Seattle Republican

ATTLE REP THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE. WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 1909. No greater evidence could be offered to "the world do move" idea than the election of Wesley L. Jones to the United States senate to succeed United States Senator Senator Levi Ankeny by the eleventh legislature. The lobby, the legislative hall and the gal The solution of out a volume of the least be treated in a spirit of absolute fairness. Give even the devil his due. The solution of all momentus questions always brings out a volume of theories, which, if properly sifted, segregated, separated and finally brought together again evolve from the homogenous mass into a meritorious measure. To give to the state a local option law that will be useful as well as ornamental is causing the bringing forward of many theories. Elmer E. Hall of Whitman county is out advocating the passage of a measure like this: Let every one sell liquors that so desires and that too without a license. If an adult wants to drink compel him or her to take out a $5 annual license and issue such person a button badge, which is to be shown before supplying him or her with drinks, and such a license be only granted to persons over twenty-one years of age. Visitors to cities shall be charged a license of $1 for the privilege of drink during the stay in such city." He believes that while such a law would work a hardship in some instances on the habitual drinker, yet it would be an absolute safeguard against minors drinking in saloons and at the same time be the means of putting pure whiskey on the market. The abolition of the board of control is being advocated by R. A. Hutchinson, a senator from Spokane. It costs the state thousands of dollars Board of Control Under Hot Fire. to maintain this board that does no more nor better work than the state formerly got from its representative else are prerogatives takes us and nai the entders. organi Board of Control Under Hot Fire. business men for nothing. If each of the public institutions of the state had a local board of control made up of business men of the immediate vicinity of the institution, the members thereof appointed by the governor without pay, those institutions would be more economically managed than they are by the state board of control, that know nothing at all of the local situation. It seems to me that the board of control idea puts the state in a position to be jobbed on every side and if she is never jobbed there is no denying the fact that the board of control has increased the expense of maintenance. In comparison to her population the taxes of the state of Washington are out of proportion with other states and it's all due to the fact that the state is board and commission ridden, all of the members of which draw big wages and are allowed almost fabulous expense accounts. Business men of unquestioned integrity would serve the state as boards of control for her various institutions without pay and give her a service for which money from them could not buy and thereby save the taxpayers thousands of dollars annually. Dr. Christenson, a representative from King county, is by no means an admirer of the methods of the state medical board and he has intro- "that i ing bu Palmer the inc Medical Reciprocity From Other States. There is no reason why the medical board of this state should not recognize and accept medical certificates from other states and issue certificates to physicians from other states who come hither bringing with them certificates duly signed, sealed and delivered. Under the present system in this state a physician of the highest standing known to the profession in other states, before he can practice in the state of Washington must undergo a catch examination and is just as likely to fail as to pass, which, to my mind, is not showing much respect to the profession in other states. When a new man comes to the state and applies for a license to practice he immediately receives a notice from a quizz school to take a preparatory course therein, for which he is taxed in addition to the $25 he pays the board, the sum of $100. If he refuses to be bled by that school of leeches he for some reason invariably fails to pass the examination and a license refused him. There may not be any connection between the board of examiners and the quizz school, but I have my suspicions. I believe the proposed law will go a long ways toward rectifying what seems to me a growing evil. Putting the race tracks out of business is quite a hobby just now in legislative circles and so much so that a tidal wave which will immediately sweep them into a fathomless abyss seems almost inevitable. But is it fair? How tem in this state a pho to the profession in the state of Washing tion and is just as l mind, is not showing other states. When applies for a license It has been suggested that the present legislature make some move toward having the state capitol taken to some point in Eastern Washington as a matter of economy to the office holders. A majority of the state's officials at present and the ensuing four years will be from that section and it will work a financial hardship on them to get to their posts of duty in Western Washington. Coming from Eastern Washington as members of the Cosgrove official family the --- --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. lery, which in the past, when the election of a United States senator was being pulled off, were filled to suffocation, were all as empty and as devoid of enthusiasm or excitement the day Mr. Jones was elected as any ordinary legislative day and those lounging in the lobby did not even go into the joint session to watch the eventful proceedings. The old days, when John McGraw completely collapsed after Watson C. Squire was declared elected, so strenuous had been the struggle; when the factions among the Republicans stood so pat as to dead lock the legislature preventing the election of either John B. Allen or George Turner; when John L. Wilson closed his headquarters and packed his grips to leave Olympia, a defeated man, and then re-opened his headquarters and was elected; when George Turner picked off the Populist legislators one by one and was finally elected and a legislative investigation followed. When Addison G. Foster was elected by John L. Wilson because King county would have no one else save Tom Humes. When Levi Ankeny was finally elected after having spent at different times a sum of money variously estimated from $250,000 to $750,000; when Sam H. Piles was elected by Charley Sweeney, who had spent in the neighborhood of $100,000, of which sum he was reimbursed by the railroads. Those old days, we repeat, are certainly no more and the people now quietly elect the senator at the direct primary election, and the members of the legislature record their will. It may have robbed the game of politics of much of its exciting features, it may have robbed the grafters of a good many easy dollars, it may have robbed the hotel men of Olympia of thousands of dollars, it may have robbed the railroads of hundreds of fares and it may have lessened the circulating medium in this state very materially, but above it all it has made it possible for the people to elect a man of ability to the senate instead of a money bag and a railroad lobbyist. Long live the direct primary law. If it be true that there is a large deficit in the state printing department, which will have to be cared for by the present legislature in the shape of an appropriation therefor, then those, who have given this branch of the affairs of the state any considera- State Printing Office Deficit. tion, are thoroughly convinced that the state should own its printing plant, a superintendent thereof appointed by the governor the same as the superintendent of the other institutions and the employees of said office be selected from a purely business instead of a political stand point. It is common talk all over the state that the position of state printer is the most lucrative one in the state. So lucrative that a man holding the position, if he is pretty smooth, is able to save up during the four years he holds the job not less than $30,000 in cash, as profits on the investments, draw a good salary every month and pay for his plant, which, all told, means that the position is worth nearly $60,000. If you tell a state house official that there is no money in being a state printer, he gives you a bland, child-like smile, as much as to say, "Well, if you are such a darn fool as to believe that, we know very much better." Anti-Race Track Gambling the Hobby. ever pernicious race track gambling may seem to be to some people yet under the protection of the law men have been permitted to expend multiplied thousands of dollars in establishing elegant race courses and for the legislature to pass a drastic law putting them down and out instanter if not sooner and thereby causing the owners to suffer a total loss in business, is not stickiing very closely to the golden rule. The particular race course that the vengeance is directed at is that of the King County Fair Association at Seattle, which particular association has expended not less than a half a million dollars in lands and houses, the most of which will be a total loss so far as the investment is concerned. It does look as if those interested in that association should be given at least a ghost of a show for their white anty. The editor of The Seattle Republican has always favored moral reforms; he has never frequented race courses, has never patronized the saloon bar and is practically a total stranger to strong drink, but these things have been fostered under the law and if a halt is to be called in them they should at State Library Volume XV, Number 24. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher following will be found to be about correct. The seven members of the supreme court, the United States senator, the governor, the lieutenant governor, the governor's private secretary; the three members of the board of control, one and perhaps two members of the railroad commission, the state grain inspector, the superintendent of the penitentiary at Walla Walla, the state bank examiner, the state dairy commissioner, the secretary of the state railway commission, the speaker of the house of representatives, the adjutant general and three score or more lesser officials in the shape of clerks and honorary boards Eugene Lorton, member of the board of control and reputed boss of the Cosgrove administration, denies the allegation and defies the allegator as Political Bossism to him playing the part of political Spurned by Lorton. dictator. "I am neither making nor Cosgrove. I believe he is sufficiently qualified as well as physically able to look after his own affairs. So far as I am concerned no influence will be brought to bear on the governor when he actually assumes the duties of the office to either remove any official or to endorse the candidacy of any one for office. Mr. Cosgrove knows the political situation of the state as well as either myself or any one else and there is no doubt but that he will exercise his prerogative in that particular. When Governor Cosgrove takes up his duties and requests of me to remove an official and name another person as his successor I will do so, but the entire responsibility thereof will rest upon his shoulders. I do not deny that I am something of a political organizer in campaigns, but I possess none of the qualities of a political dictator and I absolutely spurn the very idea." It is hoped that Governor Cosgrove will be in Olympia by not later than Monday morning next when he will immediately assume the duties of the office of governor of the state of Washington. The Anti-Saloon bill came from the printer the first of the week and as the members had a chance to carefully read the bill they found that it is a most drastic prohibition measure, and if passed would put every city, town and precinct dry. This was a sur- The Anti-Saloon League Fight. prise to a few members, but the majority expected the anti-saloon bill to be true to name, as one member expressed himself. "Of course that bill will result in a prohibition state, why that is what they want, don't you suppose their bill will be in line with their preaching?" The line is being drawn for or against the anti-saloon bill, in other words, Republicans vs. Prohibitions. It is surprising that strict Prohibitionists should be elected as Republicans, but such is the case. You hear the remark "that is not a reasonable bill, it is all one sided and nothing but prohibition on evey hand. Representative Palmer introduced a local option bill which delegates to the incorporated cities and towns the right of local self government, and provides that the question of license or no license be submitted at each general election to the voters outside incorporated cities and towns. This method does away with petitions and special elections which would amount to several thousand dollars in the larger counties. The anti-saloon people realize that the Prohibition wave has reached its limit and is receeding. The governor of Tennessee had the good judgment and backbone to veto a prohibition measure. The voters in Indiana and Ohio elected Democratic governors on account of the Anti-Saloon League agitation and Oregon elected a Democratic U. S. senator soon after it adopted the Anti-Saloon League measure. All show that the Republican party will not stand to be dictated to by the Anti-Saloon League. Savannah is reported to be in tacit rebellion against the state prohibition law in Georgia. Complaint is made that the law is not enforced in that city, and the Prohibitionists are yelling to Governor Hoke Smith to make an example of it. President Mrs. Armour of the Prohibition in the South. Georgia W. C. T. U., has inspected Savannah, and reports to the governor that "anarchy is rife" in that city. The rifeness of the anarchy consists, apparently, in letting the saloons sell drinks as of old, and raiding them once a month and collecting fines about equal to the former license fees. We read in the Sun, an exceptionally veracious newspaper, that the brand of restriction which curbs the bibulous propensities of Virginia "neither promotes morality and good public conduct nor contributes to the public revenue." The same authority finds that in Georgia and Alabama, more particularly in the cities of Atlanta, Savannah, Birmingham, and Huntsville, "prohibition now (Continued on page 5) FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 1909. REPUBLICAN .... .... .... .... COOP IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Btate of Washington for King County. Catherine EB. fakefield, Plaintin, vs. William H. Wakefield, Defendant." No. 64446-——Summons for Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said William H, Wakefield, defendant. You are hereby’ summoned’ to appear within ed days after the date of the first aoR lication of this summons, to-wit: thin sixty days after the 18th day’ of December, 1908, and defend the above ehtitied action’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for Spo at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is ‘to obtain a divorce ‘om you on the ground of non-support. F, M. JEFFERY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P, 0, Address: 147, New York / Block in Seattle, King County, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Arthur ‘Bastheim, Plaintiff, vs. Amer- jean Produce Company, a corporation, Defendant. No, 60845—Order Directing Notice to Creditors, In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of Said ‘defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with item- ed statements and other’ memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for the payment ‘of same, sald claims to be filed on or before the fif- teenth day of January, 1909. ‘And the receiver is) further ordered to cause notice to be given to the cred- itors herein by publication in the Se- attle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known cred- itors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice, Done in open court this 16th day of December, 1903. GEO. E, MORRIS, Judge. B, F, WOODS, Jr., Receiver, LEOPOLD M.'STERN, Attorney for the Receiver, 705 Lowman Bik., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 1, 1909. IN_THP SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Thomas Mullen, Plaintiff, vs. Jenny ‘Mallen, Defendant, No. ———Simmons for Publication, ‘Phe Stats of Washington to the sald Jenny Mullen, Defendant: You are here- by ‘summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- tion of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of Decem- , 1908, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff. and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff, at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so judgment wil be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘Phe object of this action 1s to secure a divorce. from the defendant, above nam- ed, for desertion. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintirt. Postoffice Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bldg. Seattle, King County, Wash- gton. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State.of Washington, In and for the County of King. Della Simonelli, Plaintift, vs.. Cerubini Simonelli, Defendant. No.—-Summons, ‘The State of Washington, to the sald Cerubini Simonelli: You ‘are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the frst publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908) and. defend the above entitled ac- tion in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and ferve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintift at thelr office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. ‘The object of sald above entitled ac- tion is to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment. and. desertion, and for a decree of said court awarding sald plain- tit. the community real property, de- scribed in the complaint. ORANGH JACOBS and HIRAM J. JACOBS, Attorneys for Plaintift. P.O. Address: 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. { December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. J. W, Brown, Plaintiff, vs. N, W. Chap- man, ‘Thos. Boyd and all ‘persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, defend- ants, No. 64514—Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington to the above named defendants, Including sald N. W. Chapman, Thos. Boyd any and every other person having or claiming an in- terest in the property hereinafter de- seribed: You and each of you are here- by notified and summoned, that the Sbove named plaintift, J. W. Brown, ts the owner and holder of one delinquent tax certificate. issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1898-9, 1900-1-2-3 and 4 inclu- sive, numbered’ B27050 and B53267 as- ‘sessed as the property of said Chapman and Boyd respectively for 1898 and 1904 upon and against lot two (2), block six- teen (18), Riverside Addition’ to Seattle, King County, Washington, aggresating $11.90, including $7.50 costs in this ac- tion; ‘That plainti@ 1s the owner of all subsequent taxes on said lot aggregating $1,60 In all aggregating $13.50 to this date and which bears 15 per cent Inter- est per annum and fs all the taxes due, Gelinqnent and unpaid on said lot and more than three years past delinquent. You and each of you are also further notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice and summons. exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after December 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and de- fend this action, and answer the com- plaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plain- tif at his office address below given, or pay the above amount with Interest, penalty and costs accrued and hereafter accruing. In case you fail so to do judg- ment will be entered and rendered against safd lot for the same and a de- eree of foreclosure decreed forever bar- ting and estopping, you and each of you from having or claiming any title there- in adverse to this claim of plaintiff and feereeing sald judgment to be a first Sen and ordering a sale of sald lot, to satisfy the same as provided by the Jaw in such cases and as prayed in plain- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN TTORNEYS = Attenti Attention! AT ttention Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want. to get ac- quainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. ’ A at rIVTN \ THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN : Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHARLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; han- dled with care and accuracy. Affidavits deliv- ered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint ; everything done in a jam- up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it hap- pens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. 307 Epler Block. : Main 305. IS"Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. tift’s complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of this court, J, W, BROWN, Attorney for Plaintim. 314 Northern Bank Bldg., Seattle, ‘Washington. First day of publication Dec. 18, 1908, December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County gf Sling. Mary C. Bell, Plaintiff, ys. Augustis Bell, Defendant. No.———Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Augustis Bell, Defendant: You are here- by “summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- Hon) Of, this “summons, to-wit: Within sixty “days after, the isth day, of De- cember, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in’ the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plainti@ at is “omes ‘below stated; and in case of your failure 60 to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording, to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court, “The object of the seid ac; tion, set forth in the complaint, is as follows, ‘To obtain an absolute’ decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of desertion, non-support and cruel treatment, ‘DH. CANN, Attorney for Plaintift. P.O. Address: 412. Oriental. Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Wash, December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of James Mills, deceased, No, &718—Notice to Creditors. By order o fsaid court made herein on the 5th day of December, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 305 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, ‘within one’ year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 11, 1908, E, B. MORRIS, As Administrator of said Estate. E. B, PALMER, Attorney for Estate, 305 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. December 11. 1908, January 8, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Ella R. Zarek, Plaintiff, vs. John G. Zarek, Defendant. No, 64417—Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the sald John G, Zarek: You are hereby sum- moned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication -of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 11th’ day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitied action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff at, their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of non- support and cruel treatment. CARRICO & DURK, Attorneys for Plaintitr. Room 608, People's, Banik Bldg. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Marfe Maud Ravey, Plaintiff, vs, Wil- fred Ralston Ravey, Defendant. No.— Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the sala Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned ‘to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty (60), days after the Lith day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintif€ at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of cruelty, EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintit. P. O, and Office Address: 304 Metro- pole, Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, December 11) 1908—January 22,’ 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TH State of Washington in and for King County. James Milton Shaver, Plaintiff, vs, Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant. No— Summons by Publication. ‘Phe State of Washington, to the said Eyelyn Maud, Shaver, Defendant: You are ‘heteby summoned to appear within Bixty (60). days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit; within, sixty, days. after the (11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action In the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at, his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- paint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintift, P.O, and Office Address: 304 Metro- pole Building, southwest comer of econd Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, State of ‘Washington. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. NOTICR—SHERIFF’S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sherift’s Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution’ is- sued qut of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of December, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case, of M.'Seller & Co., a corpéra- tion, plaintiff, versus J, J. Brys, defend- ant,’ No, 62689, and to ine, as sheriff, di- rected and delivered: Notice 1s hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within, the hours preseribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house dgor of aaid King County, in the State of Washingtap, all of the right, title and interest of the sald defendant, J.J. Brys. in and to the following de- scribed property, situated in King Coun- ty, State of Washington, to-wit: ‘Tracts twenty-three (23) and twenty-four (24), Fry's Addition to Columbia, levied on as the property of sald defendant, J. J. Brys, to satisfy a deficiency judgment, amounting to ninety-one and 29-100 ($91.29) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff, By Edw. Drew. Deputy. December 11, 1908—Januaty §&, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF’S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss, By virtue of a writ of execution, ts- sued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the sth day of December, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of J. A. Campbell Co., a cor- poration. plaintiff, ‘versus Joseph Maso- ero, defendant, No, 64439, and to me, as sheriff, dirécted and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909. before the court house door of said King County, State of Washington. all of the right, title and interest of the sald defendant, Jo- seph Masoero, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of ‘Washington, to-wit: Lot five (5). Block ten (10), Rninter Boulevard Fourth Addition to Seattle, levied on as the property of said defend- ant, Joseph Masoero, to satisfy a judg- ment, amounting to two thousand three hundred seventy-four and 95-100 ($2374.95) dollars, and costs of suit, in #70 aF LEH cay ot December, 108 ated this lay of , 1908, eC. SMITH, Sheritt. By Edw. Drew,’ Deputy. December 11, 1908—Januaty 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL state, State of ‘Washington, County of King, ss. —Sherift's Office. By virtue of an alias execution, issued of ‘the Honorable Superior Court _ of King County, on the Sist day of De- Comber, 1908, by the, lori ‘thersor, in the ease of J, &, Keefe, plaintift, versus Charles’ S.' Wangelin’ and Flora B, Wangelin, defendants, No. 64660, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction’ to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours presoribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit, at 10, o'clock a.m. on the 6th day of February, A, D, 1909, before the Court House: door,'of "said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title. and interest, of ‘said. defendants, Charles, S. Wangelin and’ Flora B: Wangelin, im and to the following de- scribed property, situated in King Coun- ty, State of Washington, to-witt Lots twenty-eight (28) and twenty-nine (28), Block eleven (11), Hillman City Addi: tion to the City of Seattle, Division No. six (6), levied on as thé property of said defendants Charles Ss. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, to satisty @ judgment, amounting to’ one ‘hundred Forty ‘and. 27-100 ($140.27) dollars, and costs, of auft, in favor of plaintift Dated this’ $ist day of December, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheri. By BDW. DREW, Deputy. January 1-29, 1909, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THD State of Washington, in and for King County. J.C. MacCallum, Plaintit, vs. Maud MacCallum, Defendant. No......-.1" Summons for Publication, State of Washington to sald Maud Mac- Callum: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to- Wit: on the 11th ‘day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action 1 the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintitt and serves copy of your answer upon the under signed attorney for plaintift, at his of fice below stated, and in case of your fallure s0 to do,’ judgment will be ‘rene dered against you according to the de. mands of plaintift’s complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court This cause is brought by the plaintitt to obtain a decree of divorce from sald de, fendant on the grounds of extreme cra: elty, adultery and bigamy, C. B PIPER, Attorney for Plaintitr, Rooms 36 and 87 Union Block, 113 ist Ave, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 11, 1908—Jan. 22, 1909, AD REPUBLICAN hoo IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THR State of Washington in and for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. in Probate, | No. 9085. Notice of Sale of Real Hstate, Notice is hereby given that in pur- suance with an order of sale made ‘and entered in the Superior Court of King Gounty, State of Washington, on the 28th day of December, 1908, in'the mat- ter of the estate of Martin Adams, de- ceased, the undersigned administratrix of sald estate will sell at public auction Subject to confirmation by said Court the following described real property, to- wit; Lots eleven (11), twelve (12) and the North half of thirteen (13) in Block four (4), Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Beattle; said sale will be made on the 8th day of February, 1909, at 10:00 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the front door of the county court house in said City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘The terms of the sale will be cash, gold coin of the Unite ed States, ten per cent of the bid to be payable at the time of th esale and the balane eon the confirmation of the said sale by this Court. Dated January 15, 1909. LILLY M. ADAMS, Administratrix of the state of said Deceased. Date of first publication Jan. 16, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Emanuel Williams, Defendant. No, ——, Sum- mons for Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Emanuel Williams, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the Ist day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintif® and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for the plaintim at tien oie below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against vou according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of Said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant. MILLION & HOUSER and GEORGE FRIEND, Plaintiff's Attorneys. Post Office Address: Room 916 Alns- Ka Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Inthe Matter of the Estate of B._O, Winslow, Deceased. No, S144, Order Appointing. Day for. Settlement. of #hfal "Account and Distribution, and Directing Notice to Be Given. Lillian At, Winslow, administratrix of the’ estate of 13.0. Winslow, deceased, having rendered and presented for: sets tlement ‘and filed inthis court her. final Account ‘of. her. administration of the estate of said deceased, together. with a petition “for the. distribution. of "the residue of said estate to the persons en- titted thereto; It is ordered that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:80 ‘o'clock a. m., be, and the same is hereby ap- pointed forthe hearing and settlement 6f said account and the hearing of sald petition ‘for distribution ‘at, Department No.4 of sald court; that the ‘clerk of this court give notice thereof by caus- ing notice to be posted in at least three of the most public places in King Coun- ty, Washington, and by publishing. & Slmilar notlee for at least four consecus tive weeks immediately before said day of settlement and distribution, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and of general circulation in said King County, Washington. Tt is further ordered that ali_persong interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court on Thursday, the 4th at of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, at the court room of De- partment No, 4 of sald court house in the City of Seattle, Washington, to show cause why an order should not be made distributing sald estate, as prayed for in said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served Epa. all persons Interested in said estate at least ten days before the day apointed for the hearing of said petition, or that a copy of this order be published for at least four consecutive weeks Bee to said hearing, in.the Seattle app ionay = weekly newspaper published in King County, Washington, and of. general cir- culation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of December, 1908. GEO, E, MORRIS, Judge. January 1—February 4, 1909, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Albert A. Kiefer, Plaintiff, vs, Edna Kiefer, Defendant. No. ——. Sum- mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Edna Kiefer: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the ist day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the compat of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your gnawer, upon ine lundersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- Plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, The object of the above entitled action is to secure a di- vorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion, KING DYKEMAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 502 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE. State of Washington for King County, In_the Matter of the Estate of B. O. ‘Winslow, Deceased. No, 8444. No- tice "of Settlement. of Final Account and of Hearing of Petition for Distri- bution. Notice is hereby given that Lillian M. Winslow, ‘administratrin ‘OF the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, has ren- dered and presented for settlement and filed in sald court her final account of her administration of sald. estate, and that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1809, at 9:30 o'clock a.m, of said aay, at the court room of Department Now d Of Salaeourt at the court House In. See attle, King County, “Washington, has been appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested. in sald estate may appear and fle excepe tions in writing to said account and to contest the same, Notice is hereby further given that said Lillian M. Winslow, the said admin- istratrix, has presented a petition for the distribution of the residue of said estate ‘and that ‘Thursday, the, 4th day. of February, 1009. at 9:30 erclocke: Said: day. at’ Department No. tof sald court at the court house in Soattio, King County. Washington, fag ‘been duty ape pointed by" said court for: the heariite of said petition, at which time all per- song Interested in sald estate may ape pear and show cause why an order shall hot be granted distributing. sald: estate ag prayed for in sald. petition, Th witness whereof T have, hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Su- Perio Court this sist day of December LILLIAN M. WINSTOW, ‘Administratele, onto" A CASE, Clerke of said. Court, By 3,4 STGURDSSON, (Sent_of Superior’ Court) Reputy, What are they moving the The coldest weather in the last three years is being experienced in Chicago. Telegraph wires are erippled in every direction, eut- ting communication with distant points, and a number of accidents due to the severity of the weather are reported, 4 PORE Oren eee Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.... Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton........Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year ...ccccccccveceense ssG800 Bix Months ........cceeeeeee eee 1,60 Three Months ............s.006. 76 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. Representative Willett may not be a Don Quixote, but he talks like it. After all woman suffrage is nothing more nor less than woman suffering. Society in the Seeley home seems to have been given a blood curdling reception. ‘Way to New York now has a’ direct Root from the United States senate to the White House. Divoree getting may be running riot, but when too persons can not be one person then they should be two persons. Down in Missouri the Republi- ean band wagon still finds trouble in getting by the Stone in the center of the political turnpike. Ladies who visit the legislature may have a ‘“‘heavenly time,’? but it’s always a “‘hell of a time’’ that the men report. From the outlandish terms used by physicians in the practice ‘of medicine one is inclined to think them magicians instead of phys- icians. From the amount of public thieving that’s being unearthed clothiers may expect a heavy run on striking striped wares this year. The senate of the eleventh legis- lature would perhaps object to be- ing labeled the House of Ruth, but it would be hard to find a more appropriate name. While western and eastern Washington still make up the Evergreen State, yet, officially speaking, western Washington is not aware of the fact. Oregon, though overwhelming- ly Republican, has elected a Dem- ocrat to the United States senate. Evidently the Republican party of Oregon has outlived its day of use- fulness. In burning that Boston benzine buggy shop, which resulted in the loss of $800,000 worth of autos, the pedestrians doubtless feel that a fine start has been made toward the preservation of human life. In making himself indispensable in every calling and avocation in which he is engaged, if there be a race problem in the United States, the Negro himself will solve it and solve it on such short notice that it will be hardly remembered by the general public. If there is anything at all in the rumor that Unele Joe Cannon rep: resents the ‘‘interests’? of the country in the house of represen. tatives of Congress, it seems but a mockery to raise his salary to $15, 000 per year as that amount would do little more than pay his enter- taining bills. * Canta By cae oe ay F f eee ea yates a Cae ig pe Sie «sci moe am _ : etn eas ae : , ¢ : Yiubnae ck etre. ee Pee j aon nee ee ee oe i a i ig foe ee aes ‘ fia * noe es See ie Suey Cai ie th a ga Pe Ze ch i = “A Pa aca aes Gs 4 bale WEShEs ts. OVA fi Who Without Opposition Was Elected United States Senator for the State of Washington by the Eleventh Legislature to Succeed Levi Ankeny. Land frauds in the West have; Ben B. Lindsay, ‘‘The Man Who| at night did janitor’s work. Thi been uncovered amounting to| Butts In,’”’ is drawing much atten-| almost broke his health down. Hi $110,000,000. Wee still stick to our] tion to the Juvenile court by the|meager circumstances forced hi text that the meshes of this gov-|novel but effective way he goes|to live in a neighborhood wher ernment of ours are completely|about things. His recent election| his companions were not of th clogged with high tone thieves. as Judge of the Juvenile Court was|most desirable class, but Be —— a victory unparallaled in Colorado] learned one thing from them whie If oyium is responsible for a| polities. He ran on the indépend-|is serving his whole state good no’ half million suicides annually then|ent ticket and received as many|—boy nature. Young Lindsey bi it would not seem extravagant to| votes as both of the old party can-| gan reading law, seryed as clerk i add a half million more annually|didates together. This was largely|a law office and became a splendi commit suicide from other causes|due to the ‘kids’? who love him|lawyer, and politician. To con and summing it all the suicide|and the kids’ mothers, sisters and| route seems the preferable one for|aunts. In Colorado the women shuffling off this mortal coil. | have a vote and according to their @@ Ea We suspect State Senator Bryan was trying to get even with State Senator Bobby Booth in moving that the legislature adjourn in for- ty days. It would cut Booth of a round hundred plunks and Bryan must have reasoned to himself that meant bankruptey for Booth, The Trimble reported at the na- tional capitol one day this week was neither an earthquake nor a voleanie eruption, but only Will- iam Pitt announcing the abnormal Republican vote of the state of Washington. ‘When it reached our ears that grafters were to be run out of Olympia night mares chased up and down our spinal appendix by the scores, but it proved to be a false alarm and we took a new lease of life. As hopeless as did Col. Bleth- en’s life seem to be, still he has actually survived the election of Jones and Chamberlain to the United States senate. He is a bit disfigured but still in the ring. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Ben B. Lindsay, ‘‘The Man Who Butts In,” is drawing much atten- tion to the Juvenile court by the novel but effective way he goes about things. His recent election as Judge of the Juvenile Court was a vietory unparallaled in Colorado polities. He ran on the indépend- ent ticket and received as many votes as both of the old party ean- didates together. This was largely due to the “‘kids’’ who love him and the kids’ mothers, sisters and aunts. In Colorado the women have a vote and according to their own wishes and the influence of the ‘‘kids’’ they elected their man. The same influence and votes elected him four years ago when his party, the Democrats, refused at first to nominate him. His work with the youths of Denver is cele- brated throughout the world. The Denver Post says, ‘He is the greatest thing Colorado has pro- duced.’’ ‘Judge Lindsey stands for something of vital importance to the whole race—a human appli- cation of the law to mischievous children.”’ ‘‘There aint no really bad kids’’ is the theory which he has worked out rather successfully tor with it he has handled nearly 6,000 eases. The people are satis- ee for the results are convincing. In appearance he is not at all like the typical judge for he is boyish in looks and by nature. He was born in Tennessee and before the war his parents were well fixed in life but after that time moved to Colorado where his father soon died and young Ben was the sup- port of his mother. Ben was a hustler: he sold papers mornings, was office boy during the day, and - J HAVE A a>, {3° BEER OF Set ~ QUALITY a ITS a Bee ae BEER ® | a SEATTLE, WASH.,U.S.A. Guaian life INSURANCE CoO. ‘ OF SEATTLE . at night did janitor’s work. This almost broke his health down. His meager circumstances forced him to live in a neighborhood where his companions were not of the most desirable class, but Ben learned one thing from them which is serving his whole state good now —boy nature. Young Lindsey be- gan reading law, seryed as clerk in a law office and became a splendid lawyer, and politician. To com- FRIDAY, JANUARY” 22, 1909. pensate him for the loss of the po- sition of district attorney which he very much desired, he was ap- pointed to fill an unexpired term as county judge. His childhood’s experiences soon caused the juven- ile eases which came up in his pres- ence to appeal to him and he made a request, which was readily grant- ed, that all juvenile cases be turned over to his court. He then's began a systematic study of them, reform schools, jails, where men, women and children were herded together and many other faulty systems in the city of Denver. And let the knife cut where it would, he investigated until he had many enemies but a cleaner and more [progressive Denver. The judge ‘says he found during the five years which preceeded his admin- istration that 12,136 Denver boys had been sent to jail with vile adults. Alo that three of every four crimes committed in the Unit- | ed States are by boys under twelve years of age. Lindsey’s bill for a ‘detention school for juvenile of- fenders, forbidding their being held at all in jails is now a state law. When the judge sends a boy to the school he sends him unat- tended and out of several hundred only three betrayed his confidence. A clever dramatization of Char- lotte Bronte’s novel ‘‘Jane Eyre’”’ will be presented at Seattle Thea- tre next Sunday afternoon and all week. The play tells a story ats onee strong and pathetic. The in- terest never lags, the comedy sein- tillates, the situations hold and the climaxes thrill. The play is staged superbly, there being nothing melodramatic in the treatment of the play, either in the setting or the adaptation. It is a comedy drama pure and simple, with a theme that will appeal to every woman’s heart, and a virility that will leave its impression on the men as well. Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SATTLE REEPUBLICAN FRIDAY. JANUARY 22, 1909. PROHIBITION IN THE SOUTH. (Continued From Page 1.) appears to have stimulated the criminal record and at the same time crimped the treasury." There can be very little question that zeal has outrun discretion in the anti-rum movement in the South, and that much legislation that has aimed to make states dry will have to be revised. The enforcement of prohibition laws in communities in which public opinion is strongly against prohibition is uphill work and bad for morals and public order. Short-term local option laws, which permit an annual review of the question of license or no license, seem to work best. That matter ought to rest on local public opinion, formed by observation of practical results. That never satisfies the Prohibitionists, who want all traffic and experiment with the possibilities of intoxication to be forbidden by law and prevented by all the power of the state. It does not accord with their purpose that any one, however temperate or responsible, should enjoy freedom of choice and conduct in the matter of drinks—Harper's Weekly, January 14, 1909. "Regardless of my personal feelings on the woman suffrage measure that many of Suffrage. women of the state are beseaching the eleventh legislature to pass, it occurs to me that it would be a fair proposition to the women and likewise to those men not in the legislature to have an opportunity to express themselves on the subject," said Representative Whalley of King county. "How I would vote on the subject, if it were submitted, I am not saying at this time, perhaps, I know and perhaps I do not, but, as said above, irrespective of my feelings as to the giving of women the actual right to vote, I believe it is my duty as a legislator to give the other fellow an opportunity to express himself on the subject the same as I now have. Of course the legislature can smother the measure, thereby preventing a public expression on it one way or the other, but in doing that the members will show they are afraid to trust their constituents on the subject. It gives the women no voting rights or privileges for the legislature to pass a bill submitting it to a vote and I believe we owe it to our constituents to give them an opportunity to express themselves one way or the other on any question in which they are more or less interested. Whether it be right or wrong to give women the right to vote should be up to the voters of the state and not wholly up to the legislature. EQUAL SUFFRAGE. The woman suffragists of the state of Washington have been working long and hard and they now feel that were it put to the voters at the next general election to amend the state constitution to give the right of suffrage to women, they would stand a fair show of winning. Before it ever gets to the voters, however, our bill has to pass the senate and house of representatives with a two-thirds majority. Think of it! Not a majority, but a two-thirds majority! How our hopes center around that precious little bill! We have established headquarters in Olympia and two or three women will be there con- LEVI ANKENY Who Was Defeated for Re-Election to the United States Senate, the Election to Which Just Six Years Ago Cost Him, So Says Reports, a Half Million Dollars. stantly to "mother" it through. It means a great deal to us if a few of the senators are prejudiced or behind the times, doesn't it? State President Emma Smith De Voe and some other women made a canvass of the two houses and revealed the fact that fifty out of the ninety-six representatives and twenty-two out of the forty-two senators were in favor of woman suffrage and said immediately that they would vote "yea" when the bill came up. Does it seem hopeful? Can we secure the forteen representatives and six senators to make up our two-thirds majority? If you really want to see the women of this state voting, now is the time to act. Talk woman suffrage and write woman suffrage every chance you have for the next two months. Sit down now, this week, if you possibly can, and write a letter to each of the men representing your district, or to any you may be acquainted with or have any influence with and tell them that you would like to see the woman suffrage bill win out. Sign your name and if married, have your wife or husband sign also. This will do a great deal of good; more than you imagine and more than anything else you could do now. If one more state grants votes to women, woman suffrage will become a national issue. Of all the states Washington stands the greatest chance of winning, so the eyes and hopes of the women all over the country are turned upon us. Are we going to fail or are we going to win a glorious victory? M. W. H. PICTURE OF WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY Showing A. Frank Kees as Superintendent, Who Was Removed, But Who Is Now Seeking to Succeed Himself. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN LEVI ANKENY Action to the United States Senate, the Cost Him, So Says Reports, a Half Bring Washington in, and with the question a national issue, it will be but a matter of a few years until all the other states have followed our example. The ballot needs the women and the women need the ballot. The laws of many of our states show atrocious discriminations against them. In only thirteen of the states is the mother equal guardian of the children with the father. He can will away from her the infant in her arms or even the child yet unborn. The husband can collect his wife's earnings or rentals and even owns her clothing. There ```markdown ``` are states in our Union where a child of ten may sell her body for immoral purposes but at five times ten she may not sell her own real estate without her husband's consent. Man can represent woman no better than the wealthy can represent the poor. "No class can be legislated for by another without it's being to their disadvantage." The "Yellow Peril," only recently foreseen, has now arrived, writes General Kuropatkin of the Russian army, and in a lengthy article he fully sizes up the recent 5 treaty as a premature and dangerous peace maker. Following are some of the points advanced by General Kuropatkin: "The conclusion of peace at Portsmouth was premature and misleading in as much as it caused Japan to be recognized as the conqueror of Russia. This he says, will be painful for all powers who have possessions or business interests in Asia. "Internal disorders, and a hostile or indifferent sentiment among the Russian public towards the war, were the real causes for Russia's part of the treaty. "Insignificant forces to begin with, and unfavorable conditions to work under, taken from the fact that at no time did more than one third of our armed forces enter battle against the Japanese caused our repeated defeats. "In September, 1905, we had knocked out the enemy's ranks in killed and wounded almost 300,000. An army of a million Russian men seasoned by fighting and in every way reliable were preparing to continue the conflict. Our army was full to its full complement, telephones, telegraphs, army supplies, wireless telegraphs, transportation department enlarged, and sanitary conditions excellent in short, a most favorable outlook was before us when the fatal news of peace was announced. "The entire peace force of the Japanese consisted of 116,000, of which as many as 13,000 were on perpetual leave. To show that they were being exhausted we began to meet among the prisoners some who were almost boys and side by side with them others who were almost aged men. The Japanese suffered battle losses of 110,000 men. Our losses were several times smaller. Those killed and wounded, who died from disease, the Japanese lost 135,000. Japan is exhausted by the war. In the latter part of the war they lacked the enthusiastic dash with which they had fought. They had wearied of the conflict." The general believes that the Japanese were much in need of ready money and that they were troubled as to how they could supply their artillery sufficient ammunition at the proper time. These with a few more points form the Russian side of the question, but like most others, it has two sides, the other in this case has not yet been forth coming. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, In and for King County. Michel A: Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara An- derson Provo, Defendant. No. 63790. Summons for’ Publication, State of Washington to said Clara An- gerson Provo: ‘ou are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy, of your answer upon the under- Signed attorneys for plaintiff, at thelr Offices stated below, In case of your failure soto do, judgment will be ren- ered against you according to the de- mands in plaintif’s complaint, which fas been. filed with the Clerk’ of the Gourt above stated. This case is brought by the plaintifé to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful desertion, FREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintif. No, 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November £0—-January 1, 190. IN_THE. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Ina iE Moster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. roster, Derendant. NO ssecees veo Summons for Publeation, state of Washington to sald Norman B. Poster: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff, at their Sifice below. stated. In case of your fail: ure so to do, judgment will be rendered agolnet you according to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Cler kof said Court. ‘This cause is brought by the plaintiff to ob- fata Miecree of divorce from sald de- fendant on the grounds of willful de- sertion and nonsupport. PREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Piaintitt. No, 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190. Pele aed Aa EE -waTtCe AND SUMMONS. nd tm_the Superior Court of ey! ‘Washington, for King County. i. H Craver, Plaintitt, vs. C. A. Cook, ‘and all persons unknown, if any, hav- {ng or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants. Steve of Washington, to the above defendants and each ‘of them: | You and each of you, as owners, claim- €nts or holders of an interest or estate fn ana to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove iamed plainti@ 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax, certificate fasued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered BO4861, for the delinquent taxes of the years T02 to 1906, Inclusive, in the amount Of, $8.89, and upon the real property Situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second ‘class tide fands in front of BEM of SH% of Bec. 6 Twp. 22.N., R. 8 E, W. M. That the taxes for the year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described Foal property, in, the sum, of 48 cents, Which several sums bear Interest at the the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. "You and each of you (including said petsons unknown, tf any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be ani Appear within sixty dave, after the date Of first publication of this notice, ex- Glusive of the day of said first publiea- Heeeceertt Ta Me atte after overnber 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action &nd answer the complaint of said plain- {ifr and serve a copy of your answer on the ‘undersigned attorney for plaintif at his office below stated, or pay the mount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- {nent will be rendered herein, foreclos- ing. the Men of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the gatisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintits com: plaint,’ now ‘on’ file in this cause and court, L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C, MacDONALD, ‘Attorney for’ Plaintift, Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edna I, Brenner, Plaintiff, vs. George W. Brenner, Defendant.—No. 64990. Summons by’ Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the sald George W. Brenner, defendant: ‘You are hereby. summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the Gate of the first publication of this sum- mong, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy ‘of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post-office address below des- ignated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you agcording to the demand. of plain- titt's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. "Phe object of said action is to secure ‘a divorce from defendant, the custody of minor children and that the commu- nity property be awarded to plaintitt gnd for permanent allmony, attorney's fees herein and costs of this action. MORRIS, SOUTHARD. & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintift. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Hal- ler Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. ropate OF fifst publication, January 16th, 09. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. F, J, Carver, Plaintiff, vs, GW. Rob- erts ‘and Jané Doe Roberts, ‘his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown. and all persons unknown, If any, having or claiming an interest 'In and to the hereinafter deserihed real property, De- fendants.—No, 62577. Notice and Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders ‘of ‘an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and num- ered as follows, for the’ delinquent taxes of the following year in the fol- lowing amount and upon the real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 6, block 2, B49256, year 1904, amount ‘eighty-nine cents, ‘That the taxes for the following prior and Subsequent vears have been, paid by the plaintift upon said above described real ‘property, to-wit: ‘Lot 6, block 2, White Brothers’ Adai- tion to ‘Kirkland, thirty-five cents (350) for the year 1805; forty-seven cents (ize) for the year 1906, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for the year’ 1907. Which several sums bear ‘interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum: from said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes upon and Against said real property, ‘You and each vf you (including said persons unknown, Sf any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notlee, exelu- Sive of the day of said first, publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1809, In the above en- titled court and action: and defend this action ‘and answer the complaint of sald plaintite and serve a copy of your an- Ewer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Inter- est and costs, In ease you fall so to. do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien. of said taxes and costs Against each parcel of sald real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest. and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the Satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as, provid- ed by Jaw and as prayed in plaintift’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift. F, J. CARVER, Attorney’ for Plaintife, omce Address, Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co, Bldg. ‘January 15—February 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. ‘Aurora Land Co, a Corporation, Plain- tif, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an in- terest'in and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, Defendants.—No. 62557. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that thte above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate ts- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the’ delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount and ypon the real property, situated in sald King County, described as follows, to- wit: ‘White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 8, block 2, B49268, year 1904, amount,’ eighty-nine cents. ‘That ‘the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above deseribed Teal property, to-wit: Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers’ Addi- tion to Kirkland—86 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47) for the year 1906, and fifty cents (60) for the year 1907. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes upon an against said real property, ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty daya after the date of first publication of this notice, exelu- sive of the day of said first, publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, In the above en- titled court and’ action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with In- terest and costs. In'case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the Hen of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed In plaintiff's com- plaint ‘now on’ file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift. F, J, CARVER, Attorney’ for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. January 15—February 26, 1909, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In_the matter of the Estate of Mary N. ‘Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7627. Order to Show Cauce Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James 8, Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary’ N. Mitchell, de- ceased, having filed in’ this court his petitio’ nsetting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and {t appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald estate: Tt is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, he and appear before the sald Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- hate department of sald court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show eause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in sald petition men- tioned, according to law, Tt is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the sald 25th day of February, 1909, In Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of Reneral ctreulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909, GEO. B. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of Kinig—ss, I, D, K, Sickels, County Clerk of King Cotinty and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washington, ‘or the County of King, do hereby cer- tify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original ‘order to show cause, made by sald Court on the 22nd day ‘of January, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitch- ell, deceased. ‘Witness my hand and the seal of sald Court this 22nd day of January, 1909. D. K, SICKELS, ‘Clerk. By PERCY F_ THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Se eee ee ee oe ae D, J, Hanna, Plaintitt, ys. James Bradshaw and’ Dawson’ Bradshaw, | co- partners doing business under the firm hame of Bradshaw Bros. Defendants.— No. .+... Summons by Publication. ‘the State of Washington the the sald James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Brad- shaw, Defendants: "You are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and'in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you fecording to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court, ‘The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is co recover the sum of two hundred and twentw-five ($225.00) dollars due plaintift from the defendants, as the Salary of plaintiff for the month of De- cember, 1908, under a certain contract of employment between the parties to this action, whereby plaintife was to, re- ceive $225.00 per month for his services as salesman for defendantss and which Said sum defendants have failed and re- fused to pay. GRAVES & MURPHY, Attorneys for Plainti¢t. P. O, Address: Seattle, County: of King, “Washington, at 911 Lowman Building. January 15—February 26 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary C, Brydges, Plaintiff, vs, Wil- Yam H. Biydges, Defendant. —No, 64926. Summons by Publication, ‘The State ot Washington to, William R. Brydges, the said defendant: In the name of the State of Washing- ton, you are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the date Of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days trom and after the 18h day’ of January, 1900, and de- fend the above entitled action In the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be Fendered against you according to, the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the cleris of the above entitled court. ‘The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To. secure a divorce for the plaintift from the defendant upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper relief in the prem- se. F, B, WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintitt. P.O. Address: 421 and 422 Boston Blocks, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of first publication, January 16, atten Sa 7800, SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of Knig. —s8.—Sherift’s Office, Ey virtue of an execution Issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 16th day of January, 1909, by the clerk ‘thereof, in’ the case of Adolph Candau, Plaintift, versus Hliza- beth ‘Franklin, Detendant; No, 64908, and to me, aa sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- Wit, at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 27th day of: "February, “A. D., 1909, before the Court Hease’ door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the sald de- fendant Biizabeth Franklin in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to- wit: On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1807, by Adam Orth to Adolph Can- dau on the upstairs part of that certain building situated on Lot one (1) in Block thirty-three (33) of D. 8, Maynard's. Plat of the Town (now city) of Seattle, situ- ated at the Southeast Corner of Fifth ‘Avenue South and Main Street, for the term of two years from June’ 1, 1907, said lease being filed for record on May 29, 1907, and of record in the Auditor's Ofhee of King County, Washington, in Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et seq., levied on ‘asthe property” of said defendant Elizabeth Franklin, to satisty a judg- ment, amounting to Ninety-five 67/100 $95.67) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintift, ‘Dated this 16th day of January, 1909. ROBT. 'T. HODGE, Sheritt. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy, 7.,.,..By JOHN STRINGER, 1] State of Washington, County of King. 88. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. 'W. J. Tower, Plaintiff, vs. George Wis- hard, George ‘Fisher, Miranda Draper, Eliot Draper, ‘Thomas Draper, Lucinda Draper, Elizabeth Draper, Lucretia Dra- per, Mary Draper, Sarah, Draper, William ishard, Samuel Wishard, Martha Bridgefarmer, Emmaline Van Wagner, Josephine Wishard, Olly Wishard, Bartne Wishard, King County, State of Wash- ington, ‘City of Seattle, ©. J, Rosenerance and Jane Doe Resecrance, his wife, and the unknown heirs of Martha Ball, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants, ‘The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and re- quired to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the fol- lowing land, situate in King County, Washington,” to-wit: The Hast half (B%) of Block Twenty-eight (28), Bige- low's Addition to the City of Seattle, less the North five (N. 5) feet of, the Hast Eighty (B. 80) feet of Lot Ten (10), and the South Thirty-flye (8. 35) feet of the Fast Bighty (I, 80) feet of Lot Nine (9). and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk of sald Court, in sata County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to ans- wer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintif’ in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein, * Witness D. KX. SICKLES, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle in sald County and State this 20th day of January, A.D, 1909, sobAte of frst pubiteation, January 22, D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. By_0. 8. BRUNS, Deputy Clerk. Jan, 22 Feb. 5, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Loyd B. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs, Maude 1. Dunning, Defendant, No. 65,071. Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Maude L, Dunning, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will he rendered against vou according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk or sard court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff! and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment of the plaintiff by said defendant ‘or more than one year and cruel treatment of plaintift by defend- ant and personal indignities rendering his life burdensome. J. HENRY DENNING, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Edwin J, Milling, Plaintift, vs, Lucy Milling, Defendant.’ No. 66,099." Sum- mons. The State of Washington to the said Lucy Milling, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action ‘in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintif, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure ‘so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of #aid court, ‘The above entitled action 1s an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonipent and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. B, T, SCHOFR, Attorney for Plaintimt. Post Office Address: "603, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. January 22-March 6, 1909, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons’ unknown, if any, | having or claiming an interest in and to the here- Inafter, deseribed real property, Defend ants, No. 64,543, Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of ‘one delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of ‘Washington, dated the 16th day of Sep- tember, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in sald ‘ing County described as follows, to- wit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block ‘Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washing- ton, being certificate No, B54314, for the year 1902, One and 4/100 (1-04) Dollars, hat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), for the year 1903, ‘Thirty-one cents; for the year 1904, ‘Twenty cents; for the year 1905, ‘Thirty-two cents; for the year 1906, Forty-four cents; for the year 1907, Forty-six cents;' which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the 1st day of publication of this’ notice, ex- clusive of the day of first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after January 22, 1909, in thé above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the un- dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court: AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintifr. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 814 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘January 22-February 19, 1909. NOTICE OF SFOCERCRD AMS MESS Seattle, Wash., Jan. 21, 1909. Notice is hereby given that the regu- lar meeting of the stockholders of the Alaska Central Railway Company will be held at the principal office of said Company at Room 502 of the Burke Building, in Second Avenue, | Seattle, King County, Washington, on’ Tuesday, the 2nd day'of March, A. D., 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon of said day. JAMES A, HAIGHT. Secretary of the Alaska Central Railway ‘Company, Jan. 22-Feb, 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT or THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. Tn the Matter of the Estate of James H, Cameron, Deceased: No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, Notice is hereby given that Homer B. ‘Turner, the administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of Febru- ary, 1909, at 9:20 o'clock, a, m., at the Court Room of the Probate ‘Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in sald King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the set- tlement of sald account, at which time and place any person interested in sald estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to sald account, and contest the same, ‘Witness, the HON. GEO. B, MORRIS, Judge of ‘said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 21st day of January, 1909, D, K. SICKLES, Clerk. (Seal) ‘By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County.—In Probate. Tn, the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No, 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 1909. ” 2 Not be Made. Homer E, Turner, administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, having “fled In this Court his, petition netting forth that said estate is now a condition to be closed, and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law there= to, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to ‘authorize a distribution of the rest- due of the said estate. Now, therefore, it is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of said James H. Cameron, de~ ceased be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room in the Probate Department ®f said court in the City of Seattle, on the 26th day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. ni, of sald day, then and there to Show’ cause, if any’ they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of the said estate among. the heirs and’ persons In ‘sald petition’ mentioned, according to law. Tt is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four “successive. weeks before the said 24th day of February, 1909, In the Se attle ‘Republican, a Newspaper printed and published in’ said King County, and Of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2ist day of January, 1909. GEO. E, MORRIS, Judge. Jan, 22-Feb, 19, 1909, PROBATE NOTION. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King—ss, In the Matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased, No, 7527. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, Notice is hereby given that James 8. Mitchell, the administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, has ren- dered io, and filed’ in said Court his Final Account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of Feb- rary, 1909, at, 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, In the City of Seattle, in said King ‘County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his ex- ceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. ‘Witness, the Hon. Geo, E. Morris, Judge of ‘said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 22nd day of January, 1909, R. K. SICKELS, Clerk, By PERCY F. THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. SHERIFY'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. ‘WOTICE, State of Washington, County of King, —ss. Sheriff's Office, By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of Novem= ber, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the dase of James Dignan, plaintif, versus Joseph B. Johnson and Annie M. John- fon, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and to. me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed ito, sell at public auction, to. the ighest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 19th'day of December, A. D, 1908, before the Court House ‘door of sald King County, in the State of Washington, the follow- tng described property, situated in King County, State: of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) ‘in block sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second, Addl- tion to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisty @ judgment, of foreclosure “of mortgage amounting to twenty-four thousand five hundred sixty; five and 88/100 ($24,665.88) dollars, and eosts of suit, In favor of plaintift, yepeted this “Lath “day of November, L. C, SMITH, Sheritt. By BBW, DREW, Deputy. November 18—December 11, 1901 ee ae SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. Inthe Superior Court of the State of ‘Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehihorn, Inc. a” corporation, Plaintift, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, RG. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, pls wite; Ovid A. Byers, tlle M. Cow! ing and Richard’ Cowling, her hus- band; Island Lime Company, a corpo- ration, Hotace Allison: and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J..W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants. pany, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock, and Jane Doe Bullock, De- fendants, ‘The State of Washington, to, the sald Defendant, Mary Augusta, Thompson: You are ‘hereby stmmoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and-serve a copy of your Gmewer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your fallure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint herein, which has been filed with the ‘clerk of this court, ‘The object of sald. action 1s to recover judgment against you in the sum of $1300.00, to- gether with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from the ard day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, dated October Srd, 1906, upon lot § black 17, Woodland ‘Addition to Salmon Bay City, King County, Wash- ington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said prop- erty, Said mortgage was recorded on the 8rd day of October, 1906, in Volume 323 of Mortgages, page 126, of the rec- ords in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBEL, ‘Attorney for Plaintift. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Mil- ler, DefendantNo. ...,.... Summons. ‘he State of Washington to the said Grace Miller, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summens, to- wit: within sixty days after the sth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above | entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below given, In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of di- yorce made against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is for the purpose of secur- ing a divorce. J, W., BROWN, Attorney for Plaintift. 314 Northorn Bank Bldg. Seattle, First publication January 8th, 1909. Jan. §—Feb, 19, 1909, NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpewa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 305 25th Ave. South, in Seattle, Wash. on the 28th day of January, 1909. Specifically, Alpewa Mining Company, G. G. Barrow and H. F. Detwiller, Trustees. January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thompson, Defendant. No. 64802. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towrt: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled claim. In the case of the written court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the rules of the law has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars, balance due for hay sold by you for plaintiff and and bound you and for which an attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. J. H. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, agent— Billegro, Bldg. of Bldg. The State of Washington to E. H. Armstrong, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with the plaintiff's command, two weeks in the course court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.88, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all your right, title and interest in and to certain diamonds now in possession of the Northern Bank Trust, for the little, Warren to together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. ```markdown ``` Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Charles H. Hancock, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Hancock, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to Alice Hancock, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the office below stated, the office of your future so to do. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of trial. POSTOFFICE ADDRESS: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Maggie, Utterback, Defendant, vs. Charles W., Defendant, for Numbers for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles W. Utterback. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above employment, which has now been with the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has now been with the clerk of said court. The object of the ab ve entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CORT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant—No. 64911. Summons The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: You are hereby notified to appear with the plaintiff in the publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court affordsal, to-wit, in the case of your affidavit, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office address below stated; and in case of your failure so to you according to the demand against you according to the demand against plaintiff, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. The object of this action is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony and between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican, beginning January 8th, 1909. A. W. FRATER, Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1909. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mabelle Pinnell, Plaintiff, vs. Seminus Pinnell, Defendant. No. --- Summons' by Publication. The State of Washington to the above named Septimus Pinnell, Defendant, to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the case of the plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judge, and record the complaint according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofeae on the grounds of desertion and failure on the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H. E. S. SHOOK Attorney for plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 400 Burke Blldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Maude Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summoned. State of Washington to the said Frank A. Moore, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the petition, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff therein, and seize property, answer the plaintiff, and undersign attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the olerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is for a decree of the Court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for a period of more than one year previous to the 1st day of April, 1908; and for a decree of the court that the custody of Nada Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the plaintiff. RONEY & LOVELESS, Office and Postoffice Address: 606-607 Oriental Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Rasmus Madsen Plaintiff, vs. The Dodd Adjustable School Desk & Chair Company, a corporation, Defendant— No. .... Order Directing Notice to Creditors. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute and litigate their claims defendant in this court and in this cause, and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing the same with the Receiver, or his attorney, prosecution statements and other memoranda regarding the same, and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for payment of the same, said claims to be filed on or before the 25th day of April 1908, the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during period and period of 160 days, the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors, copy of said notice. Done in open court this the 25th day of December A. D. 1908. HOMER E. TURNER, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. HOMER E. TURNER, His Attorney, 745 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Blk. Seattle County of King, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Hans Arnold. No. 64893. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the plaintiff's action is to free the of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. C. E. PIPER. Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 6-7 Union Blk, Seattle, Kirk City, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, and all persons unknown, if any, having of claiming an interest in and to the charter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby entitled to receive the holder of a delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated Oct. 19, 1908, and numbered B54378, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.26, and upon real estate situated in said King County, described as follows: The acres of the South acres of the West half of the N. E % of the N. W. % of Sec. 29, Tp. 24, N. R. 6 E. That the taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, as follows: For 1905, 69 cents; for 1906, 76 cents, and for 1907, 89 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and the unpaid taxes upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to some of the claims and serve a copy of your answer on the dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. S In case you fa" so to do, judgment will t be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien N of said taxes and costs against said real a property for the sums and amounts due o upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction so of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, if now on file in this cause and court. W Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Annie Scholin, Deceased. No. 8443. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Nels Scholin, the executor of the last will and estate, Deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 10th day of December, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, King County, duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hearto affixed this 16th day of November, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lewis G. Kindred, Plaintiff, vs. Lenna Kindred, Defendant. No. 64097. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Lenna Kindred, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first hearing of the complaint, on within sixty days after the 9th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do,责令 the defendant pay the amount according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties heerto on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. Attorney for Plaintiff STATENOISE Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. IN JUSTICE'S COURT Before R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace闸 for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Leon Cepparo, Plaintiff, vs. Francisco Giampetra, otherwise known as "F. Giammarusto," Defendant. No. 16117. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—s. To Francisco Giampetra, otherwise known as "F. Giammarusto." You are hereby notified that the plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in sales of $300 o'clock, at my heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 21st day of December, A. D., 1908, at the hour of $330 o'clock, A. M., and that answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover judgment against you for $27.70, being for goods, wares and merchandise sold you by Vito Vitti. Complaint filed October 29th, A. D., 1908. Dated November 17, 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace State Precinct, King County, Washington, November 20—December 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. B. Eslon, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Hoffman, Defendant. No. 64,021. Summons by Penitentiary. The State of Washington to the said Defendant Harry Hoffman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of the publication, and defend the above entitled action in the court of claim, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at the office below given; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be against you according to the demand of the plaintiff. This has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to procure a judgment against you for the sum of $105.00 for services rendered with costs and interest and to sell the property of the defendant in King County, levied upon the satisfaction of a judgment issued out of the above entitled action in this action to satisfy said judgment. THOMAS M. ASKREN and H. M. OWENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, January 1, 1988 November 20—January 1. 1909 State of Washington, County of King- ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Washington. John Winston and Clara Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. J. E. Whitworth, M. A Whitworth, his wife, Isaac M. Dunn, Jane Doe Dunn, his wife, unknown heirs, Joe D Davis, Zeph Dunn, deceased; John E Davis, Lelia Dunn, his wife, Rebecca Turner, John Doe Turner, his wife, Worrel Wilson, King County, New England Mortgage Security Company, a cor- poration, Fred McCoy, H. E. Whitton, Fred McCoy, M. E. Carr, his wife, John F. Benson and John F. Benson, wife, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, est- ate, lien or interest in the real estate designed in the application herein, Defendants, no. 21. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: S. E. $\frac{1}{4}$ of N. E. $\frac{1}{4}$; all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township twenty-three (23) N. R. Five (5) E. W. M., and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, execluted by such authority, if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, Otto A. Case, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 18th day of N. A. D., 1008 (Seal). OTTO A. CASE, Clerk By MAURICE THOMPSON, Deputy. November 20—December 4, 1908. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of King, —ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued on the Honorable Superior Court of King County, the Day of November, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Jos. Martin and Flora Martin, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. G. Fetterly and Rose Fetterly, his wife, defendants, No. 63,935, and to me, as sheriff, directed and drawn. Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours pres- scribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: December, A. D., 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following des- cribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots twenty-three (23), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) all in block forty-one (41) of the Plat of the Town of Des Moines, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage, seventy-two and 20/100 ($176.20) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 17th day of November. 1908. Dated this Tithi, 18, December 1898. By LC. SMITE, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Rosa Triest, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Triest, Defendant, No. 63,890. Summons for Plaintiff. The State of Washington, to the said Fred Triest: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of the year, to answer the complaint above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be imposed against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the deefendant heearn on the grounds of failure to support and the further grounds of cruel treatment. Attorney for Plaintiff. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. No. 9080. Order to Show Cause Why Order of Sale of Real Estate Should Not be Made. appearing this day court by the ver- ified notice this day presented and filed by Lille M. Adams, administratrix of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, that it is necessary to sell the whole or some portion of the real estate of said decedent to pay the debts of the said decedent to pay the expenses and charges of administration. It is therefore ordered by this court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said court for member, 1908, at the hour of 8:30 clock A. M., of said day at the court room of the undersigned, or at such time as this matter can be called on thereafter, at the court house in the City of Seattle, County of Washington for show cause, why an order should not be granted to the said administratrix to sell all or as much of the said real esse as shall be necessary, and that a copy of the order offered shall be consecutive weeks in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said county. Done in open court this 15th day of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Maria C. Gilbert, Plaintiff, vs. Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife. Defendants. No. 63553. Summons. The State of Washington to Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitlement in the above entitled court and answer the complaint the plaintiff and serve a copy of your war upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the court of your judgment. The object of the action is to recover damages against you in the sum of $2500 and to sell your real estate in Tacoma to satisfy the same. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. 747 New York Block, Seattle, King County, New York, Washington. December 1908, 10:00 December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. James E. Phillips, Plaintiff, vs. Emma W. Wood, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heerinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of certain delinquent tax certificates, issue of the King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10. Block 28, Replast of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, the lake in the year 1904; in the sum of $2.50. In the block 28, Replast of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45683, for the year 1904 in the sum of $2.50; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said above described lots of real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.55, for the year 1906, the sum of $1.77, and for the year 1907, the sum of $2.06, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, of the day of said first publication court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and judgment you fail so to do, judgment will be renounced and the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due against it respectively as provided in law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. JAMES E. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH, E. B. HERALD. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Nov. 20, 1908. November 20—January 1st, 1909. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE County of King, ss.-Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 27th day of October, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of The Employees Reality Association, a complaint against it versus, of Oliphant, et al, defendants, N. 1306, to me, as saheri, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for saheri's sales, to-wit: 10th day of December, 1956, 6th day of December, A. D., 1908, before the house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots fifteen (15) of Block fifteen (15) of Bank Addition, the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one thousand two hundred twenty-six and 41/100 ($122.41) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 27th day of October, 1908. 27th day of October, Sheriff. By EDW, DREW, Deputy, Oct. 30—Nov. 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Rainn C. Rains, Plaintiff, vs. Levander Rains Dennant.—No. 64162. Summons for public liability. The State of Washington to the said Levander Rains: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the further notice of this summons, towit, within sixty days, at 20th day of November, A. D. 1908, and at 20th day above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer upon the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office, stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- munity, which has been filed with the clerk of court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of failure to support plaintiff and on the further grounds of aban- donment of plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Helma A. Raymond, Plaintiff, vs. John W. Raymond, Defendant. No. 64316 Summary Publication The State of Washington, to the said John W. Raymond, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the day of December, 1908, and defend the day of December, 1908, and defend the day of action in the above entitled court, answer the complaint of the plaintiff, copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and postoffice address below designated, and in case of your failure so to, and in case you be rendered against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which is filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to remove a cloud from plaintiff's title and to quiet it in her to lots one, two and one of block forty (1, 2 and 5, Blk. 40). Two of block Second. Addition to the Town (now City of Seattle) as laid off by the heirs of Sarah A. Belt (disposed); also lot 4, block 22 (Lot 4, Blk. 22). the plat of an addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, guardian of the estate of J. H. Nagle, according to the recorded plats on records of the office King County, State of Washington and forever barring the defendant from claiming any right, title or interest in the premises and to determine any and all adverse claims of said defendant to said property in favor of plaintiff, and to be a decree adjudging plaintiff, to be the owner of said real estate, free and paid for, of interest therein by said defendant, and for relief as prayed for in plaintiff's complaint on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of King County, Washington. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King Co. Washington. Date of first publication December 4th, 1908. IN DECEMBER 4, 1908, January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon College Association, and all persons unknow unknown, if any, having or claiming an injunction to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants.—No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and him, as owners or claimants of an interest in the described real property, are hereby notified the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, on the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered 1839 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $4.63 and real property situated in said King County, are submitted as follows, to-wit SE% of SW% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. W. M. NORTHWEST BRIEFS. the yard during the year of 1908, in the pay of civilian employes, sal- aries of officers and miscellaneous expenses not covered by regular congressional appropriations. A report submitted by the coun- ty auditors at Olympia shows that over $210,434 has been realized from sales of state lands and tim- ber this month. A coneurrent resolution, intro- duced by Senator Ed. Brown, of Whateom county, providing that the legislature adjourn at the end of forty days instead of continuing for sixty days was voted down by a large majority. George F. Cotterill, of King county, is urging the necessity of the passage of a bill providing for the punishment of parents of chil- dren under eighteen years of age who have been neglected. California will be well represent- ed at the Alaska-Yukon-Pacifie ex- position this year. Eleetroliers of French renais- sance design will be used to illum- inate the grounds of the Alaska- Yukon-Pacifie exposition at Seat- tle this year. In order to protect the patrons of the various theatres in the city of Seattle from the danger of fire, Mayor MijJler has issued an order instrueting Fire Marshall Kellogg to begin at once a systematic in- spection of all the publie places of amusement in the city. The wireless telephone will be demonstrated on the grounds of the A.-Y.-P. this year. The first English walnut tree grown in the Northwest or on the Pacific coast was planted in Clark county, and part of this tree will be exhibited at the Seattle fair. The tree, when cut, last year was fifty-one years old. Secretary Root has engaged ex- Senator George Turner, of Spo- kane, to serve as one of the Amer- ican counsel before The Hague Tri- bunal, which is to atbitrate the long-standing fisheries dispute be- tween this country and Great Brit- ain growing out, of the treaty of 1818. It is believed that the case will go to arbitration before a com- mission of five or seven members of the tribunal at The Hague next summer. It has been definitely announced that North Yakima will be a divis- ion point on the North Coast. The division office, round house and a 15-yard track will be located there. This will make North Yakima the most important railroad center in central Washington. According to the report of Dep- uty County Clerk Oscar Springer, made to Judge A. W. Frater, the divorce record for 1908 showed an increase of more than 60 per cent over the record of 1907, in the number of cases filed. News from vessels in the Alaska trade will be published in a daily paper issued on the grounds of the A.-Y.-P. exposition, The publica- tion will be known as The Wireless and will contain both local and foreign news received in Seattle by wireless. Many birds of fine quality were shown at the first annual show of the Seattle-King County Poultry Association’s show and this has Lina aahlc A Shin eikdebe sean | exposition this year by an exhibit of brass wares, carved woods, lin- ens and silks. An importer in Seoul is preparing a fine exhibit for the 1909 exhibition to show the progress of the Pacific country. The cold spell caused mueh dis- turbance and inconvenience in the water service, in Seattle, so that water had to be turned into the mains from Lake Washington. Conditions are much improved at present, however. A pet kangaroo in Regents Park in Tacoma, Wash., was carried off bodily by a big bear and nothing was left to tell the tale but the large tracks of the bear. A bill providing for the protee- tion of the thousands of hotel pat- rons of this state will be presented at this session of the state legislat- ure. It provides for the appoint- ment of an inspector of hotels and fixes his salary at $2,000 per an- num with the power to appoint a deputy in each congressional dis- trict at a salary of not more than $100 per month. | RECENT INVENTIONS. | By means of the beef-truck cradle, invented by ©. A. Parker- son, Jr., of New York, the handling of trucks or travelers. used in slaughter houses, packing houses and the like, for supporting the dressed meat or other bodies from the overhead tracks, is rendered very easy. The invention relates more particularly to a cradle for engaging with the roller of the truck for raising the latter and de- positing the same up the overhead track. A photographic shutter has been recently improved upon by H. A. Byers of Pe Ell, Wash. The inven- tion is an improvement upon a pat- ent formerly granted to Mr. Byers, to the extent that the means used for varying the relative exposure of the plate, so that the sky por- tion and foreground will be ex- posed to active action of rays of light of different lengths of time, will be greatly simplified, and wherein speed regulation, with ref. erence to reduced or prolonged ex- posure of sky or foreground, ean be quickly and conveniently made, it being also possible to effect 2 ‘passage of the shutter across the entire lens at uniform speed to ob: tain rapid, instantaneous exposure Fly-Paper Holder.—J. 0. Fork- er, New York, N. Y. The special purpose here is to provide a base which may be used alone, for hold- ing a sheet of paper and prevent- ing the adhesive material from flowing, or which may be used in conjunction with a eage of coarse- ly woven wire, which latter pro- tests the paper from above. The cage is so constructed that when detached from the base it may flat- ten out to oceupy the minimum space. Cooking Utensil—F. R. Mazza and C, M. Daly, New York, N. Y. The invention relates more particu- larly to that type of vessel in which there is provided an over- hanging flange or projection be- neath which the handle may be in- serted for lifting the vessel. The object is to provide means adapted to co-operate with the handle, so that the vessel may be inverted without its becoming separated or detached from the handle. Machines and Mechanical Devices. Stump-Sawing Machine.—E. . THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN it| Webster, La Crescent, Minn. The 1-| object of the improvements are to n| provide facilities for positioning it |the saw with respect to the object e|on whieh it is directed; to provide means for expediting the erection s-|and removal of the device and the e|power transmission therefor; and it | to insure durability of the working e|parts and the entire structure in 1.|proportion to the weight thereof. it ee tee Friction-Clutch for Hoisting k|Drums—F. N. Whitcomb, Barre, ff| Vt. In this case the invention re- g}lates to certain improvements in e| hoisting drums, and particularly to the means of operating the clutch -|thereof. The invention involves t-|the structural details of this oper- d|ating member and the means for t-| controlling the same. Trigger Mechanism.—E. F. Hed- rick, Fort Bayard, New Mex. This patent discloses a mechanism in connection with the sears and trigger whereby provision is made for locking the trigger as may be desired for using the trigged mech- anism in plain trigger position or so as to arrange the mechanism for set trigger position. The devices include safety means for effectual- ly locking the parts in their ad- justed positions—Scientifie Amer- ican. wit. The thread of many a discourse is in reality a yarn, Let Him Out. Miss Gushington (entering street car)—Oh, don’t get up; please keep your seat, please do. Mr. Manhattan—Really, I'd like to oblige you, madam, but I want to get out at this corner.—Smart Set. Tommy’s Blunder. “Tommy, you should have known better than to fight with that Williams boy.’” Tommy—<‘‘I know, ma’am, but I thought I could lick him.’’—Chi- cago News. It Happened in Church. A Southern clergyman tells the following amusing story : ‘After the morning sermon one Sunday he had read the notices for the week, and then announced the closing hymn—Number so-and-so. At that moment one of the deacons came down the aisle, and the min- ‘ister paused to hear what he had to say which was that the pastor had forgotten to give notice of a meeting of the ladies of the eongre- gation. Accordingly the divine gave the notice, apologizing to the congre- gation for his forgetfulness, at-d then again announced the number of the hymn, and proceeded to read it, His feelings and those of the ‘congregation may be imagined when he began: “Tord, what a thoughtless wretch was I!’ ’—Lippineott’s. “Mamma,’ said little Elsie, ‘‘do men ever go to heaven?” “Why, of course, my dear. What makes you ask?’” “Because I never see any pic- tures of angels with whiskers.’’ ‘Well,’ said the mother, thoughtfully, ‘some men do go to heaven, but they get there by a close shave.’’—Judge’s Library. Too Indefinite. Pittsburg Millionaire (after reg- istering)—Second floor suite for self and wife. Clerk (scanning entry)—Pitts- burg? Whose wife, sir ?—Puck. &> ; JOHN H. McGRAW On Lake Washington Canal. 4\ representative of the Seattle Republican called on former Gov- ernor McGraw the other day, and asked’ him about the prospects for the construction of the Lake Washington canal. “The canal will be taken care of whenever congress shall pass a general rivers and harbors bill,’”’ said Mr. McGraw. ‘‘You see,’’ he continued, ‘‘the people of this county, with rare exceptions, are determined that that great publie enterprise shall not be defeated by any or all the selfish interests that may oppose it. During the past twenty years or more Seattle and King county have spent large sums of money, direetly and indirectly, in the promotion of this indispens- able public improvement, and the interests of our people in the project have increased with each passing year. We have now come to realize that the canal is not a commercial necessity alone, but that it is a sanitary necessity as well.’’ “The specific advantages that will result from the construction of the canal are tersely but ably set forth in an article signed by Judge Hanford, Judge Burke and others, and published in the P-I. of December 6th, 1908. I wish that every citizen of our county who has come here within recent years, and who, therefore, may be unfamiliar with the arguments in favor of the early completion of the canal, would read the article I have just mentioned.’’ “Oh, yes, the canal will be con- structed, have no doubts on that score. I firmly believe that should we abandon the project today, and, were it possible, induce the United States States to convey back to the original owners the right of way that, in the darkest days, commereially, that our peo- ple have ever experienced, cost our taxpayers more than a quarter of a million dollars (it is now worth a million and a quarter), and they freely and gladly voted to tax themselves to that amount, within five years from today our necessities, commercial, sanitary and otherwise, would compel the people of this city to build the canal even though no aid could be had from the general government. This enterprise is now at the very threshhold of complete success, and our people will not be so foolish as to permit any interest whatever to impede its further progress.’” BUSINESS DIRECTORY Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ...........++..President J. 8, GOLDSMITH ...... Vice-President BR. V. ANKENY ..e-seeseessee++-Cashior CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA ANT THE YUKON TERRITORY. FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 1909. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of “THE BANK ACCOUNT” Se Wa tigi en rer an 8 MAILED RED. ‘The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. €, N. BROOKS & CO, For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY \ 1381 Second Ave,, Seattle, Washi. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. > McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Bik., Phone Main 695 TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking dis- tance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. PURCELL’S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes wif! Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave, Seattle, Wash Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Hlectric Fix- tures before letting your contract, Latest Designs Hxclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION ¥ Business Office, Third and Spring People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. ~~ R. J. Reekle, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchan;e. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattie, Wash WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies’, Misses’ and Children’s Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. EW. WAY & 00, General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer’s Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building ’ Main 2115 Ind. L asi, fi ey