Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents POLITICS AND POLITICIANS. Much has been said over a casual remark made by the Hon. John L. Wilson to the effect that, if the friends of Senator Piles continued to heap abuse on him, two Pacific Coast Co. Votes Its Miners Senator Piles or John L. Wilson opportunity to go on the stump and tell all about Washington state politics, make a vigorous campaign. The Times declared that there was danger of Senator Wilson doing as he threatened, but it assumed a pessimistic view of the situation and added, "it does not amount to very much whether Senator Wilson or Senator Piles is in the race from King county Frank Cushman of Tacoma will be the next United States senator after Jones will have been elected." The Times, even at this early date, realizes that if King county wants a United States senator to succeed Senator Piles, she will spell his name WILSON. Or course Senator Piles stands well in King county, but there his popularity stops and he can do nothing within the next two years, at which time he will be up for re-election that will sufficiently popularize him in the outside counties as to make him a competitor for even Frank Cushman. On the other hand, the Hon. John L. Wilson, while having many bitter enemies, has a great many more warm and 19 enthusiastic admirers each one of whom will go down the line for him without promise or price, and whether Sen. Jones does or does not help him in such a contest would be of little concern. The opponents of Jones made much of the fact that his candidacy had been sprung by Senator Wilson and the burden of the campaign was thrown on the shoulders of the man who was asking nothing, but despite that fact Jones won, which was in part a very strong endorsement by the people of Senator Wilson, and no one saw the point more readily than Alden J. Blethen, editor of the Times. If Senator Piles is enthusiastically endorsed by Senator Wilson he will again be elected, but if opposed by him he will be defeated. Bob Hodge or Jack Williams that all manner of man, whether a labor unionist or any one else, obey the laws, he will find it a much harder job to be elected sheriff than it was to be nominated, despite the fact that King county is overwhelmingly Republican. His Democratic opponent, Jack Williams, is well known to the business men of this city and they know that he will give them a square deal and Hodge must at least promise them the same thing. Speaking about Hodge and Williams the Pie-maker is reminded that both of them were former deputies under Edward Cudihee when he was sheriff of King county. Williams was his criminal deputy and Hodge was one of his many field deputies located at Black Diamond, and so it matters not which one of these men are elected in November the county will get the benefit of Cudihee's efficient tutelage, for it must be remembered that he was one of the best sheriffs the county has ever boasted of. The Times Loses Nothing New to do is by some hook or crook get the Times to support said opponent and his defeat is as certain as its support. The Times has not won a single political victory since it has belonged to the Blethens. When THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN coined the expression, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie," a great many of it readers doubted it, but time has completely proven it and no longer things seen in the Times is taken seriously by any one. The chief political writer on the Times is Murky Matt and he can conjure up more political cock and bull stories than any other man in the state, and the very strange thing about it is that Joe Blethen would permit those yarns to get into the Times year in and year out when he must know they are absolute falsehoods from start to finish. The editor of the Times is daily patting itself on the back because Ankeny and McBride carried King county and if he would stop and think (this is impossible) King county was considered an Ankeny stronghold and the Jones supporters felt satisfied to make a good showing. State Library Volume XV, Number 17. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1908 Rev. E. M. Randall, the official head of the Epworth League department of the Methodist Episcopal church, who for six years was pastor in charge of the First M. E. church of this city, has spent the most of the present week in Seattle and Tacoma, where at the latter place the Puget Sound conference of the M. E. church is being held. In speaking to him as to conditions in the East he said: "I have been quoted and misquoted until I am almost of the opinion that the least I say for publication the better. I do however, say that the great Methodist church is making no concentrated effort to beat "Uncle" Joe Cannon, yet there is a crys- There is hardly any doubt that the direct primary law is a great improvement over the old convention system in most parts of the county, but be it understood were for Ankeny for senator, McBride for governor, Agnew for sheriff, Beckingham and Rutherford county commissioner and Jennings assessor, and evidently their men at the mines were so instructed, for the returns show that each of the above named men got practically a unanimous vote. In other words the company had a slate and no one except those on its slate got a vote in the camps. Just how the bosses could control their men so well is the question, but there is no doubt of them having controlled them to the extent of them voting for the men they wanted, the direct primary law to the contrary notwithstanding. Even in Black Diamond, the home of Hodge, the company almost captured the town for Agnew. talizing sentiment far and wide among them that he should be defeated as he is an unfit man for so responsible and dignified position in the affairs of our country. [Name] So far as the Republicans electing the president, there seems to be a spirit of apathy in many quarters that did not exist two montns ago, and the same spirit is to an extent found among the Democrats as well as the Republicans. Though my work has taken me to many localities of the general government I have not is often heard of some man try to perform the work he shoulders of younger men, which self same men take great offense at their neighbors when so informed. For the past forty-five years the John Miller Murphy In His Dotage management of the Washington Standard, published at Olympia has been under the continuous management of John Miller Murphy and the policy of the paper has always been Democratic in politics. Murphy has outlived his usefulness and it can be truly said of him he is in his dotage. His continued support of the Democratic policies has made of him a cynic, and in verification of the allegation the following is quoted from the last issue of his paper: REV. E. M. RANDALL REV. E. M. RANDALL as yet been able to form an opinion as to the outcome of the present national campaign. "A land slide for Bryan is predicted by the best informed politicians of his own state. The indications are cheering everywhere. The moral classes in every community are for him. Nearly all of the reputable, thinking women are for him. Most of the so-called 'gold-bug' Democrats are for him. His friends of 1896 and 1900 are still steadfast in the cause he represents. Many of the hitherto doubtful states seem to be for him—such states as New York and Indiana are now claimed for him. Many people want a change. Many Republicans openly avow their intention of voting for Mr. Bryan this year. The large city papers generally Democratic (except the Hearst papers) who have been adverse in former campaigns are now active in his support. There are many evidences, besides these, that the people are thinking, and thought, under our form of government, generally results in a wise use of the ballot." As to what the colored vote will do they, themselves, do not seem to know just now. They were lead to revolt and desert the Republicans, who have done all that has ever been done for them in this country, by Senator Foraker and to my mind for selfish purposes, and when he had used them as long as he could, he left them high and dry and formed a truce with Roosevelism, which will return him to the senate, while the colored man, theoretically speaking, will be without a friend at court. They cannot without stultifying themselves come back to the party, they cannot with any degree of consistency go to the Democratic party, and Foraker has deserted them, all of which is one of the most unfortunate circumstance that has ever occurred to them as a whole since the days of emancipation." Equal suffrage for women---woman's rights--- is to be an issue before the next legislature of the state of Washington if the petitions which are now being cur- No one but Murphy has heard of any such political upheavals. Bryan is not even certain of the Solid South. Woman's Suffrage For Washington So certain of election are the various nominess of the Republican party for representatives to the twelfth legislature of the state of Washington that already a red hot fight is on for the speakership of the next house of representatives. The aspirants for that honor up to the present time are Hon. Edward B. Palmer and Ole Hanson, of King county and Hon. George T. Reid, of Pierce county. Mr. Palmer has served two terms as a member of the house of representatives and two sessions as state senator, which has given him a wide acquaintance and he will have the influence of the large daily papers of the state. There is no doubt but that he will prove a most formidable candidate and his friends already declare that a majority of the nominees of King county favor his selection for speaker. It is safe to ing on this subject a brief letter from a woman that has given it a vast amount of thought and consideration is reproduced, which is full and overflowing with meat for thought. Woman's suffrage is by no means a popular subject at this writing, but it is one of the coming reforms of this country which seems the inevitable. Utah, Wyoming, Colorado and Idaho of the Western states have adopted equal suffrage and have no desire to repeal the act. Most persons accepts as true the statement by Plato, "The woman's cause is man's; they rise or sink together, dwarfed or God-like, bond or free," and suffragists therefore deem it necessary to show that woman's cause would be advanced by her enfranchise since, if this can be proven, it follows that, the measures would benefit men. predict that he will win the speakership victory as easily as he did the nomination a few days ago. Mr. Hansen is a very brainy politician and has been in the political lime light of Seattle for the past two years. He is a good local campaigner, but is without outside influence and can only expect to win the speakership as a compromise candidate. His candidacy may have the effect of beating Mr. Palmer, but the latters's friends do not take it serious enough to believe it will. Hon. [Picture of a man in a suit with a high collar and a tie. The background is a plain, light color. The man's face is pale, and he has a serious expression. The image is oval-shaped with a black border.]] Unfortunately, the cause of woman's rights, so-called, has been largely concerned with woman's wrongs, and in effort to right these wrongs, it has been impossible to avoid a seeming antagonism toward men. However, with the partial attainment of much which women strove for in the early days, such as the equalization of the property rights of husband and wife, the higher education of women, the enlargement of the sphere of their industrial activities, and so on, the movement to obtain enfranchisement has assumed a somewhat different aspect. We now more often than otherwise hear the reform urged as a method of securing co-operation between men and women who are working for the moral elevation of society, and as a means of rendering the influence of women in public affairs more effective. It is also claimed that woman suffrage would strengthen the bond between husband and wife by adding one more common interest, and that it would increase woman's general intelligence by enlarging her outlook and imposing responsibility in important affairs of government, thus making her a more intelligent companion to her husband. Furthermore it is held that the removal of the stigma of political disability would strengthen a mother's hold upon her sons, and that she would be better qualified to inculcate high standards of public integrity. EDWARD D. PALMER to believe it will. Hon. George T. Reid has served two terms as representative in the house of the legislature of this state and made a rather brilliant record for his ability. He, however, is a man badly troubled with a constitutional grouch and it would be a legislative blunder to elect him to the position he seeks. Mr. Reid was appointed superior court judge by Gov. Mead, but feeling that he would not be endorsed by the people, withdrew from that contest and entered the fight for representative to succeed himself. Suffragists believe that a dispassionate consideration of this question in its present aspects would lead to the conclusion that although designed primarily to confer'upon woman the power and dignity which attaches to self-government, yet woman suffrage would accomplish much more than this, and that it is a beneficent measure from which right-mined men would be great gainers.—Esther Frances Boland. LATER---It is currently reported that Frank H. Renick and Frank C. Jackson, respectively of the 36th and and 37th representative districts have likewise announced their candidacies for the speakership if elected. a EEE EEO SUMMONS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE fof Washington, for the Connty of King. 3. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, va, Maude Mac- Callum, Defendant. —Sammovs. “Tue State of Washington to the said Mande MacCallum, Defendant: You_ are’ hereby summoned to appear within sisty days after the date of the Srst publication Of dis summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the Sist day of July, 1008, and defend the hhove eutitied action inthe above entitled court, dud answer the complaint of the plaintift, and Ste ra copy of sour answer upon the tinder Higued attorney for plalutif at his office below Etated: ‘and tn case of your failure so to doy Judgment Will be rendered against you wccord~ {ieee the demand of the complaint, which bas been led with the clerk of said court. The object. of sald action fs to dissolve the ponds of inatrmons now existing between the plant aid defendant hereln on the, groumd of fraud and cruelty. c. BE. PIPER, Plainti@'s Attorney. P._0, Address: Rooms 36 and 37, Unlon Block, No. 713 First Ave., Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. uly 8i—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT oF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Te H, cruver, Plalutif, vs. Unknown Owners, and’ ali persons unknown, If any, liaving ot Midmlug an interest in and to the hereinafter Qeserihed real property, Defendants, No. —. Notice and Summons, tate of Washington to the above defendants avd cach of them: You and each of you, as iNhers, chiimants or Lolders of an interest or Gkkate in and to the hereafter deserted real property, are hereby uotified that the above Pinned ‘plalutife is the liolder of one certain de- finqueut tax certiteate Issued by the ‘Treasurer Ue King County. State of Washington, dated the {ith day. of April, 1905, and numbered, BSSI31, for te delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the Aihonnt of SL cents, and upon real property Eltaated In sald. King County, described as fol- Juws, to-wit: Lot 24, Block 7, Goodspeed’s Ad- ditien ‘to West Seattle, ‘That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been pald by fhe, plauti upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1903, the sum of By Centa; for te. year 1904, the sum of 20 cents: for the year 1005, the sum of 25 cents, and for fhe yeur 1006, the stm of $1.26, which several soma bear interest at the rate of 1 per cent. per aunumn from said date of payment, and are TY the unpaid and. unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, If any), “are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after. the date of first publication of thi fotices exclishe of the day of sald frat publi tation, towit: within sixty days after July 31, TOUS. in the above entitied court and action: dnd defend this action and answer the complatnt Sf sala. plainti and serve a copy of your answer Oh the Undersigued attorney for plaintM at bis Citice Telow stated, oF pay the amount due, te gether with Interest and costs. In ease you fall £5 ot do. judgment will be rendered herein, fore Closing the Men of sald taxes and costs against Gach parcel of said real property for the sumt {nd -atnomnts due upon and charged against each, for suid tases, luterest and costs, ordering | file “of euclt parcel of sald property for the Satisfaction of the sums charged and fonnd huaiust it respectively as provided by Iaw, and ae prayed in plaintitt's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. 1. H, CRAVER, Plaintitt. A. C, MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff, qrotice Adress: ‘8H Bailey, Boalaing, ‘Seattle, ‘ash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 0” KING County, Washington. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate 0) yonept Doheny, Leceased. No, 8399 Notice to Creditors. ‘ Notice is hereby given to all persons having claims against Joseph Doheny, deceased, or against his estate to. pre: sent the same to the undersigned, W ‘A. Greene, administrator of the ‘sald estate, at his office at Room 415 Pio: heer Building, in the City of Seattle King County, Washington, within one year after the date of the first publica: tion, of this notice, to-wit: Within one year after the 11th day of September, 1908, or the same will be dorever barred, WILLIAM A, GREENE, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph_ Doheny, Deceased, SHANK '& SMITH, Attorneys for Administrator. Sept, 11—Oct. 29, 1908. Bets A deweh Cher PMs: AUNTY ret set cen DS IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King, County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. B. T. Gres- ory, and ali persons ‘unknown, if any having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants. No. ———. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- Tendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an’ interest or estate. in and. to. the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above: named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer, of King County, State of Washington, dat- ed the 30th’ day of March, 1906, and numbered B41260, for the’ delinquent faxes of the year’ 1904, in the amount of $4.10, and upon the real property sit- tuted in sald King County, deseribed as follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 44, Balti- more Addition ‘That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid wiv the Plaintif upon said above described real property, to-wit: Hor the year 1905, the sum of $3.25. For the year 1906, the sum of $2.05, For the year 1907, 69 cents, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said dat eof payment, and are all the unpaid and. unredeemed taxes upon and hgainst sald real property, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby Further notified and summoned, to be And appear within sixty days after the Gate of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- fication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept, 11. 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serye a copytof your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff At his office below stated, or pay the Amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judg- fnent will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon, and Charged against each, for said taxes, in- ferest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of. said property for the satis- faction of the sums charged and found against It respectively as provided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- fiaint. now on file in this cause and Court, 1, H, CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. ¢, MacDONALD, Atiorney for Plaintift, Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. September 11, October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L, H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Hatch, ‘and all persons unknown, if any, hay- ing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants. No. ———. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or Estate in and to the hereinafter de- geribed Teal property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is The holder of one certain delinquent tax [ertifeate issned by the ‘Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dat- ei the Ist day of June, 1907, and num- € ul i@e ie pered B47493, for. the Cebnaquent ee Of the years. 1903, 1904 and 1905, in the amount of $72.71, and upon real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: Lot 3,” less Eis ueres sold, Sec. 20, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. W. M. ‘phat on Aug. 19, 1907, the following portion of the said land was redeemed: Beginning at, a) point 952.82 feet 8, Sites feet E. from .N. EB. corner | of Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20, thence 8, 37° Ti’ is. 100 ‘feet, thence So. 52° 19" W. 162.44 feet, thence No. 56° 3° W. 78.22 feet, thence So. 62° 3° W. 28.28 feet, thence N. 52° 19" EB, 198.76 feet to be- ginning. That on Oct. 14, 1907, the following part of sald lot was redeemed, to-wit: Beginning at a point 1170 feet So, and Was 30’ W. 20.8 feet from N. W. cor- her of lot 3, Sec. 20, Tp. 22, N. Ro 3, {hence north’ 37°41’ W. 13.90 for true point of beginning, thence S. 42° 20" W. BRe30, thence No. 56° 3” W. 99.53 feet, thence north 52° 19” east 315.80 feet, thence S. 87° 41’ E, 43.92 feet to place of beginning. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the Gnpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby Parther notified and summoned, to be Ana appear. within sixty days after the Gute of first. publication of this notice, Gattusive of the day of said publication, (ecwit; within. 60 days after Sept. 11, $908, in the above entitled court, and Action; and defend this action and an- Swer the complaint of sald plaintiff and Ste a copy. of your answer on the un- Gersigned attorney for plaintiff at his Geice below stated, or pay the amount Que, together with interest and costs, qaease you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien be Tsald taxes and costs against each Parcel of sald real property for the Rams and amounts due upon and SHarged against each, for sald taxes, fRterest and costs, ordering a sie of each parcel of said property for the Satieraction of the sums charged and faund against {t respectively as provid: éa by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs Complaint, now on file In this cause and Court, L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MacDONALD, ‘Attorney for Plaintitt. Office address: 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. September 11, October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Ore State of Washington in and for King county, Ines May Hale, Plaintiff, vs, William SV, Hale, Defendant. No, ——. Sum- mons for Publication, the State of. Washington to the said William C. Hale, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty. (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, {eS eit, within sixty devs after the 11th Ae of September, 1908, and defend the Gikve entitled action In the above en- akiea court, and answer the complaint bf the plaintiff and serve a copy of your Shswer upon «the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; And ‘in case of your failure so to do, judgment. will be rendered against you inetraing to the demand of the com- aint, which has been filed with the clerk. “the object of the above entitled ac- tion Is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion, EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintift, P, 0. and office address: Room 308 Metropole Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, cece County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TH ‘State of Washington in and for the County of King, H. 't. Rudow and L, G, Rudow, his wife, ‘plaintiffs, vs. Mary §, Boman, Albert 7. Boman and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Arissa L. A. Bilbrey and W. J. Bilbrey, her husband, Andrew F. Bur- leigh and, Bertha V. Burleigh, his wife, F. 8, DeWolf and Jane Doe De- Wolf, his wife, Defendants. Summons for Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the sald ‘Mary E, Boman, Albert 'T. Boman and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Arissa L. ‘A. Bilbrev and W. J, Bilbrey, her hus- - hand, Andrew F. Burleigh and Bertha ¥. Burleigh, his. wife. F. 8. DeWolf and Jane Doe DeWolf, his wife, De- tendanis: You, and each of vou, are hereby sum- moned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, and defend. the above entitled netion in the Superlor Court of the State of Washington for King Coun- ty aforesald: and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at thelr offices below stat- ed; and in case of your failure 0 to do. Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint. which will be filed with the Clerk of sald Court ‘The object of this said ction is to clear title to that certain property de- scribed as Lots three (3), four (4), five ts) and six. (8), in Block twenty-nine (28), of Burke's ‘Second Addition to the City’ of Seattle, in and to which the sald fefendants, and each of them, claim some. lien or interest, which len or in- terest 1s. sought to be foreclosed and declared vold and of no effect. and that the plaintivs' title in and to sald prop- erty be quieted In said action. TRA BRONSON and D, B, TREFFTHEN. Attornevs for Plaintifts P, 0. address: 614-619 Colman Bldg., Sevitle. King County. Washington. ‘September 11, October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Anna tsa Hietanen, defendant: 12th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below. stated; and in case of your failure so to do jude- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of ‘The above entitled action is an action for divorce by plaintiff against defend- ant, on the ground of desertion of plain- tiff by defendant, and on the ground that defendant is suffering from incurable, more than ten years last past. SMITH & COLE, Offre and Postoffice Address: 408 Bos- ton Block, Seattle, Wash. September 11—Oct. 16, 1908. PHONE MAIN 305. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County, CoH, Weed, Plaintiff, ys. G. Nydell, and all persons unknown, If auy, having of claiming an Interest In and to the hereinafter described real property, “Defendante, Ne, ——. Notico and smn Mone ‘State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as Owners, chumants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelnatter described rea! property, are hereby notified that the above Hamed plaintift is the holder of one certain de- Mnquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, Stite of Washington. dated the Dist aay of Dec., 1906, and numbered Btls, for the delinquent taxes of the sear 1900, In the amount of 98 cents, and upon the real property situated In said King County, described as_ fol lows, to-wit: Lot 15, Block "1, Kirkland Steel Works, ‘That the taxes for the followhg svb; sequent years have been paid by the plaiutit upon sald above described real property, to-wlt: For the year 1901, the sum of 43 cents: for the year 1002, the stim of 40 cents; for the year 1003, the sum of 3% cents; for the year 1904, the gum of 88 cents, und for the year 1905, the gum of 20 cents, which several sums beat In- terest_at the rae of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the un- pald and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you, (neluding sald persons unknown, if any), ‘are’ hereby further notified aud summoned to" be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this hotlce, exclusive of the day of sald frst publica: Hon, ro-Wit, within sixty (GO) days after, the Bath day of July, 1908," In the above entitled court aid action: aud defend: this action and answer the complaint of sald. plaintiq@ aud serve A OPS VE sulle Musee vn the Maetsigued us torney for plalntitt at his office below stated, 0 pay the amount due, together with Interest ‘and tosts, In ease you fall so to do, Judgment wil be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of sald taxes and costs agalust each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and Charged agalust each, for said taxes, interes! and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sale property for the satisfaction of the sums charged fnd found agalust it respectively as provided by Taw, and as prayed In plaintift’s complaint, now on dle In this cause and court. CH. WEED, Plaintift, A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintift, ‘office Address: 524 Bafley Bidg., Seattle, Wn. ‘Tule ah ka a TOOK: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THD STATE ‘of Washington for King County. C,H. Weed, Plaintift, vs. Unknown Owners, and ali persons unknown, If any, having ot claiming an Interest In aid to the hereinafter described veal property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. Stute of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, ag Owners, claimants or lolders of an futerest or estate in and {0 the hereinatter deserlved real property, are hereby notified that the above Hamed plaintit is the holder of one certain de: Hnquent taxe certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Diet day of Dec,, 1900, and numbered B4G415. for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, 11 the ainount of 98 cents, and upon real property Situated in sald King County, deseribed is, fol lows, to-wit: Lot 4, Block ', Kirkland Stee! Works, That the taxes for the following and Subsequent vears have been pald by the plaintin tipon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sun of 43 cents: for the yeur #002, the sim of 40 cents; for the year 003, the sum of 38 cents: for the yeur 1904, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 20 cents, which several sts bear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes Upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any), “are hereby further notified And. suinmoned to’ be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first, publica: tion, to-wit, within sixty (00) days after July Bath, 1908," in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintif and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for Dlaintit at his ofice below stated, oF pay. the Amotnt due, together with interest and costs, Th ease you fall so to do, judgment will be rend- ered hierelt, foreclosing the len of sald taxes nd costs against each parcel of sald real prop: erty for the sims and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest aud costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged And found against It respectively as provided hy Taw, anda prayed in plaintif's complaint, now ‘on file In this cause and court. C,H, WRED, Plaintiqt. A.C. MACDONALD, Attorney for ‘Plaintit, ‘Offine Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 2th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington for King County. C.F. Weed, Plaintif, vs. Unknown Owners, and ali persons unknown, If any, having or claiming in interest in and to the berelnatter feserived real property, Defendants, No ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and excl of them: You and each of you, as Owners, elalmants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are herebs notified that the above hamed plaintit Is the lolder of one certain wue- Hnatent. tax certifeate issued ty the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washhigton, dated the Bist, day of Dec., 1906, and numbered T6412, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, In the amount of,08 cents, and upon the real prop- erty situated in sald King County, described ax follows, to-wit: Lot, 3, Block 9, Kirkland Steel Works, ‘That the téxes for te following sub. wequent years have teen paid by the pinintitt hipon said above described teal property. to-wit: For the vear 1001, the sum of 4% cents: for the year 1902, the stim of 40 cents: for the vear joa, the ‘sum of 13 vente: for the year 1904, the sum of 43 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 29 cents, which several sms bear in- terest at the tate of TS per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- pall and unredeemed taxes upon and, against Sald real property. You and each of you, (neluding sald persons unknown. (f any), are hereby further notified and. suminoned to’ be and appear within. sixty ‘nya after the date of first, publieation of this hotice, exclusive of the day of sald first publica- tion, to-wit, within sixty. (60) dave after, the Bath day of Tuly, 1008, tn the above entitled court and action: and. defend chfe action and Answer the complaint of sald plaintit and serve A copy of your answer on the mdersigned at- torney for plainti at bis office below stated, or pay the amonnt due, together with interest and Costs, In case you fail so to do, Judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the Men of sald taxes and costs against eich parcel of sald real property. for the sums and amornts due upon ind charged against each, for sald taxes. inter- eat and costs, ordering a'sale of each parcel of Bald property’ for the satisfaction of, the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided ‘by law.” and. as, prayed tn plalntit’s Complaint, now on file In this cange and conrt, ©. H, WEED. Plaintit A.C, MACDONALD, Attornee for Plaintitt, Ofce Address: 524 Talley Bldg., Seattle, Wa. July 24th—Seot, 4, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington tn and for the County of King. Hannah Hill, Plaintiff, vs. Otis Hill, Defend- ant, |No. ——. Summons and ervles of Pub- Heation. State of Washington to the sald Otis HIN, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to ap: pear within sixty (60) dave after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty’ (00) days after the 24h day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action Ih the above entitled conrt. and answer*the com: pinint of the plaintif? and serve a copy of your Answer upon the undersigned attorney, for plain. tim at Ms office below stated. and tn case of yonr fatlire so {0 do. judgment will be rend- fred against on according £4 the demand of the complaint, which bag been filed with the clerk of said court: the abject for which this action fs bronght is to obtain a decree of divorce from the vefendant on the following grounds: Yet, Because the defendant abandoned the plainti@ on May 6th, 1907, said abandonment Leving been continaons for one sear and more, ‘2nd. Because the defendant since May. 1907, hag neglected and refed and still neglects and refuses to. make suitable provisions for the plaintit and. his family, Bach of said causes of nection having occurred without plalntift's fault, "JNO. 8, MONROR. Attorney for Plaintitt, P.O. Address: 499-82 Epler Block, Seattle, ‘Washington. Joly 24—Sept. 4, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington. for King County. GC. H. Weed, Dlaiutit. va. 8. A. Kinser, and ait persone unkown, {fang havhig or elimi an fatevest In and. to. te lereinatter described Teal “property, Defendants, No. ——. Notice aud Suinmons, ‘State of Washington to the above defendants and eneh of them! Yow and each of you, as Owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and tothe herinatter described real property, are hereby. notiiied that’ the above Ranted plaintift Is the holder of one certain de- Hnguent ax certigeate issued ty the Treagurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Sta day of Jan.. 1006, and numbered 42300, for the deflnquent taxes of the year 1904, In the amount of $14.56, and’ apon ihe real prop- erty situated In said King Counts, described as follows, to-wit: West 100 feet of lot 20, Block 24 Snoqualmie Falls. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years lave been Pall by the plainti® upon said above described feu properig to-wit: or the, gear 1008, the fam Of $13.27, whleh several sunis bear interest AU the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald Gate of payment, and. are all the anpald and tnredeemed taxes Upon and) against sald real property. You und each of you, (Including said persons unknown if-any), are lereby further notifed iid ‘summoned to" be and appear within sixty Gav's after the dage “of frat publlention of this hotice, exclusive of the day of sald frst publica- Hone to-wit, within. sixty. (00) days after July Bint, “oo8,' ih the “above, entitled court “and Retlon: And defend ts action and answer ‘the Complaint of sald. plaintit’ and serve a copy of Four answer on the Undérsizned attorney for laintif at his fice below” stated, ‘oF pay. the Rinowt, due, together with Interest and costs. Tnrease you fall so to do, Judgment will be rend- ered herein, foreclosing the Wen of sald, taxes Gnd. costs against each parcel of sald real prop erty forthe sums and. amounts ‘due upon and Charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and Costa, ordering sale of ench parcel of sald property. for the watiafaction of the sums charged Rnd found, against. It respectively as provided iy law, and. as prayed in plaiutift’s complaint, how on file in this cause, and court, C,H. WEED, Plapttft, A.C, MACDONALD, Attorney, for ‘Plaintitt, Office Address: 524 Batley Bidg., Seattle, Wn. Jule 2ith—Sept. 4, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington for King County. D. No Howard and Amanda B, Howard. hus- band and wife, Plaintiffs, vs, all persons un: Known, if aus, having or claiming an interest In and to ‘the’ hereinafter deseytbed real, prop- erty, Defendants. No. 62277. Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as Owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above Hamed plaintiffs are the holders of six certain Uelinguent tax certificates Issued by the ‘Treas- trer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of November, 1901, and numbered As follows. for, the delingdent taxes of the fol Towing, seat, in the following mounts, and hipon the real property situated in sald’ King County, described ax follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Mock 43, River Park, Certifionte No, 111404, for the year 1808, In the sum of $1.23; Lot 2, Block 43, River Park, Certifleate No. B11405, for the year 1898, inthe sum of $1.28; Lot 3, Block 43, River Park, Certificate Ne, "111406, for the year 1808, in the sum of $1.28; Tot 4, Block 43, River Park, Certificate |No, “11407, for the year 1808, in the sum of $1.23: Lot 5, Block 43, River Park, Certiflente "No. 111408, for the year 1898, Ja the sum. of $1.23, and Lot 6. Block 43, River Park. Cortifleate No, B11400, for the year 1808, In the sum of $1.28, That the ‘taxes for the following prior and snbse- quent years have teen pald by the plaintif? upon fad above deseribed ‘real property, to-wit: Lot {Block 43, River Park, for the years 1899 and 100, in the sum of $1.44: Lot 2. Block 43, River Park, for the years 1899, and 1900, In the sum Of $144: Lot 3, Block 48, River Park, for the years 1800 and'1900, In the sum of $1.44: Tot Flock 43, River Park. for the years 1809 and 1900, "in the sum of $1.44: Lot 5, Block 43, River Park, for the years 1899 and 1900, Jn the sum of $144, and Lot 6, Block 43, River Park. for the sears 1890 and 1900, in’ the sum of $1.44, ‘whieh several sums bear Interest atthe Pate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpald and unredeemed taxes upon and agalust sald real property. You and each of you, (Including said persons unknown, ff ans), “are hereby further notified aud summoned to’ be and appear within sixty Gays after the date of first publication of this hotlee, exclusive of the day of sald first pub- Heation. to-wit, within sixty (60) days ater July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and Retion: and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiffs, and serve a copy or sour answer on the undersigned attorneys for Plalnufts at thelr office below stated. or pay the "amount due, together with Interest and costs. Ty case you fail so to do, judgment will he sendered herein, foreclosing the Men of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sal@ real property, for the. sums and amounts due apon And charged against each, for sald taxes, In- terest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel Of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file In this cause and court. D.N. HOWARD, AMANDA E. HOWARD, Plaintiffs. CARRICO & DURK, Attorners for Plaintitts. ‘Gite Address: 003 Peoples Savings Bank Building. Seattle, King County, Washington, July 24th—Sept, 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington for King County. 1. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs, W. J. Hunt, and all persons unknown, 1€ any, having or claiming fn Interest in and to the hereinafter described teat property, Defendants, No. —~. Notice and. Sunmons. ‘State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you. as owners, claimants or holders of an Interest or estate in aid to the hereinafter described renl Property, are lereby notified that the above famed plainti Is the holder of one certain de- Hnanent tax. certifieste Issued by the ‘Treasnrer Of King County, State of Washington, dated the {oth day of Sept., 1907, and numbered 14861, for the dellnqvent taxes of the vear 1904, In the Amount af $3.53, and upon real property situated fn sald King County, deserihed as follows. to: wit: SW. WM of ihe 8. W. %. Section 25, Tp. 2N.K, OR. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintit upon said above deseribed rent Property, to-wit: for the year 1906, the sum of $037, which several sums hear interest at the fate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date Of payment. and are all the wQetd and mre- dented taxew upon and against sald real prop ert. ‘You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, If-any), are hereby further notived and summoned to" be and appear within. sixty days after the date of first publication of this hotiee, exelisive of the day of sald first publt- cation, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 4008, Inthe nbove entitled conrt and, action! and defend. this action and answer the com: pining of sald plalntim avd serve a copy of your Answer on the undersigned attorney for plintife at iis office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs, In ease you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein. foreclosing the Hen of sald taxes and) costs against ench parcel of sald real property for the gums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs. ordering Rstie of each parcel of sald property for the fatixfaction of ‘the sums charged and found against It respectively as provided by law, and as praved In malntif's complaint, now on file In {iis cause and court, T, H. CRAVER. Plaintitt. A. ©, MACDONALD, Attorney’ for Piaintift. wee Address: ‘S84 Bailes Butltng, Seattle, Vash. ‘Jnly 21—September 11, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THY STATE ‘of Washington, for the County of King. Emma M. Craig, Plain! ye. John Alexander Grale, Detendant.—No, 62200, “Summons by Pub- Heation. "The State of Washington to the said John Al- exander Crate, defendant: Yon are hereby: sam- moned to aphenr within sixty davs after the Gate of the first publication of this. summons, fowit, within «Ixty dave after the 2m dar of July, AyD, 1908, and defend the above entitled Retlon in. the above entitle’ Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer npon the wndersigned attorney for plaintift at Ns office Nelow stated: and In cece of sor failure ko to Co. Judgment will be Teurlered agninst vow according to the demand of the complaint, which has been fled with the Friday, September 18, 1908 Clerk of sald, Court, Tie obfect of the sald ace tion. set forth In. the complaint, Is ‘as. followe: "To obtain u decree of the above entitled court foreyor disclring aid anniwaliing the bonds of Inatrimony existing between sald, plaineie and the sald defendant, and granting the piaintit « Alvorce from. sald. defetdant.on the. grounds. of desertion and “abandonment. for_ more than “one year, and to obtain a decree In sald proceedings awarding to the plaintif€ the custody of the mi- hor children of auld plaiatift nd defendant, 10- wit: James Craig and Benjamin Craig, and de- Creeing the household furniture and utensils. and certaig, teal estate, situated at. the coruer, of First Street and Augusta Street, in Cornwall, Province of Ontario, to be the sole and. separate Jwoperty of the plalntim, and awarding the same To her as her. sole and’ separate property. tree from ayn claim from said defendant, and to obtain “stich other and further relied a8 the court may deem just in the premises. PV, DAVIS, Attorney” for Plalotitt, Office and P. 0, Address: 304 Pioneer Build- Ing, ‘Seattle, ‘King Comnts. Washington, Saree ee Se teas. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Anna:E, Erickson, Plaintiff, vs. Linnie Erickson, Defendant.—No, 62293. Sum- mons by Publication, The State of Washington to the said Linnie Erickson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to apepar within six- ty days after the date of the first publi- cation of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in ‘the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, And serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court, The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: ‘To ob- tain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony on the ground of non-support. HOMER E, TURNER, Attorney for Plaintitt, P. 0, Address: No. 745 N. Y. Blk. Se- attle, County of King, Washington. Juiy 24—September 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Tn the Matter of the Bstate of Sarah Duggan, Deceased. No. 9213, Notlee to Creditors, ‘By order of said court made herein on the 15th day of July, 1908, notice is hereby given to the’ realtors of, (and fo “all persone’ having claims against sald deceasgd ot against eal estate, of against the community formerly extst- ing between sald deceased and her tinsband, Daniel Duggan, to present them with the neces sary vouchers 40 the undersigned, B. G, Duggan, Adininistrator of said estate. at’ room 623 New. York Block, in Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state. within one year from and after the date ‘of first pnblication of this notice, to-wit, within one vear after July 24, 1908, or same Will be harred. Date of frst publication, July 24. 1908. BR. G, DUGGAN, As Administrator of Said Estate. RORERT H. LINDSAY, Attorney for Estate. 623 New York Block. Seattle, Wash. July 24th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATB ‘of Washington for King Counts. Margaret Hanegsehnobel, Plainti. vs, Jobm Hanegsclnobel, Defendant. No. 62277," Sum- State of Washington to John Hanegschnobel, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (G0) days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action In the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer thereto hipon the undersigned attorners for the plaintife at thelr address below given; in case of your fatlnre so. to do. judgment will be rendered agalnat you according to the prayer of plalntiff's complaint, which has been filed with the elerk of sald court. The object of this action ts to obtain a ai~ vorce from you on the ground of habitual drank= enness and failure to support platntift. CARRICO & DURE, Attorneys for Plaintift. P.O, Address: 608 Peonles Hank Building, Se- ‘attle, King County, Washington, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington In and for the County of King. Alfred Vandesandt, Plaintiff, vs. Kittle Van- desandt, Defendant,’ No. ——. Summons for Publteniton. ‘The State of Washington to the said, Kittle Vandesandi, above named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty dare. after the date of the first publication of this Summons, to-wit, within sixty days atter the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled wetion in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plainttf, and Serve a copy of your answer upon the under Signed uttorney for plaintift at Ms office below Stated. And In ease of your failure so to doy Judgment will be rendered against you accord: ing to the demand of the complaint, which has. been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the snid action, set forth in the com- plaint, Is as follows: To obtain a decree of the Conet annniling the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plainti™ and defendant. “GEORGE MARVIN) SAVAGE. Attorney for Pialntift, P. 0, Address: 545 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, July Uth—Sept. 4; 1908. Wash. : July 24—Angust 28, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs, John Doe Michener, John Doe Riley, and ‘all ‘persons unknown, if any, having or eltiming an interest in and to the hereinafter deserihed real property. Defend ants, No. ——. Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington to the above defendants and ede of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in and. tof ebhereinatter deserived real property, Ate hereby. notifled that the above named plaine ti ts the holder of one certain delinquent, tax certificate. fssned cbr the ‘Treasurer of King Counts, State of Washington, dated the 3rd day. of April, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the Helinment taxex of the followlng year. in the Toniowing amount. and upon the real property Altuated in-sald_ Kine County, deserined as fol- lows, to-wit: Certifeate No. BA129. Lot 9, Mock 5. Craven's Division to” Green Take, £08 the year 19M4 In the sum of $8.05: that the taxes for the following prior and” subsequent years. have been paid by the palinti® upon sald above Aeserited lot of real property, to-wit: For the sear 1905, the eum of $8.71; for the year 1900, the sum of $9.00: for the vear 1906 (local im: provement district No. 1007), in the sum of Ei14: for the year 1907. the sum of $10.65, and for the vear 1807 (Jocal Improvement district No. 1007). the sum of $2.04, which several sums hear Interest at the rate of 13 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are al? the. unpaid” and unredeemed taxes upon and agalnst sald real, property. ‘You and each of yon, (ineluding sald persons unknown, If-any), are hereby further notified And. simmoned tobe and appear within. sixty davs ‘after the date of first publication of this hotlee, exclusive of the day of sald first publi- cation, to-wit, Anguat 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and anawer the complaint of sald plaintttt and serve a cony af your answer on the undersigned Attorney for piaintit at bis office below stated, or pay the amount due. together with Interest fina comts.” In ese on fall 90. t9 do, Jucement WIN be tendered lerein, foreclosing thie Hen of Bald taxes and comts against each parcel of said Teal property for the sums and amounts due upon And charged against each, for sald taxes. Interest and corte, ordering sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the snms charged And found agatnst It respectively as provided by. Taw, and ns-praved In nlaintiff’s complaint, now ‘on fle In tis cause and court, Mog. NIST. Plntutitt, KENNETH MACKINTOSH € FB, HERALD. Attorners’ for Plaintift. goiter Addrees: 227-30 Colman Bidg., Beattie, Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908, Friday, September 18, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King Counts. Willam Dorris ‘and Maria ‘Dortis,. bis. wite ener vs. James M. McLellan and the un- own helts of the said James M. McLellan, if the said James M. McLellan be deceased, Joseph Me Barto, and the wukuown hetrs of the Bal Joneph Me "Barto, if the. said Joseph M, Barto be deceased, and all persons. unknown, faving, “or ‘claiming ‘to have. any. interest 10 the property described in the complalut. heretn, No. 62446." Summons for Publication. ‘The State of Washington to each and all of sald defendants: Youare hereby summoned to appear witht sixty days after. the date of the frst publica- Clon of, this. summons, to-wit: Within. sixty days after the ith day of August, 1908, and defend. the above entitled action ii the above entitied ‘court and ‘answer the complaint. of the Diaintifts herein and serve A. copy of. Your, an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plaln. titts at iis address ‘below stated and tn case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered Against you according to the demand. of the Complaing herein. which has been fled. with the Glerk “ot sald court, The object of sald. action Is to quiet title to. the following described prop- us, slttaced ia ising County, “Washington, te wie: Tots one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Boston, Heights’ Supplemental Addition to, the Elty of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and, de: bar’ the ‘sulddfendante, gd encl, and alto fier, from asserting "any ‘claim whatsoever fn and to the said. lands and premises and. to ob- fain ‘a decree decreeing that. the sald defend: Ants, and each and all-of them, have no tter- ‘eat whatsoever Inthe e4id property” and that Dluintite’ title 1s good and "valid EDWARD. VON TOREL, ‘Attornes for. Plaintit. Omce and Post Omce Address: "Rooms 003-5 Mutual Tite Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. raebingtog: sept. 1%. 1908, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King County. Elizabeth M, Lemon, Plaintify, vs. C. L. Lemon, Defendant.—No. ...... ‘The ‘State of Washington to the said ©._L. Lemon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wot :within sixty (80) days after’ the Tsth day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint Of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attonney for plaintif® at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the lexk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of failure to provide and general relief. HERBERT E. SNOOK, ‘Attorney. for Plaintitt, P.O, Address: Room 537 Burke Buiid- Ang, Seattle, King County, Washington. fept. 18—Oct. 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, Deceased. No. 6403. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made, and for Hearing on Final Account. Leota A. Conrad, administratrix of the ‘estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, having filed in this court her tinal ac- count and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the resi- ‘due thereof among the persons entitled ‘by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts Sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered, by the court that all persons interested in the estate ‘of the said Marcus O'Brantigam, de- geased, be and appear before the’ said Superior Court of King County, State, of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 8th day of Octo- ber, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. ‘of said day then and there to. show cause, if any they have, why said ac- count’ should not be approved and an ‘order of distribution should not be made ‘of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition men- tioned, according to law. It i8 futrher ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most Public places in King County and, pub: lished once a week for three successive weeks before the said 8th day of October, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a news- paper printed and published in said King County und of general circulation there: in, Done in open court this 17th day of September, 1908, GEO. FE, MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, ‘County of King.—ss, I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King ‘County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and cor- rect copy of an original order to show «cause, made by said Court on the 17th day of September, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Marcus ‘O'Brantigam, de- ceased. ‘Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 17th day of September, 1908. (Seal.) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By E. 8. SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. September 18—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H, Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura E. Price, dnd all persons unknown, if any, having or clalming-an interest in and to the hereinafter described real_property, Defendants. No. —-——. Notice and ‘Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein- after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff Is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of December, 1904, and num- bered B28894, for the delinquent taxes ‘of the yenr 1903, in the amount of $25.27. and upon real property, situated in sald King County, described as follows, to- Wit: SE% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22) N. R. 3B, W. M. less 1 acre occupied by school ‘that thé taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintift upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum, of $21.60; for the year 1905, the stim of $22.40; for the year 1906, the sum of $31.50, and for the year 1907, the sum of $20.70; which sev- éral sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept, 18, 1908. in the above entitled court and ‘action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay. the amount due, together with interest and costs, In easé you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel Of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes. Interest and costs, ordering a Sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums Charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in, this L. H. CRAVER, Plaintift. A. C, MACDONALD, ‘Attorney for Plaintift. Office address, 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash, ‘September 18—October 30, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L, H, Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura &. Pri¢e, and all persons unknown, If any, having or claiming an interest In and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No, ————. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or cliimants of an interest in the herein- after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certiti- cate Issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day’ of December, 1904, and numbered B28895, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $8.76, and upon real'property situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: SW4% of NEY of SW4 and Nw ot NEM of SW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22,.N. RK. 3 E, W. M. ‘That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff updn said real property, to-wit For the year 1904, the sum of $7.20; for the year 1905, the’ sum of $10.80; for the year 1906, the sum of $12.60, and for the Year 1907, the sum of $8.28; which sev- eral sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of bayment, and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against said Teal nranety, You and eich of you (ineluding sata persons unknown, if any), are hereby further rotified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date Of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept, 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and Serve a copy of your answer on the wn- dersigned attorney for plaintif at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs, In ase you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of sald property for thé satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H, CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MACDONALD. Attorney for Piaintitr, Office address, 524 Builey Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 0, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Diu Of Wasnington ror King County, Lottie Daughtry, Plaintiff, vs, James Daughtry, Defendant. No. 63059. Sum- mons for’ Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the,said James Daughtry, defendant: 2 You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days trom and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 18th day of September, 1908, and detend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff! and’ serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed atiorneys for plaintitt at their office and post office address below desig- nated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. ‘The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of non-support, failure to provide, cruel treatment and habitual drunkenness. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintift Office and Post Office address, 55 Hal- ler Building, Seattle, King | County, Washington. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Pifin- tiff, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane Doe Ask- heim, ‘his ‘wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants, No. 62636. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and ¢ach of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate ts- gued by the ‘Treasurer of King County: ‘Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42178 for, the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 In the amoul.t of ninety (90) ‘cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Wasi- ington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty-eight (28), Block four (4), Bal- lard Park Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above deseribed real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (94) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which sev- eral’ sums bear Interest at ‘the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum for the said date of payment, and‘are all the unpaid and unredeemed ‘taxes upon and against said lot, You snd each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the sald first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. i8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action ‘and de». fend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail So to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forciosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively. as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint,’ now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift. F, J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—Oétober 30, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County, Aurora’Land Co., a corporation, Plain- tif, vs. C. Askheim and Jane doe Ask- heim, ‘his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described. real property, Defend: ants. No, 62535. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the ‘Treasurer of King County; Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered 1342158, for, the delinquent taxes for the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property, situated In icing County, Wash: Ington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot fifty-two (52), Block four (4), Ballard Park Second ‘Addition to. Seattle, King County, Washington, That’ the taxes for the following, priot and subsequent years have been. paid by the plaintif! upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1906, thirty-four (34) cents, for the year 1906, fifty-three (58) cents, and for the year 1907, forty-elght (48) cents, which sev- eral’ sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpald and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. i8, 1908, in the above entitled court and Action ‘a:#. de- fend this action and answer the com- plaint of sald plaintif’ and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintift at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreciosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each. for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed In plaintift's com- plaint,’ now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitr, F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & &—REPUBLICAN LEGALS hub ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plain- tiff, vs. C, Askhelin and Jane Doe Ask- heim, his wife, whose ‘true christian namé is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants. No. 62533. Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property. are hereby notified that the Above named plaintift is the holder of One certain delinquent tax certificate Is- fued by the ‘Treasurer of King, County: Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered 42180, for, the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety. (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Wash- Tngton, described as follows, to-wit: Lot thirty-two (32), Block four! (4), Rallard Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, . That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which sev- eral ‘sums bear interest at the rate of fif- teen per cent. per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. : You and each of you (including said unknown persons, {f any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the. first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first Gate of publication, to-wit: within sixty days ‘after Sept. 1% 1908, In the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer bn the undersigned attorney for plaintiff At his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the Sums and amounts due upon and charges Against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sims charged and found against it re- Shectiver, «provided by law and as neared t' plaintiff's complaint, now on fie ty this canes and court, AUROPA TAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Pratntiet, pt CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff Office address, °14 Northern Bank & trest Bldg. Seatte, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora "Land Co., a corporation, Plain- tiff, vs. C, Askheim and Jane Doe Ask- heim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described, real property. Defend- ants, ‘No, 62532. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above pamed plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate Jasued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42177 for the delinquent foxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents and upon the real prop: erty situated In King. County, Washing- ton, described -as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty-seven (27, Block four (4), Ballard Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘That’ the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by ‘the plaintiff upoh said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (44) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, ana for the year 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which sev- eral sums bear interest at the rate of fit- teen per cent, per annum from the sald date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the BACH AOWTTRES TAF first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. i8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and de- fend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below Stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered here- in, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each, parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com: plaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift. F. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. ‘Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G, W. Roberis and Jane Doe Roberts. his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described reel property, Defend- ants. No. 62304. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that, the Above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent taxe certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Wash- ington, dated April 15th, 1908, and num- ered B49261, for the delinquent taxes of the year i904, in the amount of Ninety- three (92) cents and upon the real prop- erty situated in King County, Washing- ton, described as follows, to-wit: | Lot Hileven (11), Block Two (2), White Bros. Addition. to’ Kirkland, Washington hat the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintift upon said above deseribed real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906. fitty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums hear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of pay- ment ‘and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against sald Jot You and each of you (including said persons unknowr, if any). are hereby farther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date oPefirst publication of this notice, ex: Clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept, 18, 1908, In the above entitied court Ena action and defend this action and Answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his bifice below stated, or pay the amount fue, together with interest and costs, {n case you fail so to do, judgment will he rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each par- Gel of said real property for the sums and mounts due upon and charged against Gach, for sald taxes, interest and costs: Grdering a sale of each parcel of suld property for the satisfaction of the sums Pharged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintift’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. ‘Office address, 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sontember 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. ‘Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners and all persons’ unknown, {f any, having or Gaiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62227. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate fssned by the ‘Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 16th, 1908, and numbered B49271 for, the ‘delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property. situated in King County, ‘Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Fifteen’ (15), Block Seventeen (17) Richmond Beach’ Supplemental Addition to. King County, Washington, phat the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, Fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of Fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of pay- ment and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said lot, ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclus- ive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18; 1908, In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans: wer the complaint of said plaintift and Serve a copy of your answer on the Undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office helow stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs In éase you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each par- cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums. charged and found against it re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file In this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora: tion, Plaintiff. F, J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash, ie ember 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation. Plaintiff, ys. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown and all persons, un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate In and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants. No, 62306. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heerinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintife is the holder of One certain delinquent tax certificate ts- sued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, ana MUmvered =B4yeoo Lue tue dednquenct Waxes O14 the year 19v4 in ine auwunt OF sinety=chree (vo) Cents dud Upon the Feat property siuated in ning councy, Wastingion, deserved us 100Ws,. tos Wit: Lot Hive (0), p1ock 1wo (Z), White brOs, AUdIUON LO KIPKaNd, King County, Wasaington. that the taxes for the following, prior aind Subsequent years nave veen paid. by (ue piatiucit upon said above described real property, vo-wit: tor tne year 1905, dorty-one (41) cents; Lor tue Year 1906, fiuty-two (32) cents and tor’ tie year 1yui, titty (50) cents, which several Sums beai interest at the Tate of fitteen per cent. per annum trom said date of payment anu are ail the unpaid and un- Feaeemed (axes upon and against said ot, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, it any), are ferepy surtner notined and summoned to be and appear within sixty days alter the date Or first publication or this notice, ex- Clusive oc the day of said frst publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days utter Sept, 18, 1908, in the above entitied courc and ‘action; dna detend this action aud answer the compiaint or said piaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned atiorney tor plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with ‘interest and. costs, in case you rail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each par- colo. sald real property for the sums “id dees due upon and charged (stuns: cuca, for said taxes, interest and Coss, Ofacting a sale of edeh parcel of Sidiu property for the satistaction of the Sune vaatged and Tound against It re- Specuve.y as provided by iw, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now om tue i tus cause and court, AUKOkA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Piaintin, F. J. CAKV ER, Attroney for Plaintiff, Oftiee address, 14 Northern iank’ & Trust Bldg, Seattie, Wash, x Beptembue 1s October 96,1908: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE tSate ot Washington in and tor the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the kstate of Theo- philus Elliott, Deceased.—No. 8185.— Order to Show Cause why Final Account of Admimstratrix Should Not be Auowed and Estate Distributed. This cause coming on regularly before the court on this 16th day of September, A. b., 1909, upon the filing of the final account and petition for distribution of Emily Elliott, administratrix of the es- tate of “iheophilus Elliott, deceased, ta be sec for nearing: It Is Ordered, that the 22nd day of Oc- lover, sco, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at_the county court house in Seattle, King Lusso, ssashington, in Department xo. 4, in the above entitled court, be and the sume is hereby fixed and appointed as the time and place for the hearing of Said final account and petition for dis- tribution. It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estate file their excep- tions in writing, if any they have, to said final account and petition for distribu- tion, and at the sald time and place ap- pear and show cause why said final ac- count should not be approved and settled and said estate distributed, And It Is Further Ordered, that, all persons Interested in said estate be given a notice of said hearing by the publica- tion of a copy of this order once a week for four successive Weeks in ‘The Seattle Republican, and by posting copies there- of in three of the'most public places in this King County, for at least twenty days prior to said’ hearing. GEO, KE. MORRIS, Judge. PRANK S, CARROLL, Attorney for Ad- ministratrix. , September 18—October 16, 1908. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Adelaide | Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Num- ber 16144. The State ‘of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty (60) days after the 2ist day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action In the above en- titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the,demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain from you a divorce on the grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treat- ment and failure to support. PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. 0, Address: 32 Union Block, Seat- tle, King County, Washington, ‘August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King Joon P. Lewis, plaintit, vs, Clara BE. Lewis. defendant, ‘No.—. Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said Clara B. Lewis, defendant: You are hereby sum- moned to’ appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this, summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day ot July, “A, D,, 1908, and defend the above entitled faction in. the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and’ serve a copy of your answer apon. the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at bis office below stated. ‘And In case of your failure so to do. judy- ment. will be rendered agalnst you according to the. demand of the complaint. which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. ‘The object of the said action, set forth In the complaint, fs as follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolu- tlon of the bonds of matrimony now existing Detween plainti® and the defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. 3B. BALL, Attorney for Piaintitt P, 0, Address: 9-10 Starr-Royd Block., Se- attle, County of King, Washington, vie 17—-Aurust 28. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington for King County. L. H, Craver, plaintift, vs, Albert Stevenson, and ali persons ‘unknown, if any, having ot claiming ‘an interest In ‘and to ‘the herein- after described real property, defendants. No. 62158, Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners. claimants or holders of an interest ‘or estate In and to the Hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintift 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate Insued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ith day of Sep- fember, 1905, and numbered B35240, for the de- Wnquent taxee of, the year in ths amount of R246. and_ Upon the real property, situated in said King County, deseribed as follows, to-wit: So. 4 of lot 6, block 5, Young's Addition. "phat an undivided % Interest of So. 34 of aid lot less west 60 fect thereof was redeemed Rept. 25. 1005. taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon knd charged against each, for sald taxes. in- ferest and costs, ordering a sale of, eacli parcel of. sald property. for the satisfaction of | the sams charged and found against It respectively ts provided by law, and as prayed In plaintit s complaint, now on ‘fle in this cause and court. 1, H, CRAVER, Plaintit. A, C, MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office address: 524 Batley Building, Seattle, Wash. Inly 17—August 25, 1908, 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. Judge Albertson may know more law than Judge Frater, but he evidently don't know as many voters. The Times is of the opinion that the country editors have it in for it, and that, too, without just cause. Criminals feel the same way about the officers of the law. Thomas A. Edison spent a number of days in Seattle within the past week and strange to say no one saw the ghost walk during his stay in the city. Eugene Debs, as an epigramtic debator, seems an adept. If Debs does not see something ahead more than the ordinary man, he either thinks he does or he is the most monumental liar on earth Hi Gill may be Acting Mayor of Seattle in the absence of Mayor Miller, but he doesn't act like it. Just call up Main 305, Mr. Lawyer, when you have a legal notice for publication, and it will be taken care of in first-class shape and you need give yourself no further worry. The above number is that of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN located at Room 307 in the Epler block. After the races at the Meadows had closed and there no longer existed an opportunity for the Argus of this city to graft or blackmail the proprietors of the King County Fair Association into giving it any more money for at least twelve months, its last issue roasted the race track with a vengeance. For seventy-two days, the Argus through its advertising columns endeavored to get the people out to the race track and while the races were under headway said not a word in opposition to them, but when the races closed then it raised a howl about its being a gambling hole or more strictly speaking, a robbers' roost. May perhaps the Argus is working for hush money and takes this particular method of accomplishing its purpose, but in the light of its late double column advertising for the races it does seem viciously inconsistent. Persons who have kept tab on that weekly journal know that it has always been for right or wrong, whichever brought it the greatest amount of money. Forty-eight members of the next house of representatives of this state are said to be pledged to to the passing of a strong local option law. A good, wholesome, local option law seems to be generally wanted throughout the state, but prohibition under no circumstances will be tolerated. Seattle is still being torn to pieces by the steam shovel and the hydraulic machinee, which promises to continue for an indefinite period unless the nation should get hypnotized by the "matchless one." Trading and not politicier wire puiling seems to be the fort of C. J. Smith, and after the results of the last primary election will have been fully reported to him there is every reason to believe he will agree with us. Of course former Senator Wilson is not an active candidate for the United States senate to succeed Senator Piles, but his endorsement will go a long ways in saying who will be the candidate. Col. Alden J. Blethen is a splendid political prognosticator for the other fellow and the bogie man looking for the real seat of the money bag. Mayor Miller has gone to Indiana to visit his parents and perhaps get another parental hunch to be used as a basis to get a bigger office on. Minnesota may have "too much Johnson," but it is very a parent that, the third congressional district of the state of Washington is in no such trouble. Foraker has been taken into the fold by his political enemies and it is reported that, he was so glad to get in he forgot to give orders for his Negro Buccephelus to be taken to the barn. Now that the editor of the Times has lost out in politics Buffalo Bill might use him to a financial advantage by labeling him - "What is it?" President Roosevelt has had his way again, which resulted in the renomination of Gov. Hughes. Roosevelt seems to get what he wants. There is no doubt but that the voters made Hay at the late primaries while the sun shone. Jefferson may possess a sly old Coon, but he ran amuck in the Eastern Washington Hay fields. Agnew! Jim Agnew! Well, that name sounds strangely familiar. If that court house Brier bush has never as yet produced any "black berries" it looks as if it will not do so. Mead may not have been nominated, but he beat McBride, which is another personal victory for John L. Wilson, and that must be like gall and wormwood to the Times. Wilson may make Senator Piles Trimble in his very boots two years from now. In renominating Gov. Hughes the horsemen have been given opportunity to try to nose him off the track. "Republicans Weep Over Main," is a Times head line. Saw it in the Times? Main's vote may point to Democratic success, but Mr. Success seems to be so far in space that he will not get here in time to vote at the November election. Even Uncle Joe Cannon has been convinced that, shouting Methodists will be heard. "Not guilty." says Parkhurst. No one had accused you of murder. From reading the papers from day to day for the past month the presumption was that the voters were thoroughly aroused on the subject, but the actual count showed that the enthusiasm was greatest in the newspaper offices and among the candidates. In other words the voters did not seem to give a whoop in Hotentot whether they voted or not. In Seattle, but fifty per cent. of the registered vote turned out to the polls. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PETER H. BURGESS MILO A. ROOT BENCH AND BAR. One of the surprises of the late primary election, at which judges for the various superior courts of the state and likewise the supreme court were elected, was the way Superior Court Judge S. J. Chadwick of Whitman county ran for supreme judge. He easily led the entire state ticket and left those coaching him so far in the lunch that they now must feel as if they should have been coached by Chadwick instead of them coaching him. The personel of the superior court bench of King county will be the same as it has been, with the exception of Arthur E. Griffin, who voluntarily retired from the bench. He will be succeeded by the Hon. Wilson R. Ca', one of the most progressive lawyers in the Northwest. Both Judge Tallman and Mr. Gay made phenomenal runs in view of the fact they had been defeated in the bar primary, and of course all the attorneys that voiced the proceedings of the bar primary and their friends were fighting for its nominees, and of course they had that influence to overcome. It is said of Judge Gay that he is politically ambitious, and that after he will have served his four years on the bench the gubernatorial bee may buzz in his bonnet. Judge Miles Poindexter will not be a member of the superior court bench of Spokane after next January as he was nominated for representative in Congress in the Third Congressional district, and he of course expects to be elected, but whether elected or not, he will not be on the bench any more. Speaking of the prospects of him being elected it has been predicted by stalwart Republicans of the district that he is almost certain of defeat. Owing to the over crowded conditions of the courts all over the state it is said that the next legislature will be asked to create four more new judges in the state and that the King county bench will be increased to seven. If such is done the bar will again be in the lime light of public opinion in its endeavor to select a man for the position, to be recommended to the governor. The local members of the bar are of the opinion that Seattle should have at least two more justices of the peace and it is also alleged that the next legislature will be asked to pass such a bill, which would mean another scramble among the members of the bar of Seattle and King county. The justices, receiving the nomination on the Republican ticket are: R. R. George, J. B. Gordon and John E. Carroll. Have a Legal? Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN J. B. H. HERMAN D. CROW The King county superior court which began its fall session last week, is under full headway and all the judges working overtime in order to have their respective departments so thoroughly cleaned up by next January when the change is made that no unfinished business will be left. Most of the people are so well pleased over the non partisan judiciary idea, but it would give a greater amount of satisfaction if the judges were elected a different year from the regular county and state office. The election for judges should have been held next year instead of this year, and if so, it is believed a purely non partisan judiciary would be elected. If this non partisan idea was only extended to the selection of the superintendents of public schools, it would be another long step in the right direction. Speaking about the election of the members of the King county bench the primaries last week resulted in the following: A. W. Frater - - - - 15 722 R. B. Albertson - - - 15 510 George E. Morris - - - 14 688 Boyd J. Tallman - - - 14 026 Mitchell Gilliam - - - 13 447 Wilson R. Gay - - - 13 148 SUPERIOR RIGHT TO CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD Our position on the question of the superior right of a father to the custody of his minor child is well known. We gave ourselves free rein not such a long while ago in denouncing the action of a nisi prius court in refusing to give a child to its father where it was not shown that he was incompetent to care for it. 65 Cent. L. J. 175. We attempted to show in that editorial that the best interest of the child rule was being prostituted by directing its application to circumstances where it was never intended it should operate, and was subverting the rightful authority of the father. Now comes the cse of Peese v. Gellerman, 110 S. W. Rep. 196, in which the Court of Civil Appeal of Texas deprives a father of his right to his little daughter to whom he had turned over to her maternal aunt after her mother's death, and whom he desired to reclaim upon his second marriage. The father was shown to be a good man, well fixed in this world's goods and of a good, loving disposition. But the maternal relatives in resisting the father's claim were permitted to drag out of the closet of the second wife an old skeleton which in effe t showed that she had once been seduced by an ardent lover several years before her marriage when she was but a girl of seventeen years of age, and that the child of this unfortunate union was still living with its mother. The court deliberately refused to follow the great Missouri case of In re Scarritt, 76 M. 565, which is the most wonderfully clear declaration on the father's superior right to his child ever enunciated by any court in this country, and 2001 18 bedrooms Faber Friday, September 18, 1908 permits the testimony as to certain previous wrongful acts by the second wife to deprive a father of the child of his being ard the child of that natural love a.d affection which it can receive from no other source. The court plays so loosely on the heartstrings of parental affection that we are inclined to believe that the writer of this opinion has probably never experienced those deep emotions that draw a father's heart to his child. Courts are trifling with a very serious matter when they thus carelessly ignore the father's right to and authority over his children, a right and authority which existed in the days of the Patriarchs long before the existence of the state. It is upon the similitude of the parental relation that the state derives of its own authority of paren patriate and when its courts strike down the superior rights of the fathers of the land over the persons of their own children, they have laid the axe at the root of the tree from which all proper governmental authority proceeds. We are not unmindful of the fact that the Texas court has a considerable array of authority which it may cite to support it in its assumption of a right to consider the opportunities and prospects of the child alone, leaving out consideration any superior right in the father. If the courts are going to put in the balances as against the father's paramount right to the custody of the child, the desires of some rich relatives to keep the child and to furnish her with a better balance than the father can provide, the seeds of rebellion have been sown in the very nature of our being against a government which will tear our offspring from our arms and give them to another, because, forsooth, such other is better able to care for it. The courts and judges who have been guilty of setting up such standards had better spend some time in studying carefully the great opinion of the Missouri Supreme Court in In re Scarritt, supra. In the principal case it is refreshing to observe that one member of the court appreciated the importance of the father's superior right to his child. Judge Neill, dissenting from the harsh opinion of the majority of the court, says: "I believe that under the law and facts in this case the appellant has the right to take his little daughter home and r at as a member of his family. I think he has this right, because the God of nature has given it to enable him to discharge the duty he owes as a father to his child. Where a right emanates from such a source, the one to whom it is given, if fit to perform the duty it imposes, cannot be rightfully deprived of it by the courts of any country. The law itself recognizes the right primarily of the parent to the custody of his minor child, and but re-echoes the voice of nature in the duty it imposes. The mother of the child being dead, the presumption is that its father has the r g t to its custody; and it devo ves upon the party claiming adversely to it to show cause that it has been forfeited by him, that is, it must be proved that the father is not a fit person to rear and nurture his own child." —Central Law Journal. The effect of the non-partisan judiciary was all that its most ardent admirers could have expected, especially in King county. While an almost new set of judges have been elected the successful candidates are above reproach and of the highest integrity. Judge—What have you to say to the charge that, while the husband of one woman, you married three others? Bigamist—Simply this: that having four of a kind isn't what it is cracked up to be. While as yet no actual figures can be given as to the vote cast by the Republicans at the late state primary election, yet for the most part the nominees are known and the roster is a bit different from the one given by THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN last week. The nominees on the state ticket may be found below. Congressional Nominees United States Senator Wesley L. Jones First Congressional District Will E. Humphrey Second Congressional District F. W. Cushman Third Congressional District Miles Poindexter * * * Governor—Samuel G. Cosgrove Lieuteuant Governor— M. E. Hay Secretary of State Sam H. Nichols State Treasurer—E. K. Erwin State Auditor—C. W. Clausen State Land Commissioner E. W. Ro s Attorney General—W. P. Bell Superintendent of Schools H. B. Dewey State Insura 199 Commis- sioner J. H. Schively E. K. Erwin Samuel G. Grosgrove The Republican nominee for governor has been a resident of this section for many years and has resided at Pomeroy during all of the time. He is a successful lawyer and farmer. He was a member of the Constitutional Convention which is as near a public office as he has ever held. M. E. Hay Who won the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, is a prosperous merchant and farmer of Wilbur in Douglas county and for the past twenty years or more has been one of the foremost business men of that section. He has never held a public office. Sam H. Nichols Who has been nominated by the Republicans for secretary of state claims Everett as his home. He has only been in Washington since statehood and has been for the most part of the time in politics. He has been twice elected secretary of state and when he will have completed his third term he will have served as such twelve years. E. K. Erwin Who received the Republican nomination for state treasurer is truly a Spokane favorite sor, which was demonstrated by him getting almost every vote in the county in the primary election. He has been twice elected county treasurer and twice elected county clerk of Spokane county and never suffered defeat. He was a Phillipine soldier. C. W. Clausen Was nominated by the Republicans to succeed himself as state auditor. He claims Kitsap county his home, where he, pror to being elected a state office, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN STATE NOMINEES A. C. H. A. P. B. W. E. Humphrey C. W. J. H. Schively THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN CAN STATE NOM M. B. C. W. Clausen A. C. M. E. HAY E. W. Ross --- [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. S. H. Nichols ```markdown ``` [Name] W. r. Bel held numerous county offices. He was also engaged in farming and might be termed a Kitsap county pioneer. His election in November will mean his second term. E. W. Ross The Republican state land commissioner nominee hails from Cowlitz county where he was engaged in the practice of law and the lumbering industry. If elected next November he will begin his second term. He has given the state a fair and economical administration and his election is assured. W. P. Bell Who was nominated for attorney general has been for the past twenty years a legal practitioner of Snohomish county. He has for the most of the time been interested in the political game and was twice elected prosecuting attorney of Snohomish county. John H. Schively Who received the nomination for state insurance commissioner registers from Olympia. He has been prominent in the political affairs of the state since 1895 when he was a member of the house of representatives of the Washington state legislature, at which time he was known as the Webster of the house. He is seeking his first term of the above office. Henry B. Dewey Was the unanimous choice of the Republican party for state superintendent of public instruction. He has been actively engaged in school work in Pierce county for a number of years. He served as assistant to the late Supt. Bryan for a short time and after his death was appointed to the position by Governor Mead. He should have no opposition at the November election. Supreme Court Judges Stephen J. Chadwick. Milo A. Root and Herman D. Crow, seems to have been elected at the late primaries. The above is only speculation for Jonn E. Humphries is running neck and neck witn Root and Crow, and it will take the official count to decide the two successful winners conceding Chadwick's election. King County Ticket Sheriff—Robert T. Hodge. Auditor—Otto A. Case. Clerk of Court—D. K. Sickles. Treasurer—Gerrge F. Russell. Prosecuting Attorney — George F. Vandevere. Assessor—Thomas A. Parrish. Coroner---Dr. Snyder. Surveyor---John Morrison. Wreck Master --- Jack Hawkins. County Commissioner First District---M. J. Carrigan. Second District---A. L. Rutherford. The lawyer was doing a cross-examining stunt. Now, sir," he said to the witness, "tell the court how far you were from the accused when he fired the shot." "Thirteen feet, seven and three-quarters inches," answered the witness. "Oh, come now," said the lawyer, "how can you tell to the fraction of an inch?" "I knew some fool would ask me," replied the other, "so I measured it."—Exchange. Its No Trouble To call for you legal notices. If you ring MAIN 305 And leave your office address. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE for King, Country. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Isabella Haskin, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the latterinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____ Notice and the following Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest, or estate in and to the heloferlaer real property, are hereby the holder of that the above named, the holder of the one certain deed amount tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 2nd day of May, 1907, and numbered the plaintiff for the delinquencies of 1904, 1904, in the amount of $8.13, and upon real property situated within King County, described as fol- tracts. Lot 15, Block 4, Thomas Gem and subsequent years have the following prior plaintiff upon said deed described real property, to-wit; for the 1905, the sum of $6.60, and the year 1906, the sum of $6.44, which sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said realtors. You and each other (including said persons known and unknown), are hereby further notified and ammunished to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, office, exclusive of the say of first publication, to-wit: 60 days after July 31, 1905, under all entitlement and actions of defend this action and answer the complaint on the undersigned attorney's plaintiff at his office below stated, the amount due toGETHER with the costs. In case you fail closing the lien of said axes and foresee each parcel of said realtors' property for the sums and amounts due toGETHER with the interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, may, having on claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Summons. Notice and State and Washington to the above defendants and of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in estate in and to the herelafter numbered property, are hereby the right that the real named plaintiff holder of one certain delinquent certificate issued by the Treasurer 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, in the amount of 75 cents and upon the real property slumed by King County, described to-wait: Lot 1. Block 33. Maynard's ake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are paid by the plaintiff upon above deed property, for the year 1904, the sum of amounts, for the year 1905, the sum of amounts, and for the year 1906, the sum of amounts, which several sums bear interest at rate of 15 per cent. per annum from and seemed taxes upon and against said real you and each of you, (including said person himself, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, to-wit: (days after July 19, 1908, above entitled court and action; defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay amount due, together with interest, or pay amount due, in case you fall so short of the amount will be rendered hereinafter, against each parcel of said real property for sums and amounts due upon and charged each, for said taxes, interest and order, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for satisfaction for sums charged and found against, respectively as provided by law, and this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, wa. WIMM. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver. Plaintiff. vs. Wm. Mcfatray, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest in and to the hereafter descri- bed real property, Defendants. No. —. against each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon days after the date of first action of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer; plaintiff of said plaintiff and serve copy of your answer on the under oath of said plaintiff for plaintiff due, together with interest and costs. In case you so fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on costs against each of said real property for the sums due upon and charged by, for taxed taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums due found against it respondered by law, and as prayed by plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause M. C. MACDONALD, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Attorney Court In the Matter of the Estate of Frank R. Harrison, deceased. No. 8084. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, and Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Belle Harrison, the legally appointed ly qualified and active administratrix the estate of Frank R. Harrison, deased, having filed in this Court her signed and final account, setting forth all sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and distribution of the residue thereof made to the person by law en- titled thereto, and it appears that Court that said petition and final account set forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald that is therefore by the Court ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said Frank R. Harrison, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of W- ashington, at the Court Room of the Prie- bate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of October, a. M. at the hour of 9:00 a. m. of sold day, then and there to show account if any they have, why the final account of said administratrix should not be accepted and confirmed and an order of distribution made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 1st day of October. A. D. 1908, in the "Seattle Republican," a said printed and published in said King County, and general circulation therein. Done open court this 21st day of August. A. D. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Agda Almen, Plaintiff, vs. Olaf Almen, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Olaf Almen: We appeal hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the above plaintiff the plaintiff a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. F. L. SANDERS Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Margaret Johnson, Defendant. Allocation You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 4th day of September, 1908, the above entitled action, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, that his bill and Brown's agreement will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which is filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to collect the sum of thirty-five dollars ($35.00), being the amount due by you to the plaintiff and Brown, which claim has services rendered, which claim has been assigned to the Aurora Land Co., the plaintiff herein. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. H. Mecken and Jane Doe Mecken, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an award, the house described real property, Defendants., No. 62639. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49543, issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following month and upon the real property situated in and upon King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—Lot 17, Block 2; Certificate Number B49543; year, 1904; amount, $1.13. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 17, Block 2, Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—78 cents, 1905; 89 cents, 1906; $1.02, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from subsidy and investment, and are all the paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the day of September 1900 in the above enclosed and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do judgment will be required in closing to lie with said taxes and costs each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Fred A. Simons, executor of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that salesmen sets forth facts efficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sold estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the hour of 8:30 of said court, in the City of Seattle, on the 24th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks upon the said 24th day of September 1908, in The Seattle newspaper printed published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of August, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. State of Washington, County of King,ass. L. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King Court, State of Ohio, Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 29th day of August, 1908, in the matter of state of Martin Henry Hisock, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 29th day of August, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hlscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Fred A. Simon, the executor of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, has rendered account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 24th day of September, at 930 o'clock a.m., at the door room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed, said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 28th day of August, 1908. day of August (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wichington, for King County. ication. The State of Washington to the said Lowery Council, defendant. G. Shyler York, NY. hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 7th day of July, to send the above written notice in the above plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and because of your failure to do so, plaintiff will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above title action is that plaintiff may obtain the absolute divorce from you upon the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263-61 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7-Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE you wish for King County. James R. Wilson, plaintiff, vs. Eva Wilson, defendant. No. 62399. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Eva Wilson, defendant: Wilson, 48, died hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of August, 1908, for the defended action in the above court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in his office address below stated; and for your failure to do so, the plaintiff will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the complaint is to defend, on the grounds of abandonment and cruel treatment. WARREN H. LEWIS, Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: 308 Shafer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7—September 18, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle, Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Joseph Masvero, plaintiff, vs. P. Jugui trading and doing business, under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. — Summons for Publication of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Jugui, trading and doing business un- You are hereby notified that Joseph Maswero has filed a complaint against you in said court whence will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Blood Center, King County, A. D. 1908, at 10th day of Sep. A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessional and the demand of the plaintiff granted object and demand of the plaintiff is to owe 70 thousand amount the plaintiff claims to you during the past 60 days preceding the 2nd day of July, 1908, upon which claim nothing has been paid, and further, that you have attained personal security levyed on in this case under attachment issued heretoefor in favor of plaintiff. Filed August 6, A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE. Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. August 1-September 4, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT-BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington William N. Evans, plaintiff, vs. P. Juguat trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. --- Sum- mer Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Juglun, trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant: You are hereby notified that William N. Evans has will come out against you in said office and will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 10th day September, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., m. written and 800-887- dollar, and answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action and complaint is to recover judgment against you for ninety-sine and a $100 dollars. You are written and merchandise and aid and delivered to you by plaintiff between April 1st, 1908, and June 30th, 1908, no part of which has been paid, and further, to sell under attachment the personal property levied on in this cause under attachment issued heforetoe in Iowa to the plaintiff. Filed August 6. A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. August 7—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Charlotte Scobey, Plaintiff, vs. George Scobey. Defendant. Summons for plaintiff. The State of Washington, the said George Washington, summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled action and answer the court's plaintiff, and serve the court's answer upon the under-understrokes for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according .o the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the court of the Court of the Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, idleness, non-support and desertion, and for plaintiff's maiden name of Charlotte Whitehead. E. L. SANDERS. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE COURT OF THE STATE In the matter of the estate of Judith Cox Moore, deceased. No. 9237. Notice to Ccredit- By order of said court made herein on the 31st day of July, 1908. Notice is hereby given to the court that the insured said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Judith J. Moore, attorney Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle. In said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be borne. Date of first publication August 7, 1908. Attorneys for Estate, 960 Empire Blvd., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nellie Temple, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication. The Court of Washington to Lewis P. P. Temple, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toow, within sixty (60) days from and after the 21st day of August, 2012, and defend the objection entitled action in the Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure so do, do, believe. Will be rendered the court upon according to the deed of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of said court. The above entitled action is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce of and from the defendant, Lewis P. Temple, on the ground of failure, neglect and refusal to make suitable provision for said plaintiff's support, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable HERBERT L. JACKSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office address: Room 307 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21st—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Grada B. Craayo, Plaintiff, vs. Antonie Johan Craayo, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant: Antonie Johannes summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and amuse the plaintiff that serve a copy of your letter to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made in writing of the claim of the object of the entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant. JAS. M. EPLER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 1100 W. 11th Street, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 31—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the land inafter described real property. Defendants. No. 62640. Notice and Sum- State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, are awarded plaintiff is that the one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49553, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes the following year, in which amount and upon the real property situated in-wit King County, described as follows, to-wit: Wilberton Addition—Lot 10. Block 7: Certificate Number B49553; year, 1904; amount, 91 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the court said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 7, Wilberton Addition— 82 cents, 1905; $1.69, 1906; $1.22, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum for sold date of payment, all the unpaid and all the taxes upon and unpaid sale, real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said file extinction, to wait within sixty days after the 4d anniversary of September, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, on pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. You fail so to foreclose the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, the satisfaction of the amount charged and the amount as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Emma McKissen and Jane Doe McKissen, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62641. Notice and Summar You and each of you, as owners, claim State of Washoe, as above de- fendants, and each of them, Friday, September 18. 1908 ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to wit: Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—Lot 37, Block 4; Certificate Number B49542; year, 1904; amount, $1.34. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to wit: Lot 37, Block 4; Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—7 cents, 1905; 89 cents, 1906; $1.03, 1907. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: with sixty days after the 4th of September, 1908, in the above entitled notice, to answer the action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of above taxes and costs for the sums charged and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as praved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ivah Marie Durant, Plaintiff, vs. Cassie B. Durant, Defendant. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Cassie B. Durant, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today with the intention of seeking a second day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below state attorney general, so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the condition that the parties abide and deserion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessle B. de.Varona, plaintiff, vs. Edwin I. de.Varona, defendant. No. 62008. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin I. de.Varona, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and de facto after the first publication of his twxty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your complaint on the inquest and attorney at the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court, and entitled to be entitled to a jury for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. Date of first publication, July 17, 1908. Attorneys for Phailur. Office and Post Office address: 413 414 and 415 Mehlhorn Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Florence Bray. Plaintiff, vs. Charles Bray. Defendant, No. The state of Washington to said def fendant. Charles Bray. enchant. We may hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and see that the court of your name has placed upon you undesigned attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the complaint is an absurd degree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. York Building, Seattle, Washington. FRED C. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 431 New September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Anna Dilg. Plaintiff, vs. Julius Dilg. Defendant. C. 68544. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Julius Dilg. Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, the defense officer entitled to answer in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer union the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against the defendant and the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year and for non-support. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: Room 32 Union Block Seattle, King County, Washington. *N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Michener, John Doe Riley, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real estate. Defend, and summon. You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon this day after the date of the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication—wife, August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald persons to serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned attorney for the office at his office below stated, the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing sald taxes and costs against sald real property of sald real property and sums and amounts due upon charge against each, for sald taxes, sald property for the satisfaction of each parcel charged and found against, respectively as provided by law, and prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. M. J. NIST, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. MILDEM, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Blog, Seattle, Washington. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR-1 R COURT OF THE STATE King County. Washington Int. Lit. Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Larson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heresafter described real property. Defendants. No. ____. Notter and Shipment of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of your associates, claimants or holders of estate in and to such property described real property, may be notified that the above delinquent plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of December and numbered B42040, 1904, inclusive, in the amount of $20.04, upon the real property situated within King County, described as the Salmon Bay Addition Block. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff said above described real property for the year 1916 of $2.73, and for the bear interest at the sum of $2.97, which several sums annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said person. You send each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon days after the date of first application of this notice, exclusive within 60 days of said first publication, 10 days in, above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint on the undersigned attorney's plaintiff at his office before he pay the amount due, force to do, judgment will be rendered herein, close each parcel of said taxes and for the sums and amounts charged against each, taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and for the sums it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause. and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD A. Affleigh Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE at Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and address of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of airline or air property in and to the heretofore described real property, are the above named staff is the holder of one certain deferred tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated 14th day of April, 1951, and numbered B33300, for the deliware of the airline year 1902, in situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Iot 4. Block 2. Goodspeed to West Seattle, the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff as above described real prop. to-wit; for the year 1903, the sum of 24 erty, to-wt; for the sum of 20 cents; for the sum of 1904, the sum of 20 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per summ from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said person, and each of you, (including said person, unaware and if any), are hereby further notified days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after said action; and defend the entire action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the understated attorney for plaintiff at the together with interest or pay the amount of your answer with interest will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said property and costs against each parcel of real property for the sums and amounts upon and charged against each parcel of taxes, interest and costs, in a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause of court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. WASH. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Washington for King County. of Washington. Plaintiff, vs. A. Vallus, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heretofore described property proposed plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1904, and numbered the number of persons for whom the tax amount of $1.26, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6. Block 5. Queen Anne Anne Addition to the City of Seattle. Queen Anne Anne Addition to the City of Seattle. The years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1902, the sum of 68 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 63 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 63 cents; and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.17, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, to annum from said date of payment, and all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property; (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit: within 60 days after July 31, 2013, to the office of the plaintiff and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due to his office below stated, in case costs. In case so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, and the amount due upon and charged against each sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now in this cause and court. L. H. CROVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, WA July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Charles Osner and Agnes Osner, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Annie Smith and John Doe, his husband, who is unknown to plaintiffs, her husband, defendants. No. 62709. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Annie Smith and John Doe Smith, her husband, whose true given name is unknown: You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above writed notice of the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer herein upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which is on file with the clerk of this court. The object of this complaint is forth in complaint is to obtain a decree cancelling and holding for naught a certain contract given by plaintiff, Charles Osner, to the said defendant, Annie Smith, May 20th, 1906, and recorded in Vol. 476 of deeds, page 492 of records in the Auditor's office of King County for the sale of Lot 12 and the easer that I have placed in the City of Seattle, and to obtain a decree quieting title to said property in plaintiffs. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiffs Office and Public Office address, Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. August 28—October 9. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wash.ingen. in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. Schultz and Jane Doe Schultz, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heafterment described in the Deftendants. No. 62494. and Simpson. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the herliesther described in the certificate, are the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42175, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety cents of King County. Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Twenty-dye (25), Block Three (3), Ballard Park 2nd Addition to Seattle, King County. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid to the property properties to-wit for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are the valid and necessary taxable sums. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of the said plantiff, to-wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plantiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint and serve a copy of your answer to the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of salts taxes and costs against the sums charged and amounts due upon and charged against each, for salts taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sal property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, as provided by law, and as pursued in plantiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash., Aug. 14, Sept. 25, 1908. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has been duly appointed guardian of the estate of John Loftstrom, an insurance company, in claims or demands against insured person are hereby requested to present them to the said guardian at his place of business, at 745 New York Blk, Seattle, Washington. HUGH A. BOWMAN, Guardian of Fstate of John Loftstrom, an Insane Person. W. G. BEARD and H. E. TURNER, Attorneys for sold Guardian. August 28—September 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aaron W. and Co., Corporation Flatbill, w. D. Van De Watt, and Co. Van Be Watt, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter deserted real property, Defendants. No. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heretofore described property, as owners, claimants or holders of a named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated May 26, 1906, and numbered B42143, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of eleven cents, situated in King County, Washington, described as follows-to-wit: Iot nineteen (19). Block eighteen (18). Bay View Addition to Salmon Bay. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent, are paid above described paid property. to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date. The State of Washington is unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint against the plaintiff on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and amounts due upon the plaintiff for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged by law, and as waived in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bluff, Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14-Sept. 25—1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. D. Van De Watte, and Jane Dee Van De Watte, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herenafter described real property. Defendants. Named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated May 23, 1906, and numbered B42144, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of eighty-nine cents. Plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty (20), Block eighteen (18), Bay View addition to Salmon Bay, Washington; that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff. Plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax for the year 1905, twenty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.28), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the said date of payment, and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including sald unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this complaint, and to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint. In the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against the property, and amounts due upon and charged against each for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for in their complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1988. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. William Edward Rhodes, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Louisa Rhodes, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Mary Louisa Rhodes. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case you fail so to do judgment, will be remanded against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of deion E. L. SANDERS. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Daniel Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Hilma Yrjana Williams, Defendant. No. 62705. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, te-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in plaintext and the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court; the object of the above entitled action is for a decree of divorce on the grounds of desertion and aban- Attorneys for Plantin. P. O. Address: T. G. Grepson and P. V. Davis, attorneys at law, 304 Ploneen Bldg., Seattle, Wash. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Philhartt, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heirafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty-five days after the date of services of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the action and answer to be complained in the above written notice on the understated attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a fraction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. I. H. Craver. Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Deindendants. No. — Notice and acknowledgment. Washington to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain defendant and each of them. Washington of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43121. for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903. In the amount of 75 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows to-wit: Lot 3, Block 33, Maynard's Lake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the year 1903 amounted to 22 cents, the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of this person, on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing that each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfies of the sums charged and amount of each parcel of said real property if respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle. Wash. July 31 - September 19, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Shipment. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herderinafter described real property, and to the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B4312.32, the amount of $7.22, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Lot 24. Block 15. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts. That the taxes for the following sub-paragraphs are paid upon said above described real property, towit: for the year 1905, the sum of $6.30, and for the year 1906, the sum of $4.83, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all paid upon described taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and answer to the complaint of said plaintiff and said defendant on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall short of the amount due, you may close the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a payment of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on the in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 324 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31-September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for Kirk County. I. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, vs. W. H. Minor, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. N-277. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. N-277. Named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B46052 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. In the year 1905, the sum of $3.21, was delinquent in said King County, described as follows: to-wit: Lot 2, Sec. 31, Tp. 26 N. R. 7 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the year 1905, the sum of $3.11, and for the year 1906, the sum of $3.20, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the delinquent taxes upon and against said real property. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notated State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, is notified that the above plaintiff is the holder of the昂倍ant certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 12th day of April, 1907, and numbered R48005, for the dellonquent taxes of the year 1902. In the same case, the notice of the situation in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 75 feet of Lot 9, Block 73, Rilley's Addition to South Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above deferred taxes, and the sum of $1.76 for the year 1904, the sum of $1.69; for the year 1905, the sum of $1.71, and for the year 1906, the sum of $2.40, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 percent, per annum from said date of payment, and are unpaid unless deemed taxes upon a valid real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, after the date of publication of said plaintiff's action, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1508, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer: the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your complaint to the court. At his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs, for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it reimbursed as provided by law, and for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it reimbursed as provided by law, and for said plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1508. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King—Ia Probate. In the matter of the estate of Erst Hille, deceased, No. 7520 under to Show Cause Why Distribution, he is not. Not under Charles Osner, administrator of the estate of Erst Hille, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appends to the case in the Court of Washington forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Erst Hille, deceased, be and appear before the said court, and to have the said court at the court room of the Probate department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 10th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of m. day of day and there to show cause, if any they have, why an additional distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 10th day of September, 1908, to the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of August, 1908. MITCHELL GILLIAM, Judge, Aug. 7-Sept. 4, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased. No. 7820. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles Osner, the administrator of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased, his final account to, and filed in said Court, his final account to, and filed in administrator, and that Thursday, the 100th day, administration, at 0:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Court Department of our said Superior Court, in the Court in said King County, has been duly appointed, as said Court for the settlement of a account, at said account, and may any person interested in said estate and may file his exceptions in writing to said Court. Witness, the Hon. Mitchell Gilman of Jud of said Superior Court, and the seas court hereto affixed this 5th day of August, 14 (Seal) OTTO A. CASEL, Clerk By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk Aug. 7-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF T. State of Washington for King Count Clare Monteith, Plaintiff, vs. John Monteith, Defendant. No. 62620. Summons by Publication. The The State of Washington to the said John A. Monteith, Deiendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your manner under the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure for the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of his habitual drunkenness, and his neglect and refusal to make provision for his family, and to have award to plaintiff the sole custody and control of Julian Monteith, Grace Monteith, and Isabel Monteith, the three children of plaintiff and defender. H. W. CRAVEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 654 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or chal- ter interest or estate in and to the herein an described real property, Defendants. No. € Notice and Shipment. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and er you as owners, claimants or holders of an asset in state in or to the hereafter desired real property. The name of the named plaintiff is the holder of one contract linguent tax certificate issued by the Tree of King County, Washington, dated April 1995, and numbered B442602, for the delinquents in the 1956 in the amount of Ninety three (93) cents, and situated in King County, Washington, describe as follows, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block two (2) White Bros. Addition to Kirkland. King County Washington. That the taxes for the following years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said action,erty, to-wit: for the year 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified summons to be and appear within sixty days after the first notice, the second notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and demand the action and answer the complaint and plainiff notice in a way of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plainiff office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the interest and costs. In case you so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing, for the sake of your interest, against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the amount charged and found 2-LEGALS-REPUBLICAN against it, respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plainiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & T Blidge, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. NOTICE. Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. State of Washington, County of Kl State of Washington, County of Downtown—ss, Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 20th day of August, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the Crane, Plaintiff, versus A. E. Downing and Downing, his wife. Defendants, No. 60999, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours described by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit by October, A. D. 1908, before the 3d day of October, A. D. 1908, before the House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot four (4), Block eight (8), Madison Street Washington, as recorded in King County, Washington, as recorded in King County, two (2) of plates at page 85, records of the editor's office, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one hundred and fifty-two ($152.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, August, 1908. Dated this 218 day month, J. C. SMITH, Sheriff, BY FDW, DREW, Deputy, '8061 '92 acquaddes—87 BD6VF PLEADS FOR JUSTICE ication, which has been given the widest publicity: “Within the past 60 days 25 Negroes have been lynched in the United States. Only four of this number were charged with criminal assault on women. Nine were lynched in one day on a charge of being connected with amurder. Four were lynched in one day on a charge that they passed resolutions in a lodge ap- proving the murder of an indi- vidual. Three were lynched in one day on the charge that they had taken part in the burning of a gin house. The others were lynched for miscelianeous rea- sons. One was publicly burned in open daylight in the presence of women and children, after oil had been poured on his body, at Greenville, Texas, and reports state that 1,000 people witness- ed the spectacle in the open square of the town. One other victim was eighty years of age. How long can our Christion civ- ilization stand this? I am mak- ing no special plea for the Negro, innocent or guilty, but I am call- ing attention to the danger that threatens our civilization. For the Negro criminal, and especially for the Negro loafer, gambler, and drunkard, I have notning but the severest condem- nation and no legal punishment istoo severe for the brute that assaults a woman. It requires no courage for 500 men to tie the hands of an individual toa stake, but young men and boys who have once witnessed or fread in the papers of these ex- citing scenes of burnings and lynchings often get the idea that there is something heoric in at- tacking an individual in the com- munity who is least able to defend himself, No doubt the people who engage in lynchings and excuse them believe that it will have the effect of striking terror to the guilty. But who shall say whether the persons lynched are guilty? There is no way. distinguishing the innocent from the guilty except by due process of law. That is what the courts are for. Those who have examined into the facts know only too well that in the wild justice of the mobit is fre- quently the innocent man who is executed. These lynchings ter- rify the innocent, but they em- bolden the criminal. The crim- inal knows that itis much easier to escape the mad fury of the the mob than the deliberate ven- geagce of the law. But no man is so innonent that he can be safe at all times from the frenzy of the mob. Statistics show that during the past ten years an average of 32 Negroes a year have been lynch- edon the charge of assaulting women. Granting that32 a year are guilty, is that just reason for condemning over 3,000,000 adult Negro men who have no part in such crimes? Are we a nation to allow 32 criminals a year out of a race of 10,000,000 of people Ke Oe SA | 7 BOOKER T. WaSHINGTON.- say Iam not making any special plea for the Negro, but I feel that lynching is not only wrong but a mistake—an awful mis- take. Mob jnstice undermines the very foundation on which our civilization rests, viz.: respect for the law and confidence of its security. Thereare, inmy opin- ion, two remedies. First of all, let us unite in determined effort everywhere to see that the law is enforced, that all people at all times and all places see that the man charged with the crime is given a fair trial. Second, let all good citizens unite in an effort to rid the com- munities, especially large cities, of the idle, vicious and gambl- ing element. In this connection I would not be just and would not be frank unless I stated that the betters of the black race could use their influence, especially in cities, to see that the idle ele- ment that lives by its wits, with- out permanent or reliable occu- pation or place of abode, is either reformed or gotten rid of in some manner. In most cases it is this element that furnishes: the powder for these explosions.’ Booker T. WASHINGTON The Fake Cry of Rape In another column of The Age we print an article from Mont- gomery, Ala., which tells of two Negroes accused criminally as- saulting a white woman, being later freed of the charge upon the admission of the woman in question that she and her hus- band had falsified. The true story of the affair is that the woman and her husband, H. Calhoun, by name, robbed the Negroes and then threatened to set up the cry of criminal as- sault if an alarm was given. The report insome manner got out that an assault had been made upon the white woman and the Negroes barely escaped lynching. All concerned were arrested and after undergoing a _‘‘sweat- ing’’ process instituted by the authorities the Calhoun woman confessed to a canard and told the true story. They are now held in jail for highway robbery. To some the incident might seem trivial, but to others it sig- nifies much. There are many similar cases wherein a Negro is wrongfully charged with a crime and lynched, just because the woman makes the accusation. No attempt is made by the au- thorities or the mob to ascertain if the man is really guilty, but he is put to death without even TAE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN being given an opportunity to defend himself. It is noticed with pleasure that several of the daily papers in Montgomery published the true statement of facts when it be- came known that the white wo- man set upa fake ery of rape, and published her confession in its entirety. The Calhoun incident only goes to show that every dispatch from the South printed by Northern papers about Negroes assaulting white women is not true, and that in many instances the ery of rape is a falsehood from begin- ning to end.—New York Age. THE SEATTLE THEATER Uncle Josh Perkins at the Seat- tle Theater this week is a rural comedy play, with a greater number of laughs in the two acts than was ever crowded into a stage performance before. From the time that Hiram, the hired man, comes onthe stage in the second act until the fall of the curtain, it is one prolonged, con- tinuous scream of laughter. Uncle Josh Perkins tells the us- ual story of the old New Eng- land farmer befriending the girl and there are no improbabilities in Uucle Josh Perkins, no strain- ing for effect, it is simply a home-spun New England play, after the style of the Old Home- stead, but not a bit like it. The pathos is only incidental to the comedy ia Uncle Josh Perkins, but as a laugh provider itisa wonder. The Four Corners of the Earth, next week at the Seattle Theater. This is a big melo- drama, consisting of twenty-two scenes and about fifty principal and auxiliary characters. It takes the audience from the bor- ders of Southern California and old Mexico to Japan, then to Arabia, and then to the frozen North. The play has received the best possible press notices from newspapers en route to the coast. It will be the first really big attraction to appear in Seat- tle this season, though there will be no change in prices at the Se- attle Theater for this or any other engagement during the entire season. Attorneys, attention! Tue SEATTLE REPUBLICAN does the best and most reasonable legal work. Phone Main 305. oe 17 L f INSURANCE Co. OF SEATTLE a ON ac Oe Ros re ae Lr s ‘ te Ce ee ae i Gee eee es oes * Th Ke oe - sia OO ee Be SECO Bike, . $ ee iy 8 Soy ee leo a tie he ae oe Ea ae aN i a [= B Seals ie ju iy OL ay WE aN EY JIN PS de (TV) x ni LO ces p 4 ee | Ma ae & Scilla mGevartenerieiics re SdP aii ceria” Ye “THE DEVIL” AT THE THIRD AVENUE - When Messrs. Russell Drew and French advertised the stock company at the Tnird Avenue Theater the best melodramic company west of New York, they did not expect to be called upon to demonstrate this fact so un- expectedly so soon; but the pro- duction ot The Devil, at another theater brought the comparison about inan expeditious manner. Readers of last Monday’s Post- Intelligencer. can easily draw their conclusions from the un- biased review of the two produc- tions, by Mr. Wing, critic of the P.-{., who saw the production at the Third Avenue Sunday after- noon and the other tke same ey- ening. We believe that the Third Avenue company has much the best of the comparison, and those who witness The Devil, the most written about play of the century, will bear us out in our e:nelusion that a smother and better performance could not be given by any company in JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST You aa BUY ; BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 coi Ls ST. Established 1890 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking dis- tanee; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. 1. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered, on short * notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Friday, September 18, 1908 the entire West, and The Devil, is not a melodrama either, but a high-class society comedy. It runs all week at the Third Aven- ue Theater, and every one should see it. Mr. Stanley Johns and Elizabeth Hale bear the blunt of the performance, and the atten- tion they receive from the amdi- ence must be gratifying to these artists. Beginning next Sunday after- noon, Driven From Home, iy be the attraction for the thi week of Russell, Drew and French’s Third Avenue Theater stock season. The play is from the pen of Hal Reid, author of Human Hearts, and it is one of the best melodromas that that prolific writer ever produced. It will be given a detailed produc- tion by the Third Avenue Thea- ter company, i. e., every detail will be carefully looked after by the stage director and scenic ar- tist. Elizabeth Hale and Stan, ley Johns both appear in the pro- duction, and the company will be augmented by the appearance of M. J. Hooley. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing ‘bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies’, Misses’ and Children’s Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats, 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fix- tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bani. Write Today for a copy of “THE BANK ACCOUNT” a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg 1s of meat. MAILED FREE. ‘The Scandinavian-American’ Bank, , Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash, Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ..............President J. 8. GOLDSMITH ..,...Vice-President HV. ANKENY 00000000). sccee Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. TRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COM- MERCE. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and ‘SURPLUS. $1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES OVE cece seveceeeese ess + $12,500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent” with ‘conservative banking. Foreign exchange department espe- cially equipped for tne conduct of Ori- ental business, M, F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W. Maxwell, Cash. People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889, Commercial Savings and Trust # General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Was’