Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate SOME REAL LIVE ANARCHISTIC SUPPORT. One of Judge Hanford's warmest supporters in Seattle is the Seattle Republican, a paper published, we are told, by several Negroes. The utterances of the paper have for the most part indicated that they have been written by intelligent men, but one story printed in a recent issue in defense of the spotless Hanford shows that they have jumped the track of intellectuality and seem to be running amuck on the side track of anarchy. Charges have been preferred against Hanford because he refused to grant a man by the name of Olsson naturalization papers on the grounds that he was an anarchist, it is said. The Republican comes out for their champion, the "veteran jurist," and says that Attorney Perry is a character assassin and that if it is proved that the charges which Mr. Perry has made against Hanford are false, then people should not blame Hanford's sons if they should "arm themselves and shoot the life out of their father's maligner." It is too bad that the Republican editors should resort to their jungle teaching and preach anarchy of a character bespeaking their unfitness for citizenship in this country. If they aren't careful Judge Hanford will revoke their citizenship as he may consider it unsafe for them to be at large. If it has so happened that Attorney Perry has made false charges, we have courts for the correction of such evils and no one who has the good of the commonwealth in mind will preach anarchy, murder and lawlessness of the type referred to a as substitute for legal procedure. Their very doing so might incline one to believe that they did not have the greatest faith in the integrity of the court which they would uphold in such vigorous terms. Washington State Journal. The Journal like many of our contemporaries can not take issue with us without wringing in our alleged race classification. The editor of The Seattle Republican endeavors to issue a paper in whose columns matters of interest to all mankind without regard to race, color, or class, can always be found. This paper does not pose as a special champion of Judge Hanford, but it does pose as a champion for just as square deal for him as the Journal does for the red-handed anarchists. The article referred to did not brand Attorney Perry as a character assassin, but it did say, he was such un- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912. less he came forward with the evidence and it properly corroborated in proof of what he said about Judge Hanford. The article did not advocate violence being done to Mr. Perry by the sons of Judge Hanford, unless there is no law on the statute book, in case he failed to prove his case, whereby he could be punished. When it comes to practicing "jungle methods" then the practices of our ancestry will compare very favorably with those of the ancestry of the editor of the Journal. It was only a few days ago that the class of citizens of this country to which the editor of the Journal is proud to boast of being a member, lynched a woman who was a member of another class, weaker a hundred times over both in numbers and in standing than themselves. Any man alone that will abuse a woman of any race, color or class, is a brute of the lowest and most despiceable type, but for them to form a mob and lynch her is a million times more heathenish than a Hotentot in the jungles of Africa and half-starved, would think of doing. If there is so much law and order in this country then we suggest that some of those anarchistic leaders at the Dreamland Rink meeting, who argued for te lynching of Judge Hanford, learn and practice some of it. If Judge Hanford had broken the law there was a way to reach his case, why did they not resort to it, instead of assembling a mob and inciting it to riot and rebellion. We know that the articles appearing in The Seattle Republican from time to time are "written by intelligent men." but it would be a sad reflection on their intelligence if The Seattle Republican would return the compliment as to the Journal. In spite of the rantings of the opponents of Judge Hanford, nothing as yet has been brought out in the investigation to prove that a hundredth part of the hulabaloo that has been made over this matter need to have been kicked up. Granted, the judge took a drink, yes many drinks, even then he did no more than the average judge all over this country does. Show us the judge that does not take a drink and we will prove to your satisfaction that he is the exception and not the rule. Granted, that Judge Hanford visited the ladies, even then he does no more than any other man, and in view of the fact he is a single man, what more could be expected. It's all an attempt to make a mountain out of a mole hill because Hanford on the bench has not pleased a few wild eyed anarchists of the Oliver T. Erickson stripe, who do not know nor have never practiced the first principles of patriotism. Let's be liberal, but at all times let's be fair to cur fellow man, for Hanford is only human and does things as he sees them just as any other hard headed independent American citizen does. Triple plays are always exciting and they are doubly so when a pistol ball instead of a baseball is used. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XIV. NUMBER 12. THOSE COLORED DELEGATES. The part the "colored" delegates played in the Chicago Convention has been the topics of discussion and newspaper comment throughout Christendom. If they did a hundredth part toward bringing about the nomination of President Taft that they have been credited with, then they after all were the real men of that convention, and the Roosevelt-La Follette adherents should have sought to put "colored" delegates in charge of their respective presidential campaigns, instead of those who were. They would have done well to have said as did Abraham Lincoln, when informed by Grant's critics, he was drunk the most of the time, "Tell me what kind of whiskey he uses that I may send a lot of it to more of the Union generals," was the cutting reply of the man of sorrow. There were 66 colored delegates in the Chicago Convention all from the south and of that number sixteen were for Roosevelt and openly fought Taft. If then the fifty "colored delegates, who represented nothing, which is a fact) as argued a leading paper, did all this, then the country has not seen their equal in valor and political shrewdness in all her varied and various history. We do not believe the Republican party should follow in the foot steps of the Democratic party and disfranchise the colored voter of the South, but we do argue and contend that the Republican party should cut down the base of representation in the South in proportion to the votes cast for members of the electoral college. If this was done then there would be fewer colored or white delegates in the National Republican Convention that nominated presidents from the South, where there are no Republicans, in the general elections, and at the same time there would be fewer votes from the South in the electoral college to elect a president. The colored man has peaceably submitted to his disfranchisement, but he is not responsible for it taking a thousand per cent mor evotes in the North to elect a member of Congress than it does in the South. Quit cussing the "niggers" of the South for a condition that you yourself refused to remedy because you did not want to hurt the feelings of the Southern Democrats, who would lose, if represented in Congress in proportion to the votes cast for their candidates, more than fifty per cent of their present number. We believe the eclored vote of the North is going to be loyal to Taft in the November election, if for no other reason than because he showed more real friendship toward them than either Roosevelt or Woodrow Wilson. It's well that the Democratic party starts out with a Marshal for the protection of Wilson as the wild "ass" is liable to run amuck before the battle is over and a cool headed captain to marshall the disorganized forces will be essentially necessary. POLITICS AND POLITICIANS i te has no intention of pulling of the fighting: celcthes he donned to put T, R. down for the eount. When informed that Woodrow Wil- son had been nominated by the Democrats he said: Wilson is a hard man to beat and Taft will have to go some to turn the trick, but the Republicans made a long step to- ward success when they eliminated Roose- velt from the party at Chicago and they ean now buckle on their armors and go into the battle with a million times greater de- termination to win than they could have done with him hanging over their heads like a great black pallor. “Taft can win and Taft will win. The Republican party is in no worse condition now than it was in 1896, when McKinley first ran for president, yea if as bad, and half as determined fight made now as was at that time will bring Taft safely to the goal. You can hear considerable anti-Taft talk now, but befcre the eletcion Republicans will realize that, the election of a Democrat will not remedy either the real or fancied wrongs, of which they so bitterly complain, and they will quietly vote for their party nominee. Republicans at heart are Repub- lieans and are never Democrats, and though Woodrow Wilson may get scme alleged Re- publican votes he will get very few Repub- lican votes. There is no doubt but that Roosevelt has many admirers and support- ers, but the rank and file of his supporters are Republicans, and when they discover that he is seeking to wreck the Republican party by eletecing a Democrat to the presi- dency in order that he can be eleteed four years later then they will fade from him like snow before a June day sun.’’ Mr. Dovell did splendid work in the Chicago Convention and presented the case of the Washington delegation in a masterly man- ner, ‘After his presentation it is very doubt- ful if a committee favorable to Roosevelt himself would have seated the delegates of the rump ccnvention from Washington. The fight for the election is now on and every Republican should do his duty and, if he does, vietory will be ours as it has been for the past half century. se * W. H. Paulhamus, the Sumner berry king, repudiates the late Chicago Convention and pronounces it un-Republican. If any man in the state is authority on what is un-Re- publican Senator Paulhamus ought te be for he has gone off with every ism that has split away from the Republican party sinee he has been in the state, but in saying the Chicago Convention was not Republican we fear he has used his populistic balances in which to weigh the Republican merits of the Chicago Convention, in which case the test is a great deal worse than the article in question. But for a’ that Senator Paulha- mus is exceedingly popular and if he runs for governor on a Roosevelt ticket he will make his opponents hard to catch. +. * #& Governor West personally led a squad of national enards that raided a road hcuse the mayor and chief of police of Portland were recently indicted and in view of the fact the sheriff and prosecuting attorney of Multnomah county refused to elese the road house, it is highly probable that a grand jury will be summoned and those officials likewise indicted or the governor take the bull by the horns and remove them from of- fice. **. * & Governor Myron E, Hay in opening his campaign in Seattle to a coterie of rather carefully selected delegation said among many other things that his critics were wrong in saying that he had caused to be expended $40,000 on the erection of the su- perintendent’s residence at Monroe, It had only cost $24,000 and one more person be- side the superintendent resided therein (which might have been a high priced serv- ant), and that it was by no means as fine as it has been pictured. In private life the most of us are tickled to death to live in a 44,000 residence, and we suspect that the superintendent of the Monroe reformatory never lived in a more expensive one until h went to work for the state. To expend evn $24,000 on such a residence is a wilful waste of the tax payers’ money and in this so is it wasted all down the line, but Gov. Hay has done no more in this than do all men eletced to handle the people’s money, all of which accounts for the exhorbitant taxes property holders have to pay, which makes it a hundred per cent cheaper to rent than to own a home, This criticism of Gov. Hay’s official act is no indication that this paper is for or against his election, but be- ing a free lance we have no hesitancy in sayng to him and others they are entirely too liberal in dishing out the tax payers’ money. It eame under our observation a few days ago that a former state printer cleaned up over $100,000 in four years and returned to his home with more cash money in hand than he had ever dreamed of having and that the present state printer is reaping a like harvest. Of course taxes are high and they will be still higher if the same pace is kept up. ** «# Oliver T. Erickson, a Seattle councilman, who aspires to the governorship of the state of Washington, told the Hanford investiga- tors a great cock and bull story about Han- ford’s drunkenness on the bench. ‘Telling raw-hide and bloody bones stories is charac- teristic of Erickson, but Seattle folk have heard them so frequently that they no longer if ever, take any stock in them, The fact of the matter is Erickson is sore because he failed to get gubernatorial prominence at Hanford’s expense, Erickson may not be an anarchist, but he is far from being an ideal American citizen and for that reason unfit to hold any kind of office in the United States. * * * James Hamilton Lewis was given much James Hamilton Lewis was given much publicity at the Baltimore Convention, all of which, it can be said without fear of suc- cessful contradiction, he greatly enjoyed. While nice things said about him are always pleasing and appreciated, yet rather than to not be mentioned at all in the newspapers Lewis is more than willing to take some se- vere cussing, Years ago when he was a candi- date to succeed himself in Congress he said to the publisher hereof, ‘‘What I want in this campaign is newspaper notoriety, whether what is said be good or bad. If the news- papers do not talk about me I will fall of my own weight.’’ Lewis is a candidate for the United States senate from Illinois at present and he imagines the publicity he is now getting will help him in his fight. * *. * Charles E. Claypool, like Banco’s ghost will not down, and he is now again seeking to break into Congress. A number of al- leged Republicans are seeking the nomina- tion for representative in Congress from the second Congressional district, but according to Claypool’s political version, no real Re- publican had announced his candidacy, and believing there is an opportunity for a real Republican to get the real Republican votes of the district prompts him to throw his hat into the ring. At the late Aberdeen con- vention Charley Claypool came next to Sen- ator Wilson as a Republican star. His speech before the convention was a political gem and he was roundly applauded. * *. * B. W. Brintnall, who was killed by F. F. Williamson, who immediately committed suicide, seems to have played the game, by whieh he amassed a fortune, one time too many and paid the penalty with his life. He belonged to that class of American deal- ers, who never dealt with a fellow man with- out besting him. His methods of placing unemployed schocl teachers in schools were frequently questioned during his career, but he only winked the other eye and moved on in the even tenor of his way. Whether or not he bested Williamson in the timberland deal sufficiently to drive him, Williamson, to desperation, has not been brought out, but everything seems to pcint that way. If he grew rich and opulent by preying upon the misfortunes of others, then his violent ending is no more than could have been ex- pected. s ¢ @ James T. Blackistone is dead, and a bully good fellow has joined the unnumbered host of the Great Beyond. While he lived he tried to do the best he could for human up- lift, but if he fell short in any of his efforts it was an error of the head and not of the heart. He always played the game of politics, but played it more for the excitement in it than for selfish gain or sinister motives. Four years ago he took up the Taft fight in Wash- ington and he was a strong spoke in the wheel that sent a Taft delegation to Chi- cago. He was independent and outspoken, which was responsible for him not develop- ing into a public idol, but those who were aequainted with him knew his worth and al- ways stayed by him in his undertakings and they now sadly mourn his demise. China’s minister of finance has sent ulti- China’s minister of finance has sent ulti- matum to foreign bankers in demand that they deliver $3,000,000 on Monday, or that negotiations will be broken off. Impth for the Old-Time Me Old German D stein Kopfweh" German Lager, which increases in popularity season after impth for the old-time methods of beer making—a case forward to gain miles forward in the production of claim magnitude of plant—we claim simplicity. Other are extra sanitation—we make all these claim, and cl so quality—and the proof and the secret of our superi the bottle that bears the label—Old German Lager. German Lager is a rare combination of Bohemian hops is stored and properly aged by time—not forced artifi but aged only by natural methods, giving us a pro entirely lacking the bitterness so often found in bottled domestic hops, under modern methods. Increasing patronage is due, we believe, to our superior been compelled to double our storage capacity used in Lager. Who wish to enjoy a table beer made under these ideas used—or lagered—will find Old German Lager in pints scores—or telephone the plant, Sidney 75. German Lager delivered to all parts of the Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2.00, refund of 50c for bottles Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $3.20, refund of 70c for bottles Dependent Brewing ATriumpth for the Old-Time Methods Old German Lager, which increases in popularity season after season, is surely a triumph for the old-time methods of beer making—a case of stepping a foot backward to gain miles forward in the production of the perfect beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—we claim simplicity. Others claim pure water, some extra sanitation—we make all these claim, and challenge any and all as to quality—and the proof and the secret of our superiority will be found in the bottle that bears the label—Old German Lager. Old German Lager is a rare combination of Bohemian hops and selected malt, and is stored and properly aged by time—not forced artificially or mechanically—but aged only by natural methods, giving us a product that is pure and entirely lacking the bitterness so often found in bottled beers made largely of domestic hops, under modern methods. Our increasing patronage is due, we believe, to our superior product, and we have been compelled to double our storage capacity used for ageing Old German Lager. Those who wish to enjoy a table beer made under these ideal conditions, properly aged—or lagered—will find Old German Lager in pints or quarts at all liquor stores—or telephone the plant, Sidney 75. Old German Lager delivered to all parts of the City Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2.00, refund of 50c for bottles Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $3.20, refund of 70c for bottles TELEPHONE, SIDNEY 75 Seattle, - - - Washington --- FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912. SHORT. SHARP SHOTS The Chicago wood-pile was full of them. New York Herald. The standing Army will proceed to sit down on the Cuban revolutionists.—Atlanta Constitution. Must be goat's milk that Teddy drinks, judging by his proclivity to butt in.—Florida Times-Union. Seems strange, but we have not yet heard of any contesting delegates from the Ananias Club.—Philadelphia Inquirer. With the National Committee as referee we believe, Mr. Taft would never lose a golf game, either.—St. Louis Republican. Have an idea that some of these Congressmen who object to an early adjournment don't dare go home.—Philadelphia Inquirer. Any Chicago man, whether the director of a zoo or not, is able to talk interestingly about wild animals now.—St. Louis Republic. Instead of these comic-opera troubles, why should not Cuba, in time, play a star in the American flag?—Philadelphia North American. Understand that Boston wants Dr. Wiley as health officer. Aha! Found a way of adulterating them, have they?—Philadelphia Inquirer. Chicago authorities should resits to the utmost any effort to drag the local police force permanently into national politics. Washington Star. Alleged discovery of steam-roller bandits in Chicago looks like an effort to keep up with the stories of automobile brigands in Paris. Washington Star. Amid this talk of bribery in Chicago, it would be tirrible if our national song, "Yankee Doodle," became "Yank the Boodle." Philadelphia North American. Now it is said that Eve was the first suffragette. Yes, yes; that's probably where the London suffragettes first conceived the idea of raising Cain.—Detroit Letters. The Court of Commerce has collided with one of the most serious examples of contempt proceedings that the history of the judiciary has developed.—Washington Star. Rain stopped fighting in Cuba. Possibly the color line would wash out.—Philadelphia Record. Roosevelt is beginning to look upon Elihu as the Root of all evil.—Baltimore Evening Sun. A man named Tumbo of Oklahoma is mentioned for vice-president. It is not Bwano, tho.—Omaha Bee. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN T. R. is all right if it is Tariff Revision. Florida Times-Union. Financing revolutions seems to be another profitable American industry. Florida Times-Union. Our notion of wasted effort is the job of cross-examining John D. Rockefeller.—Milwaukee Sentinel. Recent event have demonstrated the futility of counting one's delegates before they are seated.—Philadelphia Inquirer. Dr. Wiley declines to become chief of Boston's health department, but not because he doesn't know beans.—Milwaukee Sentinel. Talking of Olympic races, it's the only way any European nation can make Americans run.—Philadelphia North American. Mr. Hink Dink of Chicago may be discovering that there are things about practical politics that he did not know.—Washington Star. The census bureau announces that there are 2,836,773 voters in New York state, but fails to show how many are living.—Columbia State. A Triumpth for the A Fact--- "Es Giebt Kein Kopfweh" Old German Lager, which increases surely a triumph for the old-time metre a foot backward to gain miles for beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—water, some extra sanitation—we must and all as to quality—and the proof is found in the bottle that bears the last. Old German Lager is a rare commal talt, and is stored and properly aged chanically—but aged only by natural pure and entirely lacking the bitterness largely of domestic hops, under mode. Our increasing patronage is due, we have been compelled to double Old German Lager. Those who wish to enjoy a table properly aged—or lagered—will find all liquor stores—or telephone the pla Old German Lager deliver Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2 Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $ Independent --- A Fact---- When Senator Lorimer has finished his senatorial career he can make a fortune as an advertisement for a brand of glue.—Milwaukee Sentinel. The estimate that $6,000,000 is spent for golf-balls annually in this country illustrates one phase of the conditions that create a higher cost of living.—New York World. Until Hon. Bill Flinn rounded into his true form we didn't realize that Pennsylvania had any great patriotic leaders except Mr. Hans Wagner.—Columbus Ohio State Journal. Professor Metchnikoff's new remedy to prevent old age will hardly work. The only sure way to secure this result is to die young. Philadelphia North American. After it is all over, it will be almost like a vacation to Senator Dixon and Mr. McKinley to be able to tell the truth.—Columbus Ohio State Journal. The University of Missouri offers a prize of $250 for the best essay on "Why Life on the Farm Is Ideal." Here is a chance for some fellow who lives in a flat to win some easy money.—Toledo Blade. Old-Time Methods In popularity season after season, is method of beer making—a case of stepping ward in the production of the perfect have claim simplicity. Others claim pure take all these claim, and challenge any and the secret of our superiority will be del—Old German Lager. Distribution of Bohemian hops and selected by time—not forced artificially or me- methods, giving us a product that is so often found in bottled beers made in methods. We believe, to our superior product, and our storage capacity used for ageing beer made under these ideal conditions, Old German Lager in pints or quarts at t, Sidney 75. Refund to all parts of the City 00, refund of 50c for bottles .20, refund of 70c for bottles Brewing Co. --- 3 Uncle S'am’s Three Central Characters TN RN at Woodrew Wilson, the Democratic nom- inee for president of the United States, is a brilliant example of young America doing things. But yesterday, comparatively speak- ing, he was only an ordinary pedagogue passing the humdrum life of teaching young America how to shoot, and apparently with no greater future than the ten thousand and one cther school teachers of this country, who are but passingly remembered by former pupils and understudies and never even known of by the great business world. Woodrow Wilson tired of such a life and to the surprise of those who knew him best launched his office seeking craft upon the dark and foreboding waters of the sea cf politics and sought the governorship of New Jersey, which he found and captured in- spite of opposition from within his party on account of being an unknown in polities, and from withcut because he was calamity in- clined. He had no sooner gotten that into his grasp than he steered his office seeking craft straight for the presidential gulf, and though he was frequently warned while en route thereto that his craft was entirely too frail to brave the waters of such a tempest- tossed gulf, yet he heeded not the warning but sailed in. At times it looked as if his craft had gone down never again te rise, but it weathered the storm and he now stands at the head of his party and not a badly di- vided party at that, and even Republicans say, he stands a mighty good chance of sue- ceeding President Taft. Whether or not T. R. will continue a presidential candidate since Wilson’s nomination is a question, He would increase Wilson’s chances of election tc continue a candidate and increase Taft’s chances of election to lay down. Then the paramount question with Roosevelt is, ‘‘Am I for a Democratic or a Republican president ?”’ In all probability he will choose the former, as a Democrat in the White House would so badly demoralize the Republicans that in four years they weuld be ready and willing to seek T, R. as a political savior. The fight for the election regardless of Roosevelt’s actions will be a hotly contested one and the Republicans will dispute every inch of space gained by the Democrats and their ally Ted- dy Roosevelt. Things got reversed down in Portland, Oregon, the other day when Governor West mixed in and Rush light got a light rush for red lighting. Mt. Vernon for me, chants the Washing- ton editor just now, for it means a gcod feed, something that seldom comes his way. “Fourth, yu lie,’’ softly murmured the Hanford investigation committee to the test- fiers, and a recess is ordered. It might not be out of order at this time to announce that John W. Roberts has been the safety valve in Bob Hodge’s office. Is Poindexter a Demcerat, asks an ex- change, He has never been anything else. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN William Howard Taft is jubilant over his re-nominaticn and he should be for his ad- vocates have won a signal victory the criti- cisms of the Roosevelt adherents to the con- trary notwithstanding. While President Taft is not the type of man about whom his fellowmen go wild with enthusiasm, yet he is the type of man on whose words every man can absolutely bank. There are men who accomplish the most in their efforts to uplift their fellowmen in their own quiet way and religiously avoid every form of publicity and public demonstration and Taft is just such a man. It is common to hear the ecrities of President Taft say, ‘Taft is a man that you cannot warm up to, and he can’t warm up to you.’’ There is no doubt of it, but that in no wise destroys his use- fulness as a publie benefactor and a chief executive. Comparison with the records of former presidents of the United States will prove beyond a question cf doubt that Pres- ident Taft has been instrumental in having more measures of relief passed by Congress and been directly responsible for more re- lief measures put in operation by his sub- ordinates than any other president serv- ing his first term and seeking a second. That he has blundered and that he has tried at times to play polities is not denied, but, everybody is doing it, and, why expect more of him, Had the present law been changed so that the president could get but one term and that six instead of four years, there is no doubt but that President Taft would have gone down in history as one of the country’s greatest presidents. Give Mr. ‘Taft a second term and in our opinicn the next four years in the United States will be one of her golden eras for all manner of man, In listening to the carping erities of President Taft it’s amusing to hear the So- cialist haranger on one street corner de- nouncing him as the pliant tool of the trusts, and cn the other corner men of money de- nouncing him as a populist demagogue, who is constantly driving English capital for in- vestment in the country out, The men of vast money of this country were not for Taft be- fore the Chieago Convention and we doubt if they are for him now if they think Roose- velt has the remotest chance of breaking into the White House. Both of these ex- tremes were inclined to favor Roosevelt be- fore the convention and if they had have gotten their wish, plainly speaking, the great middle class would have been in one ‘hell of a fix.’’ In spite of all that has been and will be said detrimental to Taft’s see- end term he is the man of the hour and the man that will give the country real pros- perity. Dollars to doughnuts, the Star will sup- port Wilson instead of Roosevelt for pres- ident, its foul mouthings in favor of Roose- velt to the contrary notwithstanding, That stinking little newspaper misfit is ‘always for the people,’’ when there is no campaign on, but always for the Democratic nominees in the campaign unless there is one Repub- lican running that pungles up the coin to it. FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912. John Arthur Johnson, Uncle Sam’s schwartze pugilist, has again demonstrated that, the Fourth of July is as much a black man’s day in the United States of America as it is a white man’s, if he only goes at it in the right way. Another White Hope bit the dust down in New Mexico on the glorious Fourth, and as a result the black Jack has returned to Chicago something like $100,000 better off and with no apparent knowledge of having gotten it by fistie fighting. The bluff put up by Flinn to wrench the championship from Johnson ‘was so ridiculous and so much of a farce comedy that his friends should have him arrested for obtaining money under false pretenses. He had no more show of winning, nor was no more a competitor for Johnson than Johnson would be in a cage with a wild lion that had not eaten for two weeks. Flynn simply tried to butt into a class that he had no fitness to stay in and that same propensity followed him into the roped arena when he faced Johnson, for when he realized he could not fight, then he tried to butt Johnson out. The three big men of the United States today are William Howard Taft, Thomas Woodrow Wilson and John Arthur Johnson. Taft, because he was renominated and put Roosevelt to sleep; Wilson, because he was nominated for president by the Democrats in spite of the bosses and Bryan was a losing dark horse; Johnson, because he is the un- disputed fistie champion of the world, and there is no Hope in sight to even make him look like he might lose his title, and that he takes his suecess so good naturedly. When Johnson fought Jeffries those who saw him in the ring pronounced him the most perfeet specimen of the human family in science, build and cleverness, and he seems to be holding his own. Some time ago he declared as soon as he had attended to Flynn’s wants he would be ready to whip a White Hope every week until there were no more, and if the black blackguard could put up the necessary dough he would do it to him the last week and after all he would retire for- ever from the ring. If you ean do as you say, then the world is ready and willing to say to you: ‘‘Mistah Johnsing, you’se al- right ; the world is yours.’’ Fourth of July fired away all day yester- day to the delight of Uncle Sam, Miss Co- lumbia and Young America. June marriages took the cake, but the other months’ divorcee bunch has their eye on them. Woodrow Wilson is pronounced a political wonder, which may be true, but ‘‘political wonders”’ in the past have made poor prog- ress on the road to the White House. The r got knocked out of Morphine’s name and since that time the Roosevelt boom in Washington has drepped off to sleep. If your hat should blow off and roll Away from you just let it. Stand where you are; some willing soul Will chase around an get it. Cincinnati Enquirer. YMPOSIUM SERVICE. POETIC SYMPHONY POETIC SYMPOSIUMS OF LIFE John Greenleaf Whittier. Yet, who looking backward o'er his years, Feels not his eyelids wet with grateful tears If he hath been Permitted weak and sinful as he was, To cheer and aid in some ennobling cause, His fellow men? If he hath hidden the outcast and yet in A ray of sunshine to a cell of sin. If he hath lent Strength to the weak, and, in an hour of need Over the suffering, mindless of his creed He hath not lived in vain, and while he gives The praise to Him, in whom he moves and lives, With thankful heart; He gazes backward, and with hope before, Knowing that from his works he nevermore Can henceforth part. FOR THE HOUR OF MEDITATION. "A crust and a corner that love makes precious With the smile so warm and the tears to refresh us And joy seems sweeter when tears come after, And a moan is the finest of foils for laughter, And that is life!"—Dunbar. This "Home, Sweet Home" is good to sing For it's a thrilling tune; It stirs a man like anything At midnight or at noon. Around the board, beside the fire. —Selected. Around the boa ```markdown ``` ```markdown ``` W. H. W. H. PAULHAMUS Who Leads for a State Theodore Roosevelt Party --- FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912. "We'll often go where our mother sleeps And kneel on the green turf there By that bnding willow that sadly weeps, And whisper to God our evening prayer "We shall sleep, but not forever, There shall be a glorious dawn, We shall meet to part—no never On the resurrection morn." I do not ask for glory; I do not yearn for fame; I do not want a title Appended to my name; I do not sigh for splendor; For power I do not wish; I merely want to get away A day or two to fish. —Detroit Free Press. A PRAYER IN ARMOR. Lord, give me a place in the world's great fight, The fight for the good and true; A place where the wrong outrivals the right, And there's a soldier's work to do. Make strong my heart and tender as strong, Prayer-tempered and toned for the fight; With love for the man whose monstrous I loathe, and must dare to smite. And when with earth and its strife I'm through, Let me leave it a safer place. With a clearer field for the good and the true, And the kingdom of love and grace. —Selected. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SERVICE. "HOME. SWEET HOME." Beneath the sky's blue dome, There's nothing mortals can inspire Like that old "Home. Sweet Home." But it is not enough to yell That "Home, Sweet Home" refrain, For man should practice it as well, If home shall sweet remain. It's not enough to loudly shout The old familiar air; It's something we must carry out— Boost "Home, Sweet Home" for fair. I've heard a man who sang it loud Whene'er he had a chance. He loved to yell it in a crowd And ev'ry circumstance. But when a catalog he met With lowgrade goods for sale, Then "Home, Sweet Home" he would forget And send for them by mail. If all of us should do the same— If many send their cash To help the old mail-order game— The town will go to smash. The grass will gather in the street, The crops uncut decay; And home, that once we sang as sweet, Will droop and pass away. Oh, sing that "Home, Sweet Home"'y stuff— It thrills us through and through; But singing songs is not enough— There's something else to do. Let's send no more our cash to roam To make the millionaire; Let's boost a bit for "Home, Sweet Home"'— With "Home, Sweet Home"' be square! 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84338. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 1, block 2, certificate No. B55378, year 1906, amount 73 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 2, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 91 cents for year 1908, $1.19 for year 1909, $1.78 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Josiah F. Redfield and Catherine C. Redfield, plaintiffs, vs. James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants.— No. 87223. The state of Washington to the said James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of May, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: for damages in the sum of $2,000 for personal injuries caused to the said Catherine C. Redfield on the 9th day of December, A.D. 1911, while in the employ of defendants as waitress in their cafe, in the City of Seattle, County and State aforesaid. Which is more fully and particularly described in the complaint in said cause on file in the aforesaid Superior Court. CARROLL & JOHN E. CARROLL P. P. CARROLL & JOHN E. CARROLL Attorney for Plaintiffs. P. O. Address: 77 Starr-Boyd Bldg, County of King, State of Washington, Seattle. May 17—July 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84334. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 3, block 2, certificate No. B55380, year 1906, amount 73 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 3, block 2, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 91 cents for year 1908, $1.19 for year 1909, $1.78 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION Attorney for Plantin. Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Everett Smith, deceased.—No. 13245. Chas. S. Follett, administrator of the estate of Everett Smith, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Everett Smith, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 15th day of July, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 15th day of July, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of June, 1912. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Administrator. 229 Burke Block, City. June 7-July 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Seth H. Morford, Plaintiff, vs. Albert J. D'Aoust, and the West Coast Securities Company, a corporation; H. L. Green, Defendants. No. ---. Publication Summons. State of Washington, to the said Albert J. D'Aoust and West Coast Securities Company, and H. L. Green NOTICE: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 5th day of July, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer ahe complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the clerk in the above entitled court, a copy of which is hereby served upon you by publication. The object of this suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by Albert J. D'Aoust to H. L. Green on the 26th day of May, 1911, on Lot three (3), in Block forty-three (43) of H. E. Orr Park Division number four (4). REEVES AYLMORE, Jr. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant—No. 88043. as, defendant.—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above real property, to-wit; FRED J. RICE. entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. REPUBLICAN LEGALS—June 28—noah IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. J. S. King, plaintiff, vs. Thomas Mickel, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 87073. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of thirteen certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of September, 1902, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lots one to nine, inclusive, and lots 38 to 41 inclusive, all in block 39, River Park of King County, Wash.; the numbers of the certificates being B14824 to B14836 inclusive; of the year 1900, for and upon each of the above described lots in the sum of ninety-one cents, the amount of taxes, interest and cost, on each of the above described and numbered certificates. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; Upon each of said lots there was paid, including principal and interest to April, 1, 1912, the sum of $18.49, excepting upon lot 1 there was paid principal and interest as above the sum of $18.82, and upon each of lots 40 and 41 there was paid the sum of $18.53. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said 1st day of April, 1912, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, 60 days after the 28th day of June, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest the costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 1224 Alaska Building: 50th St., Washington. First publication dated June 28th, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Minnie A. Reay, plaintiff, vs. John Reay, defendant No. _____ The State of Washington to the said John Reay, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against your according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of two years. A. J. ALLEN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Summons for Publication. A. P. Wickstrom, derendant: You are hereby summoned to appear J. S. KING, Plaintiff. FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912 within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than three years last past. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. Nettie L. Slocum, plaintiff, vs. Roy D. Curtis, defendant.-No. 27907. State of Washington, County of King --ss: The State of Washington to Roy D. Curtis: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that said plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 29th day of July, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to establish a claim against you for Ninety and 35-100 Dollars ($90.55) upon account; and in said action garnishment has been directed to Burke & Farrar, Inc., a corporation of Seattle, Washington, to hold and apply upon your said indebtedness, any personal property in their possession or control, belonging to you, and any indebtedness owing from them to you. Complaint filed June 14th, A. D. 1912. Dated June 28th, 1912. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. June 28—July 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Bert E. Bailey, Deceased. No. 14109. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of June, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, Minnie Bailey, Administratrix of said estate, at 703 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 5, 1912. MINNIE BAILEY, As Administratrix of said Estate. HENRY S. NOON, Attorney for Estate, 703 New York Blk., Seattle, Wn. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson, Deceased. No. 6998. Administratrix's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that I will sell at private sale to the highest and best bidder for cash, the following described real estate situated in King county, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 13, Madison Park Addition to the City of Seattle. Also Lot 22, Block 18, Latona Addition to the City of Seattle. Said real estate will be sold in parcels or tracts as indicated in the foregoing paragraphs, and all bids for the same must be made in writing, accompanied by certified checks or cash for at least 10 per cent of the amount bid, and addressed to the undersigned administratrix, Minnie Thompson McCarty, at Room 10 Haller Building, Seattle, Washington, said administratrix reserving the right to reject any and all bids, said sale to be made on and after Monday, the 22nd day of July, 1912. MINNIE THOMPSON McCARTY, Administratrix of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson, Deceased. July. 5—July 19. 1912. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Joseph Cass, Plaintiff, vs. Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 10th day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff and against defendant on the grounds of abandonment and desertion for more than two years. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Elder Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 10—June 28, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Buckwell, Defendant: Cyril D. Buckwerth You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Ida L. B. Hewlett, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph F. Hewlett, Defendant. No. 88539 Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the Defendant, Ralph F. Hewlett: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action, answer the complaint of the complainant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitlement court. The object of the above entitled act is a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony, and the restoration of the plaintiff's maiden name of Ida L. Burnard. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice and Office Address: 307 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons, by Publication. Summons by Publication Elizabeth Sorge, plaintiff, vs. Frederick Sorge, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Frederick Sorge, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, tow- it: Within sixty days after the 3rd day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you acco- ding to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and drunkenness. NICHOLAS SCHMITT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address and office, 412 Pacific Block, Seattle, King Co., Wash. May 3—June 21, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named Otto O. Weber, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney—for plaintiff — at his office below THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and for the custody of their minor child, Erma. E. W. HOWELL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 657 New York Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of G. W. Carr, Deceased. No. 13948. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of June, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to William J. Carr, executor of said estate, at Gig Harbor, Mason county, Washington, the place of business of said estate, executor, or to the clerk of the above entitled court, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be parured. Date of first publication, June 14th, 1912. June 14—July 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. F. A. Calfee, Plaintiff, vs. Milo H. Sanders, his wife, C. P. Hosch and Nellie M. Hosch, his wife, Eugene T. Mort, and Lucetta Mort, his wife, and Frank Myers, and W. E. White, Defendants. No. —, Publication Summons. The State of Washington, to Milo H. Sanders, and Alta M. Sanders, his wife; C. P. Hosch and Nellie M. Hosch, his wife; Frank Myers and E. W. White, Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 14th day of June, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The objects of this proceeding are to foreclose the mortgage upon Lots eight (8) and nine (9), in Block twelve (12) of Petitt's University Addition to the City of Seattle, said mortgage given to secure a note executed by Alta M. Sanders and Milo H. Sanders, under date October 15th, 1912. OCTOBER 10, 1912 REEVES AYLMORE, JR., Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons for Publication. William J. Parry, plaintiff, vs. Ellen Berry, defendant. No. 88502. Parry, defendant. No. 88502. The State of Washinton to the said Ellen Parry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha McClintock, deceased.—No. 8326. James McClintock, administrator of the estate of Martha McClintock, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martha McClintock, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court, on the 22nd day of July, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 22nd day of July, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. A. W. FRAILK, Judge. State of Washington, County of King —ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 14th day of June, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Martha McCuntock, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 14th day of June, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Jessie Holt, plaintiff, vs. James E. Holt, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said James E. Holt, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 21st day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce upon the grounds of desertion, excessive drinking and non-support. MONCRIEFFE CAMERON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, No. 323 Central Building, Seattle, Washing- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. J. W. Brown and Kate Easson, plaintiffs, vs. Venetia Harlan, and John Doe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown; Albin R. Seiler, and Jane Doe Seiler, his wife, whose name is unknown, and Herbert S. Upper, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest in the hereinafter described real estate, defendants.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said Venetia Harlan otherwise named Mrs. Venetia Harlan), John Doe, her husband, if any whose true Christian name is unknown; Albin R. Seiler (otherwise named Albin Robert Seiler, and Jane Doe Seiler, his wife, if any whose true Christian name is unknown; Herbert S. Upper, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest in the hereinafter described real estate defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, sixty days after the 21st day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, and decree be entered and rendered, according to the demands of the complaint, now on file in this court in the office of the clerk thereof, and a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The object of this action is to quiet plaintiffs' title in and to the southwest $ \frac{1}{4} $ of southwest $ \frac{1}{4} $ of northeast $ \frac{1}{4} $ of section 3, township 24, north of range 5, east of the W. M. in King County, Washington. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 620 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. C. A. Holtz, plaintiff, vs. Mabel C. Payne and unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— No. 88359. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 12th day of January, 1912, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Hiawatha Park addition, lot 42, block 2, certificate No. B76913, years 1907-8-9, amount, $7.95; Hiawatha Park addition, lot 43, block 2, certificate No. B76914, years 1907-8-9, amount, $7.95. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 42, block 2. Hiawatha Park addition amount. $1.82, for year 1910; lot 2 43, block 2, Hiawatha Park addition, amount, $1.82, for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, being June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecollsing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. C. A. HOLTZ, Plaintiff. A. D. McCLEVERTY. A. D. McCLEVERY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 501 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Wash. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84341. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 4, block 9, certificate No. B55387, year 1906, amount, 75 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 4, block 9, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 76 cents for year 1908, $1.00 for year 1909, $1.57 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sad date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Emma Chicoine, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Chicoine, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Louis Chicoine, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of May, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: An action for divorce on account of nonsupport and abandonment for more than one year. OLIVER ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 520-1 Lumber Exchange Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. May 24—July 12, 1912. IMPORTANT TO LAWYERS lawyer, you know what it means in notices. You get ready for you you find your affidavit of public close your temper and say things in day School nor look well in print so The Seattle Republican you would not have to go to confessio Creator. The Seattle Republic means all of it in legal matters, which means a whole week of you have a notice for publication If you are a lawyer, you know what it means to get good service in your publication notices. You get ready for your day in court and at the last minute you find your affidavit of publication has not been made, you rightly lose your temper and say things that would neither sound well in Sunday School nor look well in print. If you had have given the notice to The Seattle Republican you would have had no such worry and would not have to go to confession in order to get right with your Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and painstaking, which means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices until Friday noon, which means a whole week over Saturday publications. When you have a notice for publication, call Main 305. "IT Makes The Mountain Smile" Rainier BEER Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. 8 "I PROTEST." To sit in silence when we should protest Makes cowards out of men. The human race Has climbed on protest. Had no voice been raised Against injustice, ignorance and lust, The inquisition still would serve the law, And guillotines decide our least disputes. The few who dare must speak and speak again No vested power in this great day and land Can gag or throttle. Press and voice may cry Loud disapproval of existing ills; May criticise oppression and condemn The lawlessness of wealth-protecting laws That let the children and child-bearers toil To purchase ease for idle millionaires. Therefore I do protest against the boast Of independence in this mighty land. Call no chain strong which holds one rusted link Until the manacled slim wrists of babes Are loosed to toss in childish sport and glee; Until the mother bears no burden, save The precious one beneath her heart, until God's soil is rescued from the clutch of greed. —Ella Wheeler Wilcox. YOU NEVER CAN TELL He rocked the boat one summer day. The boat refused to tip. He reached old age and passed away A victim of the pip. A fool there was who gazed into The muzzle of a gun. His age was then but twenty-two; He died at eighty-one. He skated where the ice was week When he was but a lad. And now he is an aged geek. And grown men call him "dad." Of dynamite he had a store. He placed it by the fire. But it was twenty years before He played a golden lyre. And then there was a careful guy Whose ways were wise and prim, And from a cloudless summer sky An airship fell on him. —Milwaukee Sentinel If there be some weaker one, Give me strength to help him on. If a blinder soul there be, Let me guide him nearer Thee; Make my mortal dreams come true With the work I fain would do; Clothe with life the weak intent, Let me be the thing I meant; Let me find in Thy employ, Peace that dearer is than joy; Out of self to love be led, And to heaven acelimated, Until all things sweet and good Seem my natural habitude. —Whittier. —Whittier THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN --- I know what it means to get good news. You get ready for your day in court your affidavit of publication has no temper and say things that would not look well in print. If you have little Republican you would have to have to go to confession in order. The Seattle Republican is prompt of it in legal matters. It takes me a whole week over Saturday notice for publication, call Main 3 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, --- FRIDAY, JULY 5, 1912. MEANS to get good service for your day in court and publication has not been things that would neither in print. If you had have you would have had no confession in order to get publican is prompt and matters. It takes notices week over Saturday publication, call Main 305. 423 Epler Block.