Seattle Republican

HISTORICAL SOCIETY ATTLE REPUBLI THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN think they are voicing the sentiment of their constituents. The members of the eleventh legislature witnessed an unnatural phenomana in Olympia and one that no other legislature in the history of the state of Washington has ever done, as it was they had Sunday two days in succession. Sueh a phenomana has been by the cee, the the ree in Olympians Saw Two Sundays. witnessed by persons sailing to the Orient and crossing the meridian, which marks the dividing line between the East and West and only then when one comes from the East and meets another coming from the West and one happens to arrive on Saturday and the other on Sunday. In Olympia, however, Sunday set in Saturday and continued until a late hour Monday evening. This double Sunday created quite a sensation and it is said moved strong men to tears, but they got over it. In contending that the Republican platform be lived up to and that the legislature pass a county unit local option bill, Representative Frank C. Jackson Fought Local Option. Jackson of King wants the legislature to do something which he himself opposed. No dive keeper in the state more strongly opposed the adoption of the local option plank in the late Spokane state convention than did Mr. Jackson on the convention floor and despite his vigorous opposition of the plank being put in the platform he is now the loudest on the floor of the legislature in demanding that the party keep its anti-election promise. There is hardly any doubt but that a reasonable local option bill will be passed by the legislature, but Mr. Jackson will hardly be consulted. "There is talk of an anti-treat bill being introduced in the present legislature and if it is I mean to support it," tom was eliminated drunkenness would be greatly reduced and excess drinking would be the exception and not the rule. When a person wants something to eat, he seldom if really ever lines up a dozen or more men at the lunch counter to eat with him, but when he wants a drink he will line up just as many as it is convenient for him to get hold of to drink with him. I am firmly of the opinion that, the treat habit is largely responsible for the great amount of drunkenness common to the country." Members of the Oregon's legislature are hoping to pass a law making it a felony for any candidate for office to make any kind of pledge before election, which will either legally or morally bind him after election, which is interpreted to the effect that "Statement No. 1," which resulted in the election of a Democrat to the United States senate by a practically unanimous Republican legislature will be a dead one. A move in the same direction will in due time be made in the eleventh legislature of the state of Washington, which will prevent candidates from pledging themselves prior to election to give this or that man a deputyship in case of election or to support this or that measure in the legislative halls in case of election, providing he gets certain support. The race track gambling bill was dramatically taken out of the possession of the judiciary committee and after twenty-four hours of intense excitement Ole Hanson was passed by the senate, but the emergency clause failed of passage. If now the proprietors of The Meadows so desire they can open up racing say April 1st next and run until June 11, which would be seventy-two days without any molestation of the law. Representative Hansen was completely exhausted when the bill finally went through so untiringly did he work for it. It is whispered about the legislative halls that Hanson says he has spent a great deal of money on the bill, but is of the opinion that, it will result in his being elected to Congress. That there have been things doing at the legislature the past week was plain to be seen even by a blind man. Each evening of the past week the members of the legislature have been visited For Seventh by delegations interested in some proposed Legislature legislation, each of whom gave vent to his feelings one way or the other. On last Monday evening Billy Sunday addressed the members --- Local Option, Woman Suffrage, Race Tracks. was of more or less state importance, yet the measures that were given the right of way and which absorbed the time and talents of not only the respective members, but likewise the The members of unnatural phenom Olympians Saw Two Sundays. Olympians Saw Two Sundays. Woman suffrage in the senate was in a hair's breadth of meeting its fate last Monday, but friends of it stepped in the breath at the opportune time and gave it a new lease of life. During the past week the women interested in the submis strong men to tears In contending up to and that the Female Lobby Wants Woman Suffrage. Jackson Fought Local Option Jackson Fought Local Option. Judge A. W. Frater of Seattle, who is advocating the passage of a new divorce law for the state of Washington, was before the judiciary committee last Tuesday evening with the view of resuscitating the bill, which had been killed by the committee. "There is talk of the present legislature Treat Custom Treat Custom Legislated Against. That the present legislature will pass a law forbidding stores, factories and other commercial establishments from employing girls therein under sixteen years of age seems a foregone conclusion. The same bill will also fix a minimum salary for all fe to get hold of to dri ion that, the treat has amount of drunkenness Against Employing 16-Year-Old Girls. Members of the pass a law making Populist Law Quite Popular. to look as though the Initiative and Referendum will be passed and become a law. Despite the fact the bill has a very strong advocate in election or to supplative halls in case support. “If the legislature refuses to pass a wholesome and effective local option law then those who favor the passage of a local option law should insist on no law at all being enacted rather than to have one that means nothing and does still less,” came from Senator Cox completely exhausted so untiringly did her legislative halls that of money on the bill sult in his being elected Senator Cox' Local Option. That there have --- Tacoma NORTHWEST Price One Year, $3.00. S Single Copies, 10 Cents. While a number of measures have been considered by the eleventh legislature within the past week, all of which Local Option, Woman Suffrage, Race Tracks. general public were the Local Option bill, which is still in the committee of the senate; the Race Track Gambling bill, which was passed, and the Equal Suffrage bill for women, which is still in the hands of the committee. While perhaps a bare majority of the members of the senate favor the submission of the question to the voters, yet for it to pass it must get a two-thirds majority and for that reason even the friends of the bill preferred to have it go over for another week. sion of the question to the voters by the scores have been button-holing the members with a view of getting a promise from them that they would vote for the passage of the bill when it did come before the senate. A laughable situation occurred when the entire female regiment was turned loose on Senator George U. Piper. They gathered about him and began pleading for his vote and to their utter surprise he immediately spoke up and said, "I am for the passage of the bill." Judge Frater thinks that under the present law it's altogether too easy for married persons to get a divorce. Many allege incompatibility when in fact it's another man or woman they want to marry. Men and women who are married and have children should have sense enough for the sake of their children to force themselves to remain in such state and under no circumstances should they ever be legally separated, and never for alleged incompatibility. males employed by such establishments, which will be not less than $10 per week. It is argued by proprietors of business houses and industrial establishments that if they are forced to pay so high wages as that the consumers will have to pay the raise. Granting that be true the raise will be so slight that the consumer will hardly feel it, but it is not believed that the raise in salary will have any effect on the price of commodities to the consumers. There is perhaps very little if any at all a single sintila of Populism in the eleventh legislature and yet it begins Populist Law Quite Popular Senator Cotterill, the only Democratic member from King, still it is no Populist measure for Republicans are falling over themselves in their effort to advocate its passage. There are no new features about this bill, it is different from those found in the measure advocated by the most wild-eyed Pop in 1894, when Republicans hissed its advocates to scorn and ridicule and the man that is not familiar with this would-be legislation is truly an oddity and should familiarize himself with current topics. Senator Cox' Local Option. of Walla Walla. "I am not exactly advocating Prohibition for the State of Washington," he continued, "but it looks to me that it will either be county local option now or prohibition two years from now." Despite Senator Cox strong views on this subject, a majority of the members of the senate seem to think that the state of Washington is not prepared to accept prohibition and those members Ole Hanson For Congress. PUBLICAN on temperance legislation and did so in such a pathetic way that strong men wept and weak men boohood, while Sunday—well, he just bellowed. Tuesday evening the sporting men of the Sound appeared before the Committee on Game and all of them had a different solution for the game problem. The debate at times was fast and furious. Wednesday evening the Committee on Banking listened to a delegation of bankers. While they did not differ as widely as did the sportsmen on the game question, but even among them there was a wide diversity of opinion. Both Seattle and Tacoma had representative delegations present. Thursday, long before the legislature assembled, men and women began to fill up the galleries and lobbies of the legislative halls in order to Anti-Saloon Forces Watch the Battle but a few minutes before the fur began to fly. Whether or not the House would pass the Falconer-McMaster bill or the Palmer substitute was the question. While the friends of the bill pressed hard on the enemies thereof and drove them back at every hand-to-hand engagement, yet the enemies of the bill disputed every inch of ground they lost, and though hopelessly in the minority they held their firing line intact until nightfall when an adjournment truce for the night was signaled. It was truly a battle royal and even the preacher spectators spoke words of admiration for the generalship of the enemies of the bill. No filibustering was indulged in, but a vast amount of parliamentary tactics were displayed. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that no senatorial contest ever attracted a keener interest than this. The McMaster bill prevailed Friday. The Senate will doubtless have a more dramatic week on this bill than did the House. Joseph L. Mohundro has been named as state bank examiner by Acting Governor Hay. Mr. Mohundro, like Mr. Lorton and Mr. Gilham, is a Cosgrove's Friends Get Fat Jobs administration. No man has a wider circle of personal and political friends than Mr. Mohundro. He has been a resident of the territory and state for thirty odd years, and during all of that time he has been more or less active in Republican politics. He was born in the state of Missouri, and of parents who dared to be Republican when it almost meant certain death. He was four years state senator from Columbia county. In an effort to silence the oft reiterated statement that women do not want to vote, the suffragists of the United States are now engaged in Monster Petition For Woman Suffrage ratification an amendment to the national Constitution which shall enfranchise women. The work has been organized on a larger scale than ever before attempted and is in charge of no less a person than Mrs. Carrie Chapman Catt, the president of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance, who directs activities from a headquarters established for this purpose at 29 East 29th St., New York City. Here a force of competent clerks and a body of volunteer helpers send out the blanks and look after the returns. Mrs. Catt is one of the best known workers in the woman suffrage cause in the world, and indeed may be said to belong to the world, for she was born in Wisconsin, reared and educated in Iowa, was the first woman reporter in the city of San Francisco, lived in the State of Washington and later removed to New York. When Susan B. Anthony retired from the active leadership of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in 1900, Mrs. Chapman Catt was unanimously elected president. In 1904 she became president of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance, which in the few short years of its existence has grown into an affiliation of national organizations rfom sixteen countries. The president of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance is just as simple and sweet in her manner, just as democratic and unspoiled as was the young woman who came from "out West" years ago and commenced work in the national association as chairman of its organization committee. ```markdown ``` LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 Volume XV, Number 34 H. R. CAYTON, Publisher --- IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R.R. George, ussr, ussr in and died in Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Century Furniture Company, a cor- poration, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Baldwin, Defendant.—No. ..... Summons for Pub- cation. State of Washington, County of King, ss. To Alice Baldwin: You are hereby notified that the Century Furniture Co., a corporation, has fulfilled a complaint against you in said court which will continue to be held at my office in 210 New York Block, Suite King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of plaintiff Century Furniture Company is to recover and from said defendant Alice Baldwin the sum of thirty-six and 15-100 dollars, in accordance with the complaint of plaintiff. Fled December 9, A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. January 1-22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. A. Hedger, Plaintiff, vs. Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant—No. 64731. Sum- The State of Washington to the said Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first court hearing within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve the notice of your appeal to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for cruelty. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph R. Dick, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Clark Dick, Defendant. No. 63586. The State of Washington to the said Alice Dick defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, of wit: the plaintiff, dated 27th of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address. Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 27, 1908—Jan. 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Catherine Percy, Plaintiff, vs. George Percy, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said George W. are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today: within sixty days after the day of January, 1909, to do the above entitled action, in the above on the plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is that plaintiff may obtain a divorce from defendant on the grounds of defendant's desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN JUSTICE'S COURT OF SEATTLE Precinct—Before Hon. John E. Carroll, Justice of Peace in and for the Precinct of Seattle, King County, Washington. Edward Vande Vanter, Plaintiff, vs. T. T. Scudder, Defendant. Summons for publication. No. 5919-20. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to T. T. Scudder, Defendant. Hereby notified that Edward Vande Vanter has filed a claim against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, at room No. 210 in New York Block in sale by you on the 15th day of April, 1909, at 8:30 o'clock, and unless you appear and then answer the same, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover judgment against you for the sum of $50 alleged, and been loaned to you for a request, and to subject to said judgment a sum of money owing from John D. Morrissey to yourself, now under garnishment in this court. Complaint filed on Dec. 17th, 1908. JOHN E. CARROLL, J. P. January 8—January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Viola Starr, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Starr, Defendant. No. 64892. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Starr, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 8th day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and save the copy of your complaint upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office now stated; and in case of your failure against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The objection the said action must forth in the complaint, is now allowed: To obtain an abolished degree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. C. E. PIPER, Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Rooms 36-7 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Solomon Hess, Plaintiff, vs. Bertha Hess, Defendant—No. 64704. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to Bertha Hess, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 25th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer thereto upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their address below given in case the defendant will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of abandonment. Date of first publication, 25th day of December, 1908. CARRICO & DURK. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 603 People's Savings Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle County, King County, State of Washington. Rhoda J. Stanley and George E. Stanley, her husband, Plaintiffs, vs. Minnie W. Boaz, Defendant—No. .... Summons for Publication. State of Kashington, County of King, ss. To Minkle W. Boaz defendant herein; To Minnie W. Boaz, defendant hereby You are hereby notified that a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1099, at 8:30 of oclock a.m. and press you appear in the courtroom there have been taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to obtain Complaint filed December 21, A. D. judgment against you for $64.40 for house rent, coal bill, light and gas bills, R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. King County, Washington December 24, 1908—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Matter of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and also having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at his place for the transaction of business for said estate to.-wit: at room 8 UUnion Block, 713 First Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year from and after the date of this publication on this to-wit within one year from the 29th day of January, 1909, or the same will be barred. Attorney for said estate. Room 8 Union Block, Seattle, Washington. January 29-February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true claimant maintains, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 62556. N6office and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimant or holder of the estate or estate in and to their hereafter described real property, are notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent axes of the property, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers Addition to Kirkland, lot 7, block 2; certificate No. B49257; for the year 1905, $0.89; for the year 1906, and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 7, block 2. White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland; $0.35 for the year 1905; $0.47 for the year 1906; $0.58 for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon their settlement. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice executed on the day of publication of the notice to-wit 60 days after January 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against you, together with costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayer in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 29-March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. H. F. Wahlenmayer, Plaintiff, vs. Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the towit, within sixty days after the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below street 100. Your office will be rendered against you according THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimoney existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and incompatibility of temples. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 29-March 12, 1909. NOTICE STOCKHOLDERS MEETING. General Offices Midas Mines Co., Limited. Seattle, Wash., January 29, 1909. First annual meeting of the stockholders of Midas Mines Co., Limited, a corporation formed and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, will be held at the General Office of the corporation, Company 5171 the New York Building, City of Seattle, State of Washington, on Tuesday, the 9th day of February, 1909, at the hour of two o'clock p. m. of that day, for the election of trustees of said corporation, and the transaction of such other business as may properly come before such meeting. Secretary, January 29-February 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Loina Irvine. No. 6923. Notice of Sale of Real Property at Private Sale. In the matter of the estate that in persuance of an order of the above entitled court made and entered on the 28th day of January, 1909, the undersigned will sell at private sale at the office of the administrator, No. 523, New York Block. Seattle, King County, Washington, Washington, 1909, the following described property, to-wit. The east one-half of the following described tract and parcel of land: Beginning at a point in the north line of lot 2. Sec. 6, Tp. 25, north range 4 east. N. M., which point is in a fence, the northwest of lot 2; thence east along north line 330 feet; thence south parallel with the west line of said lot 2132 feet; thence west parallel with said north line 330 feet; thence north 132 feet to point of beginning, completing itself, all situ- ation. King County, Washington. All bids must be in writing and must be left at the above mentioned place prior to the day of sale above specified. JOHN N. IRVINE. Date of first publication, Feb. 29th, 1909. No. 65235 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Oyster, Theresa Boschert, Plaintiff, vs. Charles E. Boschert, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Charles E. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with you at the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of January, 1909, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. That this action is brought to dissolve the bodies existing between plaintiff and defendant, and to secure a decree adjudging the property described in the complaint filed herein to be the separate and individual property of this plaintiff and awarding the same to her as her separate and individual property for her sole use and effect. MILO A. ROOT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 630-631 New York Blk., Suite 318, King County, Washington. January 29 - March 12, 1909. No. 63887 In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Kling. H. H. Eaton, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this memorandum, sixty days after the 29th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case you have no cure so to do, judge, the undersigned attorneys according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover judgment for the sum of Two Thousand Dollars due from defendants to this indictment against the defendant to sell the interest of defendants Nellie P. Crowl and Carrie F. Orway in lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, block 7 of Front St. Cable Addition to the City of Seattle, levied upon under write of attachment issued out to county court in this action to satisfy judgment. SULLIVAN & STEVENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 514 Balley Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 29-March 12, 1909. No. 64424 NOTICE AND SUMMONS: In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. John Ballin and Jane Doe Ballin, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unk- named to him, are interested in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or follower of the delinquent tax certificate, or the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above plaintiff is the holder of a certain delin- quent tax certificate, BS2522, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for the delinquent tax August, 1908, and numbered as follows; for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1904, in the following amount. $0.90, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follow- ing: Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, lot 5 block 7, Certificate No. BS2522, year 1904, amount. $0.90. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the above described real property to-wit: Lot 5, block 7, Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, 36 cents for 1905, 50 cents for 1906, 60 cents for 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sold date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixteen days after the due publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication to-wit: within sixty (60) days after Jan. 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff of the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest of the sums charged, sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. ANVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Wash. January 29 - March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Stratton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, above named plaintiff is the holder of the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B25,969, for the year 1902, in the amount of $2.56, on ot 22, for the year 1903, in the amount of $2.56, on ot 22, that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1903, in the sum of $1.89; for the year 1904, in the sum of $1.98; for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.07; for the year 1906, in the sum of $3.60; for the year 1906 (Del. Local Assessment), $2.42; for the year 1907, in the sum of $3.60; for the year 1907 (Del. Local Assessment), $4.89; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, if any, and thus inclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and copier, or answer or the undersigned plaintiff, if both be stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. attie, Wasn. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property handlers. No. _____ Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimant and all persons of King County, State of Washington dated the January, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, State of Washington dated the January, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 41, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been added to the delinquent taxes and above described real property-to-wit. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE. Aerial Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretofore named land owner to the defendants. No.—Notice and Summons. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1909 State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of certain property or interests to be issued the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 9th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said County, located as follows, wit: Kirkland Park Addition, lot 3, block 1; certificate No. 54312; year 1909; amount, $1.05. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described ear property.办证, lot 3, block 1 Kirkland Park Addition; amount, $0.63 for 1902; $0.62 for 1903; $0.31 for 1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.56 for 1906; $0.50 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unsecured upon against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first notice, of the day of said plaintiff within 10 days after the 18th day of December, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the judgment. If you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property, of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. A Corporation. Plaintiff Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Pacific Bottlers' Supply Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Youngstown Drug Company,endant, 583-23 Oversight Notice to Creditors. In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are required to file a complaint with their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have been paid for, and that said claims to be filed on or before the fifteenth day of January, 1909. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and by mail to the creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in open court this 12th day of December, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. E. E. MORRIS, A. A. LEOPOLD M. STERN. Attorney for Receiver. 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming a hostess claim to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property of an owner, the owner named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 9th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Kirkland Park Addition; Lot 2, block 1; certificate No. B54311; year, 1900; amount $1.07. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years has been by the plaintiff upon the real property situated in said wit: Lot 2, block 1, Kirkland Park Addition; amount, $0.63 for 1902; $0.52 for 1903; $0.31 for 1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.56 for 1906; $0.51 for 1907; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the said date of 1906; and the sum of unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within six/ days after the date of your complaint, and are exclusive of the date or said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after December 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the complaint. In case your office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of the property and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it by the court of law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. F J CARVER Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Jessie White, Plaintiff, vs. Ward W. White, Defendant. No. —. Summons for publication. State of Washington to the said above named defendant. Ward W. White: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 6th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitlement in a defendant with such court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 1909 REPUBLICAN. GOOD IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Catherine E. Wakefield, Plaintiff, vs. William H. Wakefield, Defendant. No. 6444—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William H. Wakefield, defendant. Do any action after the date of within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled action and answer the complaint of plaintiff, to your answer of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which was obtained by the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of non-support. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 747 New York Block in Seattle, King County, Wash. Date: 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Arthur Bastheim, Plaintiff, vs. American Produce Company, a corporation, Defendant. No. 60345—Order Directing New Jersey Court on this matter. In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are hereby satisfied that the claims and demands the plaintiff before this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for the property of same, said to be filed on or before the fifteenth day of January, 1909. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and to have the creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in open court this 15th day of DECEMBER GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. B. F. WOODS, Jr., Receiver. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for the Receiver, 705 Lowman Blk, Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 1, 1909. IN THE INSTEAD COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Thomas Mullen, Plaintiff, vs. Jenny Mullen, Defendant. No. —Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Jenny Mullen, Defendant: You are hereby authorized a copy of your answer days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and have inscribed a copy of your answer the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce against the defendant, above named, for desertion. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Della Simonelli, Plaintiff, vs. Cerubium Simonelli. Defendant. No.—Summons, The State of Washington, to the said Cerubium Simonelli: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the third publication of this summons, to do judgment within sixty days after the 15th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case you are found guilty, be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said above entitled action is to dissolve the bond between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment and desertion, and for a decree of said court awarding said plaintiff the community property, deed or implant. P. O. Address: 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. You and each of you are also further notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the summons exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after December 18, 1908. In the above entitled court and action and defend this action, and answer the complain of plaintiff and demand a answer upon the attorney for plaintiff at his office address below given, pay the above amount with interest, penalty and costs accrued and hereafter accruing. In case you fall so to do judgment, you must垫 lot for the same and a degree of foreclosure decreed forever barring and estopping you and each of you from having or claiming any title therein in adverse to this claim of plaintiff and decreeing a sale of the same ordering a sale of said lot to satisfy the same as provided by the law in such cases and as prayed in plain- Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect.. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHARLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. tiff's complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of this court. First day of publication Dec. 18, 1908. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Mary Bell, Plaintiff, vs. Augustus Bell, Defendant. No.-Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Augustus Bell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wear a dress of the 18th day of De- cember, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and the complaint of the defendant will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on the sale of desertion, non-support and cruel treatment. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429 Oriental Bldg., Seattle, County King, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the matter of the estate of James Mills, deceased. No. 8718—Notice to Creditors. The owner of said court made herein on the 5th day of December, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 305 Lowman King, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 11, 1908. E. E. MORRIS, As Administrator of said Estate. E. B. PALMER. Attorney for Estate, 305 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Ella R. Zarek, Plaintiff, vs. John G. Zarek, Defendant. No. 64417—Summons. The State of Washington—Summons. John G. Zarek: You hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the action of John G. Zarek, in complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the court, which has been filled with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of non- support and cruel conduct. CARRICO & DURK. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Room 603 People's Bank Bldg. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Marie Maud Ravey, Plaintiff, vs. Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant. No.-Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towithin sixty (60) days after the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time using legal notices for publication, it is natural for you to want to get a with those newspapers that do your kind business. TTTLE REPUBLIC your size in this respect. It already notices for publication, as may be seen but it needs more of them, and to the business is earnestly solicited. RLEY ON THE SPOT. notices are promptly called for; have care and accuracy. Affidavits delive out delay. Charges reasonable from standpoint; everything done in a jam er. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 in you have a publication, and if it has be a Divorce Summons or a Notice give us the facts and we will do t ATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main 30 Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. --- of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of cruelty. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 304 Metropolitan Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. December 11, 1908-January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. James Milton Shaver, Plaintiff, vs. Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant. No. Summoned by Public. The State of Washington, to the said Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear at the court of December 1908, on day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; according to the word failure, so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to have a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 304 Mopelo Building, University Forest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, county of King, ss. By virtue of writ of execution, issued of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of December, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of M. Seller & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, erasus J. J. Brys, defend- ing 62889, as me, as sheerly, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff sale, to January, A. D. 1099, before the court house dor of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the sold defendant, to the property described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Tracts twenty-three (23) and twenty-four (24) Fry's Addition to Columbia, levied on as the property of the sold defendant, J. J. Fry's Addition to Columbia, judged amounting to ninety-one and 29-100 ($91.29) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 8th day of January, 1908, the writ was in the case of J. A. Campbell Co. a corporation, plaintiff, versus Joseph Masero, defendant, No. 64429, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the Joseph Masero, and to the following prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wait; at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house door of said King County, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant, Joseph Masero, and to the following prescribed by law for sheriff's County, State of Washington, to-wait-Lot five (5). Block ten (10). Ralner Boulevard Fourth Addition to Seattle. levied on as the property of said defendant, Joseph Masoero, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to two thousand three hundred seventy-four and 95-100 (3,874,504) dollars and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an alias execution, issued of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 31st day of December, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of J. E. Keefe, plaintiff, versus Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, defendants, No. 669 and to the Sheriff, of Washington, and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, towit, at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 6th day of February, 1909, before the Court House of said King County, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of said defendants, Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 52, Block eleven (28), Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. six (6), levied on as the property of said defendants Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, to satisfy a judgment amounting to one hundred and seventy (77) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 31st day of December, 1908. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW, DREW, Deputy. January 1-29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. J. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, vs. Maud MacCallum, Defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Maud MacCallum. You hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: on the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the underwriter of the plaintiff, and his fee below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to defend on the grounds of extreme cruelty, adultery and bigamy. C. E. PIPER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, 713 1st Ave, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 11, 1908-Jan. 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. In Probate. No. 9085. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance with an order of sale made and the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, 28th day of December, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, the undersigned administratrix of said estate will sell at public auction subject to confirmation by said Court following described real property, to-wit: Lots eleven (11), twelve (12) and the North half of thirteen (13) in Block four (4). Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Seattle; said sale will be made on the 8th of February, 1999, at 10:00 o'clock in the foreground of said day at the front door of the county court house in said City of Seattle, King County, Washington. The terms of the sale will be cash, gold coin of the Unti-times, ten per cent of the bid to be payable in cash and in salse and the balance con the confirmation of the said sale by this Court. Dated January 15, 1909. LILLY M. ADAMS. Administratrix of the Estate of sale 3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Emanuel Williams, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The Emanuel Williams Defendant to the said Emanuel Williams, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towrit: Within sixty days after the list of demands made by the above entitled action* in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated demands your answer to so judge, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant. MILLIEON HOUSER and GEORGE FRIEND. Plaintiff's Attorneys. Post Office Address: Room 916 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Order Appointing Day four. Settlement of Bankruptcy. Directing Notice to Be Given. Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, having rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her final account of the administration of the estate of said deceased, a petition for the distribution of the residue of said estate to the persons entitled thereto. It is ordered that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 16:00 at 9:30 o'clock a day after the same date, were pointed for the hearing and settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition for distribution at Department No. 4 of said court; that the clerk of this court give notice thereof by cause of the most public places in King County, Washington, and by publishing a similar notice for at least four consecutive weeks immediately before said day of settlement and distribution, in the newspaper printed and of general circulation in said King County, Washington. It is further ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court on Monday the 4th of February, 1999, at 10:30 a.m. clock of said day, at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court house in the City of Seattle, Washington, to show cause why an order should not be made distributing said estate, as prayed for in the order. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served upon all persons interested in said estate at least ten days before the day appointed for the hearing of said petition, or that a copy of this order be published for at least four consecutive weeks prior to said hearing, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper published in King County, Washington, and of general circulation therein. In this court this 31st day of December, 1998. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Albert A. Klefer, Plaintiff, vs. Edna Klefer, Klefer, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Edna Klefer; No. —. Summons for publication within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and answer the opposing answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the above entitled action in the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion. KING DYKEMAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 502 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Notice of Settlement of Final Account and Hearing of Petition for Distribution. Notice is hereby given that Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, has remitted paid presented for settlement and filed in said account. In addition, her administration of said estate and that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, at the court room of Department No. 4 of the State of Washington inattle, King County, Washington, has been appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file exceptionally to said account and to contest the same. Notice is hereby further given that said Lillian M. Winslow, the said adminstratrix, has presented a petition for the distribution of the said estate and that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock of said day, at Department No. 4 of said court at the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, has been duly appalled by the petition of said petition, at which time all persons interested in said estate may appear and show cause why an order shall not be granted distributing said estate as prayed for in said petition. In witness when hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Superior Court this 31st day of December, 1908. LILLIAN M. WINSLOW. Adminstratrix. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk of said Court. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. (Seal of Superior Court) Reply. “What are they moving the The fearful calamity in Italy has served to endear King Victor Emmanuel and Queen Helena to their subjects, for they have demonstrated the fact that their hearts were deeply in tune with humane promptings. At Naples the Dutchess of Aosta also toiled untiringly among the wounded brought to that city. Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. California is loud in her demand for Congress to take the duty off of Philipine products, simply because California will profft thereby. The City of Boston has expended $200,000 for an Armory. Evidently she expects trouble of a war like nature before driving her grafters out of the public's employ. Castro of Venezuelian fame was operated on not long since and came out of the ordeal with a pleasant smile. He doubtless thought of all the money he had. Despite the fact that the hat makers have not yielded to the demands of the unions, yet they announce that the price of hats will be raised. America is brim full of just such bands of robbers as these. Pitchfork Tillman in the past volleyed and thundered when his feathers were ruffled but since Teddy caught him in the act he is as still as a sheep killing dorg. That Convict's letter in last Sunday's Seattle Daily Times was a most remarkable one. If a tenth he said is true those responsible for such a state of affairs are too despicable to be kicked off into hell. Ten tiny Japanese girls are to entertain at the A. Y. P. What gave the above maidens the necessary fame to be an attraction at the fair is due to them having served Admiral Sperry a cup of tea. "What fools we mortals be." If Judge Milo A. Root after so severe an ordeal as he has undergone succeeds in building up a practice in Seattle he will further demonstrate to the world, "you can't keep a good man down". Italy wants to give Theodore Roosevelt citizenship to show her respect for him. If she does then King Emanuel had better put that crown of his in a safety deposit vault or Teddy won't do a thing to it. And now comes one Dr. Madison C. Peters, who declares that as a race the Jews are a very poor people and it does them an injustice to say, "as rich as a Jew". It is very apparent from the foregoing that even a crazey occasionally breaks into print. Emigration in more copious showers than ever before in the history of Seattle has been reported coming in by a large real estate firm. Work must be very scarce in all cities in the East this winter. That halibut fisherman that lost his mind on being informed that he had a case of appendectis must have been up against the doctor's bili before. A burnt child dreads the fire. Country Press on Legislature Senator Whitney of Spokane, has introduced a bill calculated to revolutionize the liquor business. Instead of licensing saloons he would license all men who patronize saloons by having the state demand an annual license fee from all drinkers of $5.00, on the payment of which the state would require each toper to wear a tag. This scheme might work better than some people think.—Yakima Democrat. Think of an idiot being sent to the state legislature, who has no more idea of his proper duties than to take up the time of the house by introducing a bill to compel hotels to have sheets nine feet long in their beds. This is what Representative Sharp has done. His constituents had better wrap a sheet around him and bring him home. —Island County Times. The local option bill before the legislature is a snag that seems likely to wreck several legislative craft now anchored at Olympia. The moorings of some of them are somewhat uncertain. Colfax Gazett. The legislative candidates were all pledged to the passage of a reasonable local option bill, but the rub comes on defining the word "reasonable."—Lincoln County Times. The man who inserted the word "reasonable" into the Republican state platform last May was a everybody could climb aboard of—along with the betwixt and between, statesman—he drafted a plank that everybody could climb aboard of—the churchman and the saloon man along with the between and betwixt. It was something like Statement No. 1 in Oregon, it was easy to subscribe to before election, but today in Olympia some of the members are sweating blood over the word "reasonable." On one hand they are told that it means one thing and on the other that it means another. Both the Anti-saloon men and the saloon men are maintaining lobbies for and against local option—Willapa Harbor Pilot. Representative Mort Cogswell is staying with the local optionists, but the biggest trouble with the optionists is that they want to make the state or county the unit, and the people of Spokane county want the precinct a unit, so it will not interfere with the township organization law. If the optionists gets too presistent and bull-headed about it they are liable not to get any kind of a bill through. Almost any kind is better than nothing.—Rockford Register. State Senator Ed. Brown has introduced a bill requiring not only the written consent of the TH ATTLE REPUBLICAN parents but the sanction of the presiding superior court judge before a marriage license may be issued where one of the parties is a minor. The provision applies not only to girls under 18 but to boys under 21, as well. The bill, we believe, should become a law.—Big Bend Empire No one seems able at this time to figure out with any degree of accuracy, the outcome of the local option bill. The opponents of the bill say that a vote on the Falconer-McMaster bill would show a tie; anti-saloon men declare the measure will become a law. It may be some time before the matter comes to a final show down.—Georgetown-Gazette-News. It is not altogether improbable that had there been no Ole Hanson in the eleventh Washington legislature, an anti-race track gambling bill would have been introduced and the bill might have passed. Those who take pride in critising Ole Hanson and his methods are apt to wander off into the relm of the whatmight-have-been in order to substantiate their arguments. But getting down to the workaday things-that-be, the fact remains that with Ole Hanson in the lower house, the anti-race track gambling bill has passed the house by a unanimous vote and will probably pass the senate and become part of the statute of the state. -Walla Walla Statesman. A. friend of good government writes the Washingtonian editor that Chehalis county has a good representation in the legislature, but urges that much of their efficiency is lost by an imaginary line between the House and Senate. He states that the three representatives are in close touch with each other on all matters appertaining to this section, but rather intimates that, perhaps through thoughtlessness, the upper and lower branches do not get together as they might and should. The Senate being the higher in rank it would appear to be up to It to open the way for co-operation for the public good, he says.—Gray's Harbor Washingtonian. Just now the eyes of the state, so to speak, are upon the legislature. The local option question is to the front and the Anti-Saloon League people are forcing the fight. It is up to the republican party to make good and redeem its pledges. No half way measure will suffice, no compromise with the saloon forces will be tolerated. The local option bill presented by the Anti-Saloon League is a reasonable measure and the members of the legislature should be watched closely to see that they do not sacrifice it to an unholy ambition. Nothing less than county and precinct local option will satisfy the rank and file of the party.—The Sunnyside Sun. CURRENT COMMENT Dr. Edgar Hoffman, the German scientist, is advancing the new and strange theory that a woman can not reason. He holds that after a certain point I HAVE A BEER OF QUALITY IT'S Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE, WASH., U.S.A. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE is reached women loose sight of the question at issue. When a woman shows more than the usual acruminous intellect they are not applying knowledge or experience but are making haphazard shots. He says, that when a woman shows an enduring and consistent intellectuality she is with out the attributes of love and would make an undesirable wife and mother. The High schools of Greater New York have introduced real newspaper training in their work. The boys of the school form the staffs and they are getting out bright paying publications. The work is apart from the school curriculum and is used as a practical inspiration for the making of newspaper men of the future. An inventory of the natural resources of America brings with it rather a surprise, at the same time setting a pressing duty before the public. The growth in population being on the increase and our modern way of living calling for a steady increase in consumption, the demand on our natural resources is correspondingly greater. At the present increasing rate of demand and production our supply of coal may be exhausted before the middle of the next century. Our high grade iron ores and our petroleum by the middle of the present century. The daily waste of natural gas is enormous as is the waste in coal. Our River and Harbor bills would materially decrease if the cutting of the forests was stopped so that the soil would not be washed into the streams. It is being urged on congress to appoint a national commission on the conservation of the country's resources to cooperate with state commissions to secure such conservation in all parts of the country. Atlanta, Georgia, has made a departure in the selection of her county coroner.. The new office holder is one Paul Donehoo who is totally blind. The man is said to be a marvel in his way. He is a stenographer and typewriter, an educated man, also a musical genius. He made a FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5. 1909 house to house canvas for his office and secured it not on the grounds of his infirmity, but for his ability to meet the requirements of the office. When he holds an inquest the county physician takes down the testimony the blind coroner takes it home and copies it on the typewriter. Bulletin Bubbles. Part interest—the actor's. Part interest—the actor's. Rank and file—poor newspapers. The highwayman has a low way of doing things. The finger of fate is one that is in almost evey pie. You might say of a legal wedding. "Certainly knot". The rule in a prohibition state seems to be "bar none". The words coined in the mint do not increase our vocabulary. You can not learn to be a dramatic critic by readinghg the acts. When some people try to put on style it is merely a take-off. People who make too flowery speeches should be nipped in the bud. As to the rag, some people never bite off more than they can chew. The woman in the case is often what makes a man case-hardened. When some girls are "in a pickle," it is pretty sure to be a sweet one. The ball room is where a man unused to society gets "all balled up. The town generally looks blue to a man after he has painted it red. It seems paradoxical, but it is possible to keep dry under a weeping willow.—Philadelphia Bulletin. Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SATTLE REEPUBLICAN SCIENCE HALL CYMNASIUM OBSERVATORY Templedoraal University Founded 1861. State University's New Buildings 1872. U. OF W. HAM! HAM! U. OF W. SMIT! SMIT! Schoenbual Schoenbual! WASHINGTON! ADMINISTRATION BUILDING UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 1890 NEW HALL CLARKE HALL BIRDSEYE VIEW OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. The above picture is a cut of the principal buildings and grounds of the University of Washington, located at Seattle, as they appeared some four years ago. Since that time the state has expended something like a million dollars in buildings and other improvements and the exposition, of course, has added many buildings and improvements to those of the state, hence one would not recognize the University campus as it now looks from the above picture. The authorities of the University are asking the legislature this year for an appropriation of, in round numbers, $800,000, which it is thought by the members of the legislature, who are taking a lively interest in the schools of the state, will be granted. "I consider it just and right," said Senator Pete McGregor from Whitman county, "and I shall do all in my power to get the appropriation through. We have a splendid school system in this state and I desire to keep it so, hence my intention to support the appropriation." FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909 SCIENCE HALL Tribional University Founded 1864 State University & New Bordings 1874 ADMINISTRATION BUILD UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 1894 The above picture is a cut of the principal building Washington, located at Seattle, as they appeared some the state has expended something like a million dollars and the exposition, of course, has added many b of the state, hence one would not recognize the Unive the above picture. The authorities of the University for an appropriation of, in round numbers, $800,000, w the legislature, who are taking a lively interest in the "I consider it just and right," said Senator Pete MeGr shall do all in my power to get the appropriation throu tem in this state and I desire to keep it so, hence my in NEW CODE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION. The code commission appointed by Governor A. E. Mead to revise the code of public instruction has submitted its report in the form of a bill which is now before the legislature. The subject matter has been re-arranged and conflicting parts of the law harmonized and simplified. Honorable E. C. Hughes, of Seattle, who served for eight years as a member of the Seattle board, has had personal charge of the questions dealing with the formation of districts, transference of territory, extension of boundaries by extension of city limits, adjustment of debts and liabilities, powers and duties of directors in districts of the first class, and has given the entire code careful attention. Senator Knickerbocker, of King County, representing the attorney general's office, took personal charge of the revision of those portions of the code dealing with the issuance and funding of bonds, validation of indebtedness and elections. Senator Knickerbocker has served for several years as a member of the board at Auburn and is thoroughly familiar with every phase of common school work. It is proposed under the report of this commission to divide the districts into three classes instead of two, as formerly. All cities of 10,000 or more population constitute one class; all other incorporated cities, another class, and the rural schools a third class, and different powers are given to the various boards of directors. Rural supervision is one of the new features of the school law. This is an attempt on the part of the commission to make it possible for rural schools to have effective supervision. At the present time there is a principal in charge of every building in the large cities and in the graded schools whose business is to help his associates by advice and suggestion. It has been felt for a long time that close supervision was exceedingly desirable in rural schools. The law makes it optional with the county superintendent to determine the extent of supervision within reasonable limits, subject to the approval of the county commissioners. The provisions of the "Barefoot Schoolboy Bill" have been modified by making a larger minimum apportionment to districts that have very small valuations. At the present time the same minimum apportionment is made to every district, regardless of valuation of the district. The summer schools are authorized. The attendance at such schools, unlike the institutes, is purely voluntary. This provision is intended to enable the normal schools, by cooperation with the county superintendents, to arrange for a series of summer schools in different sections of the state. The compulsory school law is modified by extending the age limit to sixteen for pupils who are not continuously engaged in some remunerative employment. The plan of certification submitted by the code commission provides for progressive certification and abolishes the permanent first grade. The report on certification is being opposed by large number of teachers on the ground that it will require additional preparation for the work of teaching. A member of the code commission, in commenting on the opposition to the plan of certification, --- OBSERVATORY U of W. Hunt! Hunt! U of W. Hunt! Hunt! Skokom! Skokom! Washington!! CLARKE HALL BIRDSEYE VIEW Washington Col located in Garfield million dollars. Few igs and grounds of the University of the four years ago. Since that time its in buildings and other improve-buildings and improvements to those university campus as it now looks from are asking the legislature this year which it is thought by the members of schools of the state, will be granted. Regor from Whitman county, "and I high. We have a splendid school system to support the appropriation." educational standing has selected it as one fill government exp country. Professor of the State of Washington Eastern Washington to many hundred do for the great apple civilized world, and from $50 per acre to will not lose anything College. stated recently that his observation showed that these opponents belong to one of three classes: First, those who had not read the code carefully, constituting fully ninety per cent. of all opposed to the plan of certification; second, those who are opposed to a high standard of certification; third, those who are directly or indirectly interested in the maintenance of summer schools at which tuition is charged for the purpose of training teachers for the examination. The report of the code commission, which makes a mark of ninety once secured a permanent mark, would destroy their business of trafficking in teachers' certificates. CARDINAL AGAINST DISFRANCHISEMENT. Consternation seized the Democratic ranks of Maryland the other day when Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore declared squarely against the constitutional amendment designed to disfranchise the Negro. The amendment is to be submitted to a vote of the people next fall. The campaign had hardly opened when the cardinal gave out an authorized interview in which he declared that the amendment was not fair to the colored race. Maryland tried disfranchisement by another amendment two or three years ago, but it was promptly voted down because the men who drew it had not succeeded in limiting disfranchisement to the Negro. Many prominent Democrats fought the other amendment, for they found it would disfranchise whites. A special effort was made, when the amendment was drawn at the last session of the legislature, to produce a measure agreeable to the Democratic opponents of the former measure. The Democrats thought the new amendment would have comparatively "easy sailing" until suddenly and unexpectedly Cardinal Gibbons declared against it in positive terms. This changed the situation noticeably. A few weeks ago the Democrats of Maryland made use of certain remarks of President-elect Taft to create the impression that he favored the Maryland amendment. Shortly afterward Mr. Taft disappointed the Maryland democracy by coming out squarely against the amendment in a letter written to William F. Stone, collector of customs, and a Republican state leader of Maryland. It is not as easy to pass a disfranchisement amendment in Maryland as it is states of the South having a larger Democratic majority. The vote has been close in Maryland for twelve years. The electoral vote cast the other day was divided. A constitutional amendment affecting the suffrage is debated and discussed in Maryland far more than in states farther south. For this reason the opposition of Cardinal Gibbons is of great moment. Referring to the point that the Democrats object to the habit of Negroes of adhering to the Republican party, the cardinal said the Democrats should offer the Negroes inducements to transfer their allegiance in whole or in part to the Democratic party. The cardinal continued: "In the case of the Negro, conciliation will some day win him over to the ranks of those who vote according to their convictions regardlesss of party affiliations. Injustice and abuse will, upon the other hand, but confirm --- [Portrait of a man with a mustache, set against a panoramic view of a city with a fortress and surrounding hills.] BIRDSEYE VIEW OF WASHINGTON COLLEGE, SHOWING PRESIDENT BRYAN. Washington College, a picture of which is herewith presented, which is located in Garfield county, is likewise asking the legislature for nearly a million dollars. Few agricultural schools in the whole country has a higher educational standing than the Washington College. The federal government has selected it as one out of seven others from which it can draw graduates to fill government experimental positions, that are being located all over the country. Professor Bryan and his army of teachers are doing good work for the State of Washington and the school is responsible for the farm lands of Eastern Washington having increased from being worth a few dollars per acre to many hundred dollars per acre. The Washington College made it possible for the great apple show at Spokane, which has attracted the attention of the civilized world, and lands good for apple culture since that show have jumped from $50 per acre to as high as $650 per acre in so short a time. The state will not lose anything by making a liberal appropriation for the Washington College. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 5 him in his present course. If he is indeed ignorant, educate him; if he be corrupt and venal, punish him for his corrupt practices and his venality; but, above all things, let us not condemn the righteous for the sins of the unrighteous. Let us not be guilty of the great crime of a wholesale violation of the written laws of our country in order to punish individuals who break those laws in isolated instances." He thought the Negroes of Maryland superior to the Negroes of North Carolina in the matter of intelligence and education. But his chief contention was that there should be no discrimination on account of color. If there is to be a property or an educational qualification, let it apply alike to all citizens. The cardinal in saying this was surely within the right. Naturally the Republicans of Maryland are happy over the situation.—Tacoma Ledger. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IS PRAISED --- 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Country. Michel A. Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara Anderson Provo, Defendant. No. 63799. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Clara An- You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and seize the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices stated below. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands in plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the Court above stated, to cause the above defendant to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful desertion. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King Ina E. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. Foster, Defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Norman B. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the court, having a copy of the lawsuit upon the undergarden attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated. In case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk kor said, cause is brought against plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant, to the grounds of willful defiance and nonsupport. serton FREUDENBERG & HEATON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190 . NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut County. Washington. L. Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter offered a real property, are notified that the one named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th of October, 1908, and numbered B54391, the 20th of June, 1902 to 1906, inclusive, in the amount of $3.89, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class lands in front of B3 E W M of Seward, R 3 E W M. That the taxes for the year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum. All the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the execution of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within sixty days after November 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and in the absence of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and charged against each parcel of said plaintiff will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said property will be ordered a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's compere now on file in this cause and Court. Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Eda N. Bremner, Jr., vs. George W. Bush, Defendant—No. 64980 Summons, by Public. The State of Washington to the said George W. Brenner, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summary, and to appear before the 15th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post-office for the date of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to secure a divorce from defendant, the custody of minor children and that the community property be awarded to plaintiff and for permanent alliance, attorney's fees herein and post-hours. MORRIS, SOUTH HARD & SHIPLEY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Writing of first publication, January 15th, 1909. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Colorado in Kinsley County, Plaintiff v. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the latter described real property fendants—No. 62577. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, and the officer scribed real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered the following year in the taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real pron- erty situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland —Lot 6, block 2, B49256, year 1904, amount eighty-nine cents. That the axes are following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 6, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland thirty-five cents (35c) for the year 1906, twenty-even cents (47c) for the year 1906, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid cents upon and unless said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: the 15th January 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, in case, in judgment, be ordered herein, fore-against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respected and provided by law and as provided in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co., Bldg. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No 62557. State of Washington to the above defenders and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one hundred thousand dollars by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—Lot 8, block 2, B49258, year 1904, amount, eighty-nine cents. That the taxes for the following prior and platinum taxes have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47) for the year 1906; and fifty cents (50) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon an annuity for the year 1907. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and to give evidence of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the company of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to pay the amount due, will you forecough the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, order, sale and payment of said taxes for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and cause. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James S. Mitchell, administrator on the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having in his court his court notting forth that said state is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize the distribution of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court of the said county in the said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, and then to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs of the said petition men- It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 25th day of February, 1909, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909. SEO E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington. State of Washington, Co. King—ss. I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on behalf of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 22nd day of January, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN State of Washington, for King County. D. J. Hanna, Plaintiff, vs. James B. Bradshaw and Daintiff, Bradshaw, co- partners of business under the firm name of Bradshaw Bros. Defendants. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington the the said James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Bradshaw, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons to-wit, within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office between the 16th and 21st days so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to recover the sum of two hundred dollars for the service of plaintiff from the defendants, as the salary of plaintiff for the month of December, 1908, under a certain contract of employment between the parties to this action, whereby plaintiff was to receive $225.00 per month for his services as salesman for defendants, and which defendants have failed and refused to pay. GRAVES & MURPHY. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington, at 911 Lowman Building. January 15—February 26 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary C. Brydges, Plaintiff, vs. William R. Brydges, Dependant. No. 64925. The State of Washington to William R. Brydges, the said defendant; In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear at the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 15th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the court, and answer of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which had been with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: No secure a dwelling for the plaintiff from the grounds upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper relief in the premises. F. B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 421 and 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of first publication, January 15, —Feb. 26, 1809. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of Knig. —ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 18th day of January, 1800, by order of the Governor, in the case of Adolph Candau, Plaintiff, versus Elizabeth Franklin, Defendant, No. 64908, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, to the highest bidder for sheriff's sales, towit, at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 27th day of February, A. D., 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant Elizabeth Franklin in an following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, towit. On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1907, by Adam Orth to Adolph Candau on the upstairs part of that block building situated on the A Block thirty three (39) of D. S. Maynard's Plat of the Town now city of Seattle, situated at the Southeast Corner of Fifth Avenue South and Main Street, for the term of two years from June 1, 1907, said lease being filed for record on May 19, 1907, of the property in King County, Washington, in Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et seq., levied on as the property of said defendant Elizabeth Franklin, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to Ninety-five 67/100 $95.67) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated the 6th day of January, 1909. ROBT, T. HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER. Deputy. January 22-February 19, 1909. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of King, ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the W. J. Tower, Plaintiff, vs. George Wishard, George Flesh, Miranda Draper, Elliot Draper, Thomas Draper, Lucinda Draper, Elizabeth Draper, Lucretia Draper, Mary Draper, Sarah Draper, Mary Draper, Martha Bridgefarmer, Emmaline Van Vagner, Josephine Wishard, Olly Wishard, Barthe Wishard, King County, State of Washington, City of Seattle, E. J. Rosencrance and Jane Doe Rosencrance, his wife, and the unknown heirs of his estate, parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following and situate in the district of Seattle. The East half (E½) of Block Twenty-eight (28). Biglow's Addition to the City of Seattle, less the North five (N. 5) feet of the East Eighty (E. 80) feet of Lot Ten (10), and the East Eighty (E. 80) feet of Lot S (10), and the East Eighty (E. 80) feet of Lot Nine (9), and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the failure to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness D. K. SKILLES The clerk, the said officer of Seattle in said County and State this 20th day of January, A. D. 1909. Date of first publication, January 22, 1909. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. By O. S. BRUNS, Deputy Clerk. Jan. 22- Feb. 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Lloyd E. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs. Maude L. Dunning, No. 65.071. Publication. The State of Washington to the said Maude L. Dunning, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case the demand against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk or said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant upon your request, abandoning the plaintiff by said defendant for more than one year and cruel treatment of plaintiff by defendant and personal indignities rendering his life burdensome. J. HENRY DENNING, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Edwin J. Milling, Plaintiff, vs. Lucy Milling, Defendant. No. 65.099. Summa- The State of Washington to the said Lucy Milling, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve the copy of your indemnified attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of theoblas has been filed with the work of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64.543. Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above mentioned person of the You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff has one delinquent certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, Park County, Washington, ten years old. That tax is $1,040. One and 4/100 ($1.04). Dollars. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property. Lot Forty-four (44). Block Two (2), for the year 1003. Thirty-one cents; for the year 1004. Twenty cents; for the year 1005. Thirty-two cents; for the year 1006. Forty-four cents; for the year 1007. Forty-six cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and redeemed taxes upon and against said You and each of you are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the 1st day of publication of this notice, exclusive of the notice published with the 60 days after January 22, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in a office below state law for the amount due with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and against each parcel of said property against each and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, respectively, vided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's court, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. P. L. B. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blge., Seattle, Wash. January 22-February 19. 1909. NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING Seattle, Washington. Notice, too, that the regular meeting of the stockholders of the Alaska Central Railway Company will be held at the principal office of the Company at Room 508 of the Suite Fulfillment, at Avenue, Seattle, King County, Washington, on Tuesday, the 2nd day of March, A. D., 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon of said day. JAMES A. HAIGHT. Secretary of the Alaska Central Railway Company. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Homer E. Turner, the administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased has been remanded and filed in said court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of February, 1909, at 8:30 o'clock, a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King Court, for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the HON, GEO. E. MORRIS, Judgment, said Superior Court, and Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 21st day of January, 1909. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. (Seal) By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County, N.C. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron. Deceased. No. 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1909 Not be Made. Homer E, Turner, administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, having filed in this Court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed, and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereunto, to, and to appear in court and petition such forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of the said estate. Now, therefore, it is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of said James H. Cameron, deceased, are deposed in the office of the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room in the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of February, 1909, at the house of the deceased, and there show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of the said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition memorandum, and the court should order it. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 24th day of February, 1909, in the Seed Bank, an espouse printed and published said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 21st day of January, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington. County of King—ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchel deceased. No. 7527. Notice of the decease. Fathom Court. Notice is hereby given that James S. Mitchell, the administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his Final Account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of February, 1984, the Room at the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King, County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his ex-tenancy to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 22nd day of January, 1909. 2nd day of January, 1909. R. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. Pursuing Honor for sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of James Digman, plaintiff, versus Joseph W. Van Damme, Anne M. Henderson, wife, defendants, No. 60182, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash. The bidder will pay: at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following property: presupended property County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) in block sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to judge, judgment of foreclosure of mortgage and banking twenty-four thousand five hundred sixty-five and 88/100 ($24,565.88) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 13—December 11, 1908. SUMMERS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R. G. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife; Ovid A. Byers, Ella M. Cowling and Richard Cowling, her husband; Island Lime Company, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants. pany, corporation, Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Defendant, Mary Augusta Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to appear within sixty days after the 6th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in the address 1133 Oak Street, close of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment in the case in the sums 1133 together with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from the 3rd day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, dated October 3rd, 1906, upon the judgment in the case in the sums 1133 Salmon Bay City, King County, Washington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 3rd day of October, 1906, on the records of Augusta Augusta, 126 of the records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Miller, DefendantNo. ..... Summons. The State of Washington to the said The State of Washington to the said Grace Miller. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear within sixty days after the date of January 8, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the demands of the complaint, which has been filed in the clerk of said court. This action is for the purpose of couring a divorce. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Business, Seattle. First publication January 8th, 1909. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1909 NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpawa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 305 25th Ave. South, in Seattle, Wash. on the 28th day of January, 1909. Exceptfully, Alpawa Mining Company, G. Darrow and H. F. Detwiler, Trustees. January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thompson, Defendant. No. 46826. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Thompson, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1809, and after the alder of the county to the above entitled plaintiff and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you, the date of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars, balance due for hay sold by you for plaintiff and used and enforced by you and top which an attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. J. H. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1809. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, Defendant.—No 64870. Summons by Publication. The H. Armstrongington to E. H. Armstrong, Defendant; You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the Ship of America entitled court and cause and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be taken against you, interest with respect to the plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all your right, interest with respect to the amounts now in possession of the Northern Bank & Trust Co., of Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Charles H. Hancock, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Hancock, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to Alice Hancock, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled complaint, to wit, within sixty days after the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said county. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maggie Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant, No. ... summons for publication The State for Washington, for the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sale court, in object of the complaint, and an opinion is a copy of your solute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant.-No. 64911. Summons. The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: We will not postpone the date of in sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complainant which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. The object of this action is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for four consecutive weeks once each week, in the Seattle Republican, beginning January 8th, 1909. A. W. FRATER. Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1809. January 8—February 19, 1809. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mabelle Pinnell, Plaintiff, vs. Seminus Pinnell, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above named Septimus Pinnell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and seize a copy of your answer to the unmerged attorney plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore extinguished, plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK. Postoffice Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Moore, Plaintiff v. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Moore, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff for the service of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is to solve the bonds of matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for the failure to pay the rent to the 1st day of April, 1908; and for a decree of the Court awarding to the plaintiff the custody of Nada.Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the plaintiff. RONEY & LOVELESS. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this said defendant in this court and this cause, and that all creditors hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing the same with the Receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding the same, and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for payment on or before the 1st day of February, 1909, and the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known place of address of said notice. Done in open court this the 28th day of December, A. D. 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. HOMER E. TURNER, His Attorney, 745 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. January 20, 1909. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 38 Union Blk., Seattle, County of King, Wash. January 8, February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Summons for Publication. Takes the action to the said Hans Arnold, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above action against the titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you including the court, and the plaintiff, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-compliance to make suitable provision for his family. Post Office Address: Room 36-7 Union Blk, Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is issued by the Treaty inquivalent tax certificate issued by the Treaty inquivalent tax certificate State of Washington, dated Oct. 19, 1908, and numbered B54378, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.26, and upon real estate situated in said King County, described as follows: The North 7% acres of the South 7½ acres of the West 2% acres of the North ¼% of the N. W. ¼% of Sec 29, Tp 24, N. R. 6 E. That the taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, as follows: For 1905, 69 cents; for 1906, 76 cents, and for 1907, 89 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. for the unpaid taxes of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve the complaint to the court. The dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the agour THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. In case you fa" so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of the sums charged for the gratification of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908-January 1, 1909. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PLANAGAN MINING CO. The annual meeting of Stockholders of the Flanagan Mining Company will be held at the office of the Company in Powellman Building, King County, Washington, on February 27th, at the hour of ten o'clock A. M., for the purpose of electing a board of nine tru- tees to serve for the ensuing year and the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting. Sec. and Treas. Dated at Seattle, Feb. 1, 1909. Feb. 5—Feb. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Eliza Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph James Miller, Defendant. No. 65,328. Summary for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Joseph James Miller Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of February, 1909, and declare the employee entitled to the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post office address below designated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment, MORRIS, SOUTH SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Feb 5, 1909. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, inrants. No. _____ Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants and in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, filed January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, Washington, filed January, 1907, Certificate No. B47,654, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents on lot 21, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are to be paid to the above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 112 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and undeemed axes upon and against the debt. You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exposition of the day of publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the sums due to so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Blvd. Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to herneafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____ Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants, and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st January, 1907, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 22, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years should be paid above described real property towright. For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date; and which are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the notice of publication, location, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs and costs. In case you fall so to the point that you will be herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against and presented by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. Elias Morrison, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property, Defendanl No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described property, are indicated that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B52,103, for the year 1902, in the amount of $1.03, on the west 16 feet of lot 9, block 63, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the person so said above described real property; to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 53 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 45 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 45 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 75 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1969, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of answer to the complaint of said plaintiff at the court before stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property and due upon each parcel of said property due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's judgment, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and are thus inclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the request of the court. If the court stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and W. T. GAFFNER, Office Address: 457 Arcade Blvd. Se- atation of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Onwors, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defra- tures and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certified tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County for Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the property situated in said King County, described as follows to-wit: Certificate No. B47,258, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Se- attle; that the taxes for the following purchased and the plaintiff years have be- come due by the plaintiff years and above described real property to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 1.738; for the year 1907, the sum of 1.819; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the complaint, and are inclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and copier, upon your answer on the undersigned plaintiff, stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald taxes and amounts due upon and charged by said sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff'saint, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. C. Superior. River Land Co., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate to the real property, hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following real property, upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B64,811, for the year 1903, in the amount of $1.11, on the west $\frac{1}{2}$ of lot 8, block "E," Kent-Meeker's Supplemental Plat; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.01; for the year 1907, the sum of 73 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes up, and against. Date of first publication, January 29th, and that Thursday, the 11th day of March, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Frances Zavolovsek, Plaintiff, vs. John Zavolovsek, Defendant—No. ... Sum- mons. The State of Washington to the said John Zavolovsek, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait: Within sixty days after the 5th day of February 19, defend the allegation entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of incurable chronic management for a period of more than ten years. J. H. BUCHANAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 745 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. February 5—March 19, 1909. VS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary M. Mitchell, Deceased.—No. 7527. Order to Shift Property Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James S. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law therefore entitled to the estate that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 11th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if found to be the cause of the death of butilon should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 11th day of March, 1909, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of governmention therein. Time in open court this 5th day of February, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I. D. K. SICKELS, of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 5th day of February, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 5th day of February, 1909. By PERCY F. D. KICKELS, Clerk. BY PERCY F. D. KICKELS, Deputy Clerk. February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Anna Golde. Deceased—No. 9577. Notice to creditors. Pursuant to an order of the above entitled court entered in the above entitled cause notice is hereby given by the undersigned administrator with the will annexed of Anna Golde, deceased, to the creditors and all having claims against the said deceased or her estate to present them with the necessary vouchers within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within one year from February 10, 1995, to the said administrator with the will annexed his place of business, Room 911 Lowermans Building in the city of Seattle, county of King, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 5th day of February, 1995. HANS H. GOLDE, Administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased. GRAVES & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administrator. Date of first publication, February 5, 1995. Date of last publication, March 1, 1996. Date of last publication. March 5. 1909. NOTICE TO CREDITORS Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present the notice to N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn., within one year. From the date of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated, Feb. — 1909. CAROLYN F. HOPKINS. Administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, Deceased, 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash Personal Paragraphs. course the Kaiser does not con- sider lager beer an anti-temper- ance drink. When Herber S. Hadley, was inaugurated governor of Mis- souri, he was the first Repub- lican governor of that State since 1871. Well, after all, “‘the world do move’’. Prof. Abbot Lawrence Lowell, who was a graduate of Harvard and an al-round athelete of her school games, has been elected president of the institution to sueceed President Eliot. The annual Negro Conference of Tuskeege, which in the past has attracted so much favorable comment, will be held this Feb- ruary 17th and 18th, Despite the close vigilance of the United States authorities the moonshiners in the state of Georgia turned out 10,000 gal- lons of the illicit stuff last year. The Methodsst Episcopal Church has within its ranks 14, 075 local preachers. Foreign countries claim 1,956 of this number, 4,128 are colored, and 7,781 are in the white confer- ences at home. In the will of the late Senator William F. Vilas of Wisconsin he made the following provision: “Tn using the income from the endowment fund, it is provided that the university establish ten professorships to receive not less than $5,000 nor more than $10,- 000 a year with a pension upon retirement (after fifteen years or more) of $2,500 a year. After the establishment of the profes- sorships, the regents shall pro- vide for fifty undergraduate scholarships, at $300 to $400 per year, and it is required that for one-fifth of this number of schol- arships, those of Negro blood shall be preferred.” The other day a man told me he was arrested for speaking on the street. When taken to jail he was ‘‘sweated”’ by the police, but refused to give his name. Then a sergeant named Coogan began to beat him. He further says the ‘‘third degree’’ means putting a lighted lamp under the victim’s feet, so he has heard. The man’s name is Hawes, and lives on Golden Gate near Fill- more. He has sued Coogan. Can these things be? What protection has one whom the pol- ice wish to abuse? What re- course has he? Certainly such crimes should be investigated and the perpetrator punished. The man told a straight-forward tale, and Ihave no doubt he spoke the truth. Have wea tor- ture chamber in our Hall of Justice?—California News-Let- ter. L. C. Gilman of Seattle, a well known attorney, has been ap- pointed assistant tothe presi- dent of the Creat Northern Rail- way. Mr. Gilman has been pro- minent in local affairs of Seattle for many years and was at one time a member of the legislature of the state of Washington. George Busse, brother of the mayor of Chicago, accidently shot and killed a Mrs. Tucker- old home of Abe Lincoln Febru- ary 12th, whien will be the one hundredth aniversary of the great American commoner. The President, Cardinal Gibbons, Bishop Galloway, Ambasadors Jusserland and Bryce, Senator Dolliver and former Governor Folk of Missouri, will be the only speakers. That even the powers that be now realize that the Pacific North- west is on the map and must be taken into consideration, is seen in President-elect Taft naming Richard A. Ballinger of Seattle as secretary of the interior. It is the first time in the history of the Northwest that it has been recog- nized in national polities to the extent of being offered a cabinet position, which is proof sufficient that the powers that be at Wash- ington City realize that the North- west is “‘risin’.’? Mr. Ballinger was for four years superior court judge of Jefferson and Clallam counties and was subsequently, for two years, mayor of Seattle and absolutely refused a second term. He for one year filled a minor position in the interior de- partment, under Secretary Gar- field, where he gained considera- tle favotable notomen: BENCH AND BAR, Judge Thomas H. Cann, who for the past five years has been located in the Oriental block, now has his law offices in the White building, Fourth and Union street. Fred C. Brown, who wasa candidate for justice of the peace at the late primary elec- tion, but who failed to get votes enough to land, feels confident that if the legislature grants Seattle another justice the County Commissioners will name him for the place. But Brown had better be careful or some other color or shade might make a better show. W. B. Stratten, former attor. ney general of this state, who has occupied a suit of office rooms in the Burke block, has taken more commodious quarters in the Central building. L. C. Gilman is now assistant to the president of the Great Northern. For a number of years he has looked after the legal business of that company in Seattle and other points in Washington. Judge Milo A. Root has opened law offices in the New York block and has already began to gather about him the skeleton of a business. Judge Root is one of the best trial lawyers in the Northwest. In Judge Arthur E. Griffin and former Prosecuting Attor- ney Kenneth Macintosh, whoare officing together in the Alaska block, two opposites are found. Judge Griffin hasjust volun- tarily left the superior court bench of King county after eight years experience while Mr. Mac- intosh is desirous of undergoing the ordeal just laid aside by Mr. Griffin. John D. Atkinson, who for the past eight years has alternately been state auditor and attorney general, is now president of the Pioneer Insurance Company with office rooms in the Central Building. a pa a e ay ee a P si ; RICHARD A. BALLINGER Who is to be Secretary of the Interior under President Taft. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Judge Hiram E. Hadley, who for the past twelve years has been a member of the supreme court of this state, has opened law offices in Seattle where he and former State Senator C. W. | Dow will enter into the general practice of law. J. Harvey Dennis city claim agent,, who took a number of lawyers to the city’s power house, to demonstrate to them that a person could not get killed at the point it was claimed a man had been killed, but who himself was knocked galley-west by an electric current while demonstrating and who has been ill for months, was able to go to the front for the city once more last Monday. If Senator Piper’s ideas prevail in the legislature King County will have at times eight superior court judges on the bench as he proposes that Judge Yakey of Kitsap County put in all his spare time in King County, which seems to be a capital idea. The Seattle Republican will publish your legal notices ata more reasonable rate than any other paper in Seattle and at the same time give you the very best service. If you will call Main 805 it will do the rest. PERSONAL COMMENT. Count Tolstoi, who has been seriously ill, has about regained his health and with his strength comes his decision as to his future efforts. The world will receive from his pen no more stories of love, or lighter or purely orna- mental literature. Says the writer, “My remaining time is short; my last days must be given to more important work.’’ Tolstoi’s latest effort is a paper on “The Law of Force and the Law of Love.’’ He is compiling a prose anthology for the use of the Russian peasantry. He is now studying the religions of India corresponding with re- nowned pundits, his object being to show that at the base of the Indian religion is the doctrine of brotherhood, self-sacrifice and al- truism. It is said that there is nothing which so well compares with the manner in which China used to lock and bar ker door from West- ern intrusion in any form as the way she now opens them - to Christianity and intellectual influ- ences. The whole nation seems to ‘be united in a desire to tear down the wall of separation. One of the native firms in that country is now advertising on its list of latest books translated into Chi- nese, ‘‘Ivanhoe,’’ ‘‘David Copper- field,’ ‘‘Robinson Crusoe,”’ ‘*Gul- liver’s _ Travels,’”’ “Sherlock Holmes,’? ‘Dr, Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,” and “Westward Ho.’’ To these are added a group of Du- mas’ novels, Hugo’s ‘‘Les Miser- ables,’”? books from Spencer, Mill and Huxley, Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare, Tolstoy’s works and Aesop’s Fables. A SUBSTITUTE FOR MATRI. MONY. The girl whé earns twelve, fifteen or twenty dollars a week sets for herself a standard of liv. ing, dress and small luxuries which would require a husband earning twenty-five, thirty and fifty dollars respectively. She re- gards as necessities what her mother considered luxuries. If a man who is earning only as much as the girl ora few dollars more a week asks her to marry him, he knows that the girl must either deprive herself of some things she has grown to regard as necessities or she must continue to work. And there is many a home-hungry young man today too proud to allow his wife to work. Through agitation and her own honest effort at desk, counter and loom, worhan is rapidly nearing the goal of equality in work and wages with men. Her services are worth today as much as those of the man who might marry her—if her services were worth less.’’— Ex. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1909 ieee BUSINESS DIRECTORY Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ..........++--President J. 8. GOLDSMITH ...... Vice-President (RV. ANKENY 0.00.0. sce see Cashior CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of “THE BANK ACCOUNT” & new, neat little 8-page paper as full or good things aa an ox if of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. €, N. BROOKS & CO. For Fritis For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1881 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking dis- tance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Blectric Fix. tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. 8 R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchan ge. Cor. Second and Pike St, Seattia, Wash WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies’, Misses’ and Children’s Wear. ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats, 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. EW. WAY & 0, General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer’s Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building Main 2115 Ind. L 3356