Seattle Republican

State library SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Now that the Seattle city election is history and it was overwhelmingly Republican from top to the bottom the attention of the politicians will be turned to the coming state convention, which will elect ten delegates to the National Republican convention which will be held in Chicago next June. While no move has been made toward the selection of the various delgates, yet it is reasonable to suppose that Seattle will get at least two out of the ten and the Piemaker wishes to announce at this time that, he desires to see the Hon. John L. Wilson one of that two. In fact if the senator will accept the honor the Republican party owes to it him and in this statement it verily believed that three fourths of al the Republicans in the county are of a like opinion. The Seattle Republican therefore rises at this opportune time to place in nomination as one of the delegates to the national convention the Honorable John L. Wilson. The motion having been duty seconded it will doubtless receive a unanimous vote at the state convention, the call for which will be issued at a very early date. Speaking about the other delegates to the convention it is barsly possible that Tacoma will be given one, the southwest two, Eastern Washington three and the northwest two and with the two from Seattle the list will be complete. Neither Secretary Lysons nor Chairman De Bruler has fixed the date JOHN F. as any of the candidates. The Democrats lost out completely and instead of Gen. Metcalf getting 3,000 votes as was generally predicted he did not get a 1,000 votes. The Socialist vote likewise went glimmering as they preferred to vote for Miller rather than take a chance of Moore being reelected. 1. VOL. XIV. NO. 41 *** The Seattle municipal election is over and it was a land slide for the entire Republican ticket. "All signs of rain fail in dry weather," is an old addage, and so it was as to the campaign prognosticator those who believed they saw signs of a Moore land slide, now realize their poor ability for political predictions. The splendid campaign made by John F. Miller told in the end as contrary to all expectations he beat Mayor Moore by a plurality of 5,038 votes. While Mr. Miller is to be given credit for a great part of the victory as he did do masterly work, nevertheless it was the Post-Intelligencer that saved the day for him. He was nominated at the suggestion of the P.I. and it gave him the best support that it has given any candidate for office in many years. Col. Prosser lead the ticket by receiving 20,149 out of the whole vote cast. Col. Prosser is a most energetic campaigner and did splendid work both at the direct primary contest and at the general election. The popularity of Scott Calhoum is still quite apparent as he came next on the ticket. Harry Carroll, who, it was thought, would get scratched to a certain extent, ran almost as strong as did Calhoum and notwithstanding the fact Billy Murphy beat Albert J. Goddard a couple of thousand votes in the direct primary contest at the late election Goddard ran pretty close to him, thus showing that Goddard s ard was just as popular SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, March 6, 1908 of holding the state convention, but that will soon be done and the call issued at once. Chairman De Bruler has issued a call for the assembling of the State Central Committee March 18th in the City of Seattle, at which time the time and place of holding the state convention will be fixed. Judge Miles Poindexter of Spokane appears to be the leading candidate for congress from that city in the Third district on the Republican side, and William Goodyear of Colfax appears to be the leading candidate on the Democratic side. R. H. Kipp of Colfax has announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination of attorney general. By the time the primary election is held Whitman county will have enough candidates to fill every office on the state tickets of the two dominant political parties. Hartline Standard. The Ankeny boosters, admonished by the rapidly diminishing numbers of the senator's friends, have at last awakened to the folly of trying to control all state, county and city politics and now announce that hereafter they will keep hands off. This announcement has been made before, and everyone knows is only made to be broken and when the time comes the usual lineup will be had. Every man who does not get down on his knees and swear allegiance to the "bunch" who are directing the senator's affairs will be given the usual bump if in the power of the "bunch" to hand it to him—Walla Walla Bulletin. [Image of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. [Name] JOHN F. MILLER ```markdown ``` All of the councilmen—elect are Republican except Sparkman of the Eight ward, who beat C. W. Mellville, who, after an exciting campaign, succeeded in beating Dr. Crichton in the primary contest, to the chagrin of perhaps a majority of the residents of the ward. The ticket—elect is as follows: * * * * * * Postmaster Eldridge, of Bellingham, is about to lose his job, according to the Bellingham papers. Poor Hugh: Eever since his first appointment, by reason of some political combination which required the slaughter of some fatted calf, his retirement has been the pro-election topic of the Bellingham prognosticators during every crmpaign. Serene Hugh: during all the talk, fuss and wire-pulling his sphinx like appearance is the admiration and life-raft of his followers and the confoundation of his enemies and when the tidal wave has receeded, he bobs to the surface as surely as a chunk of butter in a tub of water. Wise Hugh: he may not always be able to save his following, but himself he always pulls out seemingly, at times, by the eyebrows: that is the organization and that saved, well. A capital fellow is Hugh, durned if he aint, and may he enjoy the results of his labors when his enemies have gone to stimulate vegetable growth—Arlington Times. The publication day of the Seattle Republican is Friday and legal notices for publications are received up to noon on the publication day. The charges of the Republican for publishing such notices are reasonable and if you will phone your order in some one will call at once for the notice and thereby avoid any delay. Phone Main 305, office 307 Epler block, between Columbia and Marion on Second avenue. PRICE TEN CENTS Notice To Attorneys. Mayor—John F. Miller, Republican. Corporation Council—Scott Calhoum, Republican. Comptroller—Haray W. Carroll, Republican. City Treasurer—W. F. Prosser, Republican. Councilmen--at--large—W .H. Murphy, Republican, and A. J. Goddard, Republican. WARD COUNCILMEN. First Ward—James Conway, Republican. Second Ward—Eugene W. Way, Republican. Third Ward—H. C. Gill, Republican. Fourth Ward—Frederick W. Sawyer, Republican. Fifth Ward—H. F. Jackson, Republican. Sixth Ward—Arnold Zbinden, Republican. Seventh Ward—T. P. Revelle, Republican. Eighth Ward—J. M. Sparkman, Democrat. Ninth Ward—Alexander McKinnon, Republican. Tenth Ward—A. E. Parker, Republican. Eleventh Ward—W. H. Weaver, Republican. Twelfth Ward—William·H. Hines, Republican. Thirteenth Ward—J. T. Armstrong, Republican. Fourteenth Ward—Max Wardall, Republican. CAYTON'S CURRENT COMMENT 2 There is no doubt but that Kentucky, unlike the leopard and the Ethiopian is changing her spots and her color. Within the past twelve months many of the counties in the State have voted local option and it is being strongly hinted that prohibition for the state will be adopted in less than two years more. Last fall the state elected a Republican governor and now it elected a Republican United States senator, notwithstanding the fact the Democrats were largely in the majority in the legislature last Friday in the person of Gov. William O. Bradley, thus defeating Ex-Gov. Beckham, who has tried during the whole time he was governor of the state to hang Caleb Powers for the alleged murder of Gov. Goebel. Surely, surely, the sun do move. Any and every little thing that Japan does is telegraphed all over the world as though it was any of the business of the outside world as to what Japan does. Suppose she is building two monster war ships whose business, but Japan's is it? The United States and all the other powers of the world build war ships whenever they feel so inclined and no comment is made thereon and Japan should be treated in a like manner. If Japan wants to build warships and then attack some other power even in that it is her right and its up to the attacked nation to defend it herself, and if its the United States you can rest assured she will defend herself in good old Yankey style. The lives of both the president of Buneos Ayres, and the shaw of Persia, were attempted one day last week by some of their enraged subjects, but neither of them received any damage, which under the circumstances was rather remarkable. All such attacks on rulers even when the ruler is killed always fall short of the purpose which prompted them and it seems that enthusiasts would profit from experience as such attacks invariably result in those committing them in losing their own lives. Where is Heaven? Is a question that is being ask just now by inquisitive persons. Just where it is no living person can say with any degree of certainty, if at all, but every one feels absolutely certain it is some where off in space. If the same Jehovah rules the myriads of planets in space that rules this earth, it is hardly reasonable to think the Heaven of which we so often refer, is located any more convenient to this earth than to the other earths and planets, all of which being as densely populated as the earth itself. Then it seems reasonable to suppose heaven is somewhere in space, the center of the universe around which all the worlds revolve. If Heaven is the center of the universe and this earth is but one of the multiplied millions of earths and all of them are populated then where do the souls that leave this earth go? Do they go straight to Heaven, or do they go from world to world and finally graduate into heaven? This like the first is a perplexing question and no living man is able to answer definitely. No soul has ever returned from the spirit land, the spiritualistic doctrine to the contrary notwithstanding, hence no one is able to speak from experience, but it is seems reasonable that the sousl leaving this earth are purified at some place before reaching Heaven and why not on some of the other planets. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN It is peeing advocated by medical experts just now that busy men are not so subject to disease and sickness as men of leisure. They of course at sometime sicken and die the same as other human beings, but, until that times comes they are not subject to periodical sickneses as persons who do not work. So strongly constituted is the human mechanism that it can work every minute of the time it is not a sleep and yet do the physical part no material harm. By this it is not ment that a human being can start a certain kind of work and not stop until ready to go to sleep, but the well matured mind rests the body by changing work. When the body is physically exhausted the mind can be profitably put to work and do as efficient work as if the body was not tired. Physicall work for eight hours, then mental work for so many hours and finally amusing work for a number of hours and then sleep, and there is no possible way of overworking a human being and such active beings are always more healthy and freer from disease and sickness than the ones who spend their time in idleness. Work seems to be nature's physician. The old question, should divorces be granted? is going the rounds of the pulpit and the press again. While in some instances divorces may be too readily granted by presiding judges neverthless when a husband and wife find it impossible for them to live agreeably together or that they are in any way unequally yoked together there is nothing left but to break it off. Then to say that such divorced persons should be made to live single the balance of their lives would simply be inviting lives of misery and shame for them both. All this talk of marriages being made in heaven is clap trap. The Creator takes no part in whom you make love to and if after you have made love to one and you find you have grieviously erred then the Creator will hold you accountable for any misdeeds the continuing in such a life may lead up to. Married life is a business proposition with all of the air castles cut out. The days of promiscous lovemaking are all over and they play but little if any part in the lives of husband and wife and if the business can not be made to go profitable and like wise smoothly then close it out. "Do you think for a minute that a man can be a saloon proprietor and be an honest man. I have tried to be on the square as my conscience dictated, but as I lie here knowing that my life will be snuffed out shortly and look over my past career I find nothing to recommend me to clemency if I am ever called before the judgment seat, as my mother told me I would be as she taught me boyish lessons. Night after night I stood behind the bar. A bunch of fellows would come in and instead of taking their money for one drink as a man would sell a loaf of bread I would take it until they were ready to leave and then press a treat upon them. If one failed to show them they were under obligation I would give them another and shortly they would start to buy again. I have seen the same thing in a dry goods store. The wife of some poor workingman would enter the store. The clerk knew her position depended upon the sales she made but at the same time knew the customer was limited to a paltry sum for expenditure. Caring more for her position than for the woman, she would urge her to purchase silk instead of calico, and many times she was successful. Was she honest?" MMENT The man on his deathbed in the hospital, for he died shortly after unburdening himself, writhed in remorse to think of the many times he had starved families that he might give the "bouse" the price of one more "round." Think it over. Is there an honest man in the saloon business selected? Personal Paragraphs. W. H. Paulhamus of Sumner, the fruit and vegetable king of Western Washington, spent a few hours in the city one day this week and when ran onto seemed rather anxious to learn some thing about politics in Seattle. Jones for United States senator all the time. "While I desire to see Frank Cushman succeed Piles, yet John L. Wilson, sounds good to me." F. M. Jeffey, a well known local attorney, who recently aspired to the nomination of councilman from the Third Ward, has sued Hi. C. Gill, the successful candidate for that nomination, and who has been counciman for the ward for many years, for damages in the amount of $15,000 for defamation of character. Gill has a foul tongue, which once started to wagging goes it pretty strong. It got loose on Jeffrey, and Jeffrey is of the opinion that Gill let it run too long before sawing it off. Former Senator John L. Wilson arrived home one day this week after an absence of a few weeks, the nature of which absence is well known to the community. He is looking the picture of health and feels that he will not have the same trouble again. When the Senator left in charge of Mr. Sawyer and a physician, few of his friends ever expected to see him return in good health, but that he has is an agreeable surprise to them. John D. Atkinson was down from Olympia one day this week and when seen by the writer was wrapped in smiles and held a copy of the Seattle Republican in his hands. "I appreciate the many good things this paper has said about me in regard to my candidacy for governor. I will get through allright in the end when the votes are all counted." He at least has confidence in his own candidacy and that is half the batte. Dr. Rufus Smith, who went to Arizona some four months ago inquest of better health, returned last Sunday evening greatly improved by his stay on the desert. "I got next to nature and hunted and fished to my heart's content and as a result I am enjoying the best health that I have for my years. I am now ready for business." Moritz Thompson, the Washington flour king, returned last Tuesday from a three months' stay in Soutnern California, whithre he went for his health. "I am glad to get back home and will get in the business sharness at once. I am also much pleased to hear my friend Senator Wilson is better and will soon be home. Pete J. Smith, the dairy king from Issaquah, came down to the city last Wednesday to assist the Miller workers to jollify over the signal victory that was won Tuesday. Pete smiled all over his face whenever he saw a Moor worker. Elmer E. Todd got a glimpse of his broad, bland and child like smile a block away and ducked down an alley. --- SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter, A RELIGIOUS MISTAKE. Afro-American bishops of all Methodist denominations met in Washington City a short time ago to discuss Methodism in its various forms as it effected the Afro-American as well as the blackman the world over and to that extent met for a most loudable purpose. Amid their deliberations, however, they drifted into a political harangue and the more they discussed Roosevelt and his acts the madder they got until they permitted themselves to ripen into such a frenzy that for church deignitaries they passed some very intemperate resolutions. They denounced Taft because Roosevelt favored him for president and because as an appointee under Roosevelt he did not resign his office rather than carry out Roosevelt's orders, all of which, to say the least, was as unwise a thing as a body of intelligent men could do and in the face of the facts those teachers of the Great Spirit clearly demonstrated that, they did not take the Lord Christ Jesus as their exemplers by doing unto others as they would have them do unto them. No act unfriendly to the Afro-Americans in all of the brilliant career of Secretary William Howard Taft is on record. Yea he has not only not been unfriendly to them, but in every instance he has proven to be a friend at court and even in the now historic Brownsville affair he pleaded with the president to either withdraw the order of dismissal or modify it, but the president was unchangable in his opinion. Now for his kindness he is to be bruted about by the leaders of the Afro-Americans for no other reason save to punish Theodore Roosevelt, who himself on the whole has been the best friend the Afro-American has had in the presidential chair since the imortal Abraham Lincoln occupied that exalted position. But grant it Roosevelt is their enemy, why charge his enmity up to some one else simply because the two are friendly or because they belong to the same party. What could Taft done other than what he did do is a question that those bishops should frankly answer for the enlightment of those voters they hope to influence against Taft. It is always wrong to punish one person for the acts of another and that old principal of beating one person over the head in order to get even with a third person is more the act of a savage than that of a human being. But let us, if you please, look at the political phase of the situation for a minute. For whom would those Afro-American bishops have the Afro-Americans to vote, if not for Taft, who will certainly be nominated by the Republicans at their next national convention? Of course they could vote the Socialist ticket and thereby throw the electoral vote in those state where, it is claimed they hold the balance of power, to Bryan, the Democratic candidate for president, who is the idol of the various southern states; or they could vote directly for Bryan and thereby more completely forge the chain of disfranchisement around their own necks, not only in the South, but throughout the United States. Then instead of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN having Republicans in Congress, who would stand like a stone wall against Jim Crowing Washington City they would have no friends at court and thus the Jim Crowing would go bravely on until it would even venture into some of the Northern states. Can Afro-Americans conceive of a worse enemy in the presidential chair than William Jennings Bryan? He is going to be nominated by the Democrats and he is seeing to it that the South take the lead in bringing that nomination about, hence the South, if he should be elected, would domineer the White House and dictate the most of his official acts and yet there are Afro-Americans who would advocate all Afro-Americans to vote for such a demagogue in preference to Taft, who has always not only been fair to them, but has gone out of his way to do them a good turn. Mark the difference, if you will, in the treatment of the Filipinos at the hands of Taft and that accorded them by Luke Wright and then remember that it will be just such men as Luke Wright that will domineer Bryan's administration, if he is ever elected president of the United States, and you will get a faint idea of the results of Afro-Americans chasing after false gods. Will you therefore dare say you prefer in the face of this Bryan to Taft? Of course there are hot headed Afro-Americans here as among those bishops, who are selfish enough to advise the Afro-Americans to vote for Bryan, but they have an ulterior motive in doing so, which has for its object the getting of them into some minor political prominence, but for the great rank and file of the people they care not one whoop in Purgatory what befalls them. The bishops' participating in the above congress were as follows: A. M. E. Church—Bishops Henry M. Turner, Wesley J. Gaines, Benjamin T. Tanner, Abram Grant, Benjamin F. Lee. Moses B. Salter, William B. Derrick, Evans Tyree. Charles S. Smith, Charles T. Shaffer, Levi J. Copin. A. M. E. Zion Church-Bishops J. W Hood, C. R. Harris, A. Walters, G. W. Clinton, J. A. Alstock, J. W. Smith, J. S. Caldwell. C. M. E. Church-L. H. Holsey, R. S. Williams, Isaac Lane, Elias Cottrell, C. H. Phillips. Some of the Sumner Spirit that flourished at the National Capital in 1861 still lives judging from last Saturday's vote in Congress. Few persons get an opportunity to be born on the 29th of February, and their birthdays are few and far between. If Caleb Powers is not careful he will go to the gallows instead of Congress. Go free should be Powers first want. Evelyn Thaw is deserving of ten million dollars from her husband's family let alone less than a tenth of that amount. She bled and died for Harry and desertion is to be her portion for her faithfulness. Humphrey may be doing good work in Congress, but he does not want to overlook the fact that, Scott Calhoun is doing good political work in Seattle, which may send the latter instead of the former to Congress from this district. Artifical eggs may be alright, but somehow or other we are reminded of manufactured butter. This too was promised to be produced so that an expert could not distinguish it from the real stuff, but somehow or other they do. Uncle Sam's fighting Bob Evans is steaming for San Francisco with all his might and main lest the Japanese fleet beat him to it and thereby prevent him from showing off in that port as he has planned to do. In the past Seattle's Japanese colony has been going after each other pretty red handed and now the Chink colony has begun the same tactics. What on earth can be the matter with the chattering Mongolians. When will Senator Piles urge his friends to support Ankeny and thereby live up to his alleged political agraement? Echo answer. Salted pecans may be a splendid health producer, but salted mines is a most excellent wealth producer at least to the salter. Gov. Bradley should give Caleb Powers his freedom before leaving the Gubernatorial chair of Kentucky. Women not only "get men's wages" but they in many instances command men's pay for services rendered. WISE AND OTHERWISE Buster has a very good opinion of his father's calling, which is that of a clergyman. Still he thinks there are other professions that take equal rank with it, and on being asked whether he, too, would be a clergyman when he grew up, he replied: "I think so. Either that or a burglar."—Philadelphia Record. After a dinner at his friend's house, which he enjoyed hugely, he said: "Excuse me, Jones, but may I ask you how you manage to have such delicious things to eat?" "Its quite simple," replied Mr. Jones "I always kiss the cook before dinner, and hold her on my knee after dinner." "But what does your wife say?" "Oh!" returned the other, "she don't object; "she's the cook."—New York World. The veterinary surgeon paused in his lecture to display an aged cat in a basket lined with pink flannel. "Gentlemen," he said, "this cat holds, so far as I know, the maternity record. She is 18 years old, and she is the mother of 200 kittens. "I know of many cases of tabbies of 12 or 14 that have brought 100 and even 125 little ones into the world, but there is no other case recorded of a feline mother of 200." He patted the aged animal's head. "You splendid old thing," he said. "I wish I could introduce you to the Presidedt."—New York Press. A man in Missouri recently sued a railway company for damages for the death of a hound killed on the track. The company defended itself upon the following points: Said dog was chasing a rabbit up defendant's track in violation of the game laws. ant's track in violation of the game laws. Said rabbit lived on defendant's right of way, and was therefore the property of the defendant. Plaintiff's dog was a trespasser, and was hunting defendant's property without permission. Said deceased was not much of a dog, anyhow, or it could easily have kept out of the way of defendant's trains. And having fully, answered defendant prays to be discharged. -Youth's Companion. --- 4 Bench and Bar. Hon. J. B. Wall, judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, sends us the following good story: When I attended the second term of court after my admission to the bar, writes Judge Wall, I was employed by one David Thompson to assist in the prosecution of a young man named Elias Louis, indicted for maliciously killing Thompson's hog. The parties were all strangers to me, and Louis was defended by the two leaders of the local bar. The state attorney turned over the prosecution to me and I started in with all the confidence of a green hand. With Thompson's testimony I made out an overwhelming case against Louis, but the case hinged entirely on his evidence. The attorneys for the defendant made a vicious assault on Thompson's reputation for veracity. I told my client it would be necessary to bolster up his reputation and sent him out to look for witnesses for that purpose. About the time the judge was urging me to proceed, Thompson returned to the court room with the information that he could only find one witness, a neighbor of his, named Stone, but that he was all right. Relying on Thompson's assurance, I placed Stone on the stand and propounded to him the usual questions as to his acquaintance with Thompson and knowledge of his reputation for veracity, which being answered satisfactorily, I said: "Mr. Stone, from your knowledge of Mr. Thompson's reputation for truth and veracity in the community in which he lives, would you believe him on oath?" You can imagine my feelings when, after a moment's hesitation, the reply came: "Well, Squire, I would. I am bound to believe any man on oath, but I expect that I am the only man in this county who knows Dave Thompson, who would believe his oath." MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE —SUICIDE—BY-LAWS AS FORMING PART OF THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE.—A question of interest to fraternalists is discussed in Benes v. Supreme Lodge, Knights and Ladies of Honor (Ill.), 83 N. E. Rep. 127. The benefit certificate sued on provided that if the member should comply with all laws of the society then in force, or that should afterwards be enacted, the society would pay a specified sum upon his death. A law of the society provided that if any person died by his own hand within five years after becoming a member, the certificate should thereby be rendered void. In this case, the member was shown not to have known of this law. He died by his own hand within five years, and suit was brought on the benefit certificate. The certificate was held void, the court saying: "Persons belonging to a mutual benefit association, or a fraternal beneficiary society, as it is denominated by our statute, are conclusively presumed to know what the provisions of the laws adopted by the association are, where such laws are a part of the contract of insurance. Such an association is founded upon the mutual rights and obligations of all its members, and if a beneficiary could be permitted to recover in a manner other than according to the written terms of the contract which those insured enter into, mutuality among the members would soon cease." Citing, Bacon on Benefit Societies (3rd Ed.), par. 81. and May on Insurance, vol. 2, par. 552. NOTES OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS (From Central Law Journal.) MASTER AND SERVANT—DUTY OF MASTER TO WARN SERVANT OF DANGER OF EMPLOYMENT—ASSUMPTION OF RISK BY SERVANT.—In the case of Hefferman v. Fall River Iron Works Co., 83 N. E. Rep. 5, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court sustains the well-known doctrine of the duty of the master to disclose to the servant the dangers incident to his employment. Plaintiff was hired to work as a laborer for defendant. He was set to work cleaning the cylinders of cards which were being set up in the mill. The "lickerin," as it was called, was covered with paper, and plaintiff testified that he did not know what it was. In attempting to clean the cylinder as he had been instructed to do, the stick which plaintiff was using slipped, and his hand went down between the "lickerin" and the cylinder, resulting in the injuries complained of. A verdict was directed for defendant. In reviewing the evidence, the court says that there was evidence warranting a finding by the jury of due care on the part of plaintiff and of "negligence on the part of the defendant in failing to warn or instruct him of the danger when he was set to work on the card on which he was injured. * * * * There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff was cleaning the cylinder in the manner in which he had been told to clean it, so far as any instruction at all had been given him, and we do not see, therefore, how it could be ruled as a matter of law that he assumed the risk. According to his testimony he did not kow or appreciate the danger, and unless he did he could not be said to have assumed it. How much weight his testimony was entitled to was, of course, for the jury to say." This decision is in line with a long line of decisions holding the master in duty bound to warn the servant of the dangers of the employment, for, be said to assume a risk of which he is as aptly said, the servant cannot ignorant. Had the jury found that plaintiff had been warned of the dangers incident to his employment, an instruction that he had assumed the risk would have relieved defendant or liability. Having failed to warn the servant of the dangers of his employment, the master must respond in damages. The duty of the master is an active duty. It has ever been held that the master must keep pace with scientific development as it affects his business and keep himself and foreman informed of latent danger, even though it be scientific information, if it be readily attainable.—Hyrell v. Swift & Co., 78 Mo. App. 39. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of James Mills, deceased. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the above entitled court entered on the 4th day of March, 1908, whereby the former sale of the personal property of the above entitled estate to Charles Niemeyer Jr., was set aside, and a re-sale of the personal property was authorized and ordered, the undersigned, as special administrator, of the above entitled estate, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder for cash, in front of the door of the shop formerly occupied and used by said deceased as a blacksmith shop in the town of Woodinville, at the hour of ten o'clock a. m. of Saturday, March 21st, 1908, the following described personal property, towit: All tools, mechanical appliances, devices and equipments of any and every kind and description belonging to said deceased, and all stock, materials, supplies, etc., belonging to said deceased; also the lease of that certain building in said town of Woodinville wherein said deceased carried on his trade as blacksmith at Woodinville. Dated this 6th day of March, 1908. M. M. RUSSELL. M. M. RUSSELL, Special Administrator of the Estate of James Mills, Decased GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administrator. Office: 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, March 6—March 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Amelia Hughes, plaintiff, vs. James Brainard Hughes, defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said James Brainard Hughes, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint heretofore filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and also for the custody of the minor son, James Victor Hughes, and for general relief. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office address: 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 6— April 17, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Dora Wilson, plaintiff, vs. Leon R. Wilson, defendant. No. —. Summons by Publication State of Washington, to the said Leon R. Wilson, defendant: You are summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty. (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a judgment and decree of said Court in favor of said plaintiff and against you, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between you and the plaintiff herein on the grounds of habitual gross drunkenness and non-support. WILL H. MERRITT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address; 520-1 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Mar. 6—April 17, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Georgiana Raven, Plaintiff, vs. George Raven, Defendant. No. 60267. Summons by Publication The State of Washington to said George Raven: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action against you is to obtain a decree herein dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the statutory grounds of desertion for more than eight years last past, and that the following described real estate be decreed to be the separate property of plaintiff, to-wit: A tract of land in Sec. 24, Twp. 25 N. Range 3 East W. M., described as follows: Beginning 478 feet south and 37 feet east of the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Sec. 24, thence east 120 feet, thence south 38 feet, thence west 120 feet, thence north 38 feet to the point of beginning. The following described tract of land situated in the town of Hannibal, County of Oswego, New York, to-wit: Two parcels of land containing $ \frac{1}{4} $ of an acre each, being part of Lot 39; one hundred acres in Great Lot No. 39, part of Lot 39 of Great Lot 39, containing six and one-half rods. Also all that other parcel or parcels Friday, March 6, 1908 of land, known and described as one half acre of land in the States And the easterly 18 feet of Lot 21, Block 4, according to a plan of part of Lot 231, Group 1, Kamloops Division of Yale District, situated in the City of Kamloops, Province of British Columbia. And for such other relief as to the Court shall seem proper. GUIE & GUIE. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: No. 615-16 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. March 6—April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having claimed in their inb and to be hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60143. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said building, described as follow-to-wait: Lot 1 block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27403. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 1, less the east 48 feet block 58, Riley Add. to Riley's Add. to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27403. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wait: Lot 1, block 58, less the east 48 feet of Riley's Add. to Riley's Add. to Seattle; for year 1903, the sum of $2.12; for year 1904, the sum of $1.86; for year 1905, the sum of $1.78; for year 1906, the sum of $4.05. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit within sixty days after Feb. 28th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFEFF BLU. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Blug., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. E. A. Anderson, Plaintiff, vs. Philip Anderson, Defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Philip Anderson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. That the object and purpose of said action is to obtain a decree absolutely dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of abondonment of the plaintiff by the defendant. McCAFFERTY & GODFREY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: Seattle, Washington. Jan. 10—Feb. 20. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss.— Sheriiff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 29th day of January, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of George Olson, Plaintiff, versus William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, Defendant, in 1647, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit, at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 14th day of March. A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all the right, title and interest of the said defendants William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: The Southwest quarter (SW%) of the Northeast quarter (NE%) of the Southeast quarter (SE%) and the North one-half (N%) of the Southeast quarter (SE%) of the Northeast quarter (NE%) of the Southeast quarter (SE%), Section ninety-nine (TN%), Township twenty-five (25), Range five (5), East Township, Washington, levied as the property of said defendants William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to ninety-eight and 50-100 ($88.50) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 31st day of January, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Feb. 7—Mch. 6. Friday. March 6. 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herenafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60144. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herenafter described real property, are hereby notified that a named plaintiff will be the certain debt tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902, in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27412. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 3, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add, to Riley's Add, to Seattle; for the year 1902, and in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27412. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid the plaintiff upon said above described real property, and the east 48 feet 58, Riley's Add, to Riley's Add, to Seattle; for year 1903, in the sum of $2.12; for year 1904, in the sum of $1.86; for year 1905, in the sum of $1.78; for year 1906, in the sum of $4.05. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after February 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Wisdom. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. SUMMONS. Benjamin F. Blair, Plaintiff, vs. Ada C. Blair. Defendant—No. Blair, Defendant—No..... The State of Washington to the said Ada C. Clair: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the day of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The action is one for divorce. McBURNEY & CUMMINGS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 414 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 6—April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the Matter that the Estate of Ruth Anne Innesfield, Decreased. No. 7098. Notice of Substance Real. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King, made on January 9th, 1908, in the above entitled cause, the undersigned administrator will sell at private sale to the highest bidder, on or after the 28th day of March, 1908, all the right, title and interest of said estate and the heirs thereof, in and to the following described the heirs thereof, to-wit Lot four and one-half of the northwest quarter of section five, township thirty pith, being in Clallam County, Washington, Sale sale will be for cash on confirmation of sale by the Court, and all bids must be in writing and addressed to the undersigned administrator at room 402 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash., and endorsed on envelope "Bid for real estate in estate of Ruth Anne Klinefelter." Deposit will be required on acceptance of bid. WILLIAM M. KLINEFELTER. Administrator of the Estate of Ruth Anne Klinefelter, Deceased. HOWARD H. RUTZMAN, Att'y for Adm'r., ADRACH Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Boh. 28 March 27, 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. Marie Clement, plaintiff, vs. Louis P. Clement, defendant. No.... The State of Washington, to said defendant, Louis P. Clement. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit; within sixty days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading, upon the unassigned attorney, at his court below stated; and in case rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the said action is for the purpose of obtaining an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant, by the plaintiff upon the grounds of non-support and drunkenness. C. H. STEFFEN. Attorney for Plaintiff. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County.—Notice of Summons, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Seattle and E. Trust Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the plaintiff has filed a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1903, and number as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B22439, lot 3, block 6, Kaufman's Addition to Seattle, for the year 1902, amount $54.66. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 3, block 6, Kaufman's Addition to Seattle, for the year 15.70, 1904, $16.50; delinquent local assessment 1904, $4.36; delinquent local assessment 1905, $4.10; 1906, $22.50; delinquent local assessment 1906, $3.84. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within 60 days after February 14th, 1908, in th eabove entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be considered upon foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Office Address: 457 Arcade Blg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 14; last publication, March 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County.—Notice and Summons. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, for all persons unknown, in any laving or claiming an interest in and to the barelain after described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon the real property in and to King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B29268, lot 3, block 3, Town of Berlin, for the year 1902, amount $3.93. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; Lot 3, block 3, Town of Berlin, for the year 1903, $5.42; $5.25; 1905, $6.30; 1906, .09. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after February 14th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest, to be paid fall so to be indemnified will be rendered herein, forelosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W, T GAFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Oak Street, First publication, Feb. 14, last, March 27. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James Brownie, deceased.—Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. No. 7469. Lucy Brownie, administratrix of the estate of James Brownie, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for the persons entitled to the discharge thereof it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said James Brownie, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 19th day of March, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock. A. M. of said day then and after to the court they have made why other to distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order he published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 19th day of March, 1908, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 13th day of February, 1908. GEQ. E. MORRIS, Judge. Feb. 14—March 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice of Summons.—W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Rose Lent and John Doe Lent, her husband, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of any interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property described in and held King County, described follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B23097 lot 1, block 6, Rainier Addition to Seattle, year 1902, amount, $13.39. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 6, Rainier Addition to Seattle, for year 1903, $5.35; 1903, delinquent local assessment, $11.58; 1904, $5.61; 1904, delinquent local assessment, $31.78; 1905, $5.87; 1905, delinquent local assessment, $19.67; 1906, $5.40; 1906, delinquent local assessment, $31.18. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon, and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within 60 days after Feb. 14th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to the court of said affidavit and copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs' complaint, on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication Feb. 14; last publication, March 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Abram L. Vicory, philanthropy, vs. Neuland F. Vicory, defendant. No. 60030. The State of Washington to the said Neuland F. Vicory, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of cruelty and incompatibility of temper. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address; 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. William E. Terrill, Plaintiff, vs. Kate Terrill, defender, No..... The State of Washington, to the said Kate Terrill, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the court of the said court. The object of the said action, as set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a divorce by the plaintiff against the defendant upon the ground of defendant's willful abandonment and desertion of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past. AUTHORITY Office and P. O. address: Rooms 420-21 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of -Washington, County of King—ss, Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 7th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Michel Colusardo, plaintiff, versus Francisco di Napoli, sometimes known as Frank Napo, and Peppina di Napoli, his wife, defendants, No. 5438, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wait: at 10 o'clock a. m., on the 21st day of March, A. D. W. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wait: Lot numbered six (6) in block numbered eight (8) of Rainier Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to four hundred sixty and 79-100 $(460.70) dollars, and costs of suit. in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 7th day of February, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Feb. 14-Mch. 13. FRED H. LYSONS. 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King. Teckla Frisk, plantiff, vs. Sanfrid Frisk, defendant.-No. 59579. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Sanfrid Frisk, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of January. A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, the complaint of the plantiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty, drunkenness and nonsupport. HOMER E. TURNER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P, O. Address: 745 New York Blk., Seattle, County of King, Washington. Jan. 24—March 6. NOTICE TO CREDITORS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County.—In the Matter of the Estate of M. N. and Maggie Ogli, Deceased—Notice to Creditors—No. 8854. By order of said court made herein on the 5th day of February, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and their estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 523 New York Block, Seattle, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication February 14, 1908. J. W. MILES. Administrator of said Estate. O. A. TUCKER. Attorney for Estate. 523 New York Blk., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 14—March 20 PROBATE NOTICE In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King,—State of Washington, County of King, ss.—In the Matter of the Estate of James Brownie, Deceased. No notice of Settlement of Final Account.—No. 7469. Notice is hereby given that Lucy Brownie, the administratrix of the estate of James Brownie deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 19th day of March, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle in said King County, had been rendered to, and filed in said Court the element of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 13th day of February, 1908. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk. By E. S. SEYMOUR. (SEAL) Feb. 14—March 13 Deputy Clerk. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. May Bartlett, plaintiff, vs. George Bartlett, defendant. The State of Washington to the said George Bartlett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-write within 60 days after the 22nd day of February 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. P. O. address: Room 58 Downs Block, in Seattle. King County. Washington: Feb. 21—April 5, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King, Katie A. MacGregor, Plaintiff, vs. Walter G. MacGregor, Defendant. Cause No. 6008S. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Walter B. MacGregor: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of January 1988, defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Plaintiff, and answer to the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and nonumpfer, and to restore the plaintiff to her full rights. PAUL F. FOSS. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 212® American Bank Building, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication Feb. 28-April 10 1908. NOTICE TO CREDITORS: In the mater of the estate of Martin J. Whittier, deceased. To the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased or her estate: You are hereby notified and required to present your claims, if any, against said estate to the undersigned administrator thereof, with the necessary vouchers, at his residence and place of business as herein given, within one year from and after the date of the first publication hereof, or same will be forever barred. MERRIEL WHITTIER. Administrator estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased. ALLEN WEIR, Olympia, Wash. Attorney for Administrator Date of first publication Feb. 14, 1908; March 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. E. M. Martin and Jane Doe Martin, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 59803. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a, certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of October, 1905, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: 1st Add., to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, the North ½ of lot 10, block 50, certificate number B35555, year 1903, amount $2.14. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: No, 1/2 lot 10, block 50, 1st Add. to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, $2.86 for year 1906, $1.67 for year 1905, $1.48 for year 1904. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after the 7th day of Feby., 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes,erty for the sums and amount due upon and charged against each, said taxes, interest and costs, ordering the sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFENER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated February 7th, 1908. Last March. 20. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King-ss. State of Washington, County of King-ss. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 14th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk versus White, by George Olson, by the Clerk versus Warren, by the Warren, his defendants, No. 45677, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 28th day of March, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Southwest quarter (SW1/4) of Northeast quarter (NE1/4) of Southeast quarter (SE1/4) and North half (N1/2) of Southeast quarter (SE1/4) of Northeast quarter (NE1/4) of Southeast quarter (SE1/4) of Sections twenty-nine (29). Township twenty-five (25), Range five (5) east, levied on the property of said defendants, William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to ninety-eight and 50-100 ($88.50) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 14th day of February, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60146. Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each defendants owners, claimants or holders of the interest or estae in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, the described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's. for the year 1902, in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27414. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate, leaving a certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 5, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add, to Riley's Addition to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27414. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: Lot 5, less 48 feet of said Riley's Add, to Riley's Addition to Seattle: for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.12; for the year 1904, in the sum of $1.80; for the year 1905, in the sum of $1.78; for the year 1906, in the sum of $4.05. Which several years bear interest at the rate of 15 per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed upon and against said real property. taxes and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after Feb. 28, 1908, in the above, entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecloser parcel of said real property against each amount due upon and charged against each, for taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in philipft's complaint, on now file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28-April 10, 1988. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. E. Kruchon and Jane Doe Kruchon, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—No. 59802. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1003, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Denny & Hoyt's Add. to the City of Seattle, lot 4, block 24, certificate number B24822, year 1902, amount $3.74. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 4, block 24. Denny & Hoyt's Add, to the City of Seattle. $3.06 for year 1903, $12.94 for year 1903, $3.84 for year 1904, $18.75 for year 1904, $4.02 for year 1905, $32.29 for year 1905, $5.26 for year 1906, $34.06 for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest? The rate of 15 percent. The rate of 15 percent. The rate of 15 percent. All the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sold real estate. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, to wit: sixty (60) days after the 7th of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication, February 7th, 1908. Last March 20. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. Order to Show Cause and Petition for Allowance. In the Matter of the Estate of George E. Smith. Decased Ollie Smith, the executrix of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased, having filed her petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court allowing her the sum of $50.00 per month for her maintenance, as the widow of the said George F. Smith, deceased, during the administration of said estate, and it appearing to the Court from said petition that the deceased left no homestead or dwelling house for his said widow, and it appearing that the petitioner, Ollie Smith, the executrix of said estate, is the widow of said deceased and is a devisee under the will of said deceased; and that by said will no provision was made for the support and maintenance of his said widow, and that it is necessary that some provision be made for the support of said widow during the administration of said estate, and it appearing that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such cases made and provided; and it appearing that notice of the time and place of hearing said petition should be given by publication: It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before said Superior Court on the 17th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, King County and State aforesaid; then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said executrix, authorizing and empowering her to pay to herself as the widow of said deceased, from the estate of said deceased, the sum of $50.00 per month for her support and maintenance, and charge the same against said estate. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks, before the said 17th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 4th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King; do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908, in the matter of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased. Witness my hand and seal of said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (SEAL) By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. Date of first publication, March 6; last, April 3rd. IN PROBATE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King.—No. 8731. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Rode Vukojevle, Deceased Notice is hereby given to the creditors of. and to all persons having claims against Rode Vuko- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the mater of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned executrix of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased, to creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit with the necessary vouchers within one year after the first publication of this notice, to the executrix at Room 911 Lowman Building, situated on the southeast corner of First Avenue and Cherry Street, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of business of the said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 21st day of February, 1908. ELIZABETH BEAURY. Executrix of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased. Date of first publication, February 21, 1908; lst, March 20. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY. Attorneys for Executrix, 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY State of Washington. Morris Berger, Plain- iff, vs. Sarah Berger, Defendant. No. 60059, Summons for Service by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Sarah Berger, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit- with sixty (60) days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be reserved against you, and the demand of the compaign, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the above named defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. R. R. GEORGE. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, Rooms 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Rolls 26, 1908. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Brown County superior Court of King County, o. the 13th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. H. Merritt, plaintiff, versus Abbie Anderson and J. W. Anderson, her husband, defendants, No. 59943, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at, public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 28th day of March, A. D. 10, 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, the State of Washington, all said defendants, with the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots fifteen (15) and sixteen (16), block ten (10), Cloverdale Addition; also lot one (1), block eighteen (18), Gilman Park, levied on the property of said defendants. Abbie Anderson and J. W. Anderson, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to seventeen and 35-100 ($17.35) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 11th day of the month, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. Feb. 21—March 20. SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County, Christine Deppman and Charles F. Deppman, by his Guardian ad litem, C. E. Deppman, Plain-Dilworth, Defendants, tiffs, vs. Richard G. Dilworth and Mary G. defendants, Richard G. Dilworth and Mary G. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, Richard B. Dilworth and Mary B. Dilworth; You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to compel the said defendant to set forth the nature of the respective claims which they may have against all of lot one (1) section twenty-nine (29), north of range three (3) east W. M., in King County, Washington, except that ten (10) acres thereof, heretofore to-wit: on the 21st day of April, 1892, conveyed by said defendants to Amelia W. Buell by deed dated as of that date and recorded in Vol. 162 of Deed Records of said King County, at page 370 thereof, that each and every of said claims be declared of no validity, that the plaintiffs be declared to be the owners in fee simple of said premises, and that defendants have no claim against or title in or to said premises or any part thereof, and for such other and further relief as may be just and equitable. JAMES McNENEY. Attorney for Plaintiff, 514 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 31—March 13. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. J. W. La Mar, plaintiff, vs. Mabel H. La Mar, defendant. No. 60018. The State of Washington to the said Mabel H. La Mar, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the unanimous attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated; and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce on the ground of desertion. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. IN PROBATE. IN PROBATE. Friday, March 6, 1908 jevie, deceased, or his estate, to present the same with the necessary vouchers, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 6th day of March, 1908, to C. C. Emmons, administrator of the estate of Rode Vukojevie, deceased, at the office of John E. Carroll, No. 210 New York Building, corner of Second Ave. and Cherry St., in the City of Seattle, King County. State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 6th day of March, 1908. C. C. EMMONS. Administrator of the Estate of Rode Vukojevie, Deceased. JOHN E. CARROLL, Attorney for Administrator, No. 210 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 6—April 3, 1908. SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. State of Washington to the said Susan Callahan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney tor plaintiff office, how stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of desertion and adultery. JOHN H. PARKER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: Rooms 30-31-32 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. (March 6 to April 17, 1908) NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION. In the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Petitioner, vs. Pietro Sclaffani, Respondent. The United States of America to Pietro Sclaffani: You are hereby notified and required to appear in the above entitled Court within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication hereof to answer the petition of the United States of America, the petitioner herein. The object for which this petition is filed is to obtain an order from the above entitled Court for the purpose of vacating, setting aside and holding for naught a certain order heretofore made, to-wit: on or about the 2nd day of October, 1896, by the Court of Criminal Correction at St. Louis, in the State of Missouri, granting your petition and admitting you to become a citizen of the United States of America and for the further purpose of revoking, cancelling and holding for naught that certain certificate of naturalization issued to you under and by virtue of the aforesaid order of Court, upon the ground that the same was obtained fraudulently and by perjury. You are further notified and required to serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for the petitioner at his Post Office address below stated, within the stated time of sixty days, and unless you so answer said petition and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned within that time, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with the prayer of said petition as confessed and by default. ANDREW J. BALLIET, Attorney for Petitioner. P. O. Address and Office Address: United States Court House, 4th and Marion St., Seattle, Washington. W. D. COVINGTON, Deputy Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Date of first publication. March 6, 1908; last publication. April 17, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County.—Case No.……Bertrand R. Benedict, Plaintiff, vs. Primrose F. Benedict, Defendant. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Primrose F. Benedict: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office and Post Office address below stated; and in case of your failure to soudge judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. This is an action for divorce on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. E. M. FARMER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. and Office Address: 609 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, Ina A. Whalen, Plaintiff, vs. John T. Whalen, Defendant. No. 59641 The State of Washington, to the defendant, John T. Whalen: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action, being to dissolve the bonds of matrimony between yourself and plaintiff on the grounds of your desertion and failure to support plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 416 Globe Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 31—March 13 Friday. March 6, 1908 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, Rosa Kahistroff, Plaintiff, vs. Arthur N. Hill and Jane Doe Hill, his wife, The City of Seattle and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or reputed owners, or claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificate tax certificates, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of March, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Vacher's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, the west 10 feet of Lot 11, Blk. 3, Cert. No. 25888, issued for tax of 102. Ant. .55, int to Sept. 1, '07, .28, Subsequent payments taxes for 1903, .04, int; .02, ant; .06, 1904, .05, int; .01, ant; .06, 1905, .04, ant; .04, 1906, .11, int; .01, ant; .12, Total with int to Sept. 1, '07, $1.11. Vacher's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, the west 10 feet of Lot 12, Blk. 3, Cert. No. 25869. Issued for tax of 1902. Amt., .55, Int. to Sept. 1, '07., 28. Subsequent payments taxes for 1903, .4; int., .2; oat., .6, 004, .5; int., .1; oat., .6, 1005, .4; amt., .4, 1006, .15; int., .2; amt., .17. Total with int. to Sept. 1, '07., $1.16. 7 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said real prop- You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if anyy), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, January 31, 1908, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and Court. ROSA KAHLSTORF, Plaintiff. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 309 Pioneer, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Jan. 31, 1908. Last publication March 13, 1908. SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. C. H. Lilly, doing business under the firm name and style of C. H. Lilly, Plaintiff, vs. Louis S. Sparks, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Louis S. Sparks: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to, do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a judgment against you for goods, wares and merchandise sold amounting to one hundred eighteen dollars and seventy-two cents ($118.72). J. B. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: 45 Maynard Bldg., Seattle, King County, State of Washington. Jan. 31—March 13. NOTICE OF SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. No.... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of September, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: City of Des Moines, lot 2, block 78, certificate No. B48591, year 1902, $1.11. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: 51 cents for year 1903, 22 cents for year 1904, 20 cents for year 1905, 15 cents for year 1906. Which several sums been interest of 15 percent, 15 percent, 15 percent of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of von, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby father notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication. Feb. 21, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. KENNETH MACKINTOSH. E. B. HERALD. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address: 225-30 Colnan Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication Feb. 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, C. R. Collins, Plaintiff, vs. Morris Gross, Sophie Gross, his wife, and Leopold M. Stern.—No. .... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to said Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, and Leopold M. Stern, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the unified attorney's plaintiff. His office below stated; and, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a judgment against the defendants. Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, for the sum of $13,000.00, with interest thereon, from July 31st, 1907, at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, together with an attorney's fee of $1,000.00, and costs of this suit, and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, to the plaintiff, which said mortgage was recorded in Volume 355 of Mortgages, page 72, of the records of the Auditor's office of said King County, Washington, which said mortgage covers the following described property, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, to-will: Lot seven (7), block four (4), plat of an addition to the town (now city) of Seattle, Washington Territory, as laid off by the heirs of Sarah A. Bell, deceased, and for such other and further relief as shall be meet and equitable; also praying that said premises be sold to satisfy the judgment herein prayed for, and for general equitable relief. H. R. CLISE, Attorney for Plaintiff, Post Office Address: Rooms 416-520 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication, February 7th, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTRY State of Washington-Department No. ty, State of Washington—Department No. .... Mary M. Larson, Plaintiff, vs. August Larson, Defendant—No. .... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said August Larson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of his summons, to-wait: within sixty (60) days after the 11th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office and postoffice address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the court aforesaid. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the parties herein named, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support of plaintiff by the defendant; that defendant is a habitual drunkard, and has treated plaintiff with extreme cruelty, all without cause from the plaintiff; the further object of this suit is to allow plaintiff to resume her maiden name, Mary Maria Jacobsen, and for general relief. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 419-20 Pioneer Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, February 7th, 1908. Last March 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Harry W. Fletcher, Deceased.—No. 8625. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, W. W. Felger, has been duly appointed administrator of said estate by said Superior Court, that letters of administration have been duly issued to him, and that he is now the duly appointed, acting and qualified administrator of said estate. All persons are hereby notified to present their claims, if any, against said deceased or his estate, properly verified, to said administrator at his office, No. 57. Judge Seattle, Wash., within one month from the date of this notice, or the same will be forever barred. W. W. FELGER. Administrator of said Estate. Administrator of said Estate. Date of notice and date of first publication, Feby. 7, 1908—March 6. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King, County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, vs. any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No.... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Denny & Hovt's Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 13, block 62, certificate No. B24845, year 1902, $2.12. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, block 62, December 1903, adjoining to lot 52, block 81.72 for year 1903, adjoining to lot 94, for 1904, for 1905, $2.92 for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, to-wait: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the sale of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFNER. Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. H. E. Pitcher, Plaintiff, vs. A. McConnell, Daisy K. McConnell, German Savings, Building and Loan Association, and W. D. McKnight and Peter, Dedrikson, Defendants; Bryant Lumber and Shingle Mill Co., a corporation, Intervenor. —No. 59255. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said A. McConnell, Daisy K. McConnell, German Savings, Building and Loan Association, W. D. McKnight and Peter, Dedrikson, Defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of -this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of February, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the Clock of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To foreclose a material man's lion on lots twenty (20) and twenty-one (21), of block three (3) of Hillman's Lake Front Addition, Division Number Three (3) to the City of Seattle, for the sum of $316.20, and for an attorney's fee of $150.00 and costs of this action. HOMER T. TURNER, Attorney for Intervener. P. O. Address: 745 New York Blk., Seattle. County of King, Washington. Feb. 7—March 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King Countr., W. H. Thayer, Plaintiff, ws. Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant. No. 60153. Summons by Publication The State of Washington to the said Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your wrongdoing, judgment will be extended against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, upon the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year. EDWARD BRADY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County. Washington. Feb. 28—April 10, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Karl Maring, Insane. No. 8462. Guardian's Notice of Appointment. Notice is hereby given that the Northern Bank & Trust Co., has been appointed legal guardian of the property of Karl Maring, insane. That the business address of the guardian is at the Northern Bank & Trust Co.'s Building, corner of Pike Street and Fourth Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. Dated this 24th day of February, 1908. NORTHERN BANK & TRUST CO., Guardian. Feb. 28—March 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Geo. L. Hill and Jane Doe Hill, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herbalfter described real property, Defendants, No. 60145, Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herbalfter described real property in and to thereby confirm that the above plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 36, block 1. Madison St. Cable Rye. Add. to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the amount of $3.87; certificate No. 24601. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 36, block 1. Madison St. Cable Rye. Add. to Seattle, for year 1903, in the sum of $3.25; for year 1904, in the sum of $3.63; for year 1905, in the sum of $3.80; for year 1906, in the sum of $5.40. Which several years have interest at the rate of 15 per cent, annual from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit, within 60 days after Feb. 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office on behalf of the amount you owe with interest and costs. In the amount you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle. Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Karl Maring, Insane. No. 8462. Order for Sale of Real Estate. Now on this 21st day of Feb., 1908, this cause comes on to be heard before the Court on the application of the Guardian for the sale of real estate, and upon the Guardian's report, and after considering the same and being fully advised in the matter, the Court finds that the personal estate of Karl Maring, insane, is insufficient to pay the expenses of administration, the taxes of the estate and claims allowed, and that it will be necessary to sell all the real estate and entitle in real estate owned or claimed by the said Karl Maring, for the purpose of saving his interest therein. It is therefore ordered and directed that the Northern Bank & Trust Co., as Guardian of Karl Maring, insane, proceed to sell separately each parcel of real estate described in the Guardian's application for not less than the appraisement respectively. Sale to be made at the front door of the King County Court House in Seattle, Washington, by Guardian, for cash, to the highest bidder at public auction, at ten (10) o'clock A. M. March 23rd, 1908. That due notice thereof shall be given by posting three (3) copies of this order in three (3) of the most public places in Seattle, Washington, and by publishing the same for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in the Seattle Republican prior to said date of sale. Done in open court this 21st day of February. 1008. GEO. E. MORRIS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King, Bessie E. O'Connor, plaunfft, vs. Harry O'Connor, de. publication, no. 59418. Summons for Servi- ce, by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Harry O'Connor, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days, after the 24th day of January, 1908, and defend the above answer action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above answer action is to obtain the deceased judgment of said court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the said plaintiff and said defendant on the grounds as alleged in the said complaint of the abandonment of plaintiff by defendant for more than one year and the failure of defendant to support plaintiff and the two minor children of said parties. Plaintiff also demands the care, custody and control of said minor children. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Rooms 622-3-4 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 24-March 7. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County, A. Jacobs, plaintiff, vs. Frank Elshotz and Jane Doe Elshotz, his wife, whose real first name is unknown, defendants.—No. 59557. Summons. To the above-named defendants, Frank Elshotz and Jane Doe Elshotz: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons. to-wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above-named Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been tiled with the Clerk of the Court. The object of this action is to amend a mistake in a mechanics' lien, whereby the premises in the notice of claim of lien was described as lots eighteen (18) and nineteen (19), in block thirty-nine (39), of Gilman Addition to Seattle, whereas it should have been described as lots seventeen (17) and eighteen (18) in block thirty-nine (39), of Gilman Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose the said lien as so amended; for judgment against the defendants for the sum of one hundred fifty-six and 65-100 dollars ($156.65), with interest and costs of suit including an attorney's fee of fifty dollars ($50); and to cause said premises to be sold to satisfy said lien and costs, and for such other and further relief as may be just and equitable. JAMES McNENY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 20, March 7 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Sarah McBoungh and John Doe McDonaugh, her husband, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. ..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You know each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to have Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 21, block 27, certificate No. B24825, year 1902, $4.39. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 21, block 27, Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, $4.67 for year 1903, $5.79 local assessments for 1903, $4.80 for 1904, $15.60 local assessments for 1904, $5.03 for 1905, $29.92 local assessments for 1905, $7.95 for 1906, $28.29 local assessments for 1906, Wichita County tax rate of the date of 15 percent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-will: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. If you fail to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFFER. Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. PERSONAL. J. D. Williams, the noted bass singer, has been very ill for a week with an ulcerated throat, and it is feared his voice will be affected. Mrs. Mary Ray, who lives at Fremont, celebrated her 101st birthday last Tuesday evening, surrounded by her relatives and a host of friends. She is still in fairly good health. Miss Mabel Dixon had the misfortune to fall down the steps at the Coliseum Theatre Tuesday evening and was seriously injured, but is believed not fatally. Mt. Rainier Lodge, G. U. O. O. F. is beginning to wake up and will doubtless be much in evidence in society circles. The quarterly election of officers will be held March 17 and all members are expected to be present. Mrs. Shelton, acting as a committee from the Dorcas Charity Club, investigated a charity subject this week and reports it worthy of assistance. This is proof that the ladies are doing commendable work and deserve the support and assistance of the public. The program committee of the Sunday Forum is making a great howl because the audience is late getting out on Sunday afternoons, and part of the program must be left off in order to adjourn on time. The committee has arranged for an interesting program for next Sunday. It is Charles Sumner and Crispus Attucks Day. Among the speakers will be Mr. I. F. Norris, W. L. Presto, J. W. Webb, H. R. Cayton and I. I. Walker. The officers of the Forum request the public to be there not later than 4:15. Now come on time once. The Sunday Forum was entertained last Sunday by the married lady members thereof as it has not been done before. The program from start to finish was a well selected one and equally well rendered. The reading by Mrs. Jennie Clark was highly commendable and the paper by Mrs. W. L. Presto, was one of the best that has ever been read in the Forum. The remarks of the presiding officer, Mrs. Russell, were very timely and she displayed much executive ability. The singing by Mrs. Drake was up to her usual good standard and the pantomime was simply immense. The ladies showed their patriotism by having the hall decorated with the national colors and Old Glory was very conspicuously displayed, while the ladies all wore small flags. "What Women Will Do" is the title of Harry Jackson's latest dramatic effusion, which will be seen at the Seattle Theatre next week, starting March 8th. Critics throughout the country acknowledge that Mr. Jackson has succeeded in getting much of the color of Chas. Dickens' great story David Copperfield, upon the stage. The play is not a direct dramatization of that novel, but is founded upon some of the principal incidents; the action being placed about James Steerforth, Rosa Dottle, Emily Macawber, Peggetty, Uriah Heep, Hammon Peggetty, and other famous characters. Mr. Jackson has undoubtedly drawn largely from the play, "Little Emily," judging from his dramatic outline. If he has succeeded in building as good a play as that was for characters and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN acting opportunities. "What Women Will Do" ought to prove an irresistable magnet at the Seattle Theatre next week, for we get few such plays nowadays, and there are actors in the company that are known to be the real thing in Seattle. Among them. Bernice Howard and Jack White, who were last seen here in "Why Women Sin." Carl Birch is also a member of the company. "I've been divorced. At present my name is Mrs. Jones in this State. In several States it is Miss Smith, my maiden name, and in three states it is Mrs. Brown, my first husband's name." "This your residence, mum?" "I eat and sleep here, but I have a trunk in a neighboring state, where I am getting a divorce from my present husband." "Then you're married at present?" "I'm married in texas, New York and Massachusetts; divorced in South Dakota, Missouri, Alaska, Oklahoma, and California; a bigamist in three other states, and a single one in eight others."—Chicago Law Journal. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. H. W. Blaine and Jane Doe Blaine, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defections. No..... State of Washington, to the above defend- ants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are here notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delin- quent taxes of the following year, the fol- lowing amount, in said King County, described as situated in said Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 14, block 3, certificate No. P42519, year 1901, $1.97. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 14, block 3, Palatine Hill Addition to Seattle, $1.62 for year 1902, $1.52 for 1903, $3.35 for 1905, $3.51 for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum told said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against, said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the noon day of February, 1908; the above notified court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve one of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the due amount, together with interest and costs. in case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon an decharged against each, for said taxes; interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respects as provided by law, and as prayer in plaintiff's complaint, now on the Court and Court. W. T. GAFNER. Plaintiff. Office address: 457 W. Arcade Building, Seattle. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. E. M. Martin and Jane Doe Martin, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants—No. 59801. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and breach of the law. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of May, 1905, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, upon the real property identified in said King County, described in the following to-wit: 1st Addition to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, lot 9, block 6, certificate number B33971, year 1903, amount $3.22. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: Lot 9, block 50, 1st Add. to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, $5.75 for year 1906, $3.34 for year 1905, $2.94 for year 1904. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. Not and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of th ```markdown ``` The Census Taker: "Your name, mum?" "I don't know." "Beg pardon, mum?" notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your naswer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office, below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated February 7th, 1908. Last, March 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Edith Ayers, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Ayers, Defendant. Summons for Publication. No. — The State of Washington to the said Harry Ayers. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint. The plaintiff then fled the desire of valid court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure an absolute divorce from you on account of extreme cruelty and neglect. EDGAR FOSTER. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. G. Address: Metropole Building, Southwest corner Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21-April 3. Acme Publishing Co. 312 Marion Block BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Sunset, Main 1997—Ind., 1306. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. IRRIGATED LANDS We have 100,000 acres in the famous SUNNYSIDE COUNTRY. Rates reasonable. Terms. WASHINGTON IRRIGATION CO. Seattle, Washington. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office. Third and Spring McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance Colman Bldg. Main 695. Seattle : : : Washington The Comfort. I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. Friday, March 6, 1908 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Scandinavian American Bank. OFFICERS: A. Chilberg, Prest. J. E. Chilberg, Vice Prest. John B. Agen, 2nd Vice Prest. J. F. Lane, Cashier L. H. Woolfolk, Asst. Cashier. Wm. Thaanum, Asst. Cashier F. P. Searle, Manager Ballard Office. Geo. H. Tarbell, Mgr. A. D. Hayden, Cashier Tacoma Office. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. Seattle, Tacoma and Ballard. Capital Paid Up, $500,000.00. Suprlus. $350,000.00 Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. Rainier PALE BEER Its Purity Guaranteed Under the New Pure Food Law Sunset 27, Ind. 27. Claussen Brewing Association. Brewers and Bottlers of TANNHAUSER and WUERZBURGER BEER "Promotes Good Cheer" Bottled Beer Delivered to any Part of the City. Brewery at Interbay Queen Anne 1088 Ind. 7396 For ANTHRACITE COAL Phone THE PACIFIC COAST CO. Ind. 92. Private Exchange 99 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ```markdown ```