Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents POLITICS AND POLITICIANS. Much has been said over a casual remark made by the Hon. John L. Wilson to the effect that, if the friends of Senator Piles continued to heap abuse on him, two Pacific Coast Co. Votes Its Miners Senator Piles or John L. Wilson opportunity to go on the stump and tell all about Washington state politics, make a vigorous campaign. The Times declared that there was danger of Senator Wilson doing as he threatened, but it assumed a pessimistic view of the situation and added, "it does not amount to very much whether Senator Wilson or Senator Piles is in the race from King county Frank Cushman of Tacoma will be the next United States senator after Jones will have been elected." The Times, even at this early date, realizes that if King county wants a United States senator to succeed Senator Piles, she will spell his name WILSON. Or course Senator Piles stands well in King county, but there his popularity stops and he can do nothing within the next two years, at which time he will be up for re-election that will sufficiently popularize him in the outside counties as to make him a competitor for even Frank Cushman. On the other hand, the Hon. John L. Wilson, while having many bitter enemies, has a great many more warm and 19 enthusiastic admirers each one of whom will go down the line for him without promise or price, and whether Sen. Jones does or does not help him in such a contest would be of little concern. The opponents of Jones made much of the fact that his candidacy had been sprung by Senator Wilson and the burden of the campaign was thrown on the shoulders of the man who was asking nothing, but despite that fact Jones won, which was in part a very strong endorsement by the people of Senator Wilson, and no one saw the point more readily than Alden J. Blethen, editor of the Times. If Senator Piles is enthusiastically endorsed by Senator Wilson he will again be elected, but if opposed by him he will be defeated. Bob Hodge or Jack Williams that all manner of man, whether a labor unionist or any one else, obey the laws, he will find it a much harder job to be elected sheriff than it was to be nominated, despite the fact that King county is overwhelmingly Republican. His Democratic opponent, Jack Williams, is well known to the business men of this city and they know that he will give them a square deal and Hodge must at least promise them the same thing. Speaking about Hodge and Williams the Pie-maker is reminded that both of them were former deputies under Edward Cudihee when he was sheriff of King county. Williams was his criminal deputy and Hodge was one of his many field deputies located at Black Diamond, and so it matters not which one of these men are elected in November the county will get the benefit of Cudihee's efficient tutelage, for it must be remembered that he was one of the best sheriffs the county has ever boasted of. The Times Loses Nothing New to do is by some hook or crook get the Times to support said opponent and his defeat is as certain as its support. The Times has not won a single political victory since it has belonged to the Blethens. When THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN coined the expression, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie," a great many of it readers doubted it, but time has completely proven it and no longer things seen in the Times is taken seriously by any one. The chief political writer on the Times is Murky Matt and he can conjure up more political cock and bull stories than any other man in the state, and the very strange thing about it is that Joe Blethen would permit those yarns to get into the Times year in and year out when he must know they are absolute falsehoods from start to finish. The editor of the Times is daily patting itself on the back because Ankeny and McBride carried King county and if he would stop and think (this is impossible) King county was considered an Ankeny stronghold and the Jones supporters felt satisfied to make a good showing. State Library Volume XV, Number 17. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1908 Rev. E. M. Randall, the official head of the Epworth League department of the Methodist Episcopal church, who for six years was pastor in charge of the First M. E. church of this city, has spent the most of the present week in Seattle and Tacoma, where at the latter place the Puget Sound conference of the M. E. church is being held. In speaking to him as to conditions in the East he said: "I have been quoted and misquoted until I am almost of the opinion that the least I say for publication the better. I do however, say that the great Methodist church is making no concentrated effort to beat "Uncle" Joe Cannon, yet there is a crys- There is hardly any doubt that the direct primary law is a great improvement over the old convention system in most parts of the county, but be it understood were for Ankeny for senator, McBride for governor, Agnew for sheriff, Beckingham and Rutherford county commissioner and Jennings assessor, and evidently their men at the mines were so instructed, for the returns show that each of the above named men got practically a unanimous vote. In other words the company had a slate and no one except those on its slate got a vote in the camps. Just how the bosses could control their men so well is the question, but there is no doubt of them having controlled them to the extent of them voting for the men they wanted, the direct primary law to the contrary notwithstanding. Even in Black Diamond, the home of Hodge, the company almost captured the town for Agnew. talizing sentiment far and wide among them that he should be defeated as he is an unfit man for so responsible and dignified position in the affairs of our country. [Name] So far as the Republicans electing the president, there seems to be a spirit of apathy in many quarters that did not exist two montns ago, and the same spirit is to an extent found among the Democrats as well as the Republicans. Though my work has taken me to many localities of the general government I have not is often heard of some man try to perform the work he shoulders of younger men, which self same men take great offense at their neighbors when so informed. For the past forty-five years the John Miller Murphy In His Dotage management of the Washington Standard, published at Olympia has been under the continuous management of John Miller Murphy and the policy of the paper has always been Democratic in politics. Murphy has outlived his usefulness and it can be truly said of him he is in his dotage. His continued support of the Democratic policies has made of him a cynic, and in verification of the allegation the following is quoted from the last issue of his paper: REV. E. M. RANDALL REV. E. M. RANDALL as yet been able to form an opinion as to the outcome of the present national campaign. "A land slide for Bryan is predicted by the best informed politicians of his own state. The indications are cheering everywhere. The moral classes in every community are for him. Nearly all of the reputable, thinking women are for him. Most of the so-called 'gold-bug' Democrats are for him. His friends of 1896 and 1900 are still steadfast in the cause he represents. Many of the hitherto doubtful states seem to be for him—such states as New York and Indiana are now claimed for him. Many people want a change. Many Republicans openly avow their intention of voting for Mr. Bryan this year. The large city papers generally Democratic (except the Hearst papers) who have been adverse in former campaigns are now active in his support. There are many evidences, besides these, that the people are thinking, and thought, under our form of government, generally results in a wise use of the ballot." As to what the colored vote will do they, themselves, do not seem to know just now. They were lead to revolt and desert the Republicans, who have done all that has ever been done for them in this country, by Senator Foraker and to my mind for selfish purposes, and when he had used them as long as he could, he left them high and dry and formed a truce with Roosevelism, which will return him to the senate, while the colored man, theoretically speaking, will be without a friend at court. They cannot without stultifying themselves come back to the party, they cannot with any degree of consistency go to the Democratic party, and Foraker has deserted them, all of which is one of the most unfortunate circumstance that has ever occurred to them as a whole since the days of emancipation." Equal suffrage for women---woman's rights--- is to be an issue before the next legislature of the state of Washington if the petitions which are now being cur- No one but Murphy has heard of any such political upheavals. Bryan is not even certain of the Solid South. Woman's Suffrage For Washington So certain of election are the various nominess of the Republican party for representatives to the twelfth legislature of the state of Washington that already a red hot fight is on for the speakership of the next house of representatives. The aspirants for that honor up to the present time are Hon. Edward B. Palmer and Ole Hanson, of King county and Hon. George T. Reid, of Pierce county. Mr. Palmer has served two terms as a member of the house of representatives and two sessions as state senator, which has given him a wide acquaintance and he will have the influence of the large daily papers of the state. There is no doubt but that he will prove a most formidable candidate and his friends already declare that a majority of the nominees of King county favor his selection for speaker. It is safe to ing on this subject a brief letter from a woman that has given it a vast amount of thought and consideration is reproduced, which is full and overflowing with meat for thought. Woman's suffrage is by no means a popular subject at this writing, but it is one of the coming reforms of this country which seems the inevitable. Utah, Wyoming, Colorado and Idaho of the Western states have adopted equal suffrage and have no desire to repeal the act. Most persons accepts as true the statement by Plato, "The woman's cause is man's; they rise or sink together, dwarfed or God-like, bond or free," and suffragists therefore deem it necessary to show that woman's cause would be advanced by her enfranchise since, if this can be proven, it follows that, the measures would benefit men. predict that he will win the speakership victory as easily as he did the nomination a few days ago. Mr. Hansen is a very brainy politician and has been in the political lime light of Seattle for the past two years. He is a good local campaigner, but is without outside influence and can only expect to win the speakership as a compromise candidate. His candidacy may have the effect of beating Mr. Palmer, but the latters's friends do not take it serious enough to believe it will. Hon. [Picture of a man in a suit with a high collar and a tie. The background is a plain, light color. The man's face is pale, and he has a serious expression. The image is oval-shaped with a black border.]] Unfortunately, the cause of woman's rights, so-called, has been largely concerned with woman's wrongs, and in effort to right these wrongs, it has been impossible to avoid a seeming antagonism toward men. However, with the partial attainment of much which women strove for in the early days, such as the equalization of the property rights of husband and wife, the higher education of women, the enlargement of the sphere of their industrial activities, and so on, the movement to obtain enfranchisement has assumed a somewhat different aspect. We now more often than otherwise hear the reform urged as a method of securing co-operation between men and women who are working for the moral elevation of society, and as a means of rendering the influence of women in public affairs more effective. It is also claimed that woman suffrage would strengthen the bond between husband and wife by adding one more common interest, and that it would increase woman's general intelligence by enlarging her outlook and imposing responsibility in important affairs of government, thus making her a more intelligent companion to her husband. Furthermore it is held that the removal of the stigma of political disability would strengthen a mother's hold upon her sons, and that she would be better qualified to inculcate high standards of public integrity. EDWARD D. PALMER to believe it will. Hon. George T. Reid has served two terms as representative in the house of the legislature of this state and made a rather brilliant record for his ability. He, however, is a man badly troubled with a constitutional grouch and it would be a legislative blunder to elect him to the position he seeks. Mr. Reid was appointed superior court judge by Gov. Mead, but feeling that he would not be endorsed by the people, withdrew from that contest and entered the fight for representative to succeed himself. Suffragists believe that a dispassionate consideration of this question in its present aspects would lead to the conclusion that although designed primarily to confer'upon woman the power and dignity which attaches to self-government, yet woman suffrage would accomplish much more than this, and that it is a beneficent measure from which right-mined men would be great gainers.—Esther Frances Boland. LATER---It is currently reported that Frank H. Renick and Frank C. Jackson, respectively of the 36th and and 37th representative districts have likewise announced their candidacies for the speakership if elected. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King. J. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, vs. Maude MacCallum, Defendant—Summous. Maude MacCallum, to the said Maude MacCallum, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of your publication in the First day of within sixty days after the First day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the rules of the law which has been dealt with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of fraud and cruelty. Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE King County L. H. Lawer, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described property, are in and to the above named plaintiff. Is the holder of one certain deemed tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1905, and numbered B33331, for the delinquent taxes of the year, amount of $1.5 million, the real property situated in and to King County, is accorded as folio-to-wit. Lot 24. Block 7. Goodspeeds's Addition to West Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above property, is for the year 1905, the sum of 20 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid amounts taxes upon are due to real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the notice, and to appear within sixty days after the notice, except: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the notice to the undersigned, and of the plaintiff at his office, dated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and合款 each payment due upon each amount due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against it upon such parcel provided by law, and in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. G. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate or Joseph Dohney, Deceased. No. 8399 Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to all persons having claims against Joseph Dohney, deceased, or against the to present, or the 'undersigned, W. A. Greene, administrator of the said estate, at his office at Room 415 Pioneer Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: Within one year after the 11th day of September 1908, or the same will be torched, be warranted. WILLIAM A. GREENE, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Doheny, Deceased, SHANK & SMITH, Attorneys for Administrator. Attorneys for Administrator. Sept. 11—Oct. 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. T. Gregory, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer King County, State of Washington, dated March 1909, and numbered B12600, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $4.10, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 44, Baltimore Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and said above described real property, to-wit: proper For the year 1905, the sum of $2.35. For the year 1906, the sum of $2.05. For the year 1907, 69 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said dat eof payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the notice exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-write within 60 days after Sept., 1908, in the above entitled act and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest costs. In case you have a judgment, you are warranted herein, foreclosing each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and the judgment against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. Wash. September 11, October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Hatch, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property are hereby defined that the above personal plaintiff is the holder of the certain delinquent tax issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1977, and num- bered B47493, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903, 1904 and 1905, in the amount of $72.71, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: L. Less than 5.58 acres sold, Sec. 20, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. That on Aug. 19, 1907, the following portion of the said land was redeemed: Beginning at a point 19.32 feet E. 17.66 feet frm the front N. E. corner of the said land, 17, 18, 19 and 20, thence S. 37* 41' E. 100 feet, thence S. 52* 19' W. 162.44 feet, thence No. 56* 19' feet, thence S. 62* 19' W. 28.28 feet, thence N. 52* 19' E. 198.76 feet to be That on Oct. 14, 1907, the following part of sald lot was redeemed, to-wit: Beginning at a point 1170 feet So. and W. $55^{\circ}$ 56' W. 20.8 feet from N. W. corner of lot 3. Sec. 20 W. N. R. thence north 37 $^{\circ}$ 41' W. 33.00 for true point of beginning. Sence $42^{\circ}$ 20' W. 286.30, thence $56^{\circ}$ 3' W. 99.53 feet, thence north $52^{\circ}$ 19' east 315.30 feet, thence S. $37^{\circ}$ 41' E. 43.92 feet to place of Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and said person (including said persons as known if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit: within 60 days after 11, 1908, in the above notified court and action; and above this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and copy of your answer on the undesigned attorney for plaintiff at his due, together with interest and In case you fail so to do, the defendant will be rendered herein, including the lien of said taxes under costs against each parcel and real property for the sums and amounts due upon and against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Ines May Hale. Plaintiff, vs. William W. Hale, Defendant. No. —— Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William C. Hale, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, day of September, 1989 and defend the above entitled petition in the above title and answer the complaint the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below state and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be applied against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: Room 308 Metropole Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. H. T. Rudow and L. G. Rudow, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Mary E. Boman, Albert T. Boman and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Ariissa L. A. Bilbrey and W. J. Bilbrey, her husband, Andrew F. Burleigh and Bertha V. Burleigh, his wife, F. S. DeWolf and Jane Doe DeWolf, his wife, Defendants. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Mary E. Boman, Albert T. Boman and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Ariissa L. A. Bilbrey and W. J. Bilbrey, her husband, Andrew F. Burleigh and Bertha V. Burleigh, his wife, F. S. DeWolf and Jane Doe DeWolf, his wife, renew You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their pleasure below stated; and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which will be filed with the Clerk said Court. The object of this said action is to clear title to that certain property described as Lots three (3), four (4), five (5) and six (6), in Block twenty-nine (29), of Burke's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, in and to do which the said defendants, an employee of them, claim some interest, which lien or interest is sought to be foreclosed and declared void and of no effect, and that the plaintiffs' title in and to said property be quieted in said action. IRA BRONSON and D. B. TREFFITH, N.J. for Plaintiffs. P. O. address: 614-4919 Colman Bld. Seattle, King County, Washington. September 11, October 16, 1918 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Jacob Hietanen, Plaintiff, vs. Anna Lisa Hietanen, Defendant—No. ..... Sends by Publication. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Annua Lisa Hietanen, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their respective below stated, and in case of failure so to do judgment be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce by plaintiff against defendant, on the ground of desertion of plaintiff by defendant, and on the ground that incurred chronic dementia, which has existed for more than ten years last past. SMITH & COLE. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and President Address: 408 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash. September, 11—Oct. 16, 1908. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. of Washington for King County. Of Washington for King County, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ____. Notice and State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heroesinafter described tax, and the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1900, the sum of the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of 98 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 15, Block 1, Kirkland Steel Company, for the sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 39 cents; for the sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 39 cents; and for the year 1905, the sum of 29 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and assumed taxes upon and against property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the date of first publication, (o-wit, within sixty (90) days after the 24th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of our notice to each of you. For plaintiff at his office below stated, or the pay amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause C. H. WEED, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24—August 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or other property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1904, has issued a tax certificate for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of 98 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 4. Block 4. Block 5. and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 29 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unsecured taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of the notice of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said person, by the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of the property for the satisfaction of the sums charged for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged for the sums and amounts due by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1008. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA for King County C. H. Weed, *Plaintiff*, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No ——— State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain unemployment tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 21st, day of Dec. 1906, and numbered B46412, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900. In the amount of 98 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, Block 9, Kirkland Steel Works. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-with for the year 1901, the sum of 45 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 29 cents, which several sums bear in interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from paid date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive within six (60) days after the date of written six-day of July. 1908. In the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes. Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for theுத் function of the same charge and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington In and for the County of King. Hannah Hill. Plattiff. vs. Otis Hill. Defiant. No. ____ Summons and Service of Public State of Washington to the said Otis Hill. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: 1st. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on May 6th, 1907, said abandonment having been continuous for one year and more. 2nd. Because the defendant since May, 1907, has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Each of said causes of action having occurred without plaintiff's fault. JNO. S. MONROE. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429-32 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. S. A. Kinsey., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herinneria described property in and to the unpaid plaintiff in the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of Jan., 1906, and numbered 434200, for the date of the settlement of $14.56, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 100 feet of lot 20, Block 2, Snoqualmie Falls. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $13.27, which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, except, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer, to the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as provided by complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Bldg.; Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 67 Washington for king D. N. Howard and Ananda E. Howard, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, vs. all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 62277. Notice and Sum- mer. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the notice, after the date of first publication of the said publication, to woo, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney of plaintiffs at the time of first publication of the said contract together with interest and costs. If case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said taxes and costs, obtaining a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court. D. N. HOWARD, AMANDA E. HOWARD, Plaintiffs. CARRICO & DURK, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office Address: 603 Peoples Savings Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. W. J. Hunt, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. —, Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the benefit of the above named plaintiff, are notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain defendant tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Sept., 1907, and numbered 1904. In the amount of $3.53, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow: S. W. 1/4 of the S. W. 1/4, Section 25, Tp. 23 N. 6 E. 6 W. 1/4, taxes payable to the treasurer years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1906, the sum of $8.27, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the u u and more deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear with you, days after the commencement of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to your question in the manner set out in your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment and costs, ordering against each of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering against each parcel of said real property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONAID, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. Office Address: 524 Bafley Building, Seattle, Wasb. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Emma M. Crag, Plaintiff v. John Alexander Craig, Defendant.—No. 62230. Summons by Pub- lisher. The State of Washington to the said John Alexander Craig, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear with you in the publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgement to be deemed to be the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Friday. September 18. 1908 Clerk of said Court. The object of the said section, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of the above entitled court forever dissolving and annulling the bonds of the minor children of said plaintiff and the said defendant, and granting the plaintiff a divorce from said defendant on the grounds of desertion and abandonment for more than one year, and to obtain a decree in said proceedings awarding to the plaintiff the custody of the minor children of said plaintiff and defendant, to obtain a decree in said proceedings creeping the household furniture and utensils and certain real estate, situated at the corner of First Street and Augusta Street, in Cornwall, Province of Ontario, to be the sole and separate property of the plaintiff, and awarding the same to her as her sole and separate property, free from any liability arising from such other and further relief as the court may deem just in the premises. P. V. DAVIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 304 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24 - September 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Anna E. Erickson, Plaintiff, vs. Linnie Erickson, Defendant—No. 62293. Summons by Publication. Washington to the said Linnie Erickson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to apear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve copies of the complaint to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the non-supporting matrimony on the ground of non-support. P. O. Address, 744 Fifth Street, Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 24—September 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Duggan, Deceased, No. 9213. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 15th day of July, 1908, notice is hereby given to the deceased, and to all persons living in estate, against said deceased, or against said estate, or against the community formerly existing between said deceased and her husband, Daniel Duggan, to present them with the necessary suchers to the undersigned. By G. Duggan, from Boston, from New York Block, in Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, to-wit, in the year after July 24, 1908, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 24, 1908. B. G. DUGGAN. As Administrator of Sald Estate. ROPERT H. LINDSAY, Attorney for Estate. 623 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. July 24th.-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Margaret Hanegschnobel, Plaintiff, vs. John Hanegschnobel, Defendant. No. 62277. Summons. State of Washington to John Hanegschnobel, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer therein. You are hereby summoned at their address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of habitual drunkenness and failure to support plaintiff. CARRICO & PORK. P.O. Address: 603 Peoples Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Alfred Vandesandt, Plaintiff, vs. Kittle Vandesandt, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Plea. The State of Washington to the said Kittle Vandesandt, above named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, on January 24th of July. A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below. A. D. 1908, and defend the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to obtain a decree of the court annualling the bonds of matrimony not existing between the plaintiff and defendant. GEORGE MARVIN SAVAGE. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 545 New York Block, Seattle, King City, Washington. July 24th-Sept. 4, 1908. Wash. July 24-August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and are authorized to publish of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit. August 14, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of real taxes on the sums charged in real taxes for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. M. J. NIST. Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. HERALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. Friday, September 18, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. William Dorris and Maria Dorris, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown heirs of the said James M. McLellan, have been acquitted. Joseph M. Barto, and the unknown heirs of the said Joseph M. Barto, if the said Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having, or claiming to have, any interest in the property, have acquitted the complaint herein. No. 62446, Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to each and all of defendants: 1. the defendant summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. to-wit: Within sixty days after the 7th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above summons. to-wit: Within sixty days herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered. The complaint herein which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet title to the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to- Lots one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and detain the said lands and all them, from asserting any claim whatsoever in and to the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants and each and all them have no interest in the said property and that plaintiff's title is good and valid. EDWARD VON TOBAL. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 303-357 Mutual Life Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. August 7—Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Elizabeth M. Lemon, Plaintiff, vs. C. L. Lemon, Defendant—No. .... The State of Washington to the said C. L. Lemon. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towot: within sixty (60) days after the 18th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of failure to provide and general relief. HERBERT E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 537 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 18—Oct. 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King—In Probate In the Matter of the Estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, Deceased. No. 5403. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should not be Made, and for Hearing on Final Account. Leota A. Conrad, administratrix of the estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, having filed in this court her final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient for distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered, by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, room of Washington, department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 8th day of October, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the bodies of said estate and petition mentioned according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County and published once a week for three successive weeks before the said 8th day of October, 1908, in The Seattle Republicam, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 17th day of September, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington. County of King-iss. I. to the Cass County Clerk of King County and co-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 17th day of September, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased. I.求我 my hand and the seal of said Court this 17th day of September, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (Seal), P. E. S. SEFMOUR, Deputy Clerk. September 18—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura E. Price, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the actual amount paid for certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B28894, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $25.27. King County, described as follows, towit: $E\frac{1}{4} of NW\frac{1}{4} of Sec. 5, Tp. 22, N. R. 3; E. W. M., less 1 acre occupied by school that the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon such payment, and the sum of $21.60; for the year 1905, the sum of $32.40; for the year 1906, the sum of $31.50, and for the year 1907, the sum of $20.70; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, are all the impure redeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of publication to wit, within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and any other taxes, to wit, do diment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908 IN THE BROOKLYN State of Washington for King County. E. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura E. Price, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the owner of the real property, and the case issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B28895, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $8.75, and upon real property situated in said King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, SW1% of NE4% of SW1% and N4% of NE4% of SW1% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22, N. R. 3, E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, so-written, the year 1905, the sum of $10.80; for the year 1906, the sum of $12.60, and for the year 1907, the sum of $8.28; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further ratified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, or of the date of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the unpaid notice of the court office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due to the taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this court and cause. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 524 Bulley Building, Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Lottie Daughtry, Plaintiff, vs. James Daughtry, Defendant. No. 63059. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Daughtry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 18th day of September, 1908, to the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post office address below designated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of non-support, failure to provide, cruel treatment and habiliten Brunken, MORRIS, SOUTHARD, SHPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and Post Office address, 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora, Land Co., a corporation, Printtiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane Doe Askheim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants: S. 62536, Notary and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above property is certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42178 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, are hereby notified that twenty-eight (28). Block four (4), Ballard Park Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, upon sale above described, the sums payable thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1996, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum for the said date of payment, and are all the unpaid indeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said date of publication, to witt; within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, with interest, to the said plaintiff. In case you fail the judgment will be rendered herein, for closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfactory payment it receives, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Sherman Southern Bank & Truid, Fargo, Seattle, Wash. Trust Eldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18-October 30, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane do Askheim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unaware of his name, interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62535. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, hereby notice that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42158, for the delinquent taxes for the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wear: Lot four (4) Boulder Park Second Addition to Seattle King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, fifty-three (63) cents, and for the year 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid indeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 19, 2008, lattice and action a: defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so do, you will remain with the forgoing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as prince, and as prayed in his诉诉's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. F. Office address, 1191 North Bank & 340 PIPELINEN LEGALS. Hub Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane Doe Askhelm, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known are claiming an estate or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants, No. 62533. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42180, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows: titit: thirty-two (32) cents (Four); Ballard County: Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to the county for the year 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1910, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from the said date of payment and are all the sald and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said date of publication, to be within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled notice and action and defend this notice and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing each parcel of said real property, the sums and amounts and charges against, the said taxes, interest and cost, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law and as required in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Blairiff F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff Office address, 114 Northern Bank & Trust Blvd. Seattle, Wash. September 18-October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane Doe Askheim, his wife, whose christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein after described real property. Defend- ants. No. 62532. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named, and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the King County Tax Board on date June 5, 1906, and numbered B42177 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (30) cents and upon the real property situated in King County. Washington, described as follows, to twenty-seven (four) (4) Ballard County Addition to Seattle, King County Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to the amount of (48) cents; for the year 1905, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1905, forty-eight (48) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and copy copies of the signed torney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of the sums due upon and amounted due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation Plaintiff. F. F. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jae Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming interest or estate in or on the hereafter described property. Defendants, No. 62304. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and you each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described property, are the real property, are the plaintiff is the holder of one obtain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered B42621, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of three (33) cents and upon real property situated within the county, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot (over 11), Block Two (2), White Bros. Addition to Kirkland, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: for the 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bearest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including saled persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to appear within sixty days, and the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Sept. 18, 1988, in the above entitled court and answer and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property on the sums amount due and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering the sale of each parcel of said taxes for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. cgurcRU AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- ble印 F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Western Bank & Bank of America, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the nonfailure described real property, Defendants. No. 62227. Notice and Sermons. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, and each of them: named delinquent or each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent or issued by the Washington dated April 15th, 1908, and Washington dated April 15th, 1908, and the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property situated in King County Washington, described as tavern Lot Fifteen (17) Richmond Beach Supplemental Addition King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: For the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1907, fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents; for the year sums bear interest the rate of Fifteen per cent annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the of first publication of this complaint, the exclusive of the day when sixty days after publication, to-wit; within sixty days after Sept. 18, the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment be rendered herein, the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and sprayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. YA. A Corpora- AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurore Land Company, a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown and all persons, unk- nown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heera- fter describable in and to the heera- nants. No case 6008. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or esti- n or to the heerafter described re- property are heerafter described re- property and Plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered B42200 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety-three (50) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington (of which as follows, to wit: Lot five (10), block two (2), white Bros. Addition to Kirgisand, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by pianist upon said above described real property, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1909, fifty-two (52) cents and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and underecamed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notined and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date or first publication or this notice, exclusive or the day of said first publication, o-write, within sixty days after Satur, 18th February, in the above entitled court and action; and action, in the above action and answer the compaint and or said compaint and serve a copy or your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel or said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged by said taxes and costs against each parcel, ordering a sale of each parcel said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on me in this cause and court. AUKOKA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State or Washington in and for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Theophilus Elliott, Deceased.—No. 8165.—Order to Show Cause why Final Account of Administratrix Should Not be Anowed and Estate Distributed. This cause coming on regularly before the date is 11th day of September, A. L., 1908, upon the filing of the final account and petition for distribution of Emily Elliott, administratrix of the estate of Theophilus Elliott, deceased, to be set for nearing: It Is Ordered, that the 22nd day of October, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the county court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, in Department No. 4, in the above entitled court, be and the above entitled court, be and the appointed us the time and place for the hearing of said final account and petition for distribution. It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estate file their exceptions in writing, if any they have, to said final account and petition for distribution, and at the said time and place appear below such issued said final account should not be approved and settled and said estate distributed. And It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estate be given a notice of said hearing by the publication of a copy of this order once a week for four successive weeks in The Seattle Republican, and by posting on public places in this King County, for at least twenty days prior to said hearing. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. FRANK S. CARROLL, Attorney for Administratrix. September 18—October 16, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Adelaide Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Num- ber 4444. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and demand a case of no failure so as to argument it will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain from you a divorce on the grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treatment and failure to support. P.A.L. BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 32 Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King John P. Lewis, plaintiff, vs. Clara E. Lewis, defendant. No.——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Clara E. Lewis, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear before the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of July, A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you accounted for the said action, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolution of the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. J. P. BALL. P. O. Address: 9-10 Starr-Boyd Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Albert Stevenson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the case to the hereafter described in property defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, and the notice of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of September, 1905, and numbered B53249, for the delinquent taxes of the year in the amount of $2.16, and upon such payment, the State of Washington, described as follows, to-wit: 50 of bt. 6 block. 5 Young's Addition. That an undivided ½ interest of So. ½ of sald lot less west 60 feet thereof was redeemed sald lot less west 90 feet thereof was redeemed Sept. 25, 1905. taxes and costs against each parcel of said real sums for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. Wash. 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. Judge Albertson may know more law than Judge Frater, but he evidently don't know as many voters. The Times is of the opinion that the country editors have it in for it, and that, too, without just cause. Criminals feel the same way about the officers of the law. Thomas A. Edison spent a number of days in Seattle within the past week and strange to say no one saw the ghost walk during his stay in the city. Eugene Debs, as an epigramtic debator, seems an adept. If Debs does not see something ahead more than the ordinary man, he either thinks he does or he is the most monumental liar on earth Hi Gill may be Acting Mayor of Seattle in the absence of Mayor Miller, but he doesn't act like it. Just call up Main 305, Mr. Lawyer, when you have a legal notice for publication, and it will be taken care of in first-class shape and you need give yourself no further worry. The above number is that of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN located at Room 307 in the Epler block. After the races at the Meadows had closed and there no longer existed an opportunity for the Argus of this city to graft or blackmail the proprietors of the King County Fair Association into giving it any more money for at least twelve months, its last issue roasted the race track with a vengeance. For seventy-two days, the Argus through its advertising columns endeavored to get the people out to the race track and while the races were under headway said not a word in opposition to them, but when the races closed then it raised a howl about its being a gambling hole or more strictly speaking, a robbers' roost. May perhaps the Argus is working for hush money and takes this particular method of accomplishing its purpose, but in the light of its late double column advertising for the races it does seem viciously inconsistent. Persons who have kept tab on that weekly journal know that it has always been for right or wrong, whichever brought it the greatest amount of money. Forty-eight members of the next house of representatives of this state are said to be pledged to to the passing of a strong local option law. A good, wholesome, local option law seems to be generally wanted throughout the state, but prohibition under no circumstances will be tolerated. Seattle is still being torn to pieces by the steam shovel and the hydraulic machinee, which promises to continue for an indefinite period unless the nation should get hypnotized by the "matchless one." Trading and not politicier wire puiling seems to be the fort of C. J. Smith, and after the results of the last primary election will have been fully reported to him there is every reason to believe he will agree with us. Of course former Senator Wilson is not an active candidate for the United States senate to succeed Senator Piles, but his endorsement will go a long ways in saying who will be the candidate. Col. Alden J. Blethen is a splendid political prognosticator for the other fellow and the bogie man looking for the real seat of the money bag. Mayor Miller has gone to Indiana to visit his parents and perhaps get another parental hunch to be used as a basis to get a bigger office on. Minnesota may have "too much Johnson," but it is very a parent that, the third congressional district of the state of Washington is in no such trouble. Foraker has been taken into the fold by his political enemies and it is reported that, he was so glad to get in he forgot to give orders for his Negro Buccephelus to be taken to the barn. Now that the editor of the Times has lost out in politics Buffalo Bill might use him to a financial advantage by labeling him - "What is it?" President Roosevelt has had his way again, which resulted in the renomination of Gov. Hughes. Roosevelt seems to get what he wants. There is no doubt but that the voters made Hay at the late primaries while the sun shone. Jefferson may possess a sly old Coon, but he ran amuck in the Eastern Washington Hay fields. Agnew! Jim Agnew! Well, that name sounds strangely familiar. If that court house Brier bush has never as yet produced any "black berries" it looks as if it will not do so. Mead may not have been nominated, but he beat McBride, which is another personal victory for John L. Wilson, and that must be like gall and wormwood to the Times. Wilson may make Senator Piles Trimble in his very boots two years from now. In renominating Gov. Hughes the horsemen have been given opportunity to try to nose him off the track. "Republicans Weep Over Main," is a Times head line. Saw it in the Times? Main's vote may point to Democratic success, but Mr. Success seems to be so far in space that he will not get here in time to vote at the November election. Even Uncle Joe Cannon has been convinced that, shouting Methodists will be heard. "Not guilty." says Parkhurst. No one had accused you of murder. From reading the papers from day to day for the past month the presumption was that the voters were thoroughly aroused on the subject, but the actual count showed that the enthusiasm was greatest in the newspaper offices and among the candidates. In other words the voters did not seem to give a whoop in Hotentot whether they voted or not. In Seattle, but fifty per cent. of the registered vote turned out to the polls. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PETER H. BURGESS MILO A. ROOT BENCH AND BAR. One of the surprises of the late primary election, at which judges for the various superior courts of the state and likewise the supreme court were elected, was the way Superior Court Judge S. J. Chadwick of Whitman county ran for supreme judge. He easily led the entire state ticket and left those coaching him so far in the lunch that they now must feel as if they should have been coached by Chadwick instead of them coaching him. The personel of the superior court bench of King county will be the same as it has been, with the exception of Arthur E. Griffin, who voluntarily retired from the bench. He will be succeeded by the Hon. Wilson R. Ca', one of the most progressive lawyers in the Northwest. Both Judge Tallman and Mr. Gay made phenomenal runs in view of the fact they had been defeated in the bar primary, and of course all the attorneys that voiced the proceedings of the bar primary and their friends were fighting for its nominees, and of course they had that influence to overcome. It is said of Judge Gay that he is politically ambitious, and that after he will have served his four years on the bench the gubernatorial bee may buzz in his bonnet. Judge Miles Poindexter will not be a member of the superior court bench of Spokane after next January as he was nominated for representative in Congress in the Third Congressional district, and he of course expects to be elected, but whether elected or not, he will not be on the bench any more. Speaking of the prospects of him being elected it has been predicted by stalwart Republicans of the district that he is almost certain of defeat. Owing to the over crowded conditions of the courts all over the state it is said that the next legislature will be asked to create four more new judges in the state and that the King county bench will be increased to seven. If such is done the bar will again be in the lime light of public opinion in its endeavor to select a man for the position, to be recommended to the governor. The local members of the bar are of the opinion that Seattle should have at least two more justices of the peace and it is also alleged that the next legislature will be asked to pass such a bill, which would mean another scramble among the members of the bar of Seattle and King county. The justices, receiving the nomination on the Republican ticket are: R. R. George, J. B. Gordon and John E. Carroll. Have a Legal? Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN J. B. H. HERMAN D. CROW The King county superior court which began its fall session last week, is under full headway and all the judges working overtime in order to have their respective departments so thoroughly cleaned up by next January when the change is made that no unfinished business will be left. Most of the people are so well pleased over the non partisan judiciary idea, but it would give a greater amount of satisfaction if the judges were elected a different year from the regular county and state office. The election for judges should have been held next year instead of this year, and if so, it is believed a purely non partisan judiciary would be elected. If this non partisan idea was only extended to the selection of the superintendents of public schools, it would be another long step in the right direction. Speaking about the election of the members of the King county bench the primaries last week resulted in the following: A. W. Frater - - - - 15 722 R. B. Albertson - - - 15 510 George E. Morris - - - 14 688 Boyd J. Tallman - - - 14 026 Mitchell Gilliam - - - 13 447 Wilson R. Gay - - - 13 148 SUPERIOR RIGHT TO CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD Our position on the question of the superior right of a father to the custody of his minor child is well known. We gave ourselves free rein not such a long while ago in denouncing the action of a nisi prius court in refusing to give a child to its father where it was not shown that he was incompetent to care for it. 65 Cent. L. J. 175. We attempted to show in that editorial that the best interest of the child rule was being prostituted by directing its application to circumstances where it was never intended it should operate, and was subverting the rightful authority of the father. Now comes the cse of Peese v. Gellerman, 110 S. W. Rep. 196, in which the Court of Civil Appeal of Texas deprives a father of his right to his little daughter to whom he had turned over to her maternal aunt after her mother's death, and whom he desired to reclaim upon his second marriage. The father was shown to be a good man, well fixed in this world's goods and of a good, loving disposition. But the maternal relatives in resisting the father's claim were permitted to drag out of the closet of the second wife an old skeleton which in effe t showed that she had once been seduced by an ardent lover several years before her marriage when she was but a girl of seventeen years of age, and that the child of this unfortunate union was still living with its mother. The court deliberately refused to follow the great Missouri case of In re Scarritt, 76 M. 565, which is the most wonderfully clear declaration on the father's superior right to his child ever enunciated by any court in this country, and 2001 18 bedrooms Faber Friday, September 18, 1908 permits the testimony as to certain previous wrongful acts by the second wife to deprive a father of the child of his being ard the child of that natural love a.d affection which it can receive from no other source. The court plays so loosely on the heartstrings of parental affection that we are inclined to believe that the writer of this opinion has probably never experienced those deep emotions that draw a father's heart to his child. Courts are trifling with a very serious matter when they thus carelessly ignore the father's right to and authority over his children, a right and authority which existed in the days of the Patriarchs long before the existence of the state. It is upon the similitude of the parental relation that the state derives of its own authority of paren patriate and when its courts strike down the superior rights of the fathers of the land over the persons of their own children, they have laid the axe at the root of the tree from which all proper governmental authority proceeds. We are not unmindful of the fact that the Texas court has a considerable array of authority which it may cite to support it in its assumption of a right to consider the opportunities and prospects of the child alone, leaving out consideration any superior right in the father. If the courts are going to put in the balances as against the father's paramount right to the custody of the child, the desires of some rich relatives to keep the child and to furnish her with a better balance than the father can provide, the seeds of rebellion have been sown in the very nature of our being against a government which will tear our offspring from our arms and give them to another, because, forsooth, such other is better able to care for it. The courts and judges who have been guilty of setting up such standards had better spend some time in studying carefully the great opinion of the Missouri Supreme Court in In re Scarritt, supra. In the principal case it is refreshing to observe that one member of the court appreciated the importance of the father's superior right to his child. Judge Neill, dissenting from the harsh opinion of the majority of the court, says: "I believe that under the law and facts in this case the appellant has the right to take his little daughter home and r at as a member of his family. I think he has this right, because the God of nature has given it to enable him to discharge the duty he owes as a father to his child. Where a right emanates from such a source, the one to whom it is given, if fit to perform the duty it imposes, cannot be rightfully deprived of it by the courts of any country. The law itself recognizes the right primarily of the parent to the custody of his minor child, and but re-echoes the voice of nature in the duty it imposes. The mother of the child being dead, the presumption is that its father has the r g t to its custody; and it devo ves upon the party claiming adversely to it to show cause that it has been forfeited by him, that is, it must be proved that the father is not a fit person to rear and nurture his own child." —Central Law Journal. The effect of the non-partisan judiciary was all that its most ardent admirers could have expected, especially in King county. While an almost new set of judges have been elected the successful candidates are above reproach and of the highest integrity. Judge—What have you to say to the charge that, while the husband of one woman, you married three others? Bigamist—Simply this: that having four of a kind isn't what it is cracked up to be. While as yet no actual figures can be given as to the vote cast by the Republicans at the late state primary election, yet for the most part the nominees are known and the roster is a bit different from the one given by THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN last week. The nominees on the state ticket may be found below. Congressional Nominees United States Senator Wesley L. Jones First Congressional District Will E. Humphrey Second Congressional District F. W. Cushman Third Congressional District Miles Poindexter * * * Governor—Samuel G. Cosgrove Lieuteuant Governor— M. E. Hay Secretary of State Sam H. Nichols State Treasurer—E. K. Erwin State Auditor—C. W. Clausen State Land Commissioner E. W. Ro s Attorney General—W. P. Bell Superintendent of Schools H. B. Dewey State Insura 199 Commis- sioner J. H. Schively E. K. Erwin Samuel G. Grosgrove The Republican nominee for governor has been a resident of this section for many years and has resided at Pomeroy during all of the time. He is a successful lawyer and farmer. He was a member of the Constitutional Convention which is as near a public office as he has ever held. M. E. Hay Who won the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, is a prosperous merchant and farmer of Wilbur in Douglas county and for the past twenty years or more has been one of the foremost business men of that section. He has never held a public office. Sam H. Nichols Who has been nominated by the Republicans for secretary of state claims Everett as his home. He has only been in Washington since statehood and has been for the most part of the time in politics. He has been twice elected secretary of state and when he will have completed his third term he will have served as such twelve years. E. K. Erwin Who received the Republican nomination for state treasurer is truly a Spokane favorite sor, which was demonstrated by him getting almost every vote in the county in the primary election. He has been twice elected county treasurer and twice elected county clerk of Spokane county and never suffered defeat. He was a Phillipine soldier. C. W. Clausen Was nominated by the Republicans to succeed himself as state auditor. He claims Kitsap county his home, where he, pror to being elected a state office, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN STATE NOMINEES A. C. H. A. P. B. W. E. Humphrey C. W. J. H. Schively THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN CAN STATE NOM M. B. C. W. Clausen A. C. M. E. HAY E. W. Ross --- [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. S. H. Nichols ```markdown ``` [Name] W. r. Bel held numerous county offices. He was also engaged in farming and might be termed a Kitsap county pioneer. His election in November will mean his second term. E. W. Ross The Republican state land commissioner nominee hails from Cowlitz county where he was engaged in the practice of law and the lumbering industry. If elected next November he will begin his second term. He has given the state a fair and economical administration and his election is assured. W. P. Bell Who was nominated for attorney general has been for the past twenty years a legal practitioner of Snohomish county. He has for the most of the time been interested in the political game and was twice elected prosecuting attorney of Snohomish county. John H. Schively Who received the nomination for state insurance commissioner registers from Olympia. He has been prominent in the political affairs of the state since 1895 when he was a member of the house of representatives of the Washington state legislature, at which time he was known as the Webster of the house. He is seeking his first term of the above office. Henry B. Dewey Was the unanimous choice of the Republican party for state superintendent of public instruction. He has been actively engaged in school work in Pierce county for a number of years. He served as assistant to the late Supt. Bryan for a short time and after his death was appointed to the position by Governor Mead. He should have no opposition at the November election. Supreme Court Judges Stephen J. Chadwick. Milo A. Root and Herman D. Crow, seems to have been elected at the late primaries. The above is only speculation for Jonn E. Humphries is running neck and neck witn Root and Crow, and it will take the official count to decide the two successful winners conceding Chadwick's election. King County Ticket Sheriff—Robert T. Hodge. Auditor—Otto A. Case. Clerk of Court—D. K. Sickles. Treasurer—Gerrge F. Russell. Prosecuting Attorney — George F. Vandevere. Assessor—Thomas A. Parrish. Coroner---Dr. Snyder. Surveyor---John Morrison. Wreck Master --- Jack Hawkins. County Commissioner First District---M. J. Carrigan. Second District---A. L. Rutherford. The lawyer was doing a cross-examining stunt. Now, sir," he said to the witness, "tell the court how far you were from the accused when he fired the shot." "Thirteen feet, seven and three-quarters inches," answered the witness. "Oh, come now," said the lawyer, "how can you tell to the fraction of an inch?" "I knew some fool would ask me," replied the other, "so I measured it."—Exchange. Its No Trouble To call for you legal notices. If you ring MAIN 305 And leave your office address. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE for King, Country. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Isabella Haskin, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the latterinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____ Notice and the following Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest, or estate in and to the heloferlaer real property, are hereby the holder of that the above named, the holder of the one certain deed amount tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 2nd day of May, 1907, and numbered the plaintiff for the delinquencies of 1904, 1904, in the amount of $8.13, and upon real property situated within King County, described as fol- tracts. Lot 15, Block 4, Thomas Gem and subsequent years have the following prior plaintiff upon said deed described real property, to-wit; for the 1905, the sum of $6.60, and the year 1906, the sum of $6.44, which sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said realtors. You and each other (including said persons known and unknown), are hereby further notified and ammunished to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, office, exclusive of the say of first publication, to-wit: 60 days after July 31, 1905, under all entitlement and actions of defend this action and answer the complaint on the undersigned attorney's plaintiff at his office below stated, the amount due toGETHER with the costs. In case you fail closing the lien of said axes and foresee each parcel of said realtors' property for the sums and amounts due toGETHER with the interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, may, having on claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Summons. Notice and State and Washington to the above defendants and of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in estate in and to the herelafter numbered property, are hereby the right that the real named plaintiff holder of one certain delinquent certificate issued by the Treasurer 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, in the amount of 75 cents and upon the real property slumed by King County, described to-wait: Lot 1. Block 33. Maynard's ake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are paid by the plaintiff upon above deed property, for the year 1904, the sum of amounts, for the year 1905, the sum of amounts, and for the year 1906, the sum of amounts, which several sums bear interest at rate of 15 per cent. per annum from and seemed taxes upon and against said real you and each of you, (including said person himself, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, to-wit: (days after July 19, 1908, above entitled court and action; defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay amount due, together with interest, or pay amount due, in case you fall so short of the amount will be rendered hereinafter, against each parcel of said real property for sums and amounts due upon and charged each, for said taxes, interest and order, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for satisfaction for sums charged and found against, respectively as provided by law, and this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, wa. WIMM. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver. Plaintiff. vs. Wm. Mcfatray, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest in and to the hereafter descri- bed real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Sunnions. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants for holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above-named plaintiff is the holder of one certain de- Inquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 18th day of July, 1907, and numbered B48343. In the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.19, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to: No. 1. The City of Washington, Platt in said King County, and the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to: The year 1906, the sum of $2.65, which several sum of $1906, the sum of $2.65, and for the year interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon days after the date of first action of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer; plaintiff of said plaintiff and serve copy of your answer on the under oath of said plaintiff for plaintiff due, together with interest and costs. In case you so fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on costs against each of said real property for the sums due upon and charged by, for taxed taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums due found against it respondered by law, and as prayed by plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause M. C. MACDONALD, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Attorney Court In the Matter of the Estate of Frank R. Harrison, deceased. No. 8084. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, and Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Belle Harrison, the legally appointed ly qualified and active administratrix the estate of Frank R. Harrison, deased, having filed in this Court her signed and final account, setting forth all sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and distribution of the residue thereof made to the person by law en- titled thereto, and it appears that Court that said petition and final account set forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald that is therefore by the Court ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said Frank R. Harrison, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of W- ashington, at the Court Room of the Prie- bate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of October, a. M. at the hour of 9:00 a. m. of sold day, then and there to show account if any they have, why the final account of said administratrix should not be accepted and confirmed and an order of distribution made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 1st day of October. A. D. 1908, in the "Seattle Republican," a said printed and published in said King County, and general circulation therein. Done open court this 21st day of August. A. D. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Agda Almen, Plaintiff, vs. Olaf Almen, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Olaf Almen: We appeal hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the above plaintiff the plaintiff a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. F. L. SANDERS Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Margaret Johnson, Defendant. Allocation You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 4th day of September, 1908, the above entitled action, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, that his bill and Brown's agreement will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which is filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to collect the sum of thirty-five dollars ($35.00), being the amount due by you to the plaintiff and Brown, which claim has services rendered, which claim has been assigned to the Aurora Land Co., the plaintiff herein. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. H. Mecken and Jane Doe Mecken, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an award, the house described real property, Defendants., No. 62639. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49543, issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following month and upon the real property situated in and upon King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—Lot 17, Block 2; Certificate Number B49543; year, 1904; amount, $1.13. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 17, Block 2, Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—78 cents, 1905; 89 cents, 1906; $1.02, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from subsidy and investment, and are all the paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the day of September 1900 in the above enclosed and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do judgment will be required in closing to lie with said taxes and costs each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Fred A. Simons, executor of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that salesmen sets forth facts efficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sold estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the hour of 8:30 of said court, in the City of Seattle, on the 24th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks upon the said 24th day of September 1908, in The Seattle newspaper printed published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of August, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. State of Washington, County of King,ass. L. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King Court, State of Ohio, Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 29th day of August, 1908, in the matter of state of Martin Henry Hisock, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 29th day of August, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hlscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Fred A. Simon, the executor of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, has rendered account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 24th day of September, at 930 o'clock a.m., at the door room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed, said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 28th day of August, 1908. day of August (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wichington, for King County. ication. The State of Washington to the said Lowery Council, defendant. G. Shyler York, NY. hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 7th day of July, to send the above written notice in the above plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and because of your failure to do so, plaintiff will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above title action is that plaintiff may obtain the absolute divorce from you upon the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263-61 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7-Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE you wish for King County. James R. Wilson, plaintiff, vs. Eva Wilson, defendant. No. 62399. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Eva Wilson, defendant: Wilson, 48, died hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of August, 1908, for the defended action in the above court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in his office address below stated; and for your failure to do so, the plaintiff will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the complaint is to defend, on the grounds of abandonment and cruel treatment. WARREN H. LEWIS, Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: 308 Shafer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7—September 18, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle, Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Joseph Masvero, plaintiff, vs. P. Jugui trading and doing business, under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. — Summons for Publication of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Jugui, trading and doing business un- You are hereby notified that Joseph Maswero has filed a complaint against you in said court whence will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Blood Center, King County, A. D. 1908, at 10th day of Sep. A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessional and the demand of the plaintiff granted object and demand of the plaintiff is to owe 70 thousand amount the plaintiff claims to you during the past 60 days preceding the 2nd day of July, 1908, upon which claim nothing has been paid, and further, that you have attained personal security levyed on in this case under attachment issued heretoefor in favor of plaintiff. Filed August 6, A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE. Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. August 1-September 4, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT-BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington William N. Evans, plaintiff, vs. P. Juguat trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. --- Sum- mer Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Juglun, trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant: You are hereby notified that William N. Evans has will come out against you in said office and will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 10th day September, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., m. written and 800-887- dollar, and answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action and complaint is to recover judgment against you for ninety-sine and a $100 dollars. You are written and merchandise and aid and delivered to you by plaintiff between April 1st, 1908, and June 30th, 1908, no part of which has been paid, and further, to sell under attachment the personal property levied on in this cause under attachment issued heforetoe in Iowa to the plaintiff. Filed August 6. A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. August 7—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Charlotte Scobey, Plaintiff, vs. George Scobey. Defendant. Summons for plaintiff. The State of Washington, the said George Washington, summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled action and answer the court's plaintiff, and serve the court's answer upon the under-understrokes for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according .o the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the court of the Court of the Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, idleness, non-support and desertion, and for plaintiff's maiden name of Charlotte Whitehead. E. L. SANDERS. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE COURT OF THE STATE In the matter of the estate of Judith Cox Moore, deceased. No. 9237. Notice to Ccredit- By order of said court made herein on the 31st day of July, 1908. Notice is hereby given to the court that the insured said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Judith J. Moore, attorney Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle. In said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be borne. Date of first publication August 7, 1908. Attorneys for Estate, 960 Empire Blvd., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nellie Temple, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication. The Court of Washington to Lewis P. P. Temple, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toow, within sixty (60) days from and after the 21st day of August, 2012, and defend the objection entitled action in the Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure so do, do, believe. Will be rendered the court upon according to the deed of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of said court. The above entitled action is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce of and from the defendant, Lewis P. Temple, on the ground of failure, neglect and refusal to make suitable provision for said plaintiff's support, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable HERBERT L. JACKSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office address: Room 307 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21st—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Grada B. Craayo, Plaintiff, vs. Antonie Johan Craayo, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant: Antonie Johannes summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and amuse the plaintiff that serve a copy of your letter to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made in writing of the claim of the object of the entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant. JAS. M. EPLER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 1100 W. 11th Street, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 31—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the land inafter described real property. Defendants. No. 62640. Notice and Sum- State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, are awarded plaintiff is that the one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49553, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes the following year, in which amount and upon the real property situated in-wit King County, described as follows, to-wit: Wilberton Addition—Lot 10. Block 7: Certificate Number B49553; year, 1904; amount, 91 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the court said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 7, Wilberton Addition— 82 cents, 1905; $1.69, 1906; $1.22, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum for sold date of payment, all the unpaid and all the taxes upon and unpaid sale, real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said file extinction, to wait within sixty days after the 4d anniversary of September, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, on pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. You fail so to foreclose the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, the satisfaction of the amount charged and the amount as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Emma McKissen and Jane Doe McKissen, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62641. Notice and Summar You and each of you, as owners, claim State of Washoe, as above de- fendants, and each of them, Friday, September 18. 1908 ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to wit: Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—Lot 37, Block 4; Certificate Number B49542; year, 1904; amount, $1.34. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to wit: Lot 37, Block 4; Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—7 cents, 1905; 89 cents, 1906; $1.03, 1907. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: with sixty days after the 4th of September, 1908, in the above entitled notice, to answer the action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of above taxes and costs for the sums charged and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as praved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ivah Marie Durant, Plaintiff, vs. Cassie B. Durant, Defendant. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Cassie B. Durant, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today with the intention of seeking a second day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below state attorney general, so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the condition that the parties abide and deserion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessle B. de.Varona, plaintiff, vs. Edwin I. de.Varona, defendant. No. 62008. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin I. de.Varona, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and de facto after the first publication of his twxty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your complaint on the inquest and attorney at the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court, and entitled to be entitled to a jury for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. Date of first publication, July 17, 1908. Attorneys for Phailur. Office and Post Office address: 413 414 and 415 Mehlhorn Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Florence Bray. Plaintiff, vs. Charles Bray. Defendant, No. The state of Washington to said def fendant. Charles Bray. enchant. We may hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and see that the court of your name has placed upon you undesigned attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the complaint is an absurd degree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. York Building, Seattle, Washington. FRED C. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 431 New September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Anna Dilg. Plaintiff, vs. Julius Dilg. Defendant. C. 68544. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Julius Dilg. Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, the defense officer entitled to answer in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer union the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against the defendant and the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year and for non-support. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: Room 32 Union Block Seattle, King County, Washington. *N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Michener, John Doe Riley, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real estate. Defend, and summon. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above-named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinguent tax certificate issued by the Treasler of King County. State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of April 1906, and number as follows. For the delinguent taxes of the following year, in the following year, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-law Certificate No. B41200, Lot 8, Block 5, Raven's Division to Green Lake, in the year 1906. In the sum of $2.66; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $2.01; for the year 1906, the sum of $3.23; for the year 1906, the sum of improvement district No. 1007, for $3.02; for the year 1907, the sum of $3.78; for $3.02; for the year 1907 (local improvement district No. 1007), the sum of $3.20, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon this day after the date of the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication—wife, August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald persons to serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned attorney for the office at his office below stated, the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing sald taxes and costs against sald real property of sald real property and sums and amounts due upon charge against each, for sald taxes, sald property for the satisfaction of each parcel charged and found against, respectively as provided by law, and prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. M. J. NIST, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. MILDEM, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Blog, Seattle, Washington. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR-1 R COURT OF THE STATE King County. Washington Int. Lit. Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Larson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heresafter described real property. Defendants. No. ____. Notter and Shipment of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of your associates, claimants or holders of estate in and to such property described real property, may be notified that the above delinquent plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of December and numbered B42040, 1904, inclusive, in the amount of $20.04, upon the real property situated within King County, described as the Salmon Bay Addition Block. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff said above described real property for the year 1916 of $2.73, and for the bear interest at the sum of $2.97, which several sums annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said person. You send each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon days after the date of first application of this notice, exclusive within 60 days of said first publication, 10 days in, above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint on the undersigned attorney's plaintiff at his office before he pay the amount due, force to do, judgment will be rendered herein, close each parcel of said taxes and for the sums and amounts charged against each, taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and for the sums it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause. and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD A. Affleigh Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE at Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and address of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of airline or air property in and to the heretofore described real property, are the above named staff is the holder of one certain deferred tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated 14th day of April, 1951, and numbered B33300, for the deliware of the airline year 1902, in situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Iot 4. Block 2. Goodspeed to West Seattle, the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff as above described real prop. to-wit; for the year 1903, the sum of 24 erty, to-wt; for the sum of 20 cents; for the sum of 1904, the sum of 20 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per summ from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said person, and each of you, (including said person, unaware and if any), are hereby further notified days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after said action; and defend the entire action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the understated attorney for plaintiff at the together with interest or pay the amount of your answer with interest will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said property and costs against each parcel of real property for the sums and amounts upon and charged against each parcel of taxes, interest and costs, in a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause of court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. WASH. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Washington for King County. of Washington. Plaintiff, vs. A. Vallus, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heretofore described property proposed plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1904, and numbered the number of persons for whom the tax amount of $1.26, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6. Block 5. Queen Anne Anne Addition to the City of Seattle. Queen Anne Anne Addition to the City of Seattle. The years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1902, the sum of 68 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 63 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 63 cents; and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.17, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, to annum from said date of payment, and all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property; (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit: within 60 days after July 31, 2013, to the office of the plaintiff and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due to his office below stated, in case costs. In case so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, and the amount due upon and charged against each sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now in this cause and court. L. H. CROVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, WA July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Charles Osner and Agnes Osner, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Annie Smith and John Doe, his husband, who is unknown to plaintiffs, her husband, defendants. No. 62709. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Annie Smith and John Doe Smith, her husband, whose true given name is unknown: You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above writed notice of the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer herein upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which is on file with the clerk of this court. The object of this complaint is forth in complaint is to obtain a decree cancelling and holding for naught a certain contract given by plaintiff, Charles Osner, to the said defendant, Annie Smith, May 20th, 1906, and recorded in Vol. 476 of deeds, page 492 of records in the Auditor's office of King County for the sale of Lot 12 and the easer that I have placed in the City of Seattle, and to obtain a decree quieting title to said property in plaintiffs. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiffs Office and Public Office address, Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. August 28—October 9. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wash.ingen. in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. Schultz and Jane Doe Schultz, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heafterment described in the Deftendants. No. 62494. and Simpson. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the herliesther described in the certificate, are the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42175, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety cents of King County. Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Twenty-dye (25), Block Three (3), Ballard Park 2nd Addition to Seattle, King County. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid to the property properties to-wit for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are the valid and necessary taxable sums. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of the said plantiff, to-wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plantiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint and serve a copy of your answer to the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of salts taxes and costs against the sums charged and amounts due upon and charged against each, for salts taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sal property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, as provided by law, and as pursued in plantiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash., Aug. 14, Sept. 25, 1908. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has been duly appointed guardian of the estate of John Loftstrom, an insurance company, in claims or demands against insured person are hereby requested to present them to the said guardian at his place of business, at 745 New York Blk, Seattle, Washington. HUGH A. BOWMAN, Guardian of Fstate of John Loftstrom, an Insane Person. W. G. BEARD and H. E. TURNER, Attorneys for sold Guardian. August 28—September 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aaron W. and Co., Corporation Flatbill, w. D. Van De Watt, and Co. Van Be Watt, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter deserted real property, Defendants. No. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heretofore described property, as owners, claimants or holders of a named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated May 26, 1906, and numbered B42143, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of eleven cents, situated in King County, Washington, described as follows-to-wit: Iot nineteen (19). Block eighteen (18). Bay View Addition to Salmon Bay. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent, are paid above described paid property. to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date. The State of Washington is unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint against the plaintiff on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and amounts due upon the plaintiff for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged by law, and as waived in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bluff, Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14-Sept. 25—1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. D. Van De Watte, and Jane Dee Van De Watte, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herenafter described real property. Defendants. Named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated May 23, 1906, and numbered B42144, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of eighty-nine cents. Plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty (20), Block eighteen (18), Bay View addition to Salmon Bay, Washington; that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff. Plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax for the year 1905, twenty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.28), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the said date of payment, and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including sald unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this complaint, and to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint. In the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against the property, and amounts due upon and charged against each for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for in their complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1988. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. William Edward Rhodes, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Louisa Rhodes, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Mary Louisa Rhodes. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case you fail so to do judgment, will be remanded against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of deion E. L. SANDERS. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Daniel Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Hilma Yrjana Williams, Defendant. No. 62705. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, te-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in plaintext and the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court; the object of the above entitled action is for a decree of divorce on the grounds of desertion and aban- Attorneys for Plantin. P. O. Address: T. G. Grepson and P. V. Davis, attorneys at law, 304 Ploneen Bldg., Seattle, Wash. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Philhartt, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heirafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hearinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov. 1906, and numbered B43120, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903. In the amount of 75 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 33, Maynard's Lake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1904, the sum 23 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 3 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty-five days after the date of services of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the action and answer to be complained in the above written notice on the understated attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a fraction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. I. H. Craver. Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Deindendants. No. — Notice and acknowledgment. Washington to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain defendant and each of them. Washington of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43121. for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903. In the amount of 75 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows to-wit: Lot 3, Block 33, Maynard's Lake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the year 1903 amounted to 22 cents, the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of this person, on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing that each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfies of the sums charged and amount of each parcel of said real property if respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. Wash. July 31 - September 19, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Shipment. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herderinafter described real property, and to the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B4312.32, the amount of $7.22, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Lot 24. Block 15. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts. That the taxes for the following sub-paragraphs are paid upon said above described real property, towit: for the year 1905, the sum of $6.30, and for the year 1906, the sum of $4.83, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all paid upon described taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and answer to the complaint of said plaintiff and said defendant on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall short of the amount due, you may close the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a payment of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on the in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 324 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31-September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for Kirk County. I. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, vs. W. H. Minor, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. N-277. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. N-277. Named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B46052 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. In the year 1905, the sum of $3.21, was delinquent in said King County, described as follows: to-wit: Lot 2, Sec. 31, Tp. 26 N. R. 7 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the year 1905, the sum of $3.11, and for the year 1906, the sum of $3.20, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the delinquent taxes upon and against said real property. Yon and each of you, (including said persons unknown. If any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice. Exclusive notice of the day of said first publication, to-wit: the 31st day of July, 1908. In the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below and on pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes interest and cost ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and charges and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notated State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, is notified that the above plaintiff is the holder of the昂倍ant certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 12th day of April, 1907, and numbered R48005, for the dellonquent taxes of the year 1902. In the same case, the notice of the situation in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 75 feet of Lot 9, Block 73, Rilley's Addition to South Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above deferred taxes, and the sum of $1.76 for the year 1904, the sum of $1.69; for the year 1905, the sum of $1.71, and for the year 1906, the sum of $2.40, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 percent, per annum from said date of payment, and are unpaid unless deemed taxes upon a valid real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, after the date of publication of said plaintiff's action, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1508, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer: the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your complaint to the court. At his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs, for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it reimbursed as provided by law, and for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it reimbursed as provided by law, and for said plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1508. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King—Ia Probate. In the matter of the estate of Erst Hille, deceased, No. 7520 under to Show Cause Why Distribution, he is not. Not under Charles Osner, administrator of the estate of Erst Hille, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appends to the case in the Court of Washington forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Erst Hille, deceased, be and appear before the said court, and to have the said court at the court room of the Probate department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 10th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of m. day of day and there to show cause, if any they have, why an additional distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 10th day of September, 1908, to the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of August, 1908. MITCHELL GILLIAM, Judge, Aug. 7-Sept. 4, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased. No. 7820. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles Osner, the administrator of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased, his final account to, and filed in said Court, his final account to, and filed in administrator, and that Thursday, the 100th day, administration, at 0:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Court Department of our said Superior Court, in the Court in said King County, has been duly appointed, as said Court for the settlement of a account, at said account, and may any person interested in said estate and may file his exceptions in writing to said Court. Witness, the Hon. Mitchell Gilman of Jud of said Superior Court, and the seas court hereto affixed this 5th day of August, 14 (Seal) OTTO A. CASEL, Clerk By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk Aug. 7-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF T. State of Washington for King Count Clare Monteith, Plaintiff, vs. John Monteith, Defendant. No. 62620. Summons by Publication. The The State of Washington to the said John A. Monteith, Deiendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your manner under the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure for the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of his habitual drunkenness, and his neglect and refusal to make provision for his family, and to have award to plaintiff the sole custody and control of Julian Monteith, Grace Monteith, and Isabel Monteith, the three children of plaintiff and defender. H. W. CRAVEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 654 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or chal- ter interest or estate in and to the herein an described real property, Defendants. No. € Notice and Shipment. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and er you as owners, claimants or holders of an asset in state in or to the hereafter desired real property. The name of the named plaintiff is the holder of one contract linguent tax certificate issued by the Tree of King County, Washington, dated April 1995, and numbered B442602, for the delinquents in the 1956 in the amount of Ninety three (93) cents, and situated in King County, Washington, describe as follows, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block two (2) White Bros. Addition to Kirkland. King County Washington. That the taxes for the following years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said action,erty, to-wit: for the year 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified summons to be and appear within sixty days after the first notice, the second notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and demand the action and answer the complaint and plainiff notice in a way of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plainiff office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the interest and costs. In case you so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing, for the sake of your interest, against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the amount charged and found 2-LEGALS-REPUBLICAN against it, respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plainiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & T Blidge, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. NOTICE. Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. State of Washington, County of Kl State of Washington, County of Downtown—ss, Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 20th day of August, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the Crane, Plaintiff, versus A. E. Downing and Downing, his wife. Defendants, No. 60999, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours described by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit by October, A. D. 1908, before the 3d day of October, A. D. 1908, before the House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot four (4), Block eight (8), Madison Street Washington, as recorded in King County, Washington, as recorded in King County, two (2) of plates at page 85, records of the editor's office, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one hundred and fifty-two ($152.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, August, 1908. Dated this 218 day month, J. C. SMITH, Sheriff, BY FDW, DREW, Deputy, '8061 '92 acquaddes—87 BD6VF PLEADS FOR JUSTICE 图 O Prof. Booker T. Washington, the wizard of Tnskeegue, recently gave out the following communication, which has been given the widest publicity: "Within the past 60 days 25 Negroes have been lynched in the United States. Only four of this number were charged with criminal assault on women. Nine were lynched in one day on a charge of being connected with a murder. Four were lynched in one day on a charge that they passed resolutions in a lodge approving the murder of an individual. Three were lynched in one day on the charge that they had taken part in the burning of a gin house. The others were lynched for miscellaneous reasons. One was publicly burned in open daylight in the presence of women and children, after oil had been poured on his body, at Greenville, Texas, and reports state that 1,000 people witnessed the spectacle in the open square of the town. One other victim was eighty years of age. How long can our Christion civilization stand this? I am making no special plea for the Negro, innocent or guilty, but I am calling attention to the danger that threatens our civilization. For the Negro criminal, and especially for the Negro loafer, gambler, and drunkard, I have notning but the severest condemnation and no legal punishment is too severe for the brute that assaults a woman. It requires no courage for 500 men to tie the hands of an individual to a stake, but young men and boys who have once witnessed or fread in the papers of these exciting scenes of burnings and lynchings often get the idea that there is something heoric in attacking an individual in the community who is least able to defend himself. No doubt the people who engage in lynchings and excuse them believe that it will have the effect of striking terror to the guilty. But who shall say whether the persons lynched are guilty? There is no way distinguishing the innocent from the guilty except by due process of law. That is what the courts are for. Those who have examined into the facts know only too well that in the wild justice of the mob it is frequently the innocent man who is executed. These lynchings terrify the innocent, but they embolden the criminal. The criminal knows that it is much easier to escape the mad fury of the the mob than the deliberate vengeage of the law. But no man is so innocent that he can be safe at all times from the frenzy of the mob. Statistics show that during the past ten years an average of 32 Negroes a year have been lynched on the charge of assaulting women. Granting that 32 a year are guilty, is that just reason for condemning over 3,000,000 adult Negro men who have no part in such crimes? Are we a nation to allow 32 criminals a year out of a race of 10,000,000 of people to throw us into a frenzy and change the complexion of our civilization so that we are held up to foreign nations as an uncivilized people not governed by law and order? Again, I would BOOKER T. WASHINGTON. say I am not making any special plea for the Negro, but I feel that lynching is not only wrong but a mistake—an awful mistake. Mob jnstice undermines the very foundation on which our civilization rests, viz.: respect for the law and confidence of its security. There are, in my opinion, two remedies. First of all, let us unite in determined effort everywhere to see that the law is enforced, that all people at all times and all places see that the man charged with the crime is given a fair trial. Second, let all good citizens unite in an effort to rid the communities, especially large cities, of the idle, vicious and gambling element. In this connection I would not be just and would not be frank unless I stated that the betters of the black race could use their influence, especially in cities, to see that the idle element that lives by its wits, without permanent or reliable occupation or place of abode, is either reformed or gotten rid of in some manner. In most cases it is this element that furnishes the powder for these explosions.' BOOKER T. WASHINGTON The Fake Cry of Rape In another column of The Age we print an article from Montgomery, Ala., which tells of two Negroes accused criminally assaulting a white woman, being later freed of the charge upon the admission of the woman in question that she and her husband had falsified. The true story of the affair is that the woman and her husband, H. Calhoun, by name, robbed the Negroes and then threatened to set up the cry of criminal assault if an alarm was given. The report in some manner got out that an assault had been made upon the white woman and the Negroes barely escaped lynching. All concerned were arrested and after undergoing a "sweating" process instituted by the authorities the Calhoun woman confessed to a canard and told the true story. They are now held in jail for highway robbery. To some the incident might seem trivial, but to others it signifies much. There are many similar cases wherein a Negro is wrongfully charged with a crime and lynched, just because the woman makes the accusation. No attempt is made by the authorities or the mob to ascertain if the man is really guilty, but he is put to death without even Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE T.J.E SEATTLE REPUBLICAN TICE WASHINGTON. being given an opportunity to defend himself. It is noticed with pleasure that several of the daily papers in Montgomery published the true statement of facts when it became known that the white woman set up a fake cry of rape, and published her confession in its entirety. The Calhoun incident only goes to show that every dispatch from the South printed by Northern papers about Negroes assaulting white women is not true, and that in many instances the cry of rape is a falsehood from beginning to end.—New York Age. THE SEATTLE THEATER Uncle Josh Perkins at the Seattle Theater this week is a rural comedy play, with a greater number of laughs in the two acts than was ever crowded into a stage performance before. From the time that Hiram, the hired man, comes on the stage in the second act until the fall of the curtain, it is one prolonged, continuous scream of laughter. Uncle Josh Perkins tells the usual story of the old New England farmer befriending the girl and there are no improbabilities in Uucle Josh Perkins, no straining for effect, it is simply a home-spun New England play, after the style of the Old Homestead, but not a bit like it. The pathos is only incidental to the comedy in Uncle Josh Perkins, but as a laugh provider it is a wonder. The Four Corners of the Earth, next week at the Seattle Theater. This is a big melodrama, consisting of twenty-two scenes and about fifty principal and auxiliary characters. It takes the audience from the borders of Southern California and old Mexico to Japan, then to Arabia, and then to the frozen North. The play has received the best possible press notices from newspapers en route to the coast. It will be the first really big attraction to appear in Seattle this season, though there will be no change in prices at the Seattle Theater for this or any other engagement during the entire season. Attorneys, attention! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN does the best and most reasonable legal work. Phone Main 305. Guard INSURANCE OF SEATT YOU AND YOUR FRIEND GOT ME THIS TIME." "THE DEVIL" AT THE THIRD AVENUE When Messrs. Russell Drew and French advertised the stock company at the Tnird Avenue Theater the best melodramic company west of New York, they did not expect to be called upon to demonstrate this fact so unexpectedly so soon; but the production of The Devil, at another theater brought the comparison about in an expeditious manner. Readers of last Monday's Post-Intelligencer can easily draw their conclusions from the unbiased review of the two productions, by Mr. Wing, critic of the P.-L., who saw the production at the Third Avenue Sunday afternoon and the other the same evening. We believe that the Third Avenue company has much the best of the comparison, and those who witness The Devil, the most written about play of the century, will bear us out in our conclusion that a smoother and better performance could not be given by any company in YOU AND YOUR FRIEND JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST YOU CAN'T BUY BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 COLUMBIA ST. Established 1890 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ian Life CE CO. TLE Friday, September 18, 1908 the entire West, and The Devil, is not a melodrama either, but a high-class society comedy. It runs all week at the Third Avenue Theater, and every one should see it. Mr. Stanley Johns and Elizabeth Hale bear the blunt of the performance, and the attention they receive from the amdience must be gratifying to these artists. Beginning next Sunday afternoon, Driven From Home, will be the attraction for the thin week of Russell, Drew and French's Third Avenue Theater stock season. The play is from the pen of Hal Reid, author of Human Hearts, and it is one of the best melodromas that that prolific writer ever produced. It will be given a detailed production by the Third Avenue Theater company, i. e., every detail will be carefully looked after by the stage director and scenic artist. Elizabeth Hale and Stanley Johns both appear in the production, and the company will be augmented by the appearance of M. J. Hooley. GOT ME THIS TIME" Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office. Third and Spring Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fi- xtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bani Write Today for a copy of The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. JACOB FURTH ..... President J. S. GOLDSMITH ..... Vice-President R. V. ANKENY ..... Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and SURPLUS. $1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES. over ..... $12,500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent with conservative banking. Foreign exchange department especially equipped for the conduct of Oriental Business. M. P. F. Backus, Pres.; R. Spencer, 1st V. P. R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W. Maxwell, Cash. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Was