Seattle Republican

Historical Society Tacoma NORTHWEST LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON Associate PETER MILLER AGAIN When the supreme court granted Peter Miller a new trial the police department of Seattle could not have been administered a more stinging rebuke. Wether guilty or innocent the man was subjected to the most brutal and inhuman treatment that any one in America has been subjected to for the past forty years. Just how Chief Detective Tennant can be retained in office after mistreating a fellow man as he did Peter Miller is more than any good citizen can see. It has been known for years that the colored prisoners at the city hall were given such treatment, but no one had suspected that a police officer would ever administer such to a white prisoner, foreigner though he be. When Miller made the startling announcement in court and the daily papers gave wide spread publicity to the statement and it was believed by the most of those who read it, Tennant whined like a whipped whelp and declared Miller had lied from start to finish; but the supreme court, after going over the evidence, not only of Miller but of Tennant himself, concluded that Miller had been treated more as a brute than a human being in the police headquarters, and ordered a new trial. So far as this paper is concerned it has no interest in whether Miller is again found guilty or acquitted, but it does rejoice in the fact that the supreme court has branded Chief Tennant a brute in blue and any ordinary man would feel so deeply humiliated and chagrinned at being so branded by the highest tribunal of the state, and that, too, while he was an officer of the law, that he would resign and seek new fields where he would not be known; but that is not Tennant, and he will show up with the same bragadocia as if he had been the most humane gentleman that ever entered a police department. CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO The constitution for the state of New Mexico framed by the convention which adjourned at Santa Fe, on November 21, 1910, contains 20,000 words, 120 sections, grouped into 22 articles. Probably no other commonwealth ever was confronted with the peculiar difficulties that faced the constitutional convention when it assembled. Unique and paramount, despite repeated denial, was the race and language question. The 135,000 people of New Mexico who are of Spanish-American descent demanded protection of their equality before the law and retention of their ancient rights and privileges. They were suspicious of the federal enabling act, which demands all the state officers and legislators must speak English. The convention also bore in mind the advice of President Taft to formulate a "safe and sane" constitution, a "constitution unlike that of Oklahoma." It also had to take into consideration the insistent demands for progressive features, a demand out of which the Democratic minority naturally made political capital. The various county debts which the new state is to assume, the regulation of land donations of 13,000,000 acres, the regulation of liquor traffic and kindred questions had to be dealt with. As a result a constitution following the older models was adopted with these salient new features: An elective corporation commission having no judicial powers, but the rights to regulate rates for transportation and transmission; to grant charters and to supervise corporations; an automatic arrangement immediately takes the decisions of the commission to the stace supreme court, which must pass upon them without delay. The initiative was rejected but a referendum clause was included which enables 25 per cent of the voters, upon petition, to suspend a law within ninety days of a legislative session, and 10 per cent of the voters, upon petition, to submit a law passed by the last legislature to a popular vote at the next election, while a majority of the legislature may submit to the people constitutional amendments. Prohibition and local option were excluded, but the way was left open to the next legislature to deal with these questions. A stringent anti-pass section was adopted. The constitution raises a boundary dispute with Texas and Colorado; it provides for an elective judiciary from top to bottom, and for elective state officers. It limits the tax rate to 12 mills the first two years and 10 mills after that. It grants to women the right to vote at school elections and makes them eligible to be school directors and county school superintendents. It also abolishes the fee system, at present the rule. It prohibits separate schools for Anglo-Saxons and Spanish-Americans and provides for payment by the state of the railroad bond indebtedness of $1,000,-000 through the sale of 1,000,000 acres of land granted by congress. No distinction is to be made in the franchise, in jury duty or in holding office, other than that of state and legislator on account of ability to speak English. [Note:—Possibly and most probably the constitution makers for the state of New Mexico felt a pressure in the peculiarity of the enabling act requiring congress to accept the fundamental law they were to prepare, instead of directing the president to declare the territory admitted upon its people adopting a constitution republican in form. Such a pressure could only have the effect of having the convention present a kind of stereotyped affair to which no objection could be made. It seems something of a pity that one of the two new states or both could not feel free to take advanced steps in reform of judicial procedure and in provision for Workmen's Compensation legislation, two needs which will ever exist wsth it or them. Possibly both of these subjects had in them dynamicite, as corporate influence does not desire remedies to be more speedily enforced, nor do they care for a basic law to be framed for the benefit of employees. Both of these things, however, would help to make a very popular document for the general voter. It seems something of a novelty that a claimant for the rights of a sovereignty should have to be so very cautious in having to speak up for the general rights of its people. Of all situations to which no semblance of duress should be applied that one in which a territory is framing a state constitution should be recognized.—EDITOR.]—Central Law Journal. EDIORIAL EDICTS With the consumer being squeezed by the shipper and the railroads his chance of having enough to eat any ways soon is exceedingly slim. Since Bryan's picture was turned to the wall by the Oklahoma legislature we suspect that he shares in William Hsward Taft's opinion of the Oklahoma constitutional convention, that, "it was a zoological garden of cranks," which was to say, damphools predominated. Australian, Argentine and Canadian beef cattle are all trying to break into the United States, but the big bugs are seeing to it that the tariff bars will not come down, and that, too, in spite of the fact three-fourths of the people of the country are meat hungry. VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 29 Now let Colonel Billy Bryan assume the captainship of the Mexican insurrectionists if he wants to be a real live president. Japan has ordered a $12,500,000 dreadnought built in England. Have the flys become unusually pestiferous in the Mikado? Beef and pork may be coming down, but they are not low enough down as yet to be even seen with the most powerful field glasses. Tariff tinkering has been responsible for men of fense falling by the political way side and what else could be expected of Democratic asses. If Spain goes Republican then the foreigner in his native heath has more sense than he displays in the United States. He is invariably Democratic. Yes, of course, the railroads of this country loose $100,000 per day, but it is due to the fact that, the people do not have that much left after the railroads have robbed them the first time. Despite the fact that he is the heavyweight champion of the world, Jack Johnhon is having his troubles too, in not being able to find anybody to fight, if for only advertising purposes. Andrew Carnegie is threatening to give a large sum of money to some international organization that has as its propagana, "world peace." The most of us are for peace if it pays any dividends. There is no doubt but that Colonel Blethen was awfully surprised on learning that the Arcade dance hall had been opened. As surprised as he pretended to have been he perhaps is a great deal worse chagrinned at its poor business returns just now. A distinguished educator recently argued that the national government should have absolute charge of the educational affairs of this country, and to us it is a capital idea. The idea of the general government taking charge of all public utilities is growing in favor very rapidly. An old clothes social for the Elks or any other society would be far more apnropriate this year than one in which new clothes or even good clothes prevailed, and all because the most of us have nothing else but old clothes these days. A London newspaper publishes untruths about a candidate for office and he was beaten, whereupon he sued the paper and was given a verdict for $25,000. The English may be first cousins to the Americans, but if they are, they do not act like it. Adjutant General George B. Lamping has tendered his resignation to Governor Hay and desires immediate release. His chief reason for quitting the service is because he wants to return to nature and just be a plain citizen. Secondly, because he seems tired of the tin soldier racket. Is it possible that San Francisco's man in the office of superintendent of the United States census has wilfully lopped off 100,000 of the legal citizens of the state of Washington from the roll in order to give California a long lead over any other Pacific coast state? Shame on you, Mr. Durand! Shame on you. We suspect that the guards at Mrs. Eddy's tomb are to keep her from getting out and "living always" as she promised to do. If she got away she might give some of the others that want to grow fabulously rich out of the cult, altogether too much trouble. Colonel Otis, whose newspaper plant was blown up in Los Angeles a few months ago, was visiting Seattle this week and was banqueted by the Manufacturer's Association. The captains of trade were showing Colonel Otis their appreciation of him hammering the life out of organized labor and he is doubtless parading himself over the country to receive such encomiums --- ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING POLITICAL COMPLEXION OF CONGRESS AND PANICS FROM 1859 TO 1909 The following from the Statistical Abstract and Congressional Directories, furnish a host of information not accessible to the average voter: Thirty-sixth Congress 1959 Democratic Senate Democratic House 3,913 failures Liabilities $64,394,000 Forty-second Congress 1871 Republican senate Republican House 2,915 failures Liabilities $85,252,000 Forty-third Congress 1873 Republican Senate Republican House 5,184 failures (Panic) Liabilities $228,499,000 Forty-fourth Congress 1875 Republican Senate Democratic House 7,740 failures Liabilities $201,060,353 Forty-fifth Congress 1877 Republican Senate Democratic House 8,872 failures Liabilities $190,660,936 Forty-Sixth Congress 1879 Democratic Senate Democratic House 4,058 failures Liabilities $57,979,398 1891 Republican Senate Democratic House 12,273 failures Liabilities $189,868,638 Fifty-third Congress 1893 Democratic Senate Democratic House 15,242 failures (Panic) Liabilities $346,779,889 Fifty-fourth Congress 1895 Republican Senate Democratic House 12,197 failures Liabilities $173,196,060 Fifty-fifth Congress 1897 Republican Senate Republican House 13,351 failures Liabilities $154,332,971 Fifty-Sixth Congress 1899 Republican Senate Republican House 9,337 failures Liabilities $90,879,889 Fifty-Seventh Congress When things go wrong a good deal of blame is placed on Providence.—Dayton Dispatch. MORE OR LESS INTER PRESS COMMENT A Democratic congress may be expected to build a warm fire under Secretary Ballinger. Dayton Dispatch. Porterhouse steaks and tenderloin of pork are again getting in smelling distance of the average well-to-do Wilbur citizen, at least. Wilbur Register. After all, the issue is between the few who clamor for privileges and favors and the many who ask nothing but the right to enjoy the proceeds of their toil under the laws which guarantee equality.—Snohomish Tribune. That celebrated case of congressional whitewashing was done according to schedule and the other report which wound up at the rear end of the conservation congress is out voted. If that settled it the across-page "vindicated" headlines would not be so intensely meaningless.—Cle Elum Echo. The action of the South Bend women in calling a practice elections is a good idea. From years of experience on election boards we know that scores of men do not know how to make out a ballot. We predict that the women will discount the men on that proposition.—Pe Ell Enterprise. "There is no reason why this country should not have a parcels post system," said a rancher to us the other day. There are four powerful Express reasons, the "American," the "United States," the "Adams" and the Wells Fargo."—Wilbur Register. Married women of this state who live with their husbands are not permitted by the land laws of the United States to exercise the right of homesteading public land. Apparently some women have that idea since they have been admitted to suffrage in this state, but, of course, that is a mistaken notion. — Yakima Democrat. Have the women suffragists gotten cold feet already? Two women were elected as members of the Kettle Falls city council at a recent election and have refused to qualify, making the appointment of two men necessaay. Kettle Falis is the first town in the state to so honor the suffragists. —Odessa Record. The women of Anacortes voted at the last election and the city went wet by between two and three hundred votes. A few months ago the city was carried wet by only five votes. In the few places where the women exercised the right of suffrage all were favorable to the licensed saloon.—Kent Advocate. 6 Whether at sea or on shore the demands of the worker for better living conditions are usually reasonable, however intemperate may some times be the expression of those demands. The vast difference between the daily wage of the laborer and the untold millions of profit reaped by a few corporations is not just and therefore is prejudicial to the best interests of the state.—Sunnyside Sun. Oregon will shortly exploit its great caves in Josephine county, which have recently been set aside as a national reservation. Moreover the government places these caves in charge of a caretaker who will put a stop to the practice of careless tourists who invade the caves and destroy the beauty of some of the rock formations in their search for curios. These caves are said to be far superior to the Mammoth Cave in Kentucky.—Goldendale Sentinel. When the school kid wrote, "Politics is strange things," he guessed a good deal. For instance, here is Senator Jones turning down an offer of the federal judgeship in this district, when most of his friends were hoping that he would get it and thus be taken care of for life. Then there is the case of Senator Jones calling upon the law partner of Senator-to be Miles Poindexter. Poindexter was recently referred to in a speech by Senator Jones as "a Republican" who did not dare attend a convention of his party, and Judge Moore now has the Poindexter endorsement for federal judge. The press reports state that the hatchet has been buried and the drift of things rather indicate that though Senator Jones has put forward the candidacy of Judge Rudkins he is not working over time on it.—Cle Elum Echo. --- FRIDAY December 16, 1910 RESTING For the past two years this paper has insisted that the law is wrong which exempts money and credits from taxation and is a rank injustice to the man of smaller means, who is thus compelled to bear more than his proportionate share of taxation. It is interesting to note that the State Tax Commissioners has arrived at the same conclusion and will recommend to the legislature that the law be repealed and a new system be devised for the saving of state funds. It is proposed to assess public service corporations, money and credits. In this way taxes will more properly apportioned and come lighter on the poor man, as it should be. It is time that something was done to equalize these matters.—Island County Times. The complete vindication of Hon. Secretary Ballinger comes as no surprise to the people of this state. We have all known Mr. Ballinger for years. He is a western man. Familiar with western ways and western push. He knows the needs of this west in the way of conservation of the natural resources, much better than any eastern fanatic. It is as the majority of the people thought all along that the charges were made by a crank on the subject of conservation, as Mr. Pinchot, (spelled in this country, Pinch-out) who is a fanatic on conservation of nature's resources, and who was trying to apply methods of conserving which would be applicable in some older states, but not applicable to a state like Washington that requires capital to develop her latent resources, and by L. R. Glavis an over zealous petty official, who let his desires for notoriety run away with his judgment. It is too bad that an official of known integrity should be open to the attack of every cheap politician that comes along. Mr. Ballinger is himself a great believer in conservation, but believes in using common sense along with conservation.—Brewster Herald. BORROWED THOUGHTS Truth crushed to earth will rise again whenever the Colonel gets up from on top of it. —Pittsburg Post. With the death of Tolstoy, Russia's excuse for existence appears to have disappeared. —Brooklyn Times. Even with the rules in effect it is better to be on a football team than under it. —St. Joseph Gazette. Canada wants to annex Maine. Too late. The damage is all done now. —Cincinnati Com. Tribune. A former Chicago newspaper reporter has become an Espiscopalian bishop. There is hope for all. —Cleveland Leader. Massachusetts would prefer its Lodge in some vast wilderness rather than in Washington. - New York World. Colonel Roosevelt has found his voice, Malefactors of great wealth keep to the right. - L. A. Express. "I" is nominative and "ME" is objective, but just at present there is no possessive. - Charlestown News and Courier. There are now five states in which women vote. In the others they merely control the voters. - Los Angeles Herald. Mr. Bryan says that Roosevelt is eliminated. Since when has Mr. Bryan decided that one defcat eliminates a man.—Cleveland Leader. For some reason the outlook and the Commoner have not as yet been included in the same clubbing list.—Chicago Record-Herald. "American dollars have become as portentous a bogy in British politics as "British gold" use to be in America.—New York World. The returns are now all in and it is found that the only states to show Republican gains were Mexico and Portugal.—Los Angeles Herald. Two Republicans were elected to tha Texas Legislature, and the tone of the Texas press shows it feels the disgrace deeply.—Los Angeles Herald. A mountain has been located in Alaska whose peak is 2,000 feet higher than the topmost peak of Mount McKinley; name it Mount Dingle, snd look for one highey yet to name Mount Aldrich Payne.—Houston Chronicle. FRIDAY December 16. 1910 The trend of the literary people is to New York and London. Fifty-six Indiana counties have lost in population since the 1900 census.—Minneapolis Journal Jack Johnson is suffering from a nervous break down. No blame is attached to the distinguished Californian, Jim Jeffries.—San Francisco Chronicle. The British House of Lords yells "compromise" as clearly as it can with the Commons and the nation sitting on its chest and feeling solicitiously for its wind pipe.—New York World. A New York woman gives her opinion that her daughter should be able to live on $20,000 a year. The cost of living in New York is evidently moderating.—Buffalo Express. Mr. Roosevelt makes it clear that he does not regard the results of the recent elections as a final answer to the old question as to what we shall do with our ex-Presidents.—Kansas City Star. RELIGIOUS BRIEFLETS Salvation is fully free and freely full. A saved man is a safe man for he is lead by the Holy Spirit. Lottery is pay and take what you get. Many seem to think the same about prayer. The commentator Jenks says, "In the person and salvation of Christ the Lord has made provision for the sanctification as well as the pardon and justification of all believers; but all others must die unholy." According to 1st Kings, third chapter and twelfth verse and fourth chapter, twenty-ninth verse, God gave Solomon wisdom after he had come to the throne. He gave him a wise and an understanding heart to judge the people over whom he was a king. In his case at least the heart and not the head was the seat of wisdom. Copper cents and common sense are related only in sound. One may have an abundance of the former with but little of the latter. There are no bargain counters in the Lord's house. There are no special sale days. He says, "come, buy wine and milk without money and without price." Yet the pearl of great price costs all that a man hath and is worth ten thousand times ten thousand more than that. Peter's wife mother was sick of a fever. Peter's wife was thereby hindered from doing much that otherwise she could have done. Many preachers are hindered from doing much that they could were it not for so many sick sheep in the flock that have to be looked after. Zacheriah tells us that a fountain has been opened to the house of David for cleansing. Most of us make it read "in the house." It was not the place where that was in the prophet's mind but the people for whom it was opened. This fountain is for those of the household of David and not for sinners. One must get into the house before they can have the privilege of the fountain. . . . It is unfortunate to be rich and feel poor. Yet many do. I know of one well past three score and ten without a chick or child in the world, who has thousands, and yet feels too poor to have cream for coffee. *** I know of a good house on a good avenue in a good city, that standing on a corner from three sides looks into neighbors back yards and from the fourth at the wall of the adjoining house. Some folks spiritually live in a like situation. The faults of their neighbors seem so to fill the view that seemingly they never see the better side. That is an unfortunate situation to live in. Garbage cans are always kept in the back yard and every yard has them. It is unfortunate to always see the worst side of folks around you. -By the Rev. W. R. Chase TIME TO CALL A HALT The Forum would be remiss in its duty if it failed to call the soldier boys' attention to the fact that the confidence and esteem in which they have been held by the peoole of Spokane is slipping away, and unless they slow up and put on the brakes it won't be long before the splendid reputation they have made as men and soldiers will be completely obliterated. Last year one of their comrades were sent to an untimely grave by the bullet of an infuriated woman, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Several escapades about town, ending in the police court, the rape case which happily has not been proven, and lately the murder of the stranger within the city is what actuates this paper in sounding a note of warning. It won't do to say that the Negro soldiers have thus far proven themselves superior men, better behaved and more decent than their white predecessors, that is all very true. But at the same time your profession is to maintain peace an order, and the people should feel secure when you are around, and not regard you as a menace and disturbers of the peace. Avoid the appearance of evil, boys! Come through like men, and deserve the confidence of the people of this entire community. Time to call a halt, boys.—Spokane Forum. THE BIBLE The uprooter of sin The begetter of life The revealer of God The fashioner of law The guide of history The light of intellect The friend of science The comfort in sorrow The text book of ethics The foe to superstition The enemy of oppression The promise of the future The star of death's night The strength in weakness The pathway in perplexity The illuminator of darkness The escape from temptation The charter of all true liberty The forerunner of civilization The inspiration of philosophies The soul of all strong heart life The steadier in the day of power The secret of National progress The embodiment of all lofty ideals The molder of institutions and governments The ornament and mainspring of literature The guide and hope and inspiration of man. The regulator of all high and worthy standards The answer to the deepest human heart hungering —Western Christian Avocate. PROHIBITION'S GAINS AND LOSSES IN THE ELECTION Happily for each, both liquor and temperance journals manage to extract comfort from the recent elections. Thus the Cincinnati National Bulletin, in behalf of the National Wholesale Liquor Dealers' Association of America, thanks the public for its "vote of confidence, while the American Issue, an Anti-Saloon organ published in Westerville, Ohio, declares that "in the recent battle of the ballots the trenches of the Liquor Trust are filled with the wounded, while the columns of the temperance forces have not been halted as they move forward to greater victories." While the liquor organs point triumphantly to the fact that no state was added to the "dry" column, the temperance papers are equally impressed by the fact that no prohibition state renounced the faith and returned to the ranks of the "wets." The issue of the State-wide prohibition was specifically before the voters in Florida, Missouri, Oregon, Utah and Oklahoma. The fact, however, considered in relation to the returns in other states, seems to lend itself to more than one interpretation. The National Bulletin indicates a "returning sentiment on the part of the people that the best way to deal with the liquor question is not through extermination and confiscatory legislation, but through sane and effective regulation. And the Louisville Courier-Journal, always a vigorous opponent of constitutional prohibition, which it defines as "nothing more and nothing less than the prohibition of constitutional rights," declares the vote in Florida, Missouri, Oregon and Utah to mean the beginning of the breakdown of the prohibition movement. On the other hand, the temperance papers dwell rather upon the decision of the Oklahoma voters, to whom the question of state-wide prohibition was resubmitted, to keep their state in the "dry" ranks; the growth of the prohibition vote in Texas, Iowa, Wisconsin and other states; the election of five prohibitionists to the Minnesota legislature, and one to the Illinois legislature; and the election of a prohibitionist mayor in Cortland, N. Y. Says the National Prohibitionist (Chicago) of November 17th: "Final returns will probably show a considerable number of local prohibition candidates elected in different parts of the country. There are scattering cases in Texas. California reports a justice of the peace and constables elected in Turlock. The total number of Prohibitionist who hold office in one capacity and another, will probably be larger than ever." When the Courier-Journal can only see a popular reaction from the Prohibition cause, Charles R. Jones, chairman of the Prohibition National Committee, discovers evidence of a new friendliness toward the movement on the part of the public: and The American Issue is convinced that "the temperance forces more than held their own." Analyzing the results, the latter paper goes on to say: "The most significant triumph of the country was in Oklahoma, where the liquor forces of the nation massed their strength for the adoption of a constitutional amendment providing for taking the state out of the prohibition ranks and placing it in the license column. The liquor men failed by 40,000 votes and Oklahoma remains a 'dry' state. Prohibition was inserted in the cynstitution of Oklahoma when it became a state. The liquor men succeeded in bringing about resubmission in the hope of changing the verdict and opening the state to saloons. They were overwhelmingly defeated and Oklahoma is in the dry column to stay. "A significant temperance victory was achieved in Nebraska, where county local option was an issue in the election of governor. Dahlman, Democrat and 'wet,' was defeated by Aldrich, Republican and local optionist. It will be recalled that William J. Bryan repudiated Dahlman's candidacy and advocated the election of Aldrich. Bryan has 'come back' in Nebraska, but Dahlman and his liquor backers have been sent to the scrap heap and a county local option law is in sight in that state. "Another splendid victory for temperance, decency, and good government was in Tennessee, where Ben Hooper defeated Senator Taylor for governor. For the third time in the history of the stat the voters elected a Republican governor, not because he is opposed to the policy of the notorious Governor Patterson, opposed to liquor domination and in favor of the enforcement of the state-wide law against saloons. The soul of Senator Carmack is marching on in Tennessee, and in the election of Hooper the brewers and liquor dealers lose all hope of success in winning that state back into the saloon column. "Another anti-saloon victory was the rejection of Governor Stubbs in Kansas. There are few men in the country whom the liquor interests hate so cordially as they do the fighting governor of Kansas. Governor Stubbs is always on the firing line. He has stood for the enforcement of the promontory law in his state and has journeyed into other states to talk against a government of, far, and by the liquor trust. His reelection is a staggering blow to the liquor forces of the country. "It is true that state wide prohibition was defated in Missouri, Oregon, and Florida, in the last two by small majorities, but these defeats do not gain the liquor forces anything, neither do they constitute a loss to the temperance people. In Missouri, a 'wet' victory was anticipated by everybody who knew anything about the situation. Many of the strongest temperance men in the state believed it ill-advised to bring on a state-wide fight at this time. "All in all, there is no backward step. Taking the nation as a whole, it may be said that the results of the election show a decided net gain for those who are fighting the liquor traffic." Turning to the comments of the liquor press, we find a difference emphasis and interpretation. The results, declares The National Herald, "are very gratifying to the wine spirit and beer trade," since they show a swing of the pendulum toward common sense and liberality. It goes on to say: "Emmett O'Neil was elected governor of the state of Alabama on a local option platform, and statutory prohibition was defeated, and the legislature elected is in sympathy and harmony with the governor. Florida defeated state wide prohibition by over 4,700 votes but county option won out. "A Democratic legislature was elected in Indiana on a platform promising a repeal of county option and a return to town and city option. The fight in Minnesota was for the present license system versus county option. The legislature elected is opposed to county option. In Missouri state wide prohibition was defeated by an overwhelming majority. In Nebraska the Republicans declared for county option and were joined by the matchless leader who deserted the Democratic ranks to help carry county option. A Democratic legislature is elected and county option is defeated. "Oklahoma was the only sop that the Prohibitionist received. The results of the election keep Oklahoma in the state wide prohibition column. "In Pennsylvania, Berry the combination candidate of the local optionist and the Anti.saloon League was defeated by nearly 45,000, and a legislature against sumptuary laws affecting the liquor traffic is elected. The majority of the legislature against any prohibiting law is more than 300. "In Washington, the result of the election is an increased number of towns which voted co return to the 'wet' column.—Literary Digest, [Portrait of a man in a suit with a tie, facing forward, set against a dark background with a decorative border. The image is framed with a decorative border featuring a pattern of vertical lines and dots.] WILLIAM H. PAULHAMUS a majority of the state senators pledged to Senate. Mr. Paulhamus has served four very high esteem by his fellow members. Governor. Who already has a majority of the state senators pledged to support him for President of the Senate. Mr. Paulhamus has served four years in the senate and is held in very high esteem by his fellow members. He is said to be a candidate for governor. While the King county senatorial delegation would not agree to unanimously support Senator P. L. Allen for president of the senate, owing to Howard Taylor having been selected for the speaker of the house of representatives and for other causes, yet the senatorial as well as the representative delegation voted to stand as a unit on the apportionment question, and demand that the apportionment be made on the basis of the 1910 United States census, as the constitution of the state directs it shall be done. If the members of the senate and the house of representatives from the other districts of the state act as the constitution has directed them to do, they will work in perfect unison with the members of the King county delegation and all other delegations that act in the bounds of the law. It should not be a question as to whether King, Pierce, Spokane or Benton counties or whether Western or Eastern Washington gets the advantage of the apportionment, but regardless of what county is increased or decreased, live up to the law. If the constitution of the state does not mean anything then it should be declared null and void. If the constitution of the state is a thing that can be twisted and and warped to suit the convenience of the voters of some section of the state or worse still some county or city, then it is a useless com- --- WASHINGTON'S TWELFTH LEGISLATURE pilation and the sooner it is cut out completely and each legislature pass laws suitable to its liking the sooner will anarchy reign supreme and the whole go to the dimnation bow wows. The leading questions before the next legislature will be the apportionment of the members of the legislature of the state, The County Option, and the sale of the state oyster lands. As to the former the law has been laid down and the members have no other alternative but to follow the law. A3 to county option that question was thoroughly threshed over two years ago and a local optior law was that has proven itself to be eminently satisfactory, and the law and should not be disturbed. As a side issue to the county option law the all day saloon question will be advocaaed. This proposition is an experiment pure simple, and yet it may be a very good thing, for there is no denying the fact that the most of the cussedness done in saloons is done in the wee small hours of the night. The sun - down closing of all saloons and to remain closed until sun rise might not be a bad thing. As to the sale of the oyster lands of the state, its the old, old story. Dr. Beach and a few others, who manage to net elected to every legislature, religiously hammer away on the sale of the oyster lands of the THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ged to support him four years in the pers. He is said to state. Whether or not they are working in the interest of a lot of oyster land grabbers, who already have the oyster beds all well located and will file on them an hour after the bill had become an active law, the writer verily doth not know, but from the way he and Ed Palmer of King county have worked at it year in and year out, and knowing Mr. Palmer as most of the citizens of King county do, it looks very much like that, Dr. Beach is at the head of one of the biggest bunch of land grabbers ever organized in a state for selfish purposes. The governor is to an extent interesting himself in this question, and it is well that he does or the state will get buncoed and it will be charged up to his administration. LEGISLATIVE ROSTER MEMBERS OF THE SENATE Twelfth Session, 1911 Name Address Politics E C Davis Ephrata Republican AW Anderson Addy "" Jesse Huxtable Spokane "" R A Hutchinson Spokone "" E C Whitney Foothills "" G W Shaefer Spokane "" H Rosenhaupt Spokane "" Oliver Hall Colfax "" Joseph Arrasmith Colfax "" J R Stevenson Pomeroy "" J D Bassett Ritzville "" D H Cox Walla Walla "" --- [Name] PLINY L. ALLEN Who aspired to the presidency of the would seem, has been beaten to a frazzle Mr. Allen, however, is making a strenuous to receive a just apportionment at the hand nature. Who aspired to the presidency of the senate, but who, it would seem, has been beaten to a frazzle by W H Paulhamus. Mr. Allen, however, is making a strenuous fight for King county to receive a just apportionment at the hands of the next legislature. J H Smithson Ellensbuag " C E Myers Davenport " F J Allen North Yakima " J E Chappell Goldendale Dem. A B Eastham Vancouver Rep. F L Stewart Kelso " H A Espy Oysterville " H O Fishback Adna " H B Hewitt Hoquiam " A S Ruth Olympia " J W Bryan Bremerton " D S Troy Chimacum Dem. W H Paulhamus Sumner Rep. Ralph Metcalf Tacoma " J H Roberts Tacoma " Arvid Rydstrom Tacoma " Peder Jensen Tacoma Dem. B A Bowen Kent Rep. R D Nichols Seattle " Danlel Landon Seattle " P L Allen Seattle " G U Piper Seattle " Josiah Collins Seattle " J A Whalley Sesttle " F C Jackson Seattle " J A Falconer Everett " E M Stephens Monroe " Emerson Hammer Sedro-Wooley Republican Ed Brown Custer Republican H M White Bellingham Dem. MEMBERS HOUSE OF REP- RESENTATIVS Twefth Sessions, 1911 Name Address Politics H R Speddin Colville Republican S J Appleman Newport " " R E Buchanan Spokane " " W E Stevens Spokane " " G L Denman Spokane " " Clyde Miler Waverly " --- of the senate, but who, it frazzle by W H Paulhamus. Fenuous fight for King county the hands of the next legis- A M Stevens Deer Paak " G B Groff Spokane " L E Gandy Spokane " H E Phipps Spokane " E H Eshelman Spokane " C R Larue Colfax Democrat H C Todd Colfax " W C McCoy Oakesdale Rep. H S McClure Garfield " E E Halsey Clarkston " W J Kelly Pomeroy " J A Fontaine Dayton Democrat. J A McLean Walla Walla Rep. Gustav Vollmer Waitsburg " Francis Garrecht Walla Walla D B B Horrigan Pasco Dem. J C Gillett Ritzville " E L Farnswsrth Wilbur " O W Stone Davenport " J W Faulkner " Edward Johnson Bridgeport " J C Hubbell Ellensburg Rep. G E Dickson Ellensburg " Walker Moren North Yakima R. C W Chamberlin Granger Rep W E Hornibrook Goldendale " W P Christensen Stevenson " E L French Vancouver " G Y Moody Washougal " J G Megler Braokfield " J H Drissler South Bend " Frank Martin Centralia " J E Leonard Chehalis " Wm Scales Centralia " P H Carlyon Olympia " A W Demming Littlerock " P S Locke Aberdeen " E L Minard Elma " Fred Straub Hoquiam Dem. W M Beach Shelton Rep. G F Ward Bremerton " E A Sims Port Townsend " L D McArdle Quilcene " --- FRIDAY December 16, 1910 LE ‘ i eg a | 9 : STATE SUPREME COUR JUDGE F. H. RUDKINS Who seems to be the choice of Senators Jones and Piles for the federal judge of Eastern Washington. He, only a month ago, was elected to a six-year term on the state supreme bench and before he takes the oath for that term, he will in all proba- bility have been named and confirmed to the federal judgeship, which is a life position. FRIDAY, December 16, 1910 E E Fisher Port Angeles < James Me Neely Buckley fe C Dowe McQuesten Tacoma “ Govnor Teats Tacoma i R W Jamieson Tacoma S J H Davis Tacoma 2 J A Cameron Tacoma T A Thompson Tacoma . Lorenzo Dow Tacoma me F J Laube Tacoma ey FH Tonkin Black Diamond “ FJ Mess Orillia rs H D Taylor Eagle Gorge ef C H Ennis Seattle 5 G B Webster W. Seattle er WT Christensen, Seattle “ EJ Wright Seattle ; a William Wray Seattle if Victor Zedenick Seattle oe H E Kennedy Seattle a J H Ghent Seattle st S H Smith Seattle e F P Goss Seattle b O M Haroldson Seattle a F W Hastings Seattle is H D Buchannan Seattle if H E Foster Seattle i H W Holmes Everett a J E Campbell Everett Me Thos Bird Monroe i J L Boyle Snohomish es F A LeSourd, Coupeville Z W A McKenna Mt. Vernon Rer JO. Rudene La Connor Rep. W W Conner La Conner e C H Hoff Lawrence a CH Wooldridge Ferndale R. £ D. Republica J A Miller Bellingham oe DN MeMillan Bellingham “* H R Alexander Keller Dem. T H Atkinson Entiat Rep. Nelson Rich Prosser e: D W Jones Coulee City » If the coal trust of Seattle is forced to have its coal weighed by public scales the trust will simply add the amount it has been short weighting its custom- ers, to the price of each ton and go right oa robbing the public the same as before. Sa a aa ET a cs Should that New Jersey Ne- gro be named chief of police there would be no doubt of his actions as chief of police be- ing of a shady nature. Whether one daily paper or the other had the gseater number of news stories in the Sunday issue is of little consequence to the av- erage reader for not a tenth of those appearing in any of them is ever read. Senator Piles may soon, have to retire from the publiceye, but he does not propose that he wil] be forgotten all jn a day, and for that reason he will name his brother, Matt Piles, as collector of customs of the Puget Sound district When Colonel Blethen says, “Blaine abusing his betters,’’ it is a case of tooting his own horn. A blind man can see that Celon- el Blechen is better than Council- man Blaine. Chewing Gum _ Gardener, charged with everything imagin- able by those who Icst two bits in the failure of tis chewing ing gum factory, has been brought back and is now out on bail. It cost the state ten times more to get Gardener than his conviction and the serving a term in the state prison will re- ward any one. © In some countries traitors and rebels to the flag are branded traitcrs and the punishment for a traitor is death, but in the United States one may be a trait- or today, buta patriot tomorrow, and be named to the highest of- fice in the land the third day. President Taft has just named Judge White of Louisiana, who is proud of the fact that he was an officer in the Confedevate THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN DAS TORY FSCS ie aN TRG R EM) BS at Beer ets aoe Fy Raters G28 RAR ANS Fg Brae tink i eae Toe fei he ana ee oes Peso er spn Toe fag et a ths eas iat : ne as 4m me ee ice 6 Rail eed te Oe Raha a a Bes ty Se ie a paeiet Bean: Se ers Oe es fee hee S A LE ag ee o a Gael ci Giese era a 7 Neeser eae qth i bai) Rt) Sain cay td aise si hte AU afc Wein a ar oe re Sb eee PS spec hE sine. bi Fee or ha ee Reap apie He a acer iy ete ee ee peg se 8 8 ear ee oe Pla tee Gets ay uae Pore een fie ae Bie dia) esto ele ee eee ar ae ae aah ag ner te 3 ee RS oe OM ica: es aa PUL Samia ee paar) eae Puli) Bae eo eae ates any aA Oh Sa ase Sth 2 Se army and for four long years he struggled with might and main to destroy the country, ov- er which he is now the supreme justice. In any other country save this Major White would have been hanged as was Bene- dict Arnold. Nor since the war has Judge White been the ideal citizen whereby he merited so eminent an appointment as has been givea him. President Taft has put two former officersin the Confederate army on the su- preme bench. If your enemy slaps you on one cheek turn the other, is an injunction of the Bi- ble and it is probably on that theory President Taft is working. Texas is a great state. There are several counties in the state larger than several of our East- ern states. But Texas is great in resources as well as in size and its material progress is som- thing wonderful. The total tax- able valuation of the state of Texas is $2,382,637,058, This is an increase of $72,844,432 over the valuation of 1909, which was $2,309, 803,626, Likewise it is an increase of $12,941,504 over the estimate prepared for the Automatic Tax Board when the state tax rates were fixed, the estimate giving a valuation of only $2,269,695,554. This in- crease of taxuble valuation is all the more notable when the drouth of the past year is taken into consideration. AMUSEMENTS Miss Emma Bunting, whe is by all odds the biggest favorite among stock actresses who has ever played an extended engage- ment in Seattle, has been secured by Russeli & Drew for the Al- hambra Theatre. and will open at that play house next Sunday afternoon, in the ‘‘Girl Raffles,’’ Fs , Sas ee ™ eee A tt Se j Mer Ba 8 : ie ee ane es ct eee uN — Pe ee | oe a ee . pe ecg \ \ fee See a Mage ee. \ \IE ce Bes oe pe eee gees F 4 i ee oo Ae oS Cie NO 4 i, Be. ag ene oo Pi Bee Ne ee ie Bias aN aS ae mS cal CS HOWARD D. TAYLOR Who will be without opposition for s House of Representatives of the next legis state. He has already served two terms in representatives and will make an able, just presiding officer. Who will be without opposition for speaker of the House of Representatives of the next legislature of the state. He has already served two terms in the house of representatives and will make an able, just and efficient presiding officer. a play that achieved extraordin- ary success in all the metropoli- tan cities of the East, but has never been seen here before. Miss Bunting needs no introduc- tion to Seattle theatre goers.. As an actress she is in a class by herself. She will be supported by Mr. George Whitaker and a specially selected company, em- bracing most of the principals of the Russell & Drew Company and six new additional actors and actresses. Popular prices will prevail as usual at the Alham- bra. If the Seattle Daily Times only got ten cents per inch for the space it devotes to its circu- lation yarns and its cheap chal- lenges it would be something like $10,000 to the good every month, but alack and alas, it’s all hot air. SECOND WEEK FOR “THE GIRL” Mr. Haker, manager of the Baker Stock Company and Mr. Cort, manager of the Seattle Theater have had to lay down to popular opinion. The advance orders for seats for ‘‘The Girl of The Golden West’? demanded that it run a second week. It is not the fact that the play is being produced simultaneously in Italian ut the Metropolitan Opera House in New York, nor is it the undying popularity of the story, that is exactly ac- countable for this upsetting of all precedents at the Seattle play house, but rether the high class performance being given by the Baker players. For the final week of this play and to be in keeping with the popular festive season spirit, six separate and distinct benefits have heen arranged for, by the management, Monday night of Judge John E. Risedorph, one of the well known citizens of Se- attle, died at his home last Mon- day and was buried Wednesday. For many years he was a promi- nent newspaper man, having been proprietor of the White River Journal. He sold that and retired from the business, but became an active business. man of Seattle. Some years ago, however, his health failed him ond he gave up business and fin- ally went to California for his health. He traveled extensively in old;Mexico. H returned late last spring, but had not fully re- gained his health and found this climate was not good for him. He had planned to return south this winter. In the recent cam- paign he assisted his son, A. A. Risedorph, of Kent, to edit the Kent Advertiser, which was done in his usual vigorous style. He wasaG. A. R. man and was buried under the auspices of that organization. PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK of Seattle. Capital Stock $300,000 vevsits $8,250,000. Jacob Furth, President, R, V. Ankeny, Cashier. F. K. Struve, Vice-President. 0. W. Crockett, Asst. Cashier. We do strictly a commercial bust ness. We solicit the accounts of in- dividuals, firms and banks. People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R J. Reekie, Viee Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. “General Hank ‘and’ Heshange,’ Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Was I 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons, Carrie Hull plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway, Hull plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint Herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants. No. This case named defendants, to the above named defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint, to the above unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October, and defend the above entitled act, the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and a copy your answer upon the lengued attorneys for the plaintiff their office below stated, and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to wit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Wash- REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. County, Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is un- derdents. No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- lery You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-write within sixty (60) days after the day of September 10, 1900, defend the above action in the above enclosed court and answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and the assistance sold and delivered by you by the plaintiff this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the clerk of Seattle have been attached thereunder. CARVAR. Attorney for Plaintiff Office and postoffice address. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of first publication of this sums, exclusive of the date of the said publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure, do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the above entitled court. class The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion and to terminate the marriage. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- dor ty. Summons by Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant.—No. 76217, The State of Washington, to the said Charles B. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with court. the clerk Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matri- ty existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the cust- ody of their minor son, Robert E. Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant.—No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the said K. Marston, defendant. We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the cleft of paid court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON. Alcalif's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, H. and H. perennial unimprover. If any, hailing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or hold the property of King County real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th of April, 1810, and numbered B64 of the 1906 tax act of Gov. War 1906 in the amount of $1.69, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit. Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of B64 of the 1906 tax act, 0. T. 20, or E. W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. 119 the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cen.'s; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cen.'s. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annur, from said date of payment, and are all the sums payable on interest upon and against said, real, property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and September 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment for the sums paid taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant—No. — Lomás, defensista - Nº. —. The State, Washington, to Harry —. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your complaint under signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from himself, and the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, and for the return of her maiden name. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co. and all all persons known. If any living or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendant and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61756 for the delinquent amount in the year 1905, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section. S. E. 25 feet to the place of beheading. (Part of N. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N. E., R. E., W. M.) Tnat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 64 cents. Which several cents must be put at the of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated on the notice, owe judgment to interest and costs. If case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charge- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and, in the event of a complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co. a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74725. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, on the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy on your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the commander, who has been filed in court of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 10 besides the cover of suit, and the said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and L. M. BUSSELL. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defended by N=13472. To T W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, o-wait, 21st New York, on the 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wait, numbered and delivered to said defendant the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and answer copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed by the defendant in the motion to be foot of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and wrongdoing of the plaintiff, defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10.408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. And the Administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for disribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by the court, and appearing to the court the said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au horize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington: at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Department No. 10 of the City of December, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the mos public places in King County, for a period of four weeks upon a said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 5th day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, a torney for said Estate, 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4. Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Halle Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her account of her administration of the estate of said deceased. It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 6th day of November, A. D. 1910, at 9:30 a.m. in the afternoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by causing notices to be posted in at least three public places in this county, one of which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published and a genealogical publication in this county once a week for two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done in open court this 9th day of November, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Specific Performance. Petition for Special Performance. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. Mitchell, Missouri No. 1920 Notice is hereby given that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of November, 1910, filed in the above entitled court his petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, to wit: Lots six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington as the time for hearing said petition, and as a pergons interested representative, heirs, devisees or personal representatives are ordered to appear and present any objections to the granting of the said petition. Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MITCHELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administrator. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Pilgrim on Blossom-Pine Boulevard Co. a corporation plantiff. vs. A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.— No. The State of Washington, to A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under-signature attorney for plaintiff of his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and 44, block 7, Greenwood Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. P.J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blvd., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to William E. Voist, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the malden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK. Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Adell Toomire, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Toomire, defendant.—No. 32501. The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomire, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your answer and service, copy your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No allmily is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burke Block. Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 17—Dec. 23, 1910. FRIDAY December 16, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tury Surmons by Publication. William J. Clarke plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant. No. The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, it is 1510, and declared the plaintiff in action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below given; in case of your failure so that the plaintiff will be burdened against you according to the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of de IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Hallel Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in, said court the final account as such administratrix, and that the 28th day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in old King County, has been duly appointed to act as the ment of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, (Seal) By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carwell, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Prechot, King County, Washington Summons by Publication ington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Elichter, plaintiff vs. Cora Lowe certainly will be the object of this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars and a balance of ($12.00), being a balance due for mand John Doe Lowe, her husband. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. Your dental work will cost $1,000 and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices are in the First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and that State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for six years. We compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-J. and Monday's Times and Star. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO.. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. Main 3044. J. W. Lysons. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. FRIDAY December 16. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, alter of Bennett, and in band, Charles Newberry, and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Grenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, wrongly giving name is unknown, D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the mid day of September, and to send the above complaint in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE state of Washington, for King Coun- tv. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter B. Nordin, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty days after the date of the first ship 1919, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and the required agreement, ordering to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be forced upon you, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West $60 feet of S$1/4 of S$1/4 of NE$1/4 of Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N. R. 4 E. W. M. certificate number B546$4, year 1906, amount $1.23. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of per cent per annum from said fee of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale first published, Julyilication, to-write first published, Aug. 19, 1910, in above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amount of the charge against each parcel of said taxes, ordered by sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and azpraved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the commencement of the tenth days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office beginning on the day of the hearing so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the two plaintiff and defendant, for the team upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff, and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real property awarded by the clam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township July 30 north of Range blues (85) west Cilham county; also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8) Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys, for Plaintiff Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8. KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. —. Summons. The state of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff the second, and answer upon undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony be between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matjasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, coppartners, doing business under firm name and state of Alaska Liquor Company and Pedestrians No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matjasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, coppartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co. You can reach of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington on the hour of 8:30 o'clock a m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents (40.25) in gross and twenty-five pittif on account of merchandise sold and deliver to the defendants during the year. 909. Fried September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Room 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Notice to the Blog. In the Notice to the Estate of Allen P. Mitten Deceased - No. 11658 By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, the county and state, within the year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910 1910. SARAH H. MITTEN, FRED W. WEST, HENRY BLACKWOOD, As Executors of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Wm. Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, sa. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come to be heard at my office in Room 2100 of Your Buildable Seattle County. Washington, on the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of sale complaint is to recover the sum of $2,252.25, wages and merchandise sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct. King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Aina Lauren Jane E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Aina May. Cole, defendant—No. 76590 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n. The State of Washington, to the said nt Anna, May, Cola, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; the decree of divorce to or judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King King George III. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, on October thirty days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office before the court; and so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of marimony existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. No. 12054. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and al persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at room No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November, 1910. Date of first publication Nov. 18, 1910 EJDWARD VON TOBEL EDWARD W. IN TOBEL Administrator to the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. Nov. 18—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of Kling. Frank U. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Emily Wilson, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Emily W. Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of November 18, 2014, and the entire entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the deed of the office which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of drunkenness. JOHN H. PERRY Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dec. 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, F.; Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington dated October 8th, 1910, will sell it private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot 31, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Lynch, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Hinton D. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips. Phillips, derenkni: The State has asgong, to the above defendant, Park D. Phillips: Named. We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in said cause according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, refusal and neglect of the deed, provide for the support or maintenance of the plaintiff's force upon their marriage on the 5th of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. 2 COLUMBIA STREET Established 22 Years two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. LESTER S. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of Wahington, for he County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Allan Poole, Deceased. No. 7346. Notice of Settlement, of Final. Account Notice is hereby given that Phebe L. Poole, executrix of the last will and testament of Allan Poole, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court, her Final Account as such executrix, and that Thursday, the 15th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been July appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 18th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 25—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In Mallet of the Estate of John E. Corbally Deceased. No. 12024. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that all persons having claims against the estate of John E. Corbally, deceased, are hereby required to present the same, with vouchers in support thereof, to Mary Corbally, executrix of said estate, at the office of Robert F. Booth, $11 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, that being the place of the transaction of such business, within one year from the date of the first publication hereof, MARY CORBALLY, executrix of the Estate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. ROBERT F. BOOTH, Attorney for Executrix. $11 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication November 25; last, December 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. May V. Russell, Plaintiff, vs. Jonh T. Russell, Defendant. No. 77203. Summons by the Station. The State of Washington to the said John T. Russell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 25th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offence, and that he has failed to failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 539 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 25, 1910—Ipn. 6, 1911. Daisy Houf, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Houf, defendant.—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Houf, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 20th day of September, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the file in this cause and Court. State of Washington: To the above de fendants and each of them: Lendand, and of course, York and of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1908 November 1908, and numbered B548575, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the certificate of said first publi- fullication, to-write within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and Attorney for Executrix. answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. M/C DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants. No. 75301. State of Washington. To above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1909, and numbered compliant by the plaintiff an service of copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been King County, described as follows, towit, Lot 2, Block 5, Allentown Acres. What the taxes have been paid by the sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property towit: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and answer of said first publi- lyplication, to-wit; within sixty days Sept 30, 1919, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of no failure to do so, the bill will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT QF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Walter S. Boxwell, Plaintiff, vs. Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant. No. 77321. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington: To Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 2nd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secrete the absolute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of desertion and for a decree declaring him to be the sole and separate owner of Lots 30 and 31, Block 11, Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle. F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. DEC. 2, 1910—Jan. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Winifred Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Frances J. Jones, Defendant, No. 77320. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to Frances J. Jones, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of December 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer appended to the notice at your office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure an absolute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of drunkenness and desertion. JOHN SLATTERK F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Painting Attorneys for Paintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Dec. 2, 1910—Jan. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Mary Murphy, plaintiff, vs. Thomas A. Attorney, for Court No. 75150. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 16th day of December, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for habitual drunkenness. EDWARD W. FRANKLIN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 29 Scheureman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Order Directing Notice to Creditors. Standard Oil Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Taxi Delivery Co., a corporation, defendant—No. 75872. In the above entitled matter it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant, and all parties interested in defendant, prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda reporting same; and that such security they have for the purpose of same, said claims to be filed on or before the 19th day of December, 1910. And the said Ralph C. McAllaster, having asked for his discharge as receiver of the said defendant corporation, it is further ordered, and notice is hereby given to all creditors and parties interested in the estate, that the said Ralph C. McAllaster will move this court for the passing of a count and his discharge as receiver on the said list of December, 1910. And the receiver is further ordered And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the SE. REPUBLICAN, once a week for two successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in Open Court this 3rd day of December, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Judge. RALPH C. McALLASTER, Receiver. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for the Receiver, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington. Dec 9—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King—ss. Standard Oil Company, a corporation, plaintiff, and defendant, the company, defendants, defendants, defendants a corporatized decree. I have held the county clerk of King County, and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the state of Washington for the County of King, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original order directing notice to creditors in the above entitled cause as the same appears on elder documents. This is a true and perfect transcript of said original and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand and the seal of the said Superior Court, at my office in Seattle this 5th day of Dec. 1910. (Seal) By W. K. SICKELS, Deputy. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the partnership existing between Anton Aagaard and Scott I. Wallace for the manufacture of Aagaards Waterproof and Leather Preservative has this day been dissolved and an Aagaard has been acquired and agreed to pay all accounts against said partnership, said partnership having appeared under the name of the AAGAARD MANUFACTURING CO. The undersigned will not be responsible for any indebtedness incurred in the name of the above company hereafter. Dated Dec. 8th, 1908 SCOTT I. WALLACE. Dec. 9—Dec. 30, 1910. Notice is hereby given that there will be noticing of the stock-holders of the Savings Investment Association, a corporation, on the 4th day of February, 1911, at 1:30 o'clock p. m., at No. 809 Fifth Avenue, for the purpose of considering the question of increasing the capital stock of said corporation from $25,000 to $50,000 for the transaction of such business connected with said increase as may properly come before said meeting. Dated December 7, 1910. EVELYN H. HALL, HARRIETT M. BISHOP, ANNA M. BROWN, RUTH E. EAGLES, ELIZABETH AHONEY, ADELAIDE POLLOCK, JOSEPHINE I ATWOOD. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 28, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Craditors. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Bunkholder, deceased No. 11277. Burkholder, deceased, on the 17th day of December, made herein on the 17th day of December, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and among the necessary vouchers or the undersigned executrix of said estate, at 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 9, 1910. HALLIE HURKHOLDER, As Executrix of said Estate. F. J. Carver. Attorney for Estate. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 7, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. Ben Huber, plaintiff, vs. Sina M. Adams, the Empire State Surety Co., John A. Ames and L. G. Helnz, defendants. No. 77372. The State of Washington to the said defendant, Sina M. Adams: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th of December, 1900 defend the above entitled claim in the above entitled suit, and answer the plaintiff of your answer herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the address below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose those two certain mortgages heretofore given by you, the first one executed and delivered on the 18th day of May, 1909 to secure the sum of $400.00 with interest thereon. At the rate of 8 per cent per annum from said date until paid, the second one dated July 30, 1910, to secure a note for the sum of $400.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest against an attorney's fee of $100.00 and costs, both of said mortgages being on the foliage described real property in King County, Washington, to-wit; Loc. 13, block 12, Gilman Park, as per map recorded in Vol. 3 of plats, page 40, records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of the said defendants, and each and all of them, in and to said property. to said prophe- EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of Marion B. Baxter, de- ceased. To all whom it may concern, and particu- larly to the creditors, if any, of the estate of Marion B. Baxter, de- ceased. You, and each of you, will please take notice that the undersigned has been appointed the executrix of the estate of Marion B. Baxter, deceased, and that all claims of every kind and nature whatsoever, either on behalf of Marion B. Baxter or against the estate of said Marion B. Baxter, deceased, should be presented to the undersigned, as executrix, at her business address, No 314 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington, on or before one year after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit, on or before no year from the 14th day of November, 1910 BEATRICE BAXTER, McCLURE BEATRICE BAXTER McCLURE, Executrix of the Estate of Marion B. Baxter, deceased. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 13, 1911. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF MIDWAY MILL CO. To the Stockholders: The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the Midway Mill Co. will be held at the office of the Company, No. 1011 American Bank Building, on January 19th, 1911, at 10 o'clock A. M., for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. C. C. PIERCE, JR., President. Attest: R. A. ALEXANDER, Asst. Secretary. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles H. Hathaway, deceased—No. 11819. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated December 12th, 1910, I will sell at public auction sale at the front steps of the King County Court House at 10:30 A. M., January 7th, 1911, for cash, the following described real estate, situated in King County Washington: Dated this 15th day of December, 1910. Date of first publication, December 16th, 1910. ALICE HATHAWAY, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles H. Hathaway. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON, 607 Pioneer Building. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. wit: within sixty days after the 14th LEGOOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad. In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Biordean deceased—No. 5556 Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons it relates to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior of the Living County, State of Washington, at the court of the bate Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, and the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said election, and that the county shall four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS. ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN E Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. S. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King —ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full true and correct copy of any order to show cause by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and E. Andrew Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife. Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife, Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corporation, John Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation, L. A. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation, John Scutt, and Richard Roe Gelser, a co-partner doing business as Gelser Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation. V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company and J. K. Witerspoon witherspoon The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor, J. K. Withererson, in his failure to answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention which be deemed to be in violation of court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington; C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Withererson. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against deceased or against estate or presentation with the necessary wuchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased.—No. 11830. By order of, said court made herein on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY Block Phone Seattle - - Washington FRIDAY Decembe 16, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE. ED Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington. First and Cherry.