Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1912. CURRENT COMMENT CURRENT COMMENT Single Copies, 10 Cents. That man or woman that shouts the longest and loudest for the dear people always bears the closest watching Teddy Roosevelt by the people. "I Coming Tuesday. am for the people," 999 times out of 1000 Teddy Roosevelt Coming Tuesday. has a proviso attached thereto, which, when interpreted, means providing the people will elect me to an office. Next Tuesday Theodore Roosevelt, the monumental political faker of the age, will beat the air and paw the earth in Seattle in his efforts to convince the people that, "I am for the people, the people must rule (through me)," and like epigramatic imposters, but this mighty effort that he is putting forth to protect the people is all done to put Roosevelt back into office. He has held office the major part of his life and while "I was in office" the people got all that was coming to them. In other words, Roosevelt is the people and the so-called people are but so many pawns upon the chess board to be moved, placed and corralled at "my sweet will." If Roosevelt is for the people why did he not wait until the people demanded his presence? The world has never seen a more dangerous character than Theodore Roosevelt, nor has this Republic ever had a man that bears the watching that does he. ration may have been the early stages of organized labor, but such demonstrations have outlived their day of usefulness, and each Lifeless Marches No Longer Needed. year the public shows less and less interest in those long, lifeless marches. The principles of organized labor are part of the organic body of this country now and acknowledged by all persons, and there is no probability of it going backward, if honest and straightforward men are kept at its head. The principles of organized labor are so much a part of the fundamental principles of this government now that the middle man is being ground into atoms between the capitalistic mill stone and the organized labor mill stone, or more plainly speaking, it's a drag and a draw as to whether the capitalistic trust or the organized labor trust is the most dangerous to the perpetuation of the free institutions of the country. Charles W. Morse, who was released from the federal penitentiary that he might not die in prison, is back on Wall Street doing business at the same old stand and in the Convict Morse Is Back Home. Convict Morse Is Back Home. same old way, and shows no signs of being any the worse from his prison experi- ence. The fact of the matter is, Morse never deserved the consideration that he got, and the surgeon and physician that recommended his release, on the grounds that he could not live more than two or three months, must have been bribed, so to speak. If Morse had been a pauper no such recommendation would have been made for him. Some statesmen, Gladstone, perhaps, declared: "All men had their price," and we are of the opinion that the physician that recommended the release of Morse not only had his price, but verily got his price. For a short time after his release Morse made a bluff at being sick, but that did not last long and on Wall Street today he is as active as he was in his palmiest days. Pretty well founded rumor has it that the Scripps papers of the Northwest were paid the snug sum of $25,- 000 to support the Scripps Papers Got the Mon. gubernatorial candidacy of Robert Hodge Scripps Papers Got the Mon. to pull the chestnuts of another candidate out of the fire. Should Hodge get the nomination there would be no more show of his election than a snow ball to fly through hades, and this was known to the interested parties, hence the cash masuma for the papers to support his candidacy. But what we desired to get out of the proposition is: here is chain of papers that howl six days in every week about the "downtrodden people," and yet it will sell its editorial columns, so goes the report, as quickly as it gets an opportunity. There is no doubt but that the Pacific State Telephone Company has paid for its silence on the municipal telephone proposition, and it is believed that on divers occasions in this city its blatant mouth has been shut with wads of greenbacks. grouch against the coal man a mile long because the weather has been such, most Ice Man Scowls At the Coal Man. of the past summer and at the present time, as to give the coal man all the better of robbing the people. In years past, each of those personages have had an opportunity to get in his works, but this year the ice man has had awfully hard sledding, and he must be green with rage at the coal man. The coal kings in the Northwest are powerful public factors and may perhaps they by some hook or crook reached the Omnippotent Ruler and prevailed upon Him to make it hard for the coal man that they could make a little more money, as LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XIV. NUMBER 27. they needed it to buy franchises in a planet that the scientist say is inhabited, but quite cold and in need of an extra amount of fuel. Next Monday, King County will be the proud possessor of a real live fair, and from the reports that have County Fair Is been sent out by the Much Needed. officials thereof, she will have one that no County Fair Is Much Needed. citizen need feel ashamed of. County fairs are great educators of the people and do much toward stimulating the inhabitants of the section in which they are held to improve their environments. Good county fairs are not only good for the farmers, but of equal importance for the people of the cities various and towns. The persons owning homes in the country on Puget Sound have too long depended upon the farmers of California to supply the markets of the cities with fruit and vegetables and nothing will so suerly arouse them from that lethargetic state than a good, live county fair. A well-arranged county fair will prove an incentive to the man in the city eking out a miserable existence to try to get hold of a few acres of land to help supply a hungry market. It is a fact that the markets of Seattle could consume 300 per cent more chickens and eggs than they do, and in fact almost as large a per cent of every other table edible. It is hoped that the city folk will turn out to the fair, which will last the entire week, in large numbers, and it is further hoped that the country folk will also be there in equally large numbers and show to the city folk the possibilities of the Puget Sound country. The Seattle Daily Times is showing a disposition to fight the candidacy of John F. Murphy and may, perhaps, Murphy deserves the opposition of every honest publication Editor Blethen. Murphy Stung by Editor Blethen. in the county, but the fact is Blethen opposing Murphy will not cost him very many votes, as no one believes, any thing that is seen in the Times of whatever nature it may be, but Murphy is getting his just desserts for not sending Editor Blethen to the penitentiary when he had an opportunity, which punishment, in the minds of a majority of the people of this state and county, Blethen richly deserved. It is the consensus of opinion that Murphy stultified his official position in refusing to sign Blethen's indictment until so ordeded by the court, and when he dismissed the criminal cases against Blethen after the indictments had been signed, it looked more so. Taking it all in all, it's a dirty mess of poisoned political purps. 2 With David McKenzie charging wholesale graft prevailing through the whole county official roster and the Dave McKenzie taxpayers being buncoed out of thousands Makes Expose. of dollars every year Dave McKenzie Makes Expose. by the various county officials and with the opposing candidates for the office of prosecuting attorney charging that official with more or less compromising deals, it begins to look as if an official stench equal to that in New York City is soon to be uncovered in King County. If there is any proof in the various charges that are being scattered about the county about official corruption, the sooner an honest grand jury is called to investigate the whole routine the better for the tax payers. Stealing is not a matter of politics, and politics should not enter into such an investigation. The public should learn the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and learn it before the election that other officials may be voted for. There is altogether too much graft among the public officials of America for the good of the government, and radical steps should be taken to clean up the whole situation and then endeavor to elect honest men to office. The United States is honey-combed with graft extending through every department of our municipal and Uncle Sam's legislative systems. General Graft. This much is evidenced by the fact that Uncle Sam's General Graft. graft is being exposed in towns, cities, counties, states and in the nation at large. Millions of dollars are being stolen every year by those who have been placed in a position of Trust and whose business it should be to guard the public from such evils. There is but one way to combat this growing menace and that is by punishing convicted offenders so severely that others will live in fear of the law. There is scarcely a greater crime than the betrayal of a public trust and robbing the whole people of public and private funds. The law should make every willful betrayal of a public trust a penitentiary offense, the degree of punishment increasing with the size of the graft or steal, and making the sentence once fixed unpardonable. The man who steals his millions and the one who spends his thousands for bribing legislators should be sent to the pen for life and made to remain there. In five years, with such laws enforced, graft and bribery would be reduced to a minimum. Until some such stringent law is placed on the statutes of every state, and until such time as the people actually want our laws enforced, we will have public officials who will steal, graft and bribe for private gain.—Exchange. Comical stories are often told of the queer situations, the homogenous racial conditions in the United States Negro-Chinese Union is from time to time Produce Jews. responsible for. Recently, J. Will Lysons, one of Washington's rising young business men, was called to New Orleans on business, and he tells the following story as being both original and true: A young colored girl had been reared by THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN a Northern white lady, who had taken up her home in that city, and every effort had been put forward to bring her up as good girls should be. She was eighteen, a beauty, and as smart as chained lightning. One day with a rather sad face she approached her "good angel" and told her she was going to leave her, which caused an awful commotion. "Yes, you have treated me fine, but I am going to get married." "In that case," came the reply, "if you are getting a nice young man that will take care of you and make you happy it is the proper thing for you to do, but who is the man you are going to marry?" "Chinese John," promptly as well as cheerfully, came the response. "My God, Janny; think of the mistake you are making by marrying a Chinaman. You will lose the respect of your own people and he has no friends for you to go with. And then think about your children." "Oh, yesm, I has thought all about that, and I know if I marry that Chinaman and have any children they will all be Jews, but Jews ain't bad folks." She married the Chink. Despite the fact the Jews are very wealthy all through the south, and especially in New Jews Have Hard Sledding. aside by the leading white citizens almost as badly as are the Negroes. No special laws have been enacted by the legislatures regulating the actions of the Jew as have been for the Negroes, yet the social laws make of him almost as much an outcast as the Negro. Having never seen any such racial distinctions as I met in that city, it was a novel experience for me and one I will remember for a good many years yet to come. I did not do any business in the city, but the future looks good." Even in the North, racial mix-ups often occur that are sufficiently amusing to make even the proverbial Is a Jew a Indian laugh. In a White Man? Populist meeting upon Pike street some years Is a Jew a White Man? ago, as the discussion opposing the money broker and the bond-holder was being elaborated upon by each speaker, which were many, each of them delighted to compare them with the actions of the Merchant of Venice, who exacted his pound of flesh, and his Jewish propensities were forcible brought out. Among the advocates of Populism in that meeting was an ardent Jew, and after the weakness of the Jawish race had been forcibly dwelt upon, the Jew present protested at the base misrepresentations poured out upon his race and gave the Merchant of Venice story an historical lie. The last speaker, in order to square himself, jumped up and declared he meant no insult to the Jewish race. Instead of trying to insult the race, he really believed a Jew just as good as a white man. It was too good for further serious talk and the meeting broke up amid wild yells of laughter, but neither the speaker nor the Jew enjoyed the joke. FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 6. 1912 Despite the fact the Jew in the South is classed as a white man and for the most part so treated, yet The Negro Loves the Jew and the Negro often meet in a business way,yea not The Jews. The Negro Loves The Jews. only often meet, but the Negro apparently would rather do business with the Jew than the Anglo-Saxon One of the most famous streets in Memphis is Beal, on which is located hundreds of business houses owned by Jews, which street might appropriately be styled Nigger Broadway of Memphis, on account of the large number of Negroes daily seen thereon. It's amusing in the extreme to watch the Negroes pour in from the country, and even the city, on the merchants of Beal street, to make their regular household purchases, and hear them confide in each other how they are going to skin "Cheap John" in a deal. Perhaps they keep their word, but somehow or other the Jew has grown immensely rich and the Negro is but little better off than he was a decade prior, and especially those who buy on Beal street. Of the 20,000,000 school children in this country, not less than 75 per cent "need attention today for United States physical defects which Educational Notes. are prejudicial to health and which are United States Educational Notes. partially or completely remediable." This is the finding of Dr. Thomas D. Wood, professor of physical education in the Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, and published for free distribution by the United States Bureau of Education. "Careful study of statistics and estimation of all conditions leads to the following personal conclusions," writes Dr. Wood: "From $1\frac{1}{2}$ to 2 per cent, or 400,000 of these have organic heart disease. "Probably 5 per cent, 1,000,000 at least, have now or have had tuberculosis disease of the lungs. "About 5 per cent, or 1,000,000 have spinal curvature, flat foot, or some other moderate deformity serious enough to interfere to some degree with health. "Over 5 per cent, or 1,000,000, have defective hearing. "About 25 per cent, or 5,000,000, have defective vision. "About 25 per cent, or 5,000,000, are suffering from malnutrition, in many cases due in part at least to one or more of the other defects enumerated. "Over 30 per cent, or 6,000,000, have enlarged tonsils, adenoids, or enlarged cervical glands which need attention. "Over 50 per cent, or 10,000,000 (in some schools as high as 98 per cent), have defective teeth which are interfering with health. "Several millions of the children possess each, two or more of the handicapping defects. "About 100 cities in the United States have as many different kinds of organizations for the care of health in the school. "The most important of all our national resources is the health of the people. The most valuable asset in our capital of national vitality is the health of the children. "Public education is the legocila, the strategic, and the responsible agency of FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1912. the Nation, of each State, and of each com- munity for the conservation and enhance- ment of child health. “To become an effective instrument for the protection and promotion of child health, it is essential that the school should not only be a sanitary, healthful place for children, but that the various agencies in public education should be so organized that each pupil may be given the best possible opportunity to escape weakness and disease and far more to realize the attainable best in growth, in development of biological, in- tellectual, moral, social and economic pow- er.’’—Statistical. NEGROES IN THE UNITED STATES. A preliminary statement showing by states and geographic division sthe num- ber and proportion of mulattoes among the Negroes enumerated at the Thirteenth De- cennial Census of the United States, taken as of Auril 15, 1910, been issued by Census, Department of Commerce and Labor. The statisties were prepared under the direction of William C. Hunt, chief statistician for population in the Bureau of the Cencus, and are subject to revision. The statement gives gomparative figures for 1870 and 1890, no glata being available for 1880 or 1900. The term ‘‘mulatto’’ as used in the cen- sus of 1910 includes all persons, not full- blooded Negroes, who have some proportion or perceptible trace of Negro blood. The Bureau of the Census does not regard the returns as being beyond question, since the classification of Negroes as full-bloods or mulattos was necessarily to a considerable degree dependent upon the personal opinion and conseientiousness of the enumerators. The results, however, are believed to ap- proximate the facts for the country as a whole and for large aggregates. In 1910 there were in continental United States as a whole, 9,827,763 Negroes, of whom 2,050,686, or 20.9 per cent, were re- ported as mulattoes. In 1890 there were 1,182,060 mulattoes reported, or 15.2 per cent of all the Negroes, and in 1870 a total of 584,049, or 12 per cent. Thus the figures taken at their face value show that about one-fifth of all the Negroes in 1910 had some admixture of white blood, as against about one-eighth in 1870. It may be noted, however, that an increase in the mulatto element does not necessarily imply increas- ing intermixture with the whites, since the children born of marriages between blacks and mulattoes would be mulattoes, accord- ing to the census definition. The percentage of mulattoes reported va- ries widely in different states and different sections of the country. It was to be ex- pected that the percentage would be rela- tively high in those sections where the Negro population is small as compared with the total population and would be higher in the North than in the South. In general the results are in agreement with this pre- sumption. In New England, and in the East, North, Central and Pacific divisions about one-third of the Negro population were re- ported as mulattoes, while in each of the three southern divisions the proportion is only about one-fifth. In the Middle Atlantic division for some reason the percentage is not higher than it is in the Southern di- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN “es — , ee : ee | - a Gath y aie at y = JOHN H. SCHIVELY Candidate for the Republican Nomi- nation of State Insurance Com- missioner. visions. This may possibly be due to the rapid growth of Negro population in that division through immigration from the South. NOWADAYS. Folks are telling nowadays That the devil’s gone away; Ministers have caught the craze, And some preach it, strange to say. Claim it isn’t, any more, Right to think there is a hell, ‘Where the awful fires roar, And proclaim the sinner’s knell. Yet when we see On every hand, The greedy clutch That binds the land; 4 The want, distress and deep despair, It seems to us There is no doubt The devil still exists somewhere. Nowadays the fashions run To a more ‘‘free-thinking’’ view, For, no matter what you’ve done, Fires of hell won’t torture you. “‘Satan’s only just a myth, He’s not on earth,’’ they say, “Torturing the sinners with Fiery brands of hell today.’’ But when we gaze Around and see The wretchedness And poverty, The crimes, the wrongs done here and there, It seems to us The devil lives, And fires of hell must burn somewhere, For, no matter what you’ve done. —Selected. PUGET SOUND TRACTION COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Olive Street, Or phone Main 2680 - - - ~- Independent 208 amen BONNEY-WATSON CO. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly at- tended to. Telephone Elliott 13. i a tte JAMES T. LAWLER Candidate for Judge of the Superior Court King County, Washington Primary Election, Sept. 10, 1912. JOHN T. CASEY for Superior Court Judge Law Office, 449 New York Block, Seattle Main 8642 Election Sept. 10, 1912. A. R, UPRIGHT Candidate for State Land Commissioner Subject to Republican Primaries Septem- ber 10, 1912. DAVID H. COX Republican Candidate for State Treasurer Subject to Republican Primaries, Septem- ber 10, 1912. L. FRANK BROWNE Non-Partisan Candidate for Judge of Superior Court King County, Washington Primary, Sept. 10, 1912. JOHN E H.UMPHRIES Non-Partisan Candidate for Judge of Superior Court King County, Washington Primary Election Sept. 10, 1912. Nothing Counts Like Good Service LESS WORK BETTTER COOKING A CLEAN KITCHEN CLEAN FOOD LESS COST FOR FUEL USE A GAS RANGE Seattle Lighting Co. 1314 Fourth Ave. Main 6767 POLITICS AND POLITICIANS The closing week of the campaign is not nearly so exciting as was anticipated, owing to the split in the Republican party, but all parties are in better political condition than if the split had not come. The election in Vermont has by no means served as a strong stimulant to the Bull Moose party, but on the other hand has given the Republican party more hope. Despite the fact that it looks as if Roosevelt will carry the state of Washington for president, yet it is evident that the movement is on the wane, and it will have to hustle to keep alive until the 7th of November next. So far as the state and county tickets are concerned the Bull Moose party is not going to cut much ice only in spots where the Republicans make undesirable nominations. The Republicans will by an overwhelming majority nominate Myron E. Hay for governor, and owing to his concentrated strength, providing his political managers do not get drunk over his political success, the odds of election are quite in his favor. The Bull Moose candidates for governor are many and each one of them is hot at all of the others, on the grounds that they are knocking him. It is hard to say at this writing whether Lawrence, Paulhamus, Case or Hodge is the strongest, but it matters not which one proves the winner, all the others will either sulk in their tents or openly oppose his election. It's a safe bet that the gubernatorial Bull Moose candidate will not only run a poor third in the race, but he will have to hustle to lead the Socialistic candidate. The scramble for the Democratic nomination is equally strenuous as that of the Bull Moosers. The leading candidates are Bill Dumphy of Walla Walla, E. C. Million of Seattle, Hugh C. Todd of Seattle, and M. M. Godman of Whitman, and the fight at this writing seems to lay between Dumphy and Million. If either of those men should be nominated and the defeated ones forget it and support the ticket such candidate would give Gov. Hay an exciting finish. So unknown are the Republican candidates for lieutenant-governor and so little discussion are they that one would be taking his life in his hands to make a prediction as to the outcome of that fight, and yet Pillar is going to get a big first choice vote in King county, while Hart will get a big second choice vote. As said above, so little has been said about this particular nomination, that it is not discussable. Here is one of the lame points about the direct primary law, the big nominations are fought over to the last ditch while the lessor ones are forgotten and overlooked. It is almost as important to the state to have an honest, upright man as lieutenant governor as governor as he has more opportunities to job the txpyers thn the governor. So far as the nomination for secretary of state is concerned in the Republican party, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Name] KENNETH MACKINTOSH, Who is seeking the nomination for superior court judge and who, it is believed, will be one of the high men next Tuesday, so high that he will not have to make a second run. the Hay line-up promises to give Ike Howell the nomination. Senator Kline stood a chance of winning out, but he has done little or no political work, which has greatly lessened what chances he had of winning the nomination, but if Howell is nominated he will have a hard time to win at the polls as the Bull Moose candidate will be largely supported by those voters who will support Kline. There will be no let-up on Howell. Had the Post-Intelligencer kept hands off John H. Schively would have beaten Senator Fihsback two to one, but since that paper has openly opposed Mr. Schively he will have a hard fight to win the nomination and a still harder fight to win the election in case he is nominated, as it is street talk that the P.-I. is going to keep after him until it gets him, which perhaps means that either the Bull Moose candidate or the Democratic candidate will win the election for insurance commissioner. C. W. Claussen will in all human probability, win the Republican nomination for state auditor, not that he has made any effort to do so, but chiefly because his deputies and understudies have put in a good word for him all over the state, and secondly because the Hay machine favors him. Mr. Claussen has few political enemies, and since he is always Johnny on the job, there is no great disposition to turn him out so far as FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1912. TICIANS the Republicans are concerned. However, if he only wins the nomination by a narrow margin, his opponent may turn his support to the Bull Moose candidate and thereby give Mr. Claussen more trouble than he had anticipated. There is always danger as long as the voters are not counted, but it is not thought that either the Democratic or Bull Moose candidate for attorney general will give Vaughn Tanner very much alarm, although he has assumed that don't care attitude and resting on the theory that "I don't have to do anything for the fathers and mothers of the state are just dying for an opportunity to vote for me." Just such over-confident politicians are the kind that frequently get the everlasting self-conceit knocked clean out of them. If Dave Cox is nominated by the Republicans for state treasurer he will be elected by an overwhelming majority, but if Ed Meath is nominated the Bull Moose or the Democrat will have a most excellent chance of winning the fight. Meath may be rather popular among a certain class of voters, but the church element will not vote for him, which will mean his defeat. If Mrs. Josephine Preston does not beat the life out of the little "whiffling sissy" for the nomination of superintendent of schools then it will be because the average voter has no idea of the man. Mrs. Preston is a broad-gauged, liberal-minded woman, equal to cope with the school situation of the state, while Burrows, her opponent, is a political pin-head that will make the office, in case he is nominated and elected a political training ground. If he is nominated he should be defeated at the polls. If the Republicans nominate John W. Roberts for sheriff he will in all human probability be elected, but if not then the Democratic nominee, Ed Cudihee, will be elected by an overwhelming majority. Cudihee realizes that Roberts would be his most dangerous antagonist and for that reason he would rather see Thayer nominated. The fight for county clerk is a sort of kill-kenny cat fight and the Republican voter for the nomination might shut his eyes and make a choice and get as good results as if he studied the worth of the two candidates. The Bull Moose candidate is said to be in a frame-up with Sickels, one of the Republican candidates, to the effect that, if Sickles is nominated he is to lay down and if Sickles is defeated, he is to stick and Sickels is to support him. Under such conditions the Democratic candidate ought to win the election. The Republicans ought to nominate Frank A. Bell for county auditor and thereby take a long step toward cleaning out the court house ring that has pap-sucked at the court --- FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1912 house for the past twelve or more years. If Bell is not nominated then the Bull Moose or the Democratic candidate should b elected. Under all circumstances, a court house clean-up should be made. The fight for the nomination for prosecuting attorney has reached the stop-and-think stage. Some ugly charges have been recently made against John F. Murphy, and if they be but partially true, then he should be defeated so badly that he would not even remember he also ran. This paper has always been under the impression that Murphy did some good work in the clean-up a year or so ago, but according to statements by both A. G. McBride and J. Henry Denning, his work had a string to it. If the allegations of Mr. Denning be false, it's up to Mr. Murphy to not only politically deny them, but to brand the men as falsifiers and even liars. As confident as Mr. Murphy has been of renomination, today he stands in grave danger of being defeated for the nomination, and if Mr. McBride is nominated by the Bull Moosers he will still have the fight of his life to win out in case he is nominated. After due consideration we have decided to support as the ninth candidate for superior court judge, Everett Smith, who was recently appointed to that place by Gov. Hay. He has not only made good as a judge, but he is a man of high ideals and has always been a most praiseworthy citizen. Four justices of the peace are to be nominated by the Republicans for Seattle precinct and while there are a hundred and one candidates, in our opinion Justices John B. Gordon, Fred C. Brown and John E. Carroll should be renominated and likewise elected. They have all made most admirable justices and have the respect of the entire community, and there is no reason why they should not be continued in office. We believe that John B. Wright would make an excellent official and therefore recommend him as the fourth man for the place. Mr. Wright is a native son and one of the heavy property holders of the city, and will give the city a splendid administration. John W. Smart is seeking the office of constable and merits the nomination. He has been a resident of Fremont for many years and stands well in the community. He never before sought an office and being well acquainted in the city, it is the consensus of opinion that, he will be successful in his undertaking. The Seattle Republican has known Mr. Smart for many years and can cheerfully recommend him to the voters of the city for the Republican nomination of constable. Robert L. Kline has been in Seattle for the past four days and has put in some good work in the interest of his candidacy for the Republican nomination of secretary of state. The Seattle Republican knows Mr. Kline to be a man of honor and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN integrity and a man who could be approached, should he be nominated and elected secretary of state, as readily by the humblest citizen as by the banker, which thing cannot be done with Ike Howell, the appointed incumbent. Scores of labor leaders are helping Mr. Kline in his candidacy, who under no circumstances would turn their hand over for Howell. Mr. Kline will sweep the Northwest and even get a magnificent vote in Pierce county. He will get a big vote in King county and that vote ought to put him over the fence. BISMARCK'S ATTITUDE TOWARD WO MEN. "What I am I have become through my wife," Bismarck declared at a reception given in the city of Berlin. "I respect every woman who elevates us men, teaches us religion and morality, preserves our ideals, and scatters roses along the path of our earthly life. I have long wished for the co-operation of women in politics, but we are not yet advanced enough. Women should not encroach upon men, but should influence and soften them and lead them to good works. Mark my words, the day will come when women will be called to co-operate in politics. "We men are all clumsy. We Germans, especially, are bears. So are the diplomats. Moreover, if women were in politics, fewer secrets would become public, for a clever feminine mouth can keep silent. Yet in the midst of innocent conversation it understands how to extract many a secret which it keeps from us men. Women chatter so delightfully about the gravest topics that one—when one is an old donkey—fails to notice one has said more than one wished. In everything that has to do with slyness, woman is our superior." Meeting later in the day the same friends to whom he imparted these confidences, Bismarck said: "Well, probably we shall not meet again in this world. The old lion is retiring, growling, to the dark forests. My work has not been in vain. It will live, for if Germany's men become weak, Germany's women will be strong."—"London Mail." COUNTY AND CITY COURT HOUSE. The proposed $980,000 bond issue for the erection of a County Office Building, to house all County and City Officials, including the Courts, excepting the Police and Health Departments, Hospital and Jail, which are to occupy the present City Building, is one of the most important local questions to be decided by the voters at the coming election. This proposition is clearly an economical one, as the County and City are now paying for rented space, a sum which would cover the interest on the entire issue, and suffer all the inconvenience and loss from having the Departments scattered about the city. The County is deriving no income from the block of land which it owns and upon which the building is to be erected, and as the present Courte House is unfit for further use, there can be no logical argument against the issue. The building is being designed as a commercial structure, such as private enterprise would build. No attempt at determining the location of a Civic Center is being made, as the building is not designed to form a unit of any civic group, but as an office building covering the entire block bounded by Third and Fourth Avenues, James and Jefferson Streets As many stories as will be required will be erected, and the foundations will be laid for additional height, so that the finished structure will be twelve stories, covering the major portion of the block, with the central portion adequate for eight more. Thus providing a structure that can readily be disposed of to private investors at a profit to the County, when a Civic Center is voted and the County and City erect their buildings as part of the Civic group. September 6—October 25, 1912. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate Boycotting the King County Fair because Teddy Bullmoosy is going to speak therein is silly, sickly sentiment. If the charges of David McKenzie be true, then King County has entertained Mr. Graft on divers occasions. May, perhaps, Morse was dying of an incurable disease while in prison, but the disease was to get back on Wall Street. Teddy is to perform at the county fair in Seattle next Tuesday and we suppose it will be a monkey and parrot time. If the Hon. Theodore Roosevelt is to be believed, the liars in the United States are so numerous that they are countless. Friends of Victor Zednick have a Way to prevent the Thirty-fourth district from a Wray of light in the next legislature. The soap-box speelers of the Socialist party had better look to their laurels lest the Bull Moose soap-box speelers get their goat. Down East, T. R. did not get very much political encouragement, but he hopes the West will do better by him, though he is beginning to have his doubts. For the first time in the history of the state the legislature will have to elect the governor of Vermont, no one getting a majority of the votes cast for governor. If live fish is ever sold at the door the monger will have to kill them, as the average woman is too tender-hearted to kill a fish or anything else—except her husband. In the Vermont election Bryan seems to think Democratic victory for the presidency is foreshadowed. Believe me, Bryan has been seeing things for the past twenty years. Ohio has turned down the woman suffrage amendment, but adopted forty-two others not one-half so humane as the defeated one. The mother of presidents is showing little regard for her offspring. If You Have a Legal Notice, Telephone MAIN 305 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No. ---. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug, 16—Sept. 27, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant.-No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo Mauvais, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.—No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26, A. D. 1912. Dated July 15, 1912 R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant.—No. —. The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wift, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens' Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land. Application. State of Washington, County of King ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Clarence M. Austin, a bachelor, plaintiff, vs. H. F. Custance, Theodore Jensen, Rasmus Jensen, and the unknown heirs, if any, of Leonard Olet, deceased, and the unknown heirs, if any, of William Brown deceased; Johannah Maria Paulson of Krogrieve, Kingdom of Norway, and the unknown heirs, if any, of said Johannah Maria Paulson, if she be deceased; and the unknown heirs, if any, of A. Amunds, deceased; and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: "Austin's Garden Addition to the City of Seattle," as per plat thereof recorded in the auditor's office of King County, in Vol. 20 of Plats at page 48 of the records in said office, and file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; such service being deemed complete at the end of the twenty-first day from and including the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, August 23, 1912; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. WITNESS, D. K. Sickels, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 3rd day of August, A. D. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS. Date of first publication August 23, 1912. Date of last publication September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.—No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Madeline Glazier, plaintiff, vs. John W. Glazier, defendant.—No. 88021. The State of Washington to the said John W. Glazier, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 30th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support. P. O. Address 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between Thomas G. Perkins, Sam Gibson, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell under the firm name and style of Purity Cone Company, and doing business at 141 22nd Ave. North, Seattle, Wash., has been dissolved by mutual consent, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell withdrawing therefrom, and notice is hereby given that the undersigned will not be responsible for any debt incurred by said Purity Cone Company from this date. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between W. H. Simpson and C. L. Gillette, under the firm name and style of Simpson & Gillette Sign Co., at Seattle, Washington, has been dissolved, C. L. Gillette withdrawing therefrom. W. H. Simpson will continue the business under the firm name and assume all the obligations and receive all moneys due the firm. W. H. SIMPSON, C. L. GILLETTE. Dated this 25th day of May, 1911. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Julia E. Siebe, Plaintiff, vs. Harry R. Siebe, Defendant. No.——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington: To the above named defendant, Harry R. Siebe: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be re- dressed against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is: That the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant on the grounds of (1) desertion and abandonment for one year and more, and (2) nonsupport, and (3) that the minor child be awarded plaintiff, almony and costs. Date of first publication July 12, 1912. FRANK H. KNAPP, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 219 Epler Block, 813 2nd Ave., Seattle, King County, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Amidown, Jone Doe Amidown, his wife; Margaret K. Amidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Stella Ellinwood, deceased.—No. 14330. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 6. 1912 present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Clarence Ellinwood, of said estate, at 4340 11th Ave. N.E., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication August 23rd, 1912. CLARENCE ELLINWOOD, As Administrator of said Estate. FRITZ F. HARRI, Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for County of King. Charles Jenson, Plaintiff, vs. Erma E. Jenson, Defendant. No. 89538. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Kruna E. Jenson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from the defendant Erma E. Jenson, dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant on the grounds of desertion and drunkenness, and personal indignaties rendering life burdensome. Attorney for Pianifi. P. O. Address 502 Pioneer Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. September 6—October 11, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. In the Matter of the Application of the Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredge Co., a corp., to Dissolve and Disincorporate. No. 89633. Notice. The Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Co., a corporation, having filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, its petition to dissolve and disincorporate, and an order having been made by the Judge of said Court, fixing the time and place herein below stated for the hearing of said petition. Notice is hereby given, that the application and petition of said Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Company to dissolve and disincorporate will come on duly and regularly for hearing in Dept. No. 9 of the Superior Court of said State of Washington, for King County, in Seattle, Washington, on Monday, the 28th day of October, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day. Witness the Honorable Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of the above entitled court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 3rd day of Sept. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS. Clerk (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By G. A. GRAND, Deputy Clerk. Septevmebr 6—October 25, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Lena King, Deceased. No. 14508. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the fifth day of September, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate of Lena King, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Administrator of said estate, at 614 Lumber Exchange Building, the palce of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 6, 1912. GEO. S. KING, As Administrator of said Estate. RAYMOND D. HOYT, Attorney for Estate, 614 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Washington. September 6—October 4, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant.—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant. Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Winslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. Du- Boise, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 8th day of April, 1912, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 3, block 38, certificate No. B76931, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 4, block 38, certificate No. B76932, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 5, block 38, certificate No. B76933, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 6, block 38, certificate No. B76934, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 7, block 38, certificate No. B76935, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 8, block 38, certificate No. B76936, year 1908, amount $0.66. Lot. 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 4, block 38, Grove addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. McLEAN & BALLIET, Empire Bldg., Seattle. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Elder Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Harry N. Bentley, plaintiff, vs. Beatrice Young Bentley, defendant.—No. 88910. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Beatrice Young Bentley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the compaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abondment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause, for more than one (1) year. GEO. H. BAILEY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Edwin A. Huntley, plaintiff, vs. Marie Baxter Huntley, defendant—No. Baxter Huntley, defendant.—No. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the paintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer on plaintiff's attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff, Edwin A. Huntley, and the defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley, upon the grounds of cruelty and desertion. P. O. address, suite 720 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No. ——— The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered alainst you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Secon.—Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for publication. Mabel Nex, plaintiff, vs. Albert Nex, defendant—No. 88972. defendant.—No. 88912. The State of Washington to the said Albert Nex, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support for a period of more than three years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN TH E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K Dyer. You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1,650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Orva Anderson, plaintiff. vs. James B. Anderson, defendant—No. 88911. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, James B. Anderson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, with- in sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of non-support and desertion and abandonment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause for more than one year. GEO. H. BAILEY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, suite 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, pallintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. _____ The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thousand dollars ($1,000), and interest thereon at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the following real estate, to-wit, lots five (5), six (6), seventeen (17), and eighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant — No — as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. _____ The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dollars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to secure said note, on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants—No. 89294. The State of Washington to the said B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, dated August 10, 1911, to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an attorney's fee of $250.00, and for a deficiency judgment. P. O. Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August, 23-October 4, 1912. i Oe e . Rat en L ee Orr ee te aaa SS Su finns a Pei eae Te ihigeese Sane Es a be: veer Pesce eae nies a Uoetaaer Beene} at Pie hes} bead eee eae a eel sae aise ue lesa pears ay rae ae ipsa tes ae ee ee aoa alae ae eae peer cee ee Hl hci ah ieee aan Noy Sucue ee ie ee: Daag sal Gay Re eee ee te eee ae se Bes ake i eee. ae Se eats pict pbs Pak: Bae es 2 Re Lee ae is pe Fea e sa feeoke para, ail i ee ee ‘ue Se io eee Rel) Bete oe Phe: a ie ie oes ae Beh: pean ae fan. S eat eae cee ce Pci Saas AF ea ety aoe an er By ae ee BRON Sta gar eee Rees: Le ina = Bear ats aS Meme ee yer eae fiers pier a Sie Bet eats arte de sce Sale 2 ae ne Be gh org Sat rataagy 5 poe Nene Spal eee sah Nigut Shee he Ae pe a /aaeeenine a oo oi Rest et ee < i eae as eo Sere Le PEN Tiere =p i, sacs ie ee ee See ee te tag ei Mee ee a a eee eae Sa ic cree oe es cue era 1 es ee hay ae ess, em Ste Reg ENA ie Net ae Pie S Ms Pee es Needs ae a iar erm Noe <i phere aig ae ee det! ee = ie. ct ae Papi dats Hera dey BS eae heating eee ete wid ae aL deere Mee a pe + ae Hes arn oe ie Birks ee a ~ Hee) ie ieee Mees ce pas ie VPS EE gts ee baa ae We res eas 3 Be ae seer 0 ae ea ee Bea a el ee Rete. pee oh ert aoe Hees a ee ake Sere ALBERT HANSEN Jeweler nid Sivereunen LOWMAN BUILDING | First and Cherry ie Paid Advertisement. ERNEST B. HERALD Candidate for JUDGE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Non-Partisan Judiciary Ballot Primary Election, September 10, 1912 Paid by C. W. Ide WILL E. HUMPHREY CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS Subject to Primaries on September 10, 1912 | Paid Advertisement. J. Henry Denning FOR Prosecuting Attorney KING COUNTY Republican Primary Sept. 10, 1912 Kenneth Mackintosh CANDIDATE FOR Judge of Superior Court Paid Advertisement. JOHN B. WRIGHT CANDIDATE FOR JUSTICE OF THE PEACE FOR SEATTLE Republican Primaries, September 10, 1912 Office: 623 New York Block ° This Is It ! A good, strong, live, weekly paper that is not afraid to say things for the benefit of the public weal, is what every householder should have come to his or her address. If you think like this and are inclined to act on this initiative, then you are on, if you will send THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN your subscription. It first saw the light of day in 1894, and it has been firming away ever since, without having missed an issue and but a few hours late. The management would feel greatly encouraged if the paper’s subscription list would double up this year.. It is always Read- able, Reliable, Republican, and is quoted by the state press more than any other state weekly. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 423 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. “IT Makes The Mountain smile ” a | fly ees | EN eS ahaa: L6G. GFZ Gare as eee oe. 1G) | Re RS, (me null ea >I) De G///// py, ay) o ew EH op ‘a4 ne Ree Vee wy janet Ty ne alata TW he Cae x EE see | ANA df ly \ | siti a ny oy WA, yy ae en Pen | }) ne t y" ale i } | Yl \ a |) LiVEAI is ud ast So AM Wi J Nh \\ ving CLA he i Ne | WGA AR che PPI pape aes Lt Al VN WZ tes an ma ne hy, H I H | i ae ri ee ae oe a | My i \ \\ ili as i eee eee al. 7 Wye eee | ess 4 HT i i i a i ? a i ~ i ot ee ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. SEATITLE BREWING & MALTING Co. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1912.