Seattle Republican

THE PEOPLE'S FORUM About twenty-one years ago, I made my first visit to Olympia, and for the purpose of attending to some matters in the Supreme Court. The judges were not overworked then as they now are. In the afternoon, I went duck hunting with the clerk, Mr. Rinehart. Either as a clerk or duck hunter, he was a high grade proposition. He has been clerk of the Supreme Court ever since. Judges may come and judges may go, but C. S. Rinehart "goes on forever." There is a good reason for this. A better, more competent, pleasant and obliging clerk cannot be found in this great, large Union. I like to say this of Mr. Rinehart, because it is true. There is still another thing that can be said of him. He has the genius of discovering genius in others. Selecting his assistants, is where so many officials fall down, but not so with Mr. Rinehart. I don't know where his discovery of F. S. Guyot, was made, but the state cannot furnish a better assistant. The same high standard has been maintained in the selection of a stenographer, May D. Parkhurst. In fact, nothing too good can be said of these two assistants and for twenty years, the office of clerk of the Supreme Court of Washington is all, and more than any one could expect, in a boss controlled state. When Clarence Dayton Hillman was convicted before Judge Donworth on the charge of fraudulent use of the mails, he received as fair and impartial a trial and treatment as any conscientious court could extend to any one charged with a crime, and after a sentence of two and a half years had been imposed upon him the defendant boasted, "the fight has just begun." His case was taken to the court of appeals and from there to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. Hillman's great fight reminds one of Don Quixote's battle with the wind mills, but right has finally prevailed and his case has also demonstrated, money don't always free a criminal. The punishment meted out to him is richly deserved. He is a rich man, partially made so by unfair and dishonest dealing with his patrons. Had he been honest in his dealings, he would be a richer man than he is. Some men would rather make five dollars dishonestly than ten dollars honestly, and Hillman seems to be in deep sympathy with the former class. He is comparatively a young man. He will serve the time allotted and return a wiser and better man. He is a good, keen rustler and no doubt will live down the disgrace and become a truly upright and desirable citizen. The progressive element of the United States is misunderstood. It is a movement in favor of certain principles, and not to further the ambitions of any one particular man. Progressives of course, have their preference, but it matters but little whether it be Roosevelt, La Follette or Cummings. La Follette and Roosevelt were probably the first men to advocate the progressive movement, which simply means better, purer and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN cleaner administration of public affairs; that the people and not the political leaders shall rule. Progressive principles are not modern. They are as old as history itself. France had her progressive leaders whose work culminated in the French revolution. Greece, divided as it was into small republics and other forms of government, furnished many examples of progressiveness, and Pericles, a man more like our beloved Lincoln, than any statesman that ever lived, endeavored, though in part unappreciated, to instill into the minds of the people of Athens and Attica these same principles. The reforms of Cromwell in England and the wresting from King John, the great Magna Charta in 1215, are examples of the demand of a people asking that progressive principles be applied in governmental affairs. In the United States, a progressive movement was started in the National convention of the Liberal Republicans at Cincinnati, on May 1st, 1872, and Horace Greely was nominated for president. This movement was handicapped by difference of opinions on the tariff question and the endorsement of Greely by the Democratic National convention apparently added no strength to the ticket. Then, but not to the same extent as now, a great many people, who were apparently in the minority, demanded better and purer government. Then, as now, they wanted fewer political bosses, but they did not know what name to give to the reforms they were demanding. The defeat of Greely put a quietus on reform movement of the American people for some time, but it again broke out when the Populists swept the Republican and Democratic parties aside in many of the states, and it died for lack of good, ocompetent leadership. A lull in the storm ensued, but God in his infinite goodness gave us Theodore Roosevelt for president, and he set about cleaning out the "Augean Stables." He denounced everything that was wrong from race suicide to chicken stealing and the moral sentiment of the country commenced to improve. He kept up a vigorous fight against graft and corruption in office. He refused to follow the footsteps of his dishonest predecessors, and started the digging of the Panama canal. He forced a pure food law through Congress, which the people had demanded for fifty years, and which is saving thousands of lives annually. Railroad, forest reserve and irrigation laws are a few more of his measures. The grafters were grilled and dishonest corporation decisions were advertised and denounced. He talked for better, and untainted courts, and he favors the direct primary and recall. Name one thing that would be beneficial to the people of the United States as a whole that he failed to advocate. All these, and many more that space will not permit me to mention are progressive ideas, and either Roosevelt, La Follette, Cummings, Brvan or Wilson, will continue to fight for them if elected. It is because I believe in keeping up the reform fight that I am a Progressive. Presi- FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. dent Taft promised to continue the Roosevelt policies, but he has not kept his word. He has not been either sincere or truthful with the people. He told the people the courts were all right. Do you believe him sincere in this? He said the tariff law he signed was the best ever. Do you believe he was truthful when he said it? If he was, why does he now want the tariff on wool changed and reduced? The platform he was elected on called for a revision and downward too but what did he say to condemn schedule "K"? Please name one word that Mr. Taft has ever said that would tend to improve the moral tone of the people? He is a genuine standpatter. He says everything is all right as it is. He is against the direct primary and the recall and he asks his renomination from the conventions and political bosses that I believe a great majority of the people would like to get rid of. Now don't accuse Progressives of insincerity. They are not opposed to Taft for any reason except that he will not keep up the battle that has been commenced for better and cleaner government. The men who want a Progressive for president are just as patriotic as those who wish to restore the bosses to power, and I think more so. If you want good government, clean courts and a people's rule, we must fight for it. This the Progressives are doing—the reactionaries are opposing it in my opinion. John C. Higgins, the prosecutor for the Seattle Bar Association, is one of the few bold, fearless lawyers, and ought to receive all the encouragement that a grateful association of lawyers can give him. His work of purifying the profession will not only be appreciated by the attorneys, but also by the public in general. Higgins deserves a medal, and a gold one at that, and a ocmmittee may call on me for a contribution. When that young daughter returns to her home from school with weary steps and a worn-out look, it is because she is compelled to climb the steps leading to the rooms in the various stories of the building. Some day, perhaps, school boards will be thinking as much about preserving the health of the pupils as to cram them full of education. In San Francisco, the number of notaries are limited and the office is a good paying proposition. A recent editorial of Scott C. Bone, described the advantages of good health. That is the only thing I possess that I could divide with my fellow man and still have plenty left. Don't make fun of a man because he don't smoke a nice looking cigar. Judge Chadwick, one of the most popular men in the state, smokes the awfullest, woe begone looking thing you ever saw. The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred document. Therefore, no text can be extracted from this image. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Politics and Politicians FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. much improved, and in fact well on the road to permanent recovery. Mr, Furth has been a great factor in the building of Seattle, yea, verily there has probably been no other save James A. Moore who has done as much and has been as instrumental in inducing capital to come to Seattle as has Jacob Furth. It is the hope of the entire business fraternity of this section that his complete recovery will be soon and it will not be long before his familiar figure be seen on the streets of Se- attle as of yore. A, J, McDonald, for the past three years bailiff in Judge Gay’s court, has tendered his resignation to accept the business man- agement of a new oencern that will soon be launched in Seattle, He has been prominent in the business and labor circles of the city for a number of years and at one time threat- ened to break into the political arena by be- coming a candidate for the legislature. He has been a general fayorite about the court house and especially with the juries serving in Judge Gay’s department. A. E. Ruffner, of the Seattle Weekly News, formerly known as Ballard, has announced his candidacy for the Republican nomina- tion of County Commissioner from the north commissioner’s district of King County. He has been quite a factor in both the polities of the city and county for a number of years and being a member of the Weekly Publish- ers’ Association of the county ought to stand a splendid chance of being nominated. E. E. Cushman as a federal judge in Alas- ka has doubtless made good and for that President ‘Taft named him to sueceed Judge Donworth. Ed, as he is commonly known amnog the old timers, has played a pretty suecessful political game, for he has been able to hold some kind of an office, either state or federal, for the past twenty years. He did his best work as deputy U. 8. district attorney under Wilson R, Gay and subse- quently as special attorney for the govern- ment. Henry Alberts McLean, an attorney of Seattle, has announced his intention of jar- ring Will E. Humphrey loose from the job of representing the first Congressional dis- trict of Washington. Mr. McLean lived for many years in Skagit county and campaigned the northwest for a score of years in political contests. Factionally he aligns himself with the Progressives and says he is certain of winning, ‘‘but in case I do not win the very next day I will be for the successful candi- date.” Tom Murphine is said to have the inclina- tion to deprive Will E, Humphrey of his right to sit in Congress. He too is a Prog- ressive, which demonstrates that the woods are full of Progressives. With two or more Progressives beating the bush for votes it looks as if Humphrey will have an easier time in succeeding himself than he did two 86a man in my opinion. that you-well frazzle is Judge Gay, who may en- ter the fight,’’ said Kenneth MacIntosh, a leading Seattle attorney and politician of King County. Edwin L. Blaine, member of the city coun- cil of Seattle, says, ‘‘I do not want to go on record as recommending that the city pur- chase the Hebb power site, but 1 do recom- mend that some similar site be purchased even if it costs a million and a half dollars. If the Hebb site can be developed to produce 40,000 horse power within the next fifteen years the memory of the council making the purchase will be idolized, The city needs more cheap power and in her possession it will be one of her greatest assets. Wick- strom may not own the Lake Cushman site, but somebody does, and Seattle should get it now even if she has to begin condemna- tion proceedings to get it.”’ James E, Bradford, Seattle’s corporation counsel, has begun a suit against the Sunset Telephone Company, and if he makes no greater effort to win this case than he did to prevent the merger of the telephone com- panies then he is simply wasting the city’s funds in beginning the suit. It may be un- fair to Mr, Bradford, but it is the concensus of opinion that, he did not tote fair in the merger fight and with the slightest bit of encouragement a recall fight would be waged against him. Gen, James Dent Grant, who suddenly passed away last Thursday, was truly the son of his illustrious father, Gen. Ulyssis 8. Grant, and had followed his wake from early childhood. He was not exactly a veteran of the great Civil war, but he saw the most of it, as he was with his father in the most of the conflicts in that memorable strife. He did not in after years gain as much fame as a warrior as his father, which was doubtless due to a lack of opportunity, but he became a distinguished soldier and left his foot- prints on the sands of time. His death will be regretted by the civilized world. Lest ye forget the electorial vote is as fol- lows: Fo ethene dk LE SRS TUM SEO» | RROD hee oars mentee 0 SPP TE al Gols cs MR de Co le igo aaa | CRIVARIEN selene en enue gunna ne CRONIN EL Rc ie BOS IAS MarR gg Uiernesiinnb eee i cimoimenins | Delaware .---.-sssssssssvsssssseeecceeeeereetenatnnnnnnnnnnee 13 a Oa ie cbrtimne ee oe Georgia -...n--.-eecnseececeesesesceneeeeneeseneennmecsanennass 14 MT oe en rere em oe Te ica eieneee Ae ee naictenns oe ee ae ene asin oe ee oi eis Gagionemeysee Oe RGMGUGHY ooncnnndensecesnncencencsetcegercernsecesstecsnenrveee 13 TRUABANA Si anes meteor, CO IR ee ee eon C8 Maryland ....-2-c---s-c-secsssecesesseeeceeeeteeetennetens 8 RARER OMRON (ca scarcer istic a Retain st OL oer ne eee de Mississippi -......-......--------cceeeseeceeseeceseeeneeeeseeee, LU Miles ourind:id wlden.dapinugsatias.d.., 18 Montataieeniend.wtlo Alaslcuninesspant 4 Nebkadkaiiic hihaltosdtenshen ua 8 Nevada vii: Annette ae 8 New Hatipehire 2... scmelunnie 4 Peon a ide ott a eatin anaemciaten > Ae Pea aM ORO stranay packers era paredisiarncropetes © PEA OMIE agaist (i ae oiirsicasdoisisste cs ooinc SO DARA OBEOUIG s Scaiiiecce pects atiete ea 1 GRU TSA OB tathace dct tances ricsethises-ieeriuiene DT Berane cei adeh eed iii ecca: csi acics Oe Omabona Oo ees lee... 10 ONT BRED. BEI it OR a leh 8 Réntisylvaiia® 222002 el el 2 8B Rhode idland Via ee ee leeuns 5 Mouthi@arehna Ligeti.) Mee 9 South Wukotacctpac tee 6 (BRr GRR ie tN dete cslglimead consi ntti eaiihess, LS de inci hie cai ti Miers meen aiacte neers OF Si Hees islliec cape ecst tO tac states lth dep crertaneg Tel lich Lefts cptistiaers tags |, © Eh cen aichietthe-atyrgerertpan oo eit Tivad: ssf gO arose ates A | MUGS Y EA cerca igs erteareencsceconsueeocsseene PV IROGU ete tee sates MD otal nca6lennaodadoges--aaserserctingpeL eM RES cee ee eS em Ske A ee Twice the total number of electors coming from each State is the number of delegates the State is entitled to participate in Na- tional Conventions. The New York Herald has a pool of its representatives in every state on the forth- coming Republican nomination for President. After making generous allowances for the claims of the Roosevelt men, the correspond- ents, striving in every instance to be impar- tial and as analytical as possible, give Presi- dent Taft 593 votes as against 277 for Mr. Roosevelt. That means the President will have on the first ballot, providing conditions are the same in June as they appear to be now, 54 more than the necessary majority of 539. SHORT. SHARP SHOTS. It is easy for some politicians to mistake the call of the wild for the call of the people. —Boston Transcript. Teddy should have told Taft four years ago that he was only lending it to him.— Jacksonville Florida Times-Union. There is a play in New York called ‘‘The Truth Wagon.’’ It must come under the head. of slightly used vehicles.—Cleveland Plain Dealer. Senator Lorimer voted against the peace treaties. Evidently he is determined that if he can’t have peace nobody else shall.— Cleveland Leader. A Frenchman claims to have found a way to turn iron into gold. A Sot who lives in America found how to do that long ago.— Boston Advertiser. Underwood, in removing the duty on su- gar, is certainly in a fair way to become the candy kid if he doesn’t beoeme the candi- date—Brockton Times. making car-windows larger for people in wrecks to crawl through will not meet the issue of breaking rails—-New York Herald. A correspondent wants to know what a Progressive is. Well, a Progressive in poli- ties is a man who calls for a new deck when the cards stop running his way.—Trenton State Gazette. It is stated that Madero expended $7,000,- 000 on the revolution through which he be- came Preisdent of Mexico. It is doubtful if he thinks now that he got the worth of his money.—Seattlé Post-Intelligencer. Colonel Roosevelt mentioned no names in his latest reference to the good trusts, but we thought we detected a faint blush of modesty on the damask cheek of the United States Steel Corporation—Columbus Ohio State Journal. Mexico having received a ‘‘square deal’”’ in the prohibition of the shipment of arms across the border for the use of revolution- ists, a return of courtesies should prevent the dispatch of bullets across the border in this direction-New York World. Roosevelt will not get the Nobel Prize this year.—Atlanta Constitution. Dime-novel circulation vastly decreased; daily papers probably suffer—Wall Street Journal. There seems to be no doubt about Mrs. Pankhurst’s bonnet being in the ring!— Dayton Journal. Let her who is without votes cast the first stone. (From the proverbs of Pankhurst.)— Columbia State. 5 It is the Taft opinion that a dog running without a third-term license ought to be kicked around.—Atlanta Constitution. If Colonel Harvey has any choice for Vice- President he is wisely refraining from mak- ing it known.—St. Paul Pioneer Press. By courtesy of Central Americans, all re- volutions have been suspended during Sec- retary Knoox’s visit.—Wall Street Journal. The Maryland suffragettes will celebrate their defeat by giving a baby show. Is this to be a loan exhibition?—Dayton Journal. Colonel Roosevelt ‘‘had no desire to run,”’ but from the way Taft is going it looks as if he will have to—Southern Lumberman. A conservative is a man who will not look at the new moon, out of respect for that an- cient institution, the old one.—La Follette’s Weekly. Colonel Roosevelt may yet take the posi- tion that if we do not give him the nomina- tion he will take his:canal away from us.— St. Louis Times. Stockholders of the Standard Oil subsidi- aries ought to put up something handsome for Attorney-General Wickersham on his re- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN tically rewriting two of Mr. Taft’s treaty contributions—New Orleans Times-Demo- erat, LIFE’S FUNNY SIDE. Long Waits.—Pride goes before a fall— so long before in some instances that envi- ous folk get weary of waiting for the catas- trophe.—Puck, Modern Announcement.—‘‘Wanted: <A governess who is a good stenographer to take down the clever sayings of our child.’’ —Fliegende Blaetter, Belated—A man named Shakespeare has been tried and convicted in England on a charge of having stolen bacon. Rather late date, isn’t it?—Satire. Different Now.—‘‘ Why are you so bitter against Uncle Nebuchadnezzar?’ “He lost his money shortly after we named the baby for him.’’—Pittsburg Post. Irresistible-—‘‘However did you reconcile Adele and Mary?’’ “I gave them a choice bit of gossip and asked them not to repeat it to each other.’’ —Fliegende Blaetter. Security —‘‘Did you lend that forgetful friend of ours the book he asked for?’ “Yes, But I took care to borow his um- brella the same day.’’—Washington Star. Merely a Brother.—Young Lady—‘‘ Please show me some ties. Clerk—‘‘A gentleman’s tie?’’ Young Lady—‘‘Oh, no, it’s for my brother.’’-—Fliegende Blaetter. FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. An Old Hand.—‘‘Have you had any ex- perience as an office-boy?”’ “I should say I had, mister; why, I’m a dummy director in three mining companies now.’’—Brooklyn Life, The New ‘‘Play.’’—‘‘Really,’’ said Mrs. Pozozzle to her husband, ‘‘we must go and see Sothern and Marlowe next week in ‘Repertoire.’ I’ve heard so much about that play, and I have never seen it.’’—Kansas City Star. Diplomacy.—Butler—‘‘'‘There’s a man_be- low to see you, sir.’’ Mayberry—‘‘ What did you tell him?” Butler—‘‘I told him you told me, if it was a lady, to say you were in, and, if it was a iman, to say you were out.’’ Mayberry—‘‘ What did he say then?”’ Butler—‘He said to tell you he was a Jady.’’—Harvard Lampoon. Laundried—‘‘All new arrivals are washed,’’ explained the warden of the pris- on, ‘And if they make a fuss?’’ “Then they are ironed.’’—Sacred Heart Review. : In the Swim.—He—‘‘I see there’s a chance for the imposition of an income tax. Good thing, too.’’ She—‘‘Yes, George. And you must pay as big a tax as you can, dear, just to keep up appearances,’’—Cleveland Plain Dealer. A Good Beginning.—I'wo street peddlers in Bradford, England, bought a horse for $11.25, It was killed by a motor-car one day and the owner of the car paid them $115 for the less. Thereupon a new indus- try sprang up on the roads of England.— Christian Advocate. Back at Him.—A certain young man who prided himself on a bruskness that he mis- took for wit met an eminent but touchy sculptor at a studio supper. “So you’re the chap,’’ he said on being introduced, ‘‘that makes mud heads.”’ “Not all of them,’’ the sculptor replied quietly —Y outh’s Companion, Like Real Life——‘‘Does the hero marry the heroine at the end of all their troubles?’’ “No; at the beginning.’’—Judge, IMPORTANT TO LAWYERS. If you are a lawyer, you know what it means to get good service in your publication notices. You get ready for your day in court and at the last minute you find your affidavit of publication has not been made, you rightly lose your temper and say things that would neither sound well in Sunday School nor look well in print. If you had have given the notice to The Seattle Republican you would have had no such worry and would not have to go to confession in order to get right with your Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and painstaking, which means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices until Friday noon, which means a whole week over Saturday pub- lications. When you have a notice for publication, call Main 305, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 423 Epler Block. FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. 7 Wild, Wild—A newspaper having offered a prize for the most impossible item of local news, the competition was won by a wildly imaginative genius, who sent in the follow- ing brief story: “A cabman and a bus-driver came into collision in the street with their vehicles, so that their wheels were locked. ‘“«My dear sair,’’ said the cabman, ‘1’m very sorry for this accident. Will you kind- ly excuse me?’ “«*Pray do not mention it, my dear sir,’ replied the bus-driver, ‘The fault was mine, rather than yours.’ And after getting clear of each they bowed politely, and proceeded about their business with a pleasant ‘good day.’ ’’—Tit-Bits. Pitiful Case—‘‘I do believe my brother will die a bachelor. He has such bad luck! Every time he wants to marry a girl for love, she has too little money.’’—Fliegende Blaetter. Just an Ordinary Dinner.—‘‘I believe that President Taft will be present at that public dinner I am going to.’’ “Good gracious! Is it as common as that?’’—Life. A Feat.—‘‘Have you any invisible hair- pins?’’ “Certainly, madam.’’ “Gould I see them, please?’’—Fliegende Blaetter. Pantomime.—‘‘I hear ye had words with Casey.”’ ‘*We had no words.’’ 4 “Then nothing passed between ye?’’ “Nothing but one brick?’’—Washington Herald. Clever Boy.—‘‘How does it happen that you are five minutes late at school this morn- ing?’’ the teacher asked, severely. “Please, ma’am,”’ said William, “‘I must have overwashed myself.’’—Harper’s Maga- zine. Unmailed Letters —Gibbs‘‘My wife ex- plored my pockets last night.’’ Dibbs—‘‘How did she come out?”’ Gibbs—‘‘As an explorer should. She ac- quired enough material for a lecture.’’— Boston Transcript. Not His Fault,—‘‘I certainly am sincerely indebted to you for winning my ease.’”’ “By no means. I represented your op- ponent.’’ “Just so.’’—Fliegende Blaetter. Opera at Home.—Oletime—‘‘Is your mar- ried life one grand, sweet song ?’” Newlywed—‘‘ Well, since our baby’s been born it’s been, like an opera, full of grand marches, with loud calls for the author ev- ery night,’’—Tit-Bits. On the Run.—Smith—‘‘We are certainly in luck with our new cook—soup, meat, veg- etables, and dessert—everything perfect!”’ Mrs. $.—‘‘Yes, but the dessert was made by her successor.’’—Fliegende Blaetter. il a a a The Wrong Guess.—The young man pro- duced a small, square box from his pocket. “T have a present for you,’’ he began. “J don’t know whether it will fit your finger or not, but—’’ “Oh, George!’’ she broke in, ‘‘this is so sudden! Why, I never dreamed——’”’ But just then George produced the gift— a silver thimble—and it got suddenly cooler in the room.—Ladies’ Home Journal. a Family Bookkeeping.—‘‘Does he know his own failings ?’’ “He ought to. His wife keeps the list.’’ —Birmingham Age-Herald. Familiar Noise—Wife (dining at res- taurant)—‘‘John, dear, can you see what those people at the next table are eating?” Husband—‘‘Can’t see at all, but it sounds like celery.’’—Brooklyn Life. Drowning the Storm.—Mrs. A—‘‘ What did your husband say when he saw the bill for your new gown?”’ Mrs. B.—‘‘I didn’t hear. I started to play on the piano.’’—Boston Transcript. Hearsay.—‘‘Did you hear the new opera in New York?”’ ‘*¥oa,@ “Tt was sung in English, wasn’t it?’’ “IT was told so.’’—Cleveland Plain Deal- er. A True Sport—‘‘Why do you live with your husband, if you quarrel all the time?’’ “Well, my sister bet me a box of choc- olates we would never celebrate our paper- wedding anniversary, and I’m going to win THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN All for Nothing—‘‘l always was un- lucky,’’ he said with a weary, sigh. ‘‘What’s the matter now, old man?’” his friend asked. “T’ve spent over $500 on having my boy taught to play the fiddle, and now his hair’s all comin’ out.’’—Chicago Record-Herald. His Job.—A farm-hand had worked in the field from dawn till darkness, doing the chores by lantern light. ‘‘I’m going to quit,’”’ he said to the farmer at the end of the month. ‘‘You promised me a steady job.” ‘Well’ haven’t you got one?’’ was the astonished reply: : “‘No,”’ said the’man, ‘‘theré are three or four hours every night that I don’t have anything to do and fool my time away sleep- ing.’’—Suecess Magazine, Another Precocious Child—A director of one of the great transcontinental railroads was showing his three-year-old daughter the pictures in a work on natural history. Point- ing to a picture of a zebra, he asked the baby to tell him what it represented. Baby answered ‘‘Colty.’’ Pointing to a picture of a tiger in the same way, she answered ‘‘Kitty.’’ Then a lion, and she answered ‘“‘Doggy.’’ lated with her seeming quick perception, he then turned to the picture of a chimpanzee and said: “Baby, what is this?” “*Papa.’’—Woman’s Journal, On Soh Ons eiaahian pasa ye wea! dank, Oth ghabrides gals 0 eee ugesHol'y jug dd Cay ane pennies bedi tren ew nile wants heGucgaie yctd ¢ Sggin(, Pose a Pdi ele E. L. GRONDAHL, President JOHN ERIKSON, Vice-President A. H. SOELBERG, Vice-Pres. and Cashier A. C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashier Condensed Statement of Condition of THE STATE BANK OF SEATTLE Seattle, Washington As rendered to the State Examiner at the close of business February 20, 1912 WE INVITE YOUR ACCOUNT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Caroline Frederica Ensminger, deceased.—No. By order of said court made herein on the 21st day of February, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator with the will annexed of said estate, at his office 320-321 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, February 23, 1912. Attorney for Estate. Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 23—March 22, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. George W. Crane and Hannah H. Crane, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Samuel E. Brackins and Jane Doe Brackins (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; W. N. Sandy, Wilbur F. Hill, James McNaught and Jane Doe McNaught (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, defendants.— No 86489. The State of Washington, to Samuel E. Brackins and Jane Doe Brackins, (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; W. N. Sandy, Wilbur F. Hill, James McNaught and Jane Doe McNaught, (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 15th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entited court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiffs at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above court. The object of this action is to clear title to lot fifteen (15), block six (6), of Noah Flickinger Town Plat of Cove Addition to the City of Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington, and to enjoin and restrain you, and each of you, from claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest of any kind, name or nature whatsoever therein. HIGGINS, HALL & HALVERSTADT, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office and Postoffice address, 817-823 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication March 15th, 1912. March 15—April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Erma Cramer, deceased—No 11674 By order of said court made herein on the 16th day of February, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication February 23, 1912. ALEXANDER H. CRAMER, Administrator of the Estate of Erma Cramer, deceased. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Administrator. 1308 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County. Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. Order to show cause on sale of real estate. In the Matter of the Estate of Harry T. Traynor deceased... No. 12590 T. Traynor, deceased.—No. 18599. The administratrix of the estate of Harry T. Traynor, deceased, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of all real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administratrix is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Monday, the 25th day of March, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The Seattle Republican loves to publish Legal Notices and if you will call up Main 305 when you have a notice for publication it will do the rest. 423 EPLER BLOCK $1,203,412.49 --- The Seattle Republican loves to publish Legal Notices and if you will call up Main 305 when you have a notice for publication it will there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said administratrix authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said deceased, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 25th day of March, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 16th day of February, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Administratrix. 432 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 23—March 22, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. The MacDougall & Southwick Co. (a corporation), plaintiff, vs. Lillian M. Lian Willis, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Lillian M. Willis, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 2nd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment for $1549.13 for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to defendant between Nov. 1st, 1910, and Jan. 1st, 1912. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 2—Mar. 15, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Order Directing Creditors to File Claims. Western Lime & Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, defendant. —No. 56871. Standard Oil Company, a corporation, having duly presented its petition to the court herein, from which it duly appears that said petitioner is a coporation entitled to maintain this proceeding; that one E. M. Williams, on or about the second day of August, 1907, was duly appointed permanent receiver for the defendant above named; that said E. M. Williams as such receiver on or about the 30th day of September, 1910, filed what purported to be his final report as such referee; that there- FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. TOURIST BATHS Here you will find the most up-to-date bath establishment in the West. Equipped at a cost of $50,000. Turkish, Russian, Nanheim Effervescing, Electric Ray and Medicated Baths. Bake Oven treatment applied for rheumatism. Both ladies' and gentlemen's departments, respectively, in charge of skilled and experienced men and women. Operated in conjunction with the remodelled TOURIST HOTEL Occidental and Main Seattle THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Olive Street, Or phone Main 2680 - - - Ind. 208 Now, on motion J. W. Russell, one of FRIDAY. APRIL 12. 1912. LEGAL NOTICES 427 Epler Blk. Main 305 the attorneys for said petitioner, Standard Oil Company, IT IS ORDERED, that the creditors of E. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, present and file with the clerk of this court on or before the 26th day of March, 1912, their claims, duly verified. And it is ordered further that this order be published in some newspaper regularly printed and published in the city of Seattle, for two consecutive weeks (once each week), and that a copy of this order as so printed be mailed to each of such creditors at their last known place of address, which said publishing and mailing shall be deemed sufficient notice to all the creditors of said E. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation. And it is hereby further ordered that any creditor of said E. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, may on or before April 7th, 1912, file in the office of the clerk of this court, objections to the claims of any other creditor filed pursuant to this order. And it is hereby further ordered that immediately after said April 7th, 1912, the petitioner herein may apply to this court to have a date set for the hearing of all said claims and the objections thereto, if any, and that this order and the publication and service thereof as hereinbefore provided for shall be deemed sufficient notice to all the creditors of said E. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, of the time and place set for the hearing upon said claims, and objections filed thereto, if any. And it is hereby further ordered that the question of the compensation to be allowed to the attorneys of said petitioner, Standard Oil Company, for their services in the action against the surety on said receiver's bond, and for their services in this proceeding, shall be deferred until the making of the final order upon the hearing and determination of such claims, and objections, if any, filed thereto. Done in open court this 7th day of March, 1912. (March 15—March 29, 1912.) JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. Albert A. Evans, plaintiff, vs. H. S. Helgason, defendant.—No. 27005. State of Washington, County of Kingss: The State of Washington to H. S. Helgason, defendant: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Albert A. Evans has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle. King County, Washington, on the 19th day of April, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said paintiff is for goods, wares and merchandise (necessaries) sold defendant by plaintiff in the sum of eighteen and 25-100 dollars with interest. Complaint filed Feb. 24, A. D. 1912. Dated March 11, 1912. R. R. GEORGE. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County. Wash. March 15—April 7, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. Dorothy Collins, plaintiff, vs. Ernest O. Collins, defendant.—No. 86447. The State of Washington to the said Ernest O. Collins: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a decree of divorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. CORWIN A. TOWNSEND. Postoffice address. 505 and 506 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice. In the Matter of the Petition of the Ford Harder Grain Co. to dissolve and disincorporate.—No. 86344. Notice is hereby given that the Ford Harder Grain Co., a corporation, has filed a petition in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, which said petition prays that said corporation be disincorporated and be dissolved, and said Court has fixed the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of the 20th day of May, 1912, in the court room of Department No. 9 of the above entitled Court in the court house in the City of Seattle, King County. State of Washington, as a time and place when and where said petition will be heard, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN at which time and place all persons interested may show cause, if any they have, why said corporation shall not be dissolved and disincorporated. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 8th day of March, 1912. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk of Said Court. By D. A. GRANT, Deputy. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Petitioner. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. March 15—May 17, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Order to Show Cause Why Real Estate Should Not Be Sold at Private Sale. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Gibson Bell, Deceased—No 6677 James Bell, the administrator of the estate of Mary Gibson Bell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition for an order requiring him to sell at private sale all or sufficient of the real estate of Mary Gibson Bell, deceased, for the purpose of paying claims against the said property and the costs of administration, and it appearing therefrom that there is not sufficient personal estate in the hands of said administrator to pay said claims, it is ORDERED that all persons interested in the said estate do appear before this court at the court room of the probate department thereof on the 1st day of April, 1912, at 9.30 a. m. then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order for the sale of the real estate as prayed for by the said administrator should not be made, and it is further ORDERED that a copy of this order to show cause be published once each week for four consecutive weeks, beginning with the 1st day of March, 1912, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published in the city of Seattle. Done in open court this 27th day of February, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Herman Nelson, plaintiff, vs. Chas. F. Albin, John Winston and Clara Winston, defendants.—No. 86167. The State of Washington to the said Chas. F. Albin, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose a mortgage on the land described in the complaint in this action, and situated in King County, Washington. Said mortgage was given by the above named defendant Chas. F. Albin to the plaintiff and bears date the 30th day of March, 1909, and is recorded in Volume 430 of mortgages on page 559. P. O. Address, Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 1—April 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for Knig County. Summons by Publication. Etta Logan, plaintiff, vs. John W. Logan, defendant.-No. 86159. gan. defendant to, 86159. The State W. Washington to the said John W. Logan, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the said court. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of the failure of the defendant to make suitable provision for his family, and on the further ground of cruelty to the plaintiff by the defendant, and to award to the plaintiff the care, custody and control of Patrick John Logan, a minor son of said parties, and to award and decree to plaintiff as her sole and separate property the following described lands and premises: Lots eleven (11) and twelve (12) in Block 8636 Tacoma Land Company's Sixth Addition to the City of Tacoma, together with certain personal property described in the complaint. For further particulars reference is made to plaintiff's complaint now on file herein. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 1—April 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Cordelia A. Davega, deceased—No. 12501 I. E. Moses, administrator with the will annexed, of the estate of Cordelia A. Davega, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Cordelia A. Davega, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 15th day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 15th day of April, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 11th day of March, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the county of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Davit Albien Lunden, deceased.—No. 12369. Emil T. Hendrickson, administrator of the estate of Davit Albien Lunden, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Davit Albien Lunden, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, Washington, on the 22nd day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 22nd day of April, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 15th day of March, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84585. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Aug., 1909, and numbered B60369, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount $1.73, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows. to-wit: Undivided 1/4 of N. 1/2 of NE. 1/4 of SE. 1/4 Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., 6 R. E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.72 for the year 1908, the sum of $2.23; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1910, the sum of $1.17. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Stewart Holmes Drug Co. (a corporation), plaintiff, vs. The Make-Man Tablet Co. (a corporation), defendant. No. 86521. The State of Washington to the said The Make-Man Tablet Co. (a corporation), defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 5th day of April, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment against the defendant in the sum of $17.17, interest and costs, and to garnishee money owing by F. C. Blendel, of Seattle, Washington, to said defendant. LEOPOLD M. STERN, J. W. RUSSELL, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 714 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Washington. (April 5—May 17, 1912.) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Service by Publication. Mary Elizabeth Graham, plaintiff, vs. Wendell Stuart Graham, defendant.— No. 86743. State of Washington to the Defendant, Wendell Stuart Graham: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 5th day of April, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their address below stated, and in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce upon the ground of failure to support and abandon. Dated at Seattle, Washington, April 2, 1912. BOSTWICK & STEELE. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office address: 609 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, Washington. (April 5—May 17, 1912.) JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. Peter E. Peterson, plaintiff, vs. Pete Kiboff, alias Sedor Kebizoff, alias Pete Kabizoff, defendant.—No. 22107-22108. The State of Washington to Pete Kiboff, alias Sedor Kebizoff, alias Pete Kabizoff: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Peter E. Peterson has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come to be heard at my office in Room 602, Prefontaine Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 6th day of May, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover judgment against you for the sum of $86.67, claimed to be due plaintiff, costs and disbursements. Complaint filed March 27th, A. D. 1912 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, Washington. (April 5—May 3, 1912.) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Summons for publication. Charles B. Mayhugh, plaintiff, vs. Grace E. Mayhugh, defendant.—No. 86911. The state of Washington to the said Grace E. Mayhugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 5th of April, 1912 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and paper address, 408 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. April, 5—May 17, 1912. 8 REPUBLICAN LEGALS—Mar 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. County of King. Perry A. Conley, plaintiff, vs. Florence Conley, defendant. Summons for Publication.—No, 86256. To the said Florence Conley, defendant, greeting; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object and purpose of the above entitled action is to procure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of desertion. H. O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 525 Henry Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. March 8-April 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State, of Washington, in and for the County of King. Susan Clark, plaintiff, vs. Earl J. Clark, defendant. Summons for Publication.—No. 86255. To the said Earl J. Clark, defendant, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complain of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be re- render against you, according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object and purpose of the above entitled action, is to secure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of abandonment and desertion. H. O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 525 Henry Bldg.. Seattle, King County, Wash. March 8—April 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Alfred H. Stone, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Edmunds and the unknown heirs of David Edmunds, deceased, also the other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint, defendants.—No. The State of Washington to the unknown heirs of David Edmunds, deceased, also the other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint: You and each or you are hereby moned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 12th day of April, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned atorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree quieting title to Lots 5 and 6. Block 48. of South Park, King County, Washington, in the plaintiff and adjudging plaintiff owner thereof and that said defendanth have, not, nor has any of the many interest whatsoever in and to said lands and premises. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address. 604 Mutual Life Building. Seattle, Wash. April 12, May 24, 1912. State of Washington for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Louisa Shaffer, deceased.—No. 13992. By order of said court made herein on the eighth day of April, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Joseph R. Shaf- ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ing, Seattle, the place of business of fer of said estate, at 328 Central Build- of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Arminta E. Craig, Deceased. No. 13822. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned executor of said estate, at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 22nd day of March, 1912. Dated this 22nd day of March, 1912. EDWARD J. CRAIG. Executor of the Estate of Arminta E. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased.—No. 12263. Emily A. Hammett, administratrix of the estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased, having filed in this court her final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Samuel Hamnett, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, on the second day of May, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, and if they final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition emitted according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said second day of May, 1912, in "The Seattle Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of March. 1912. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 27th day of March, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 27th day of March, 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. J. HENRY DENNING, Attorney for Estate. Date of first publication, March 29, 1912. Date of last publication, April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. New York to Creditors. Notice to Creditor In the Matter of the Estate of J. H. Probate No. 13845. Clarke, deceased. Probate No. 13845. By the order of said Court made and entered on the 25th day of March, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the vouchers required by law to the undersigned, M. J. Clarke, administratrix of said estate, at 401 Marion Building,, the place of business of said estate in Seattle, in said King County and State of Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, March 29, 1912. M. J. CLARKE, As Administratrix of said Estate. E. C. MILLS. E. C. MYRTLE, Attorney for said Administratrix and Estate. Office and Postoffice address, 401 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTEE CO. THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTEE To the Stockholders:—The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trustee Co. will be held at the office of the company, No. 1010 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash., on Thursday, May 2nd, 1912, at 10 c'clock a. m., for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. As Executor or said Estate. CHAS. K. JENNER. Attorney for Estate. 328 Central Building, Seattle, Wash. April 12—May 8, 1912. March 22-April 19, 1912. State of Washington. March 29—April 26, 1912. Seattle. Wash., March 28th. 1912. March 29—April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Surveys of Publication Sudan Alcott Wilkinson, plaintiff, vs. Mamie Wilkinson, defendant Wilkinson, defendant: The State of Washington to the said Mamie Wilkinson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 29th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion for five years and for incompatibility and cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 29—May 10, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made In the Matter of the Estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased.—No. 11412. Charles C. Smith, executor of the estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is thereore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Anna Shaughnessy, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court on the 29th day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 29th day of April, 1912, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of March, 1912. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington. County of King,—ss. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 22nd day of March, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 22nd day of March, 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy Clerk. March 29—April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased.—No. 14015. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, W. W. Eldred, administrator with the will annexed, of the estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year after the 12th day of April, 1912, to the undersigned administrator with the will annexed, as aforesaid, at suite 655 Colman Building, in the city of Seattle, county of King, state of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Administrator with the Will Annexed, of the Estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased. First date of publication April 12th, 1912. April 12—May 28, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. William Bornstein, plaintiff, vs. Sadle Bornstein, defendant—No. 86983. State of Washington to Sadie Bornstein, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in the above entitled cause in the above entitled court within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of April. A. D. 1912, and defend said cause in said court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys of the plaintiff at their address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the said complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant. HOLZHEIMER & HERALD Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 428-429 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 1912. sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. REVA JACOBSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Jan. 19—March 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons. Hyman & Oppenheim, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. D. C. Robbins, de- fendant.—No. . . . The State of Washington to the said Mrs. D. C. Robbins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 23rd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to recover the sum of Eight Hundred and 63-100 ($800.63) Dollars with interest at six per cent per annum, balance due over and above all payments for merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to said defendant at her special instance and request between March 11th, 1910, and February 16th, 1911, inclusive, and to subject Lot 7, Block 1, H. E. Orr's Park Division Two (2) in King County, Washington, to attachment and sale towards satisfaction of the judgment which plaintiff will recover in said action Date of first publication February 23, 1912. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. G. F. Mayer, plaintiff. vs. A. L. Irish, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85431. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter defied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 30 certain delinquent tax respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. G. F. MAYER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. ty. Notice to Creation. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Bieber, deceased.—No. 13863. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of March, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sald deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seat- tle, in said King county and state of Washington. within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication March 8th, 1912. CONRAD BIEBER. As Executor of Sald Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. March 8—April 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Notice to Creditors. In the matter of the Estate of Sarah C. Towsley, deceased. — Probate No. 13864. By order of said court made and entered on the 4th day of March, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said estate to present them with the vouchers required by law to the undersigned, Ethel B. Slosson, at her residence in the city of Mount Vernon, Skagit County, Washington, or to her attorneys, McLean & Balliet, 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, within one year from and after the 8th day of March, 1912, the same being the date of the first publication of this notice, or the same will be barred. ETHEL B. SLOSSON, As Executrix and Trustee under the Will of Sarah C. Towsley, Deceased. By McLEAN & BALLIET, Attorneys for Executrix and Trustee. Empire Building, Seattle, Wash. March 8—April 5, 1912. Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 18.