that they are not to be wanton in destruction, lest they destroy themselves. The legislators are not to be thought apart from the people. They are the people's further selves, as are the other officials that are chosen to act for the people. Their slection is merely a matter of convenience, since the people cannot meet together to discuss and pass on questions for the public good. The individual is in evidence as much as it is possible for him to be so, and thus answering the best form of government—the nearest approach to individual government. Referendum and recall is of the theory that legislators and officials act independently of the people, making any handing down laws to them, rather than carrying out their wishes. We have no such condition. And when it is urged that we have, it is merely an assumption, or the expression of a theory of possibility. The legislators and officers could forget the purpose of their selection. But would it be conducive to their political longevity? Not much. They are also the people, and are no more interested in making hard conditions than the people are to have them. The tendency of the Bull Moose crowd is to divorce the people and the officials, notwithstanding they are immediately depending on them. A laborer will generally stand with his employer in most things, where politics is not involved, since he depends on his employer for existence. He may not be en rapport with the employer, but he does not oppose him or antagonize him. Some such relation exists between legislators and officials and the people. The referendum and the recall are weapons of destruction. Perhaps nothing in history has worn such a menacing front. They were not revived out of necessity, but as engines of offense to beat a way into the affections of the people and finally into office by disgruntled men. The dear people, happily, are becoming to see the intent. They know that there are no tyrants among us. If there were, they would be expelled by the force of public opinion, which brooks no infringement on the American patent of rights.—Age. CURRENT COMMENT 2 THE NEGRO'S LEGAL RIGHTS. Unless the supreme court of the state of Washington reverses Judge Everett Smith of the superior court of King County, the legal right of the colored man to sue for civil rights has been fixed for all time to come. The defendant to a civil rights damage case, which was recently filed in the courts of King County, demurred to the complaint of the plaintiff on the grounds that, under the statute of the state of Washington there was no grounds for complaint. Judge Smith took it under advisement and in due course of time rendered the following opinion as to the colored man's legal rights: "After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel and the law as cited, this court is of the firm opinion that in the state of Washington there is absolute equality of white and colored men before the law. A colored man is entitled to the same rights and consideration in public places as the white man. If unjust discrimination is used against him and he deems himself financially injured thereby, he has a right of action in this court, and has the right to establish the amount of injury, if any, before a court or jury, against the parties chargeable with the alleged injury." The black man has the same legal rights in this state as the white man, or he has not. If he has not, then the sooner the courts establish that fact the better for both the blacks and the whites. If proprietors of public places have the legal right to order colored men out of their places for no other cause than that their skin is black, then it will save a good many heart aches as well as legal battles for the courts of the state to leave no doubt on the subject. The case in question will be fought to a finish on its merits. THE TIMES' OUTBREAK. For a short time after the dismissal of the criminal cases against the Blethens the Times, of which they are the proprietors, made a bluff at respectability, but sheared of its editorial garbage reservoir, it was like salt that had lost its savor, and its circulation, almost immediately, ran down fifty per cent. Col. Blethen being a human thing, ever ready and willing to do anything to get the money, it was impossible for him to be good for any great length of time, and his first outbreak was to advocate the recall of Mayor Cotterill in order to make an opportunity for the Times to get the money from the tenderloiners, and such other persons, who, like the Times, thrive most when vice runs riot. Either the editor of the Times is possessed of a magic wand, by which he succeeds in making a respectable community support his vulgar publication, or the community is full and overflowing with licentious lepers masquerading under good citizenship clothing, who secretly encourage the editor of the Times to have his paper fight to keep the vice syndicate in control of the city government. The Times' recent attack on the preachers of this city is perhaps the THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN most damnable outbreak that that paper has ever been guilty of, and God knows that is saying a good deal. But in spite of all this, the Times is patronized by alleged good people. Is not humanity a queer combination of contraductions? LYNCHED BY THE LAW. There seems to be little doubt but that the Negro lynched in the penitentiary of Wyoming by the convicts was a moral degenerate, providing he was guilty of even half of what he was accused, but just how fifty or more convicts could break from their line of march and lynch a man and yet the guards not know the guilty ones, is more than even a jackass with a head almost a yard long can explain. The whole story reads like it was aided and abetted by the prison officials, and if they did not then it is an easy matter for the warden to get the names of every convict that participated in the act. Lynch law is a relief of barbarism and under its baleful influence the whole country is slowly but surely retrograding. Human monsters that will rob a woman of her virtue are too despicable to be permitted to associate with the human family and death should be their portion, and this is especially true of a human monster that will attack a saintly matron of seventy summers, but death is but death, and the penalty is no more severe when administered by a mob than by law. That the warden and many of the guards were fully aware of the lynching bee is quite apparent. It's now up to the governor of the state to remove the entire official roster of the penitentiary in order to protect the good name of the state. THE ENLISTED MAN. For nearly two weeks twelve hundred enlisted men have been in camp within a mile of Hadlock, Irondale and Chimacum. While in camp these men have been permitted a liberal amount of freedom and they have been frequent visitors to the three places near camp. While no booze has been permitted on the camp grounds, it is available on all sides. Twelve hundred men is a greater body than is commonly assembled in a community like this, and a certain amount of disorder and trouble might be expected. But the contrary has been the case. No more orderly, decent, better behaved body of men ever got together than the twelve companies of coast artillerymen who have been living for days near this place. Their camp has been daily visited by numbers of men, women and children and the men have intermingled in the little towns close at hand. There has not been a single complaint so far as is known, lodged against the enlisted men; they have attended strictly to their own affairs and they have been courteous, kind and considerate to visitors and those they came in contact with in the towns. To many whose knowledge of the enlisted man comes by devious and unreliable routes, the actions of the men came as a pleasant surprise. They were not only decently behaved fellows, but, getting right down to brass tacks, were better behaved than almost any FRIDAY. OCTOBER 4. 1912 big bunch of civilians getting out on a camping expedition. The American soldier is generally a pretty decent fellow, and while there are some roughnecked, irresponsible and disreputable people among them, it is safe to guess the percentage is at least as low as it is among civilians. Anyway, the chicken stealing is not always done by the soldier, although he comes in for a good share of the blame. Colonel Bailey and his staff are to be complimented on the most excellent order maintained by their commands, and the men are to be congratulated upon serving under officers who can so perfectly handle a human machine of so great a size. —Irondale News. THE WHITE'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE BLACK The Negro problem, long looked upon as a Southern question, can be regarded as such no longer. It concerns the North as well, since "census figures indicate that the South is becoming whiter, largely due to the fact there is a steady migration of the Negro to the North." Another face that complicates the problem is that figures show the Negro to be going to the city in both the South and North. The percentage of Negroes for the entire country is 10.7 and for cities of 25,000 and over it is 16.5. Negroes constitute one-fourth or more of the total population in each of twenty-seven of these cities, and in four of them the proportion is more than half. In each of twelve cities there are more than 40,000 Negroes, while in Washington, D. C., the Negro population is 94,446. These figures, presented by Rev. Charles Stelze in various organs of the religious press, show that the Negro is increasing in numbers, tho not as fast relatively as the whites. And the question that the white is anxiously asking is "whether he will be a 'good' Negro or a 'bad' Negro." The answer, Mr. Stelzle declares, depends as much upon the white as upon the black, and he brings forward some important facts for the white man to ponder: "The Negro will never return to Africa to establish a Liberian Republic. He is the only man in America who has been brought here against his will. For 250 years there was systematically expunged from the Negro race the best qualities which fit a man for citizenship in a democracy. Considering the lack of opportunity, the advice of fool friends, and the inherent limitations which are both natural and acquired, the Negro has done pretty well since the day that he was set free. "The fact that the Negro is dying in such large numbers of tuberculosis and other still more frightful diseases is, of course, due to his ignorance and to other reasons for which he is largely responsible, but we can not forget that it is also to be charged to the fact he is compelled to live in the worst sections of our towns and cities, often without drainage or sewerage or garbage service, without water within a reasonable distance, and scarcely any of the sanitary conditions in house or yard or street which whites consider an absolute necessity. We FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912. drive the worst forms of immorality into the Negro quarters and then curse the Ne- gro because of his moral weakness. We subject him to the severest test of our city life—physical, moral, and __ political—and then cynically declare that the ‘nigger’ is no good, anyway. Let’s give him a square deal—a man’s chance. Neither race-hatred nor mawkish sentimentality will settle this very delicate question. The South can not settle it alone, and the North can not do the work for the South. The North and the South, the city and the country, must tackle the thing together, for this is a national problem.’’ HARD-HEADED PHILOSOPHY. The trouble with livin’ these days as 1 sees it is that every time a feller earns a dol- lar out o’ somebody else, somebody else earn a dollar and a quarter out 0’ him. Seems to me they’d be a piwerful pile 0’ money lying round loose fer the feller that’Id invent some kind of an inkybater arrange- ment whereby a hired man could hatch out suthin’ wuth while while he was a-settin’. The chief trouble with the general run 0’ Road Commissioners, gentlemen, is that they spend more time thinkin’ about the commis- sions than they do thinking about the roads. I tell ye, Bill, I’ve lived round these here parts goin’ on to sixty-two years now, and I hain’t never sold my vote to nobody, but all the same my time’s allers been wuth from two ter six dollars a day to somebody on *Lection Day. A Valuable Find. “‘Ah!’? said the burglar, a smile of delight spreading over his face as he looked around the house. ‘‘Here’s a bath-tub.’’ “Aw, rats, Bill!’’ growled his assistant. “*Y? ain’t goin’ to waste none o’ your time taking a bath, I hope.”’ “Not on yer life,’’ returned the delighted Bill. ‘‘But these here nickel spiketts and th’ lead pipe’s wuth all o’ thutty dollars.”’ A Pronounced Check. Woggley had been found guilty, and sen- tenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars. “Oh, well,’’ he said, ‘‘of course I’ll have to pay, because I am in a great hurry to get on, but I haven’t fifty dollars in my pocket. Will you take my check ?’’ S “Sure,’’ said the justice. Woggley drew his check, and at once pro- ceeded to crank up his machine. ‘“‘Hyar, mister,’’ cried the justice, ‘‘they hain’t no need o’ your doin’ that. I’d ought to have told ye we’ll hev to hold that there care ez s’curity till the check goes through.’’ Temporarily Postponed. ‘“‘Why, Rastus,’’ said Smithers, ‘‘what are you doing here? I thought you were going to be married this morning ?’’ ‘“‘Why, yass, ah was, Mistah Smithers,’ said Rastus, ‘‘but dat ceremony am temper- arily pothponed, suh. De bride, she done run off wiv dat wuthless niggah Tham Jon- sing, suh.’’ ‘ Perkins (as he misses for the twentieth time): Tut! tut! fudge! Caddie: Say, boss, you can’t learn to play golf wid dat language. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Evidence, “Did you really believe, doctor, that your old medicines really keep anybody alive?’’ asked the skeptic. ‘“‘Surely,’’ returned the doctor. ‘‘My pre- scriptions have kept three druggists and their families alive in this town for twenty years.’” An Acute Ear. “Acute hearing?”’ said little Binks, scorn- fully. ‘‘Don’t talk to me about anybody’s acute hearing—why, my mother-in-law—’’ “‘Yes?’? said the genial philosopher. “My mother-in-law has heard me say things I never even thought of uttering,”’ said little Binks. Nothing New. “T gee,’’ said Bilkins, ‘‘that a French sci- entist has discovered a method for staving off old age.’’ “Well, what of it??? demanded Wilkins. “‘There’s nothing new in that. A man can stave off old age by jumping off the Eiffel Tower; or dropping a lighted match in a powder barrel while sitting on it; or by rocking the boat when he’s out on the water ; or by riding over Niagara Falls sitting astride of a log. Those French scientists make me tired with their hullabaloo over nothing. The Wisdom of Silas. Don’t pin your faith to nothin’, my son. Ef it won’t stick without a pin it ain’t wuth stickin’ tew. Some fellers’ necks reminds me 0’ hosses. They ain’t no airthly use t’ nobody ontil they’re broke. The great trouble with a lot o’ fellers I know is that after they’ve laid down their principles they lay down onto ’em. Some habits, gentlemen, is like eggs—ye don’t never have no idea about how bad they be till ye try to throw off the yolk. The Pres’dent o’ the United States ast me to be the Post Master o’ this here town. But, shucks! I’m too busy swattin’ flies to read all them postill-cards the summer- boarders sends out. ‘Wake up, Henry, you’re walking in your sleep.’’ ~ “What do you want me to do—fly?’’ Before a Montana audience the other day, Colonel Roosevelt indignantly refuted the charge that he desires to be king, convine- ing even the few skepties present by point- ing out that kings don’t have much power these days——Columbus Ohio State Journal. it remained for the Boston Globe to opine that Straus would win in a waltz.—Atlanta Constitution. . The New York woman who eloped with an iceman resorted to desperate means to reduce the cost of living—Albany Journal. Arnold Bennett, the English author, says he needs a rest after his American tour. So do we, Arnold.—Cleveland Leader, “Suspender Jack’’ is one of the Colonel’s strongest supporters. So there seems to be something in a name, after all.—Southern Lumberman, A scientist says men don’t know how to eat. Perhaps they’ve forgotten how since food prices went up.—Cleveland Plain Dealer, The denial of the report that life can be produced artificially is a heavy blow to a multitude of former politicians—New York Evening Post. They’ve been singing an opera in Es- peranto over in Europe, but it’s dollars to doughnuts that the audience didn’t know the difference—Newark News. THE ORPHEUM. i The Orpheum next week will present to its patrons the following entertaining, as well as interesting program: The distin- guished acress, Miss Amelia Bingham, in her original idea, ‘‘Big Moments From Great Plays.’’ Nellie Nichols, a chic, dainty singer of lilting songs. The singing min- strel, Frank Morrell, the California boy. The famous clown, Slivers, in an original pantomime, ‘‘The Ball Games.’’ Lewis and Dody, the two Sams. Azard Brothers, haz- ardous equilibrists. The Flyning Russells, establishing an aerial speed limit. THE EMPRESS. Beginning next Monday and for one week will present the following: G. Molasso’s unparalleled pantomime, ‘‘La Dance au Violins,’’ featuring Mile. Ivonne Andre and a company of ten dancers. James F, Leon- ard and Clara Whitney, presents a touch of nature called ‘‘Duffy’s Rise.’’ Howell & Scott, patter and parodies. England’s elite entertainer, Glen Ellison. Pritzkow & Blanchard, in ‘“‘A Mixed Affair.’’ Falls & Falls, in tumbles, turns and twists. Twi- light pictures, BONNEY-WATSON CO. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty, All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly at- tended to. Telephone Elliott 13. Nothing Counts Like Good Service LESS WORK BETTTER COOKING A CLEAN KITCHEN CLEAN FOOD LESS COST FOR FUEL USE A GAS RANGE A Small Payment with Your Order Will Place One In Your Home Seattle Lighting Co. 1314 Fourth Ave. Main 6767 POLITICS AND POLITICIANS That the politictl sentiment of the state is rapidly swinging from Teethevelt to Taft is apparent wherever you go. A short visit to the southwestern section of the state within the past week convinced the political Pie-maker of this paper of this fact. The same conditions were met in eastern Washington the week prior. While there is always a chance of a political slip, yet we do not believe we are taking any very desperate chances in predicting Taft will carry the state by a sound and sane majority. *** The Republican State Central Committee has just been reorganized and is ready for the political battle that confronts it in this state. It has gone on record as ready and willing to work in perfect harmony with county organizations, and to that end it earnestly solicits the co-operation of the local organizations of the state. *** The returns from the late direct primary election show that, Henry B. Dewey, one of the Republican nominees for Congress from the state at large, outside of King County, ran neck and neck with J. E. Frost, the other Republican nominee, which indicates that Mr. Dewey is just as popular throughout the state as his running mate. Dewey's friends in King county are organizing for the fall election, and they believe that by the time of the November election his candidacy will have been so well handled that he will run just as well in King county as will Mr. Frost. Mr. Dewey is not a Bullmooser and has never had any sympathy with the third party movement, and it is unfair for Republicans to think of voting for Falknor, a wild eyed Bullmooser, in preference to Dewey, a regular Republican. *** The Seattle Republican is so absolutely certain at this writing that the entire Republican state ticket will win that it thinks it an absolute waste of time to individualize on the various candidates. Auditor C. W. Claussen never left his desk during the primary campaign, and does not propose to do so now. He is an ideal official and the people have found it out and propose to vote for him as they have done in the past. *** In King county politics the Republicans in large numbers are going to vote for Edward Cudihee for sheriff because he seems to them to be by odds the most capable man in the race for the place. Two of the most extensive employers of men and women in Seattle said to The Seattle Republican one day this week: "We propose to do all we can among our employees to make votes for Cudihee, despite the fact we are old-line Republicans. No Bullmoose candidates for us, and when we compare the fitness of the Republican nominee for sheriff with that of the Democratic nominee we have no other alternative but to work for Edward Cudihee. We remember his work in that office when he was sheriff some THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN years ago, and it was so satisfactory that we will work to get him in the office again." As these gentlemen talk, so are hundreds of other Republicans talking, and The Seattle Republican is of the opinion that Edward Cudihee will get more votes than the other two candidates combined. *** The supreme court is today hearing arguments pro and con as to the eligibility of Judge Black for governor of the state of Washington. Judge Black may or may not be eligible, but he has no more chance of election than a snow ball has in flying through hades. Earnest Lister would have stood a better chance, but even he would have no chance of election as against Hay. *** A large number of Moosers have organized against the election of Hodge for governor and in spite of his plea to the unsuspecting laboring man for his vote, he seems at this time to be losing ground. Should Hodge be elected governor it would be such a snap for Kenny Beaton that he could safely say: "I am worth a quarter of a million dollars." In the opinion of many persons who know Kenny, Gov. Hodge would make very few appointments until such applicants had seen Kenny and contributed to his campaign fund in liquidation of Kenny's work for Hodge. He would be Hodge's private secretary and would be governor by proxy. To the Citizens of King County: Usually at the election times, dishonets politicians, for the sake of gaining office, make untruthful and unjust statements. One such statement has been called to my attention, namely: that the Auditor's office made mistakes in handling the Primary Election returns of September 10th, 1912, and that through such mistakes King County would be put to considerable expense in re-counting the returns. I desire to state that no such mistakes were made and that no deputy auditor is responsible for incomplete returns made to the Auditor's office, and I stand ready to attend any meeting, public or private, and point out to the people that the criticisms given out were made by dishonest political ward heelers. OTTO A. CASE, County Auditor. BY A. C. SHAW. To you I cannot refrain from expressing my appreciation of the support received through the columns of your paper, and to the people of your community for the complimentary vote from their hands. At the time of entering the contest it appeared to me that true republicanism was a hopeless cause; my duty to assist in its restoration. I, therefore, filed as a Taft Republican, not believing or expecting I would receive the nomination. Have accomplished more than hoped or expected, and am exceedingly grateful to, and perfectly satisfied with the verdict of the people. Am now in that hap- FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912 py position where I can and will continue to contend for what I believe to be the best interests of the people, beyond the pale of suspicion of office seeking. What the country needs is to be relieved from the agitating, muckraking statesmen; left with the thinker and builder, not the experimenter; or turned over to the free trade, football, tariff tinkerer; a rest from the ranting of the self-labeled agitating progressives; in office, fighting to hold on to their salary; out of office, trying to break into the treasury; claiming to be contending for the dear people; from he, who for seven and one-half years was their leader, confessing that all the things he now advocates he did not think of when in; proclaiming he does not want to be king, but what he could not accomplish in two terms he can now do in one. If not, then he shall reign on until he completes the destruction began in 1907. What we especially need is confidence; McKinley confidence; confidence in each other, our neighbors, officers, statesmen, courts, the future of our country. To be restored to that mental conditions where we believe that if we invest or let go of our dollar, it will be returned with some part of another, reasonably rewarded for its assistance in returning prosperity and developing the best state in the union. We are in our infancy. From 1900 to 1910 we gained 120 per cent in population; but as the result of Democratic succession in the House of Representatives, and self-labeled progressive agitation, from 1910 to 1912 we drove over to our neighbor (Canada) three hundred million of invested and capital seeking investment, and approximately one million of our population. In April of 1911 we furnished 16,397, and in April of 1912, 21,494; one-third of Canada's emigration. It is time for business men, farmers, laborers, professional men, men out of employment, working on half time, with empty houses and stores, whose rents are declining, to use the gray matter God gave them and stop and think. Not worship an idol. Roosevelt could not possibly be elected. To be successful he must have 266 electoral votes. The most he could possibly get is California with 15, Kansas 10, Montana 4, Nevada 5, North Dakota 5, Oregon 5, South Dakota 5, Utah 4, and Wyoming 3, which makes 52, and giving him Washington with 7, and Idaho with 4 (neither of which states he will carry) he would have 63 electoral ALBERT HANSEN Jeweler and Silversmith LOWMAN BUILDING First and Cherry FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912. votes. His cause is hopeless; his mission— the destruction of the Republican party, which for twenty-five years honored him, he hopes to accomplish. To follow him is to commit political suicide. This state cannot possibly afford to do it. It will stand out as a true Republican Rom- an, and stamp out, as it stamped out pop- ulism and free silverism, and _ self-labeled progressive. He and his cause, and those who follow it will ultimately, sink into po- litical oblivion. A SVL AV SAE SAMI a ee Once there was a famous nation With a long and splendid past : Very splendid was its station, And its territory vast; It had won the approbation, The applause and admiration, Of the States who’d had oceasion, In a time of tribulation, And of disorganization, Not to mention degradation, And profound humiliation, To observe it standing fast Without any trepidation, Or sign of vacillation, And faithful to the last. Came a time of dire distraction, Full of terror and despair, When a delicate transaction Called for unexampled care; But the people were directed, Both the well and ill-affected, To a wholly unexpected And surprising course of action, Based on motives new and rare (Being governed by a faction As they generally were). In a little time the nation Had a chance of saying whether It and its administration Seemed inclined to pull together: And it spoke its mind with vigor :— “Such disgraceful conduct must Everlastingly disfigure Future annals and disgust Evermore the candid student: You have been unwise, imprudent, Pusillanimous, unjust; And neglectful to our name Till this melancholy story Put a period to our fame.’’ So this faction, disappointed, Lost the national good graces, And their rivals were anointed, And were set in the high places. Pretty soon arose conditions Most embarrassing and hard, And the party politicians Had to be upon their guard. Illegitimate ambitions, Democratic rhetoricians, Persons prone to bare submissions, Men of warlike dispositions, Wild and wicked statisticians, Metaphysical magicians, People apt to sign petitions, Men inclined to make conditions, And a host of wary foes, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ee a Compassed round the ruling faction: But a certain line of action They incontinently chose; And with great determination And extreme discrimination Not untouched by exaltation, After proper preparation, And profound examination, Wrong it out with acclamation, And each other’s approbation, Till the national taxation Not unnaturally rose. —Selected. THE POLITICAL ZOO. The elephant’s a noble beast when he’s in ‘prime condition, But somewhat surly when the feast shows signs of intermission. He’s rather sot in all his creeds, and mid all noisy clatter He stands four-square on his past deeds, like any old stand-patter. He loves to dwell on other days, reflecting on his record; On how he’s won a lot of bays, some of them slightly checkered. He’s rather sluggish, having fed too well on public curry, And moves too slowly, it is said, for those who’re in a hurry. The Don-key. The donkey, like the elephant, is quite a noble critter. He hasn’t got much use for cant, and truly hates a quitter . His ears are large, his will is strong; he thrives in stormy weather, And when ’tis fair he struggles long to hold himself together. He seldom gets his portion full up at the public manger, And in his hunger terrible is ‘sometimes dubbed a danger. He loves the elephant to smite, and never was a slicker Old champion when in the fight the greatest need’s a kicker. The Bull-Moose: The Bull-Moose is a nature fake, made up of creatures sundry, Who keeps the public wide-awake with noises loud and thund’ry. He views with hate, and wrath, and scorn, all dolei far niente, And feeds thrice dialy from a horn, called Perkins’ horn of plenty. The elephant and donkey he doth greet with blatant snorting, And o’er the land and o’er the sea is con- stantly cavorting. He’s partly lamb, and partly ram, and part- ly kanga-rooster. Ilis motto’s ‘‘I don’t givadam! I’ll do what- e’er I chooster !’’ The Race. These three are lined up for a race. The Mammoth has the inside— Though there is that about his pace that in- dicates the thin side; The donkey has the outer course, and judg- ing from his prancing He thinks that he’s a battle-horse to Victory advancing. Yet have a care, ye Riders, not to be of win- ning certain— There is no telling really what will happen at the ‘‘curtain.”’ You doubtless both are Gentlemen, but, sirs, the race is rocky Aagainst a crazy Bull-Moose when it’s rid- den by a jockey! HORACE DODD GASTIT. TOPICS IN BRIEF. There is no silent partner in the firm of Roosevelt and Johnson.—Columbia State. Somebody ought to tell the President and his friends that a Presidential campaign is going on.—Philadelphia Record. The wise postal authorities have set the date for the opening of the parcel-post just one week after the end of the Christmas rush.—St. Louis Republic. A number of Denver officials have been indicted, showing that those Western cities still try to keep up their petty rivalry with New York.—Washington Post. It is very doubtful whether Wall Street is gnashing its teeth over campaign-fund publicity. It will save them a lot of money. —Nashville Lumberman, An automobile belonging to ex-Speaker Cannon brought only $600 in Washington yesterday. But everybody will admit that Uncle Joe once had a great macihne.— St. Louis Republic. A terrible alternative confronts the Mex- ican revolutionists. If they do not lay down their arms they will be’ starved or shot, and if they surrender they’ll be put to work.—Chicago News. That long-lost tribe up in the arctie re- gions that hadn’t been heard of before since 1412, must have been surprised when in- formed that the tariff hadn’t been revised downward yet——Columbus Ohio State Jour- nal, 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. AMES R. STIRRAT, JOHN KYLE, Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug. 16—Sept. 27, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant.-No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo Mauvais, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.—No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King —ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26. A. D. 1912. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintic, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory. A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens's Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. August 8—September 20, 1912. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land. Application. State of Washington, County of King IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Clarence M. Austin, a bachelor, plaintiff, vs. H. F. Custance, Theodore Jensen, Rasmus Jensen, and the unknown heirs, if any, of Leonard Olet, deceased, and the unknown heirs, if any, of William Brown deceased; Johannah Maria Paulson of Krogrieve, Kingdom of Norway, and the unknown heirs, if any, of said Johannah Maria Paulson, if she be deceased; and the unknown heirs, if any, of A. Amunds, deceased; and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: "Austin's Garden Addition to the City of Seattle," as per plat thereof recorded in the auditor's office of King County, in Vol. 20 of Plats at page 48 of the records in said office, and file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; such service being deemed complete at the end of the twenty-first day from and including the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, August 23, 1912; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. WITNESS, D. K. Sickels, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 3rd day of August, A. D. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Date of first publication August 23, 1912. Date of last publication September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.—No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Madeline Glazier, plaintiff, vs. John W. Glazier, defendant—No. 88021. Glazier, defendant.—No. 88021. The State of Washington to the said John W. Glazier, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 30th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between Thomas G. Perkins, Sam Gibson, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell under the firm name and style of Purity Cone Company, and doing business at 141 22nd Ave. North, Seattle, Wash., has been dissolved by mutual consent, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell withdrawing therefrom, and notice is hereby given that the undersigned will not be responsible for any debt incurred by said Purity Cone Company from this date. JOHN CAMPBELL, NELLIE CAMPBELL August 23—September 13, 1912. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between W. H. Simpson and C. L. Gillette, under the firm name and style of Simpson & Gillette Sign Co., at Seattle, Washington, has been dissolved, C. L. Gillette withdrawing therefrom. W. H. Simpson will continue the business under the firm name and assume all the obligations and receive all moneys due the firm. W. H. SIMPSON, C, L. GILLETTE. Dated this 25th day of May, 1911. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Mary Palmer, Plaintiff, vs. Chas, H. Palmer, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas, H. Palmer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support, desertion, and habitual intoxication. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Eilers Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication Sept. 13, 1912. Last publication November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Amidown, Jone Doe Amidown, his wife; Margaret K. Amidown, now Margaret K. Dver; You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to IN CAR The wife to 4th the plan of att beh der dem file act ben int Ap de and and gave 473 Wa Kid gave and the de son win P. a CE V Cov A. Un Cov be pan for Wa and low T pan ne be Ca T of to A Cov ide ton T the W Kint Int T sa ed Wa T spe cen W. tr ci T to n and cere not all pro cere man T sh 1st ci be I ger s of the ing D. Sta S Bri se him that the nere and all that the the tion S thi 191 (Se Not IN S C FRIDAY. OCTOBER 4. 1912. present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Clarence Ellinwood, of said estate, at 4340 11th Ave. N. E., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication August 23rd, 1912. CLARENCE ELLINWOOD, As Administrator of said Estate. FRITZ F. HARRI, Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for County of King. Charles Jenson, Plaintiff, vs. Erma E. Jenson, Defendant. No. 89538. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Krima R. Jenson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from the defendant Erma E. Jenson, dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant on the grounds of desertion and drunkenness, and personal indignaties rendering life burdensome. P. O. Address 502 Pioneer Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. September 6—October 11, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. In the Matter of the Application of the Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredge Co., a corp. to Dissolve and Disincorporate. No. 89633. Notice. The Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Co., a corporation, having filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, its petition to dissolve and disincorporate, and an order having been made by the Judge of said Court, fixing the time and place herein below stated for the hearing of said petition. Notice is hereby given, that the application and petition of said Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Company to dissolve and disincorporate will come on duly and regularly for hearing in Dept. No. 9 of the Superior Court of said State of Washington, for King County, in Seattle, Washington, on Monday, the 28th day of October, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day. Witness the Honorable Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of the above entitled court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 3rd day of Sept. 1912. FELS Cork (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By G. A. GRAND, Deputy Clerk. Septevmebr 6—October 25, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Lena King, Deceased. No. 14508. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the fifth day of September, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate of Lena King, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Administrator of said estate, at 614 Lumber Exchange Building, the palce of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Carl H. Eggert, Plaintiff, vs. Madison Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his wife, and Henry Markam, Defendants. No. ____. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Madison Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his wife, and Henry Markam, Defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 4th day of October, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment upon a promissory note for $525.00 dated October 14, 1908, due October 14, 1911, with interest at 9 per cent per annum from April 17, 1911, and for interest after delinquency at the rate of 12 per cent per annum; for $100.00 attorneys' fee and for costs; and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure said note, recorded in volume 415 of Mortgages, page 473, in the records of King County, Washington, upon lot 20, block 4, of Adams' Home Tracts, situated in said King County, Washington, which mortgage is a first lien upon said property, and to foreclose all right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said lots; and for a deficiency judgment against said Madison Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his wife, and for general relief. P. O. Address: 602 Hoge Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. October 4—November 15. 1912. CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PART- Coin & Gift Company CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED nership of The Cain & Cain Company. We, the undersigned, A. L. Cain, Cora B. Cain, as general partners, and A. W. Bricker and John N. McIntyre, as special partners, all citizens of the United States, and residents of the County of King, State of Washington, being desirous of forming a limited partnership pursuant to and in conformity with the laws of the State of Washington, do hereby make, subscribe and acknowledge, in duplicate, the following certificate of limited partnership to-wit: The name assumed by said limited partnership and under which the business of said limited partnership shall be conducted shall be "The Cain & Cain Grocery." The names and places of residence of the general partners are as follows, to-wit: A. L. Cain, residence, Seattle. King County, Washington; Cora B. Cain, residence, Seattle, King County, Washington. The names and places of residence of the special partners are as follows, to-wit: W. A. Bricker, residence, Seattle King County, Washington; John N. McIntyre, residence, Seattle, King County, Washington. The principal place of business of said limited partnership shall be located in the city of Seattle, King County, Washington. The amount of capital which each special partner has contributed to the common stock is as follows, to-wit: W. A. Bricker, special partner, has contributed $640.00; John N. McIntyre, special partner, has contributed $10.00. The general nature of the business to be transacted by said special partnership shall be the buying, handling and selling of a general line of groceries, fresh and salt meats, flour, feed, notions, and in general the doing of all things necessary to be done in the proper conduct of a general retail grocery, feed and notion store and meat market. The time when said special partnership shall commence shall be October 1st, 1912, and the time when said special partnership shall terminate shall be October 1st, 1913. In witness whereof, the above named general and special partners have respectively subscribed these certificates of special partnership, in duplicate, at the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, this 27th day of September, A. D. 1912. A. L. CAIN, CORA B. CAIN, W. A. BRICKER, JOHN N. McINTYRE, State of Washington, County of King, ss. A. L. Cain, Cora B. Cain, W. A. Bricker, and John N. McIntyre, being severally first duly sworn, each for himself and not one for the other, says that he is one of the persons named in the foregoing Certificate of Special Partnership; that they have read the same and know the contents thereof and that all matters therein contained are true; that they have signed the same as their free and voluntary acts and deeds for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. A. L. CAIN, CORA B. CAIN, W. A. BRICKER, JOHN N. McINTYRE, Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of September, A. D. 1912. (Seal) GEO. H. BAILEY. Notery Public in and for the State of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No.— The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered aainst you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Secon.—Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson, Deceased. No. 6998. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash the following described real estate situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 13, Madison Park Addition to the City of Seattle. All bids must be in writing accompanied by a certified check or cash for at least 10 per cent of the amount bid, and addressed to Minnie Thompson McCarty, administratrix, Room 10 Haller Building, said administratrix reserving the right to reject any and all bids, said sale to be made on or after Monday, October 21st, 1912. MINNIE THOMPSON McCARTY, Administratrix of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson Deceased. October 4----October 18, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C. Chapman, Deceased. No.——. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. D. H. Chapman, administrator of the estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, State of Washington, on the 12th day of October, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 12th day of October, 1912, in "Seattle Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of September, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Rose Besaw, Palintiff, vs. Charles Besaw, Defendant, No. ----- Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles Besaw, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of non-support and desertion. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 508-10 Lyon Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nellie Schork, Plaintiff, vs. Clarence J. Schork, Defendant. No.——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the above defendant, Clarence J. Schork: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of incompatibility of temperament, and upon the further grounds of defendant's failure to support and provide for the plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Dora Hannah Wright, plaintiff, vs. Rowland Raymond Wright, defendant.—No. 88142. The State of Washington to the said Rowland Raymond Wright, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after 27th day of September, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To secure an absolute decree of divorce on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and cruelty. Attorney for Plainch. P. O. Address 304 Lyon Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE of King, Summons by Publication of King. Summons by Publication. State of Washington for the County Katherine Bowman, plaintiff, vs. H. Bowman, defendant.—No. 90062. The State of Washington, to the said H. Bowman, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 27th day of September, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To secure an absolute decree of divorce on the grounds of non- support and cruelty. P. O. Address, 304 Lyon Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Max L. Kendall, Plaintiff, vs. Louise Kendall, Defendant. No. 89685. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Louise Kendall, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is an absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address 539 New York block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 13—November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, pallintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. —- The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judg- 7 ment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thousand dollars ($1,000), and interest thereon at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the following real estate, to-wit, lots five (5), six (6), seventeen (17), and eighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dollars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to secure said note, on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants—No. 89294. The State of Washington to the said B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, dated August 10, 1911, to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an attorney's fee of $250.00, and for a deficiency judgment. LEOPOLD M. STERN & J. W. RUSSELL, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 23—October 4, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Edward C. Heuss, Deceased. No. 14080. Notice of Change of Administrator. Notice is hereby given that Fritz H. Huess, the Administrator of the above entitled estate, has been removed, and that Tillie Huess has been appointed Administratrix of said estate in his stead. Creditors are hereby notified to present their claims against said estate to said Administratrix at her place for the transaction of business, to-wit: 1307 Hoge Building Seattle, Washington, within one year from the date of the notice to creditors previously published to-wit: TILLIE HUESS, Administratrix De bonis non of the Estate of Edward C. Huess, Deceased. Sept. 20-Oct. 5, 1912. "On what grounds does your father object to me?" he asked. "On any grounds within a mile of our house," she answered. Byker-I attended a successful sleight-of-hand performance last night. Pyker—Is that so? Byker—Yes. I lent the conjuror a counterfeit dollar-bill and he gave me back a good one. A good, strong, live, weekly paper that is not afraid to say things for the benefit of the public weal, is what every householder should have come to his or her address. If you think like this and are inclined to act on this initiative, then you are on, if you will send THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN your subscription. It first saw the light of day in 1894, and it has been firming away ever since, without having missed an issue and but a few hours late. The management would feel greatly encouraged if the paper’s subscription list would double up this year.. It is always Read- able, Reliable, Republican, and is quoted by the state press more than any other state weekly. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 423 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. “IT Makes The Mountain smile 7 ee UE ee a Se os 4 SS a ee FA = b ips) yg 9 Ze y Rayer yy Ss, beer LS Res > (Ge oy & Ce ae ay © eee a 4 { Up ON Og a YT Sg hI B bee ih tl lei | } “i ij yy EE he/7 (an A tt i CY | In ey | | / (St Tee i 1 ‘ = f : hadi 4 eT / i Wal A oy OSU ies mn 'e, y ut Si I Y SS ah )) | = \ Pi int \ i vam “or ees io tiie nh, ae a hC \ 4 l \ RAS : Bie Mik Wie 7 . ang - ike SS | Ih REZ 4 i \\| Da nal wy ‘eg aed i i 4 | a 4 cones m1 Me ey My, mali | Zip Hi Ih i iN} i SH int a Sen glad mh \ il Tl WA eee aa ae |. Ml AN m7 T i s ce pe ia a i ( hi oe MS : Soe ’ “il M ny | IL a _ ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING Co. THE HENPECKED MAN. He dare not call his soul his own, He cannot make a friend a loan, He would not raise his voice a tone— The henpecked man. He dare not leave his home at night! No one but wifey knows what’s right, He’s in a dickens of a plight— The henpecked man. He cannot buy a suit of clothes; Has no idea what he owes; Is humble from his head to toes— The henpecked man. He does not know how bad he’s “in;” To stay out late for him is sin; But at the poor old cuss don’t grin— The henpecked man. A poker game he dare not play; Nor after 10 o’clock can stay; If he should lose he cannot pay— The henpecked man. His ma-in-law comes up to town; And sizes him clear up and down; Then he is roasted—gets it brown— The henpecked man. Sometimes to lodge he ventures out; Perhaps his wife will have a doubt; When he returns he’l get a pout— The henpecked man. He suffered much on earth and so We know that when he dies he’ll go To heights above, and not below— The henpecked man. —St. Joseph Gaze’ £f1 NS LANA WER EN of Seattle, Washington Corner Second Avenue and Columbia Street Capital 0.2... sees. ---e--+++---$8500,000.00 Burplus 2.65. io. oe ee LOO OND Deposits shown under call of September 4, 1912, showed an increase over call of Septem- ber 1,191, OF 78 PER CENT the largest gain of any bank in Seattle. An Evidence of Confidence, 4 PER CENT ON SAVINGS. OFFICERS: J. W. Maxwell, President F. W. Baker, Vice-President J. H. Bloedel, Vice-President John K, Bush, Cashier Chas. B. West, Assistant Cashier ‘The proposed $980,000 bond issue for the erection of a County Office Building, to house all County and City Officials, including the Courts, excepting the Police and Health Departments, Hospital and Jail, which are to occupy the present City Building, is one of the most important local questions to be de- cided by the voters at the coming election. This proposition is clearly an economical one, as the Coun- ty and City are now paying for rented space, a sum which would covcer the interest on the entire issue, and suffer all the inconvenience and loss from hav- ing the Departments scattered about the city, The County is deriving no income from the block of land which it owns and upon which the building is to be erected, and as the present Coure House is unfit for further use, there can be no logical argu- ment against the issue. The building is being designed as a commercial structure, such as private enterprise would build. No attempt at determining the location of a Civic Center is being made, as the building is not designed to form a unit of any civic group, but as an office building covering the entire block bound- ed Ey Third and Fourth Avenues, James and Jeffer- son Streets As many stories as will be required will ve erected, and the foundations will be laid for addi- tional height, so that the finished structure will be twelve stories, covering the major portion of the block, with the central portion Baequate for pnt more. Thus providing a structure that can readily be disposed of to private investors at a profit to the County, when a Civic Center is voted and tne County and City erect their buildings as part of the Civic ‘group. September 6—October 25, 1912. PUGET SOUND TRACTION COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Clive Street, Or phone Main 2680 - - - ~- Independent 208 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOSOOOOOOOOO FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1912. 499990000000000006090006